students, the course fulfills liberal arts Core Curriculum requirements inHistory II (Modern History), Natural Science, and Cultural Diversity. In addition, for students inthe undergraduate human-centered engineering major, MMW also fulfills their first year“introduction to design” engineering requirement. This course includes weekly lectures,engineering design labs, and peer-led reflection sections.Avneet Hira: I am an aerospace engineer trained in engineering education research and designedand have taught Introduction to Human Centered Engineering a 4-credit required course in thehuman-centered engineering major at our institution. The course is positioned to introducestudents to commonly taught first year engineering concepts (Reid et al., 2018
design and technical problemsolving, but that when this model is held up to actual engineering work, it turns out thatengineering educators overlook the substantial role that socio-emotional and relational activitiesplay in engineering work. Trevelyan thus identifies a mismatch in engineering education andwork, ultimately concluding that engineering education curriculum change based on empiricalstudies of engineering work has the potential to strengthen engineering education. Thisconclusion is similar to the position of Stevens, Johri & O’Connor (2013), who argue that thecontexts of engineering education and professional engineering work should be understood inconcrete detail and studied comparatively. They point out that there are not
between cognition and student outcomes. The study represents an extensive search of 27,464 published studies from 10 library holdings and 10 Journals in engineering education. Twenty studies, meeting study criteria, were coded for 39 variables in six categories. Studies were assigned to one of two groups based on the statistical evidence that was reported. Group I reported p-values only and Group II reported F, t, or chi square values. Significance of Group I studies is shown through a summary chi square and p value. A summary weighted unbiased effect size was determined for Group II studies. With only 0.07% of studies meeting search criteria, it was determined that there is a limited amount
students with experiences in not only the design, butalso the prototyping, testing, fabrication, and operation of a complex aerospace system. TheCDIO Capstone Course is a component of major CDIO educational initiatives in the Departmentthat include new teaching laboratories, a reformed curriculum, emphasis on active and experientiallearning, and applications of technology for teaching, learning, and assessment.The CDIO approach grew out of the need to provide students with more authentic learningexperiences that would prepare them for the demands of current engineering practice and Page 7.1128.1research. Most beginning engineering students
a significant role in theconfiguration design of these primary components.The traditional engineering education is structured to emphasize on mathematics, physical,sciences, and engineering sciences. The problem is the lack of sufficient concentration on designand creativity. The creative thinking and its attitudes is essential to design success. Creating a newdesign requires ability of creativity and overcoming its strong barriers. Many engineeringprofessors find it more difficult to teach design than to teach traditional engineering science-basedanalytical topics. Every undergraduate engineering curriculum has a design component, althoughthe extent and structure of that component may vary widely. Engineering design fundamentals arecommon
the R6:0 and R6:1 registers. They both are stepped through thepatterns which reside in data file #B3. Input I:1/0 is used to energize both sequencerssimultaneously.In order to increase the number of steps, one must cascade sequencers [1]. Figure 6 shows aconnection for which the number of steps may be increased to 512. This means that there are256 steps stored in data file #B3, and an additional 256 steps stored in data file #B10. Note thatwhen the first sequencer has completed the 256 steps (i.e., step 0 through step 255) residing indata file #B3, then the second sequencer will start stepping through the last 256 steps which is indata file #B10. Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &
engineering education and research, a partnership wasformed between an academic institution and public agencies. This partnership involved theUniversity of California at Irvine and the Department of Transportation from the cities of LosAngeles, Irvine, and Anaheim. The benefits from this partnership includes a laboratory experiencebased on real-world networks and traffic, the use of state-of-the-practice methods and tools, andthe inclusion of curriculum input from practicing engineers. The results from the two years of thisexperiment demonstrate that such a collaborative effort can be fruitful and can be pursued further.A proposed implementation at Rowan University is discussed at the end of this paper.IntroductionA survey conducted by
goals and the collaborative nature of two Career Readiness modules were integrated into the coursethe planned activities. Since engineering problems often as extra-credit opportunities on the Blackboard site. Theserequire collective problem-solving and clear communication modules, developed by our institution’s Center for Careeramong team members, integrating these skills into the Readiness and Life Skills, include the Career & Self-curriculum helps students develop essential professional Development module and the Networking and Elevator Pitchbehaviors early in their education. The course structure, which module. Upon completing both modules, students earn oneincludes weekly team-based problem
computer-related technologyand at the same time not replace time-honored parts of the curriculum.” Much of the focus on computing in architectural curriculums has been on the role ofCAD and digital media in support of design studio. CAD can provide an effective andsometimes necessary tool to facilitate creation of complex forms that may not be buildable oreven documented using conventional representation tools [6] [7], and the embrace of computermodeling in the design studio among some students and educators is a logical extension of thewidely publicized utilization of computing tools by “star” architects and designers. Page 10.228.1
