, logistics, results of the implementation of this program as well as lessons learnedover the years and suggestions for improvements and future study.2.0 Retention Philosophy and Theoretical Frameworks Utilized in Program DesignThe retention philosophy of the researchers is grounded in the observation that no trueone-size-fits-all model of retention exists [11]. An integrated design approach [11] was adoptedin which faculty, staff, upperclassmen and industry partners collaborated on the design,development, delivery, and assessment of program contents. The strength of the program stemsfrom the diversity and adaptability of its content. The various types of program activities worktogether to provide many safety nets [12] that serve the dynamic
assis- tant. She has volunteered at numerous STEM outreach activities on and off of the Boise State campus throughout her time as a student and is passionate about increasing diversity in STEM and helping girls and women to recognize that STEM is a path that is open to them if they want to take it.Dr. Beth A. Myers, University of Colorado, Boulder Beth A. Myers is the Director of Analytics, Assessment and Accreditation at the University of Colorado Boulder. She holds a BA in biochemistry, ME in engineering management and PhD in civil engineering. Her interests are in quantitative and qualitative research and data analysis as related to equity in education.Ms. Katherine Christine Tetrick, Washington State University
mentors, approximately eight percent reportedunfavorable perceptions in these areas for year 1.Year 2 resulted in 95% retention, 50% URMs or women, 90% participation in interventions andadvising, and 75% graduation/transfer. Student feedback for year 2 found favorable results forstudent relationships, engagement and motivation, access to study groups, and confidence. Inaddition, most students reported favorable perceptions of access to mentors, while eight percentreported unfavorable perceptions in this area. It is noted that student perceptions improved fromyear 1 to year 2, particularly in the student relationships, and confidence perceptions. Thus, theprogram’s formative assessments seem to be working.ClosingThe SAMS program seeks to build a
performance data that could be used to track its progress towards meeting targets.To encourage their critical thinking and reflective learning, one third of the grade for the paperwas based on the quality of reflection and conclusions from their case study, including their ideason how the innovative practices used in the case study could be applied to the net-zero eco-district design process for the UH North Campus. All assessment rubrics for assignments likethis are made known to students at the beginning of the course.Students shared their case study research with the whole class, with discussion facilitated byinstructors regarding their findings and reflections summarized in their 3,000-word paper. Thisexperience helped them reach consensus
developing curriculum and assessment tools and overseeing the research efforts within EPICS. Her academic and research interests include the profes- sional formation of engineers, diversity and inclusion in engineering, human-centered design, engineering ethics, leadership, service-learning, and accessibility and assistive-technology.Dr. Andrew O. Brightman, Purdue University, West Lafayette Andrew O. Brightman serves as Assistant Head for Academic Affairs and Associate Professor of Engi- neering Practice in the Weldon School of Biomedical Engineering. His research background is in cellular biochemistry, tissue engineering, and engineering ethics. He is committed to developing effective ped- agogies for ethical reasoning
educational innovations.In this work we extend an existing model of school systems and demonstrate thatthe modeling process itself can be a powerful tool for both understanding andmaking adjustments to an education intervention. This research was conductedwithin an NSF DRK-12 project, EarSketch, in which the primary goal was to design,implement and assess a STEAM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Arts, &Mathematics) educational intervention aimed at broadening interest andparticipation in Computer Science. While the aim of the modeling effort was toidentify key attributes of school settings likely to impact intervention sustainabilityin the long term, during the intervention, we found that the models also shaped thediscussions and decisions
Paper ID #19949T-SITE: A UMBC Community of Transfer Scholars in Computing, Informa-tion Technology, and EngineeringDr. Danyelle Tauryce Ireland, University of Maryland, Baltimore County Danyelle Ireland is the associate director of the Center for Women in Technology (CWIT) at the Univer- sity of Maryland, Baltimore County (UMBC). At CWIT, Dr. Ireland develops and assesses the impact of programming to support the academic achievement, professional development, and overall success of underrepresented students in computing and engineering majors. She also collaborates with the UMBC College of Engineering and IT (COEIT) to
Agricultural and Biological Engineering at Purdue University. She is a member of Purdue’s Teaching Academy. Since 1999, she has been a faculty member within the First- Year Engineering Program, teaching and guiding the design of one of the required first-year engineering courses that engages students in open-ended problem solving and design. Her research focuses on the de- velopment, implementation, and assessment of modeling and design activities with authentic engineering contexts. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Characterization of Techniques used in Industry: The Practice of Complex Problem Solving in EngineeringAbstractThere is a gap between academia
