Manager of the US EPA funded project on developing educational materials for building professionals which focuses on protecting buildings against chemical and biological attacks. His research interests have been focused on optimization and economic analysis of mining and energy projects, Monte Carlo simulation, real options analysis, carbon management, and computer modeling of energy technologies. He is a member of both the Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration (SME), the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum Engineering (CIM) and the Air and Waste Management Association (AWMA). He has experience in the exploration and production of crude oil and natural gas as well as in
at Western private university during Fall 2016. All participants inthis research were engineering or prospective engineering students enrolled in an entry-levelengineering course typically covering the general area of “statics”. Course content material wasdrawn from standard college-level solid mechanics textbooks. In-class labs were conducted ingroups of 4-6 students and included hands-on, interactive experiences such as interpreting forceswithin stacked Jenga Blocks™ or calculating forces on a longboard. The course also includedtwo major projects. Project 1 involved a four-person team building a 24 cm span model trussbridge which was then loaded to failure. Project 2 involved two person teams doing independentresearch on an engineering
for collecting and analyzing the data obtained by faculty and howthis information is used to within the feedback loop is also illustrated.IntroductionThe EC 2000 accreditation criteria require that an institution have in place acomprehensive outcomes assessment program to ensure the quality and continuousimprovement of the educational process1. There have been many papers published in thelast few years on the topic of assessment as it relates to the new criteria. Assessment maytake place at the course level or at the program level2. Course level assessment attemptsto ensure that in a particular course the required material is sufficiently well taught andunderstood. Program level assessment addresses the program outcome indicators as wellas
cheating in any particular area because any student who indicated that they copyhomework, lab reports, or cheat in exams/quizzes more than 0% of the time has been designatedas “sometimes” cheating for purposes of illustration in Table 1.Table 1 – Percent of students indicating that they sometimes copy homework, copy lab reports,and cheat in exams/quizzes. Major HW Lab Exam/Quiz All 73.7 54.5 29.9 CIVIL 69.1 51.1 45.2 MECHANICAL 78.1 56.2 37.5 CHEMICAL 75.4 34.4 19.7 COMPUTER SCI
Paper ID #41205Developing Research Identity: Experiences and Influences Leading to UndergraduateStudents’ Growth as ResearchersSamantha Splendido, Pennsylvania State University Sam Splendido is a Ph.D. candidate in Mechanical Engineering at Pennsylvania State University. She is currently a graduate research assistant under Dr. Catherine Berdanier in the Engineering Cognitive Research Laboratory (ECRL). She earned her B.S. in Biomedical and Mechanical Engineering from Pennsylvania State University.Catherine G. P. Berdanier, Pennsylvania State University Catherine G.P. Berdanier is an Associate Professor of Mechanical
accommodated. Resources for the studio are covered, inpart, from a student laboratory fee. Since I also use many of the materials with our active K-12Outreach program (through the American Institute of Chemical Engineers or AIChE studentchapter) some support originates with an endowment dedicated to AICHE and the undergraduateprogram.From the earliest days of this initiative, my goal has been to engage students with materials theycould quickly put into use so that they might focus on the learning outcomes. Having coachedmiddle-school teams in First® Lego® League, I saw the potential adaptability of LEGO NXT kitsfor a range of projects and activities well-suited to freshman engineering. With base kits under$300, the LEGO NXT robotics set is very cost
other use of real-time video. A completedescription for the assessment of this project has been described elsewhere (1). Example 2: Non-Destructive Inspection System for Defects QuantificationThis approach was developed to accurately detect any abnormality such as cracks orcorrosion that could lead to mechanical failure. Traditional means of testing have requiredextensive hardware set-up, software, and time consuming assembling and disassemblingthe various components of the system. Often the failure part is embedded and hard toreach, and there may not be a simple way for detecting it. In this project, a non-destructive inspection approach was designed using image processing. The design wasimplemented to detect a very fine fracture that