expected on several model elements such as furniture and wall layouts. Clearerinstructions are needed during lab demonstrations, and in the term project guidelines, to clarifythe requirement for these parts in order to reduce the unnecessary modeling time spent bystudents.References1. Sacks, R. and Pikas, E.(2013). "Building information modeling education for construction engineering and management. I: Industry requirements, state of the art, and gap analysis." Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(11).2. Sabongi, F.J.(2009). "The Integration of BIM in the Undergraduate Curriculum: an analysis of undergraduate courses." Proc., 45th Annual Conference of ASC, Gainesville, FL.3. Wu, W
Education: A Review Monikka M. Mann, George Z. Tan Industrial, Manufacturing, and Systems Engineering Department Texas Tech University AbstractThe need for highly trained and capable engineers to address increasingly complex problems that facesociety is clear. With the current pandemic, it is becoming increasingly imperative that Universitiesadjust their curricula and programs to prepare Engineering students with capabilities to overcomeuncertainty. Multidisciplinary skills and the ability to communicate with disparate teams is a full-fledged requirement. This paper presents a review of six critical avenues for
as design, build, manufacture, integration, optimization, and testing, 2) inits encompassing technical learning on mechanics, electronics, and programming 3) in itsintegration of technical and non-technical learning such as communication, business, andteamwork, and 4) in its fostering leadership and community engagement through growingstudents as not only learners but also knowledge transmitters and producers. Student participantsalso have the flexibility of identifying areas of special interests and strengths to develop theirskill sets and prepare for future academic and professional development.The LPS educational framework has been implemented through the formation of a teamparticipating in an international robotics competition, FIRST
subsystems modeling as prerequisites for capstone design,” in American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Vancouver, B.C., 2011.22. K. Marais. (2009) AAE 35103 Aerospace Systems Design. Purdue University School of Aeronautics and Astronautics. [Online]. Available: https://engineering.purdue.edu/AAE/Academics/Courses/Descriptions/- AAE35103_formerly_490B23. L. Nicolai and G. Carichner, Fundamentals of Aircraft and Airship Design. AIAA Education Series, 2010, vol. 1.24. D. Raymer, Aircraft Design - A Conceptual Approach. AIAA Education Series, 2009.25. J. Roskam, Airplane Design, Parts I - VIII. DAR Corporation, 1990.26. J. R. Wertz and W. J. Larson, Space Mission Analysis and Design
students gain an appreciationof the paperwork, documentation, and team meetings involved with a 510k. A PrincipalEngineer at Arthrex discussed patents and intellectual property aspects of the design process andagain, the importance of documenting all ideas, progress and testing in a design notebook. Inaddition we had speakers discuss manufacturing and human factors, while another speakerprovided a case study on medical device development. The speakers help round out topicsdiscussed from the book with a full appreciation of the “biomedical” aspect of the product designprocessAssessmentProgram outcome assessmentAssessments of program outcomes were planned prior to the course development as the facultyprepared their curriculum for ABET accreditation
AC 2009-2480: THE UNDERSTATED VALUE OF FREEHAND SKETCHING INTECHNOLOGY EDUCATIONDiarmaid Lane, University of Limerick Diarmaid Lane is a teaching assistant and PhD student in the Department of Manufacturing and Operations Engineering at University of Limerick. He is currently responsible for teaching Design and Communication Graphics to trainee teachers of Engineering Education. His special interests include freehand technical sketching and pedagogical approaches in Engineering Graphics Education.Niall Seery, University of Limerick Dr. Niall Seery is a lecturer in the Department of Manufacturing and Operations Engineering at University of Limerick. He currently directs the graduate
curricular structures.At the time, it was believed that the French were more experienced in the design andconstruction of ships, thus the curriculum in the Qian Xue Tang was based on a French militaryschool model. In this division the language of textbooks and instruction was French. Thus theQian Xue Tang was also called “the Navy Shipbuilding School,” or “French School”. Whereas,in the Hou Xue Tang, a British educational model was employed as the British were believed tobe the world navigation experts. Under the suggestion of Zuo Zongtang, Prosper Marie Giquelwas appointed as the first supervisor of the Foochow Shipbuilding School. Giquel, a Frenchmilitary officer who had fought in the Second Opium War, had also served as a commander ofthe “Franco
engineering education,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 100, pp. 1344-1360, 2012.9. C. I. Pettiford, “3-Course Capstone Sequence,” Proceedings of the Capstone Design Conference, Columbus, OH, 2014.10. C. I. Pettiford, “Enhancing visualization of magnetic fields in Electromagnetic Fields Course,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, New Orleans, LA, 2017.11. J. L. Long, and C. Ziebart, “First-Year Program Enhancements at Liberty University,” Proceedings of the FYEE Annual Conference, Daytona Beach, FL, 2017.12. H. E. Medina and K. M. Ceffaratti, (2015, June), “Novel Visual Algorithm to Teach Benefit-cost Ratio Analysis,” Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference, Seattle, Washington, 2015.13. D. Ford, and J. Dillard, “Crossing the
AC 2012-3008: RESPONDING TO THE CALL: EXTENDING THE UNI-VERSITY RELATIONSHIP VIA CONTINUING EDUCATIONDr. Craig G. Downing, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Craig G. Downing is the Interim Department Head of Engineering Management with responsibility for