industry [5], such as teamwork and communicationskills. Once the EC2000 criteria were instituted, US engineering institutions began to implementit, and large changes swept through the undergraduate curriculum [5].The impacts of EC2000 have been significant. In a study that assessed graduates from beforeEC2000 and after, graduates in 2004 were shown to be better prepared in all nine outcomes thatwere assessed compared to graduates in 1994, especially in understanding societal and globalissues, ability to apply engineering skills, teamwork skills, and understanding of ethics andprofessional issues [6]. This was attributed to the fact that “improvements in student learninghave indeed resulted from changes in engineering program curricula, teaching
problem areas and ways to improve the program informative assessments. Other metrics to evaluate effectiveness and success, noted by Yue, etal. [17] should include the percentages for each of the following: participants who graduate orare on track to graduate, complete their degrees within a certain number of years, and attendrequired program events. These assessment metrics may be used as a model for S-STEMscholarship/mentorship programs and can be tailored to specific non-traditional orunderprivileged populations of students. 6 In another S-Morris University in Illinois, Kalevitch et al. [18] reported collecting theusual quantitative data in
for grants, supporting their data storage and preservation needs and, finally,looking to teach RDM to students and faculty. Teaching RDM skills to students is an importantacademic competency that the students will need as they progress through school and into theirprofessional careers. Carlson et al. in their assessment of data information literacy needs ofstudents and research faculty state, “Although faculty and students do consume research data,our analysis indicates that we have to address their roles as data producers as well.” [9]. With thegrowing emphasis on data reuse, interdisciplinary research and multi-institution collaboration,the next generation of researchers will need RDM skills to navigate and excel in this shift towardbig
still struggling to bewidely accepted by students and the institutions where they study [21], [22]. Students aregenerally found to be excited about working in a technology integrated environment [23], buttheir main preference still remains to manipulate equipment in person and get directexperience [24] of handling equipment. However, studies have shown that remotelaboratories do provide similar learning outcomes as face-to-face laboratories [25], [26] and,on occasions, comparatively better learning outcomes for students and with better reflectiveability [27].Our study is focused on assessing the appropriateness of remote laboratories for first-yearengineering students. It is based on a comparison made between students’ experience andperception
understanding different typesof disability, including hidden disabilities, to determine what is needed to overcome mobilitybarriers. Students are expected to gain competencies in identifying and assessing the physical,information, and communication needs of persons with disabilities in both standard andemergency situations and to know different techniques for providing situational assistance ontransport to people with different disabilities. Reading materials for this portion of the courseinclude the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) [7]. Thecompetency area contains an ethics component, which focuses on proper communicationsetiquette as well as awareness and tolerance for physical, social, ethnic, and cultural
programs and research have investigated the effectiveness ofsuch efforts. The following section presents preliminary results based on 3 of the 5 active yearsof the SIIRE program.Program ResultsWork on assessing the effectiveness of the SIIRE program is on-going; however, preliminaryevaluation indicates some encouraging signs. We present these inital findings based on severalmeasures that were used to assess the success of the program, including the percentages of SIIREstudents who: • Continued on to engineering graduate school • Received engineering related employment upon graduation • Completed an engineering bachelor’s degree • Participated in a co-op, internship or undergraduate research program • Completed the SIIRE program
imperative that the course instructor includes a few hands-on-basedlectures to introduce PLC and how to wire it. It is the authors’ goal to build the trainers insummer and to include the lectures in following semesters and to assess students learning usingthe trainers. This will be the goal of a future pedagogical study.Reference[1] A. Alavizadeh and M. Mikhael, “Developing PLC-based pneumatic lab activities for anundergraduate course on fluid power,” in Proceedings of the American Society for EngineeringEducation Annual Conference & Exposition, 2018, Salt Lake City, UT, USA, June 24-27.[2] A. Alavizadeh and M. Mikhail, “Integrating measurement instruments in pneumatic labactivities,” in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering
students in EE 306 and have now accumulated two semesters worthof data for the SI program in this course.This longitudinal report of the SI program’s three year operation will detail our findings, whichwe hope will be beneficial for further development of SI for this course, other engineeringcourses at the university and for other administrators of similar programs.II. Limitations of StudyLimitations of assessing correlations between grade outcomes and SI session attendance occurdue to the voluntary nature of the program. In order to control for self-selection bias, weconsidered standardized test scores (SAT and ACT) as indicators of student preparation forcollege level coursework. However, this only accounts for one of many factors that could
presentingthis material to the students outside of formal classroom time, thus preserving time in-class formore active learning and problem-based activities.The flipped learning course design continues to gain popularity in engineering education;however, large-scale quantitative statistical analysis of student outcomes and achievement incourses taught simultaneously through alternative course designs remains limited. The purposeof this study was to examine the effects of these varied instructional methods by investigating thestudent achievement outcomes of engineering students enrolled in the same course taughtthrough three different instructional models. The study also aims to assess more specific flippedcourse design components (video lectures) on
students designed a sun tracker, aproportional-integral-derivative (PID) controller to maximize the power generated by the solarpanel by adjusting the angle of the panel with respect to the solar irradiance. The third projectwas a control system to fix the lateral position of a boat in the water flume while it wasnavigating along the flume to prevent contacts with the walls. Finally, a discussion on how theset of demonstrations and the design projects boosted students’ interest in the Control SystemsDesign course. An assessment has been conducted to evaluate the impact of the demonstrations,labs and project on the student learning outcomes and the depth of their understanding of keyconcepts in comparison to that obtained in the previous semesters
goals. It is important to define achievable and reasonable rubrics thatthe students can follow and achieve successfully. Those rubrics can be structured as theobjectives of the project that should reflect a safe and successful environment where students are encouraged to participate instead of feeling embarrassed. It should promote an interesting andrelevant experience, as well, where the students are allowed to fully engage in a professional roleto fulfill the goal they are working on.In this paper, two project-based activities are discussed along with their impact on sophomoreand junior students’ performance. The new structured course grades were compared totraditionally taught class environment grades. The comparison allowed assessment of
, and conceiveengineering can help us better design K-12 engineering education, prepare teachers and schoolcounselors in implementing those curricula, and assess effectiveness of those curriculum designon students’ learning [3]–[5]. In particular, studying teachers and school counselors’ beliefsabout engineering is vital as they work on the front line in engaging with and conveyingknowledge to students. This knowledge can influence how students perceive and believeengineering, and eventually students’ decisions whether to pursue engineering or not [6]. Therefore, in this study, we argue that because 1) K-12 engineering education hasbecome essential in the quest of improving engineering education in the US, 2) understanding K-12 actors
developed and added including: • web pages with text • embedded videos of worked example problems • embedded short concept videos.During Summer 2013 these course notes were expanded to include thought questions so studentscould assess their own learning.Beginning with Phase 2, Matlab was introduced to the students at several points over thesemester to ensure that each student could use Matlab as it has become something of an industrystandard. In the early part of my teaching, NC State had no course to teach Matlab. At the currenttime over 67% of my students have taken or are currently taking a course in Matlab when theytake Statics. The content for Matlab in Statics has been dialed back, but the basics of Matlab arestill presented each
points, first prior to the start of fall semester before taking any engineeringcourses (Time 1). They were surveyed again at the close of fall semester, their first semester inthe engineering program (Time 2). Students were provided time during summer orientation aswell as class time to complete each survey. In total, 2315 participants completed the engineeringidentity measure at Time 1 (n = 1,900) and Time 2 (n = 1083). To assess students’ persistence inengineering, retention information was obtained at the beginning of their second year, and thisinformation reflected their major status at the end of the previous academic year (Time 3).MeasuresA five-item measure of engineering identity utilized in this study was developed and validated asa
information of specific interest to a class topic or student. Note that data are currentlybeing added to the App and some of these analyses will be more effective after more data areadded. Examples of how the App database can be used in a class lesson plan include: - Reviewing engineering team members who worked on a project to better understand the different civil engineering disciplines (e.g., geotechnical, stormwater, transportation). This will help students understand the vast range of engineering activities. - Analyzing what classes and skills are most important for different civil engineering specialties, which can help students relate course work to their future jobs. - Assessing what engineers like about their