inconjunction with Centennial Middle School in Wake County, North Carolina. The first week ofthe camp consisted of a teacher week, where teachers came to NC State University College ofEngineering to work side by side with engineering faculty to plan and test camp activities.Additional enhancement experiences were incorporated to help provide ideas and enrichment forthe teachers in other areas covered by their science, math and social studies goals. One long-term objective was that the teachers use some of the material they learned to change the way theyteach various subjects during the school year. An evaluation was done six weeks after the camp.During the second week of the camp, fifty middle school students came to the campus ofCentennial Middle
- Computer • Botany - Electrical • Chemistry - Industrial • Computer Science - Material Science • Environmental Toxicology - Mechanical • Mathematics - Nuclear • Pharmacology - Systems • Physics • Structural Mechanics NAFP selection is competitive with only six NASA employees and six MSI facultychosen each year. Selected participants begin as a cohort and then proceed to specific NAFPassignments. There have been seven cohorts formed since the beginning of the program in 1997.As shown in Table 4, 57 fellows, including 33 NASA career employees and 24 MSI faculty,have participated in the NAFP program2
AC 2010-1502: FIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING: A COMPREHENSIVE APPROACHTimothy Hinds, Michigan State University TIMOTHY J. HINDS is an Academic Specialist in the Michigan State University College of Engineering Undergraduate Studies and Department of Mechanical Engineering. He is the lead instructor and coordinator for the Cornerstone Engineering program teaching courses in engineering design and modeling. He has also taught courses in machine design, manufacturing processes, mechanics, computational tools and international product design as well as graduate-level courses in engineering innovation and technology management. He has over 25 years of combined academic and industrial management
test-bed setting, and supplemental instructor aidsare currently under development. To view and request samples of the modules, please visit thewebsite http://engr.nmsu.edu/~csm/nsf-project. This material is based upon work supported bythe National Science Foundation under Grant No. 0230643. Proceedings of the 2005 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference Texas A&M University – Corpus Christi Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education Module Development There have been numerous recent educational research publications that suggest the needto introduce the concept of “statistical thinking” into secondary education programs, i.e
Colorado and has six years of structural engineering consulting experience. He currently consults on learning and talent development programs within the architecture, engineering, and construction industry. Mr. Leidig has focused on community-engaged engineering and design for over fifteen years.Steve CroweWilliam C. Oakes (Director and Professor) William (Bill) Oakes is a 150th Anniversary Professor, Director of the EPICS Program, Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University, and a registered professional engineer. He is one of the founding faculty in the School of Engineering Education having courtesy appointments in Mechanical, Environmental and Ecological Engineering and Curriculum and Instruction. He was the
disciplines, including computer, electrical, chemical, industrial, mechanical, civil, aerospace, biological, materials, marine, petroleum, nuclear, manufacturing, systems, environmental, geological and management engineering. ≠ A discussion about engineering as a major, which involved topics such as characteristics of students who may be interested in engineering, course requirement for different engineering majors and how these courses relate to typical job descriptions for engineering majors, where to ho to find information about careers for engineering majors. ≠ A comprehensive overview of engineering functions (possible
learning strategy implemented was modelinginstruction12,13,14,15. Students worked in formal groups of three to solve the given problems; theyrecorded their analysis on portable whiteboards. Then the entire class would sit in a big circle todiscuss their findings. All students were able to see every other group’s boards and wereencouraged to ask questions of their peers (see Fig.1). Most of the physics worksheets wereadopted from the material designed by the Physics Education Research Group lead by EricBrewe at the Florida International University. Figure 1. Students working in groups and whole class discussion.Other teaching strategies implemented in the Fis-Mat Project are based on educational researchin the disciplines, for
biomechanicslearning modules developed as part of the VaNTH educational coalition. The pedagogicalframework for these modules is based on the widely publicized book “How People Learn”(HPL). The HPL teaching framework presents the learning material as a series of challenges thatare posed through a “Legacy Cycle.” The VANTH biomechanics modules were presented in anundergraduate Mechanical Engineering course, titled “Biomechanics of Human Movement,” inFall 2004. The class (N=18) was divided into six, three-member teams. All challenges wereperformed by the teams as computer homework assignments using a CD that was supplied by theinstructor. Pre-tests, post-tests, and affect rankings were administered for each module. Thestudents were also surveyed on the learning
HOLLEBRANDS is an Assistant Professor of Mathematics Education at North Carolina State University. She completed her Ph.D. in Mathematics Education at The Pennsylvania State University. Prior to attending Penn State, Dr. Hollebrands taught high school mathematics in New York and North Carolina. She is currently serving as the editor of the Technology Tips column in the Mathematics Teacher.Elizabeth Parry, North Carolina State University ELIZABETH A. PARRY is currently the Project Director of RAMP-UP, a K12 math outreach program funded by the GE and the National Science Foundations. She obtained her BS degree in engineering management with a minor in mechanical engineering from the University of
Paper ID #14609Transforming Liberal Arts Graduates to Advanced Manufacturing Careers:The First CohortDr. Ibrahim F. Zeid, Northeastern University Ibrahim Zaid is a professor of mechanical, industrial, and manufacturing engineering at Northeastern Uni- versity. He received his Ph.D. degree from the University of Akron. Zeid has an international background. He received his B.S. (with highest honor) and M.S. from Cairo University in Egypt. He has received var- ious honors and awards both in Egypt and the United States. He is the recipient of both the Northeastern Excellence in Teaching Award and the SAE Ralph R. Teetor
Curriculum Assessment Using Professional Certification Criteria Robert G. Feyen, Ph.D., CPE Mechanical and Industrial Engineering University of Minnesota Duluth Todd W. Loushine, Ph.D., P.E., CSP, CIH Occupational & Environmental Safety & Health University of Wisconsin WhitewaterIntroductionThis paper describes a curriculum assessment approach developed for a graduate-level programin environmental health and safety (EHS). The program was created in the mid-1970s to serve agrowing need
the goal of establishing an entrepreneurially minded (EM) engineer. The useof a set of canvases developed by Strategyzer has been beneficial in many engineering classes tointroduce students to the concepts of value proposition and an abbreviated business model (via thebusiness canvas) [8]. Despite the effort of many engineering schools, as summarized recently by the NationalAcademy of Engineers [1], to update their curricula to include EM concepts in their students, manyof the projects are focused on mechanical [9], electrical and civil engineering disciplines [10, 11].A search of the Journal of Engineering Entrepreneurship shows very little on chemicalengineering, as does a look at the ASEE Chemical Engineering division and American
2016, he has been a Visiting Professor with the Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Department, University of Missouri. Currently, he is As- sociate Professor with the Engineering Department, Colorado State University-Pueblo. He is the author of two book chapters, more than 73 articles. His research interests include artificial intelligence systems and applications, smart material applications, robotics motion, and planning. Also, He is a member of ASME, ASEE, and ASME-ABET PEV. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Engaging High School Teachers in Artificial Intelligence Concepts and ApplicationsIntroduction and Justification Artificial
Influencing Innovation in Education Samir El-Ghazaly Division DirectorElectrical, Communications and Cyber Systems (ECCS) Division Engineering Directorate National Science Foundation Arlington, VA NSF’s Origin, Mission, and Structure Independent federal agency established by Congress in the NSF Act of 1950 › “To Promote Progress of Science,” and “Advance National Health, Prosperity, and Welfare,” and “Secure the National Defense” Supports fundamental research and education across all fields of science and engineering Sponsors research primarily through grant mechanism, but operates no
Session 2325 35 Design Activities to Try in an Engineering Design Class. Clark Merkel, Patsy Brackin Department of Mechanical Engineering Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology.Abstract:Fresh New Ideas! Are you looking for new design activities to try out in yourengineering design course? This paper provides a description of 35 different ideas for in-class activities that you might find appropriate for use. While our target was for use in amechanical engineering freshman design course, many of these ideas may be applied just aseasily for other disciplines. Each of these
Paper ID #14347Teaching Design for Constrained Environments: A Partnership with Non-Governmental OrganizationsProf. Russell D Jamison, Virginia Commonwealth University Russ Jamison is the Alice T. and William H. Goodwin, Jr. Chair of Engineering Education, and Profes- sor of Biomedical Engineering and Chemical and Life Science Engineering at Virginia Commonwealth University. He is Dean Emeritus of the VCU School of Engineering. He previously served as Professor of Materials Science and Engineering and Founding Professor of Bioengineering at the University of Illi- nois at Urbana-Champaign. He has also served as Senior Vice
react to lecturematerial, to complex group exercises in which students apply course material to ‘real life’situations and / or to new problems [2]. Some of the active learning techniques explored in thisresearch include brainstorming, think-pair-share, thumbs up / thumbs down response tostatement, pause procedure, group discussions, guided lectures, students work a problem thenevaluate each other’s work, responsive lectures, use of props, muddiest point, puzzles / Page 25.139.2paradoxes, discussions, work on the blackboard, games etc.Active LearningActive learning is anything course-related that all students in a class session are called upon
, revealed both measurements to be strong indicators of CHDhence, thinning blood [27]. The mechanism through which it deaths, even in subjects at lower levels of Framingham riskperforms this is yet unknown. However, heavy drinkers are scores [33]. Receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves formore prone to have cardiac problems when compared to non- WHR plus smoking and Framingham prediction model werealcoholics. Heavy drinking (≥300 g ethanol/week or more than identical in predicting CHD deaths [9], confirming the role of3 drinks a day), was associated with increased risks of total, obesity as a key contributor to CHD-related deaths.hemorrhagic and ischemic strokes, while moderate alcohol iii
by the unaided eye. The middlesection of the subject is spent building and testing circuits, and observing how their performancecan be tailored by changing the values of select components. These experiments are followed byin-class discussion to solidify understanding, with additional explanatory material presented asneeded. Active components are covered in a "black-box" fashion, along with discussion of how toread data sheets. Devices covered include transistor switches, comparators, operational amplifiersand elementary timing circuits. Most experiments include indicators, sensors, and/or actuators(e.g., solenoids and motors). The subject concludes with a service-learning design projectapplying the material learned. A recent example involved
South Carolinaand is a 2-year participant in the NSF GK-12 Fellowship Program.JED LYONS is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at the University of South Carolina and theDirector of the South Carolina Center for Engineering and Computing Education. He teaches laboratory, design,and materials science to undergraduates, graduate students and K-12 teachers. He researches engineering education,plastics and composites. Jed is the GK-12 PI. All correspondence should be addressed to Jed S. Lyons, University ofSouth Carolina, Columbia, SC, 29208. lyons@sc.edu.CHRISTINE EBERT a Professor of Education and the Associate Dean of the Graduate School and Co-PI on theGK-12 grant Dr. Ebert is instrumental in teaching engineering students how to
Paper ID #34699Self-Efficacy, Mathematical Mindset, and Self-Direction in First-YearEngineering StudentsDr. Matthew Cavalli, Western Michigan University Dr. Cavalli is Professor of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering and Associate Dean in the College of Engineering and Applied Sciences. His technical research interests include materials behavior and solid mechanics. His educational interests include distance education and first-year student success. He has previously served as the Chair of the Materials Division of ASEE.Ms. Anetra Grice, Western Michigan University Anetra Grice is has served as the STEP Program Director for
Paper ID #11972Improving Student Technical Communication via Self ReflectionMr. Kenneth P Mineart, North Carolina State University Kenneth Mineart received his Bachelor’s degree in Chemical & Biochemical Engineering from the Uni- versity of Iowa. Currently, he is a doctoral student in Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering at North Carolina State University where he works in the field of block copolymer science with Professor Richard Spontak. Kenneth has regularly served as a graduate teaching assistant for a variety of courses including: Unit Operations Laboratory, Material and Energy Balances, Introduction to
departments of a university and anindustry, we would discourage university researchers from pursuing fully proprietary work as itviolates the academic spirit of publication. As previously noted, the most tangible results ofresearch conducted at a university are publications. To complete an advanced degree where athesis is required, the thesis must be made public. However, in many instances, informationprovided to university researchers is proprietary and must be treated as such. The key to resolving this issue is an early understanding of what is publishable and whatis not. Well before any agreement is reached, the scope of the publishable research content (e.g.,the material that can be reported in a thesis) should be discussed in detail and