. Cambridge: Oxford University Press.8. Angwin, J., Larson, J., Mattu, S., & Kirchner, L. (2016, May 23). Machine Bias: There’s software used across the country to predict future criminals. And it’s biased against blacks. [ProPublica]. Retrieved May 24, 2016, from https://www.propublica.org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing9. Fowler, S. (2017, February 19). Reflecting on one very, very strange year at Uber. Retrieved February from https://www.susanjfowler.com/blog/2017/2/19/reflecting-on-one-very-strange-year-at-ub er10. Mims, C. (2017, August 13). What the Google Controversy Misses: The Business Case for Diversity. Wall Street Journal.11. Buolamwini, J. (2017). Gender Shades: Intersectional Phenotypic
Nadeau6, the major barriers to enhance the Leanmethodology in academia are the correct determination of added value, different types of waste,and defining a client of the process improvements. Kang and Manyonge10 in their study definedthe types of waste which can be found in HEI with focus on the waste of over-processing andexcessive motion. They considered three basic categories for process improvement: Students,Research, and Staff, and included the teaching assessment and research life cycle processes inthe list of processes for improvement using Lean tools. The authors described a 5S project forprocessing and storing of students information which resulted in reduced waiting time and betterquality of service for students.In attempt to determine
engineering from Virginia Tech, and his B.S. in industrial engineering from Clemson University.Dustin M. Grote, Virginia Tech Dustin currently serves as the Graduate Research Assistant for the Virginia Tech Network for Engineering Transfer Students (VT-NETS) Program with the Engineering Education Department at Virginia Tech. His research focuses primarily on access issues for underrepresented/minority and low income students to bachelor degrees through community college pathways, curricular complexity for transfer pathways into engineering, higher education policy as barriers to access, and assessment and evaluation in a higher education context. Dustin is currently completing a PhD in Higher Education Research, Policy, and
curriculumin the mechanical systems area. Under the best of circumstances, the topic is challenging, butespecially so when both two-dimensional (planar) and three-dimensional rigid body dynamics arecovered in the same 3-hour semester class. To address these challenges, several changes wereimplemented in a section of Rigid Body Dynamics in the Fall of 2014 and continuing into Spring2015. First, in class lecturing was replaced with online videos developed for two Coursera MOOCson dynamics. Second, various types of active learning were introduced into the classroom. Ofparticular concern in this paper is the inclusion of experiments into the lecture portion of the class.These experiments are described in this paper and assessment results from the two
, adapting their understanding tothe cultural understanding and value system of the recipient society rather than imposing theirown expectations upon the infrastructure design. While these skills benefit the students workingon international service design, they also enhance engineering skills in general by providingproblem-solving techniques that are vital to the practice of engineering in the workplace5.Specifically, encouraging the students to scope the problem, gather information and assess/definesolution options over time—rather than in a compressed period as would occur with a one-semester class—results in greater competency, as has been demonstrated in past research1.The instructors of the course have participated in various extracurricular
freshman or capstone engineering classes that have a fairly broad scope of learningobjectives. This paper describes the design and assessment of a service-learning module in arequired junior-level course in probability and statistics for engineering students at a large publicuniversity, which typically enrolls 90-100 students. This course is ideal for service learningbecause students struggle with the material, complaining it is “too theoretical”, and can feelanonymous in a large lecture course. Yet, there are few examples of how to successfullyintegrate service-learning ideas, including reflection activities, into a high-enrollment course thattraditionally focuses heavily on quantitative fundamentals.This paper details the design, student work
executive director of the i-STEM network. She holds a BS degree in elementary education, an MA in Education Administration and an EDS in Educational Leadership. As a 30 year veteran teacher and administrator she has been in- volved in school reform, assessment, literacy, student achievement, and school improvement. Her current work involves coordinating partnerships with educators, the Idaho Department of Education, business, and industry to raise STEM Education awareness. Anne’s research interests include STEM education, inquiry and project-based instruction with the incorporation of 21st Century learning, change practices, and cultural influences on school effectiveness. c American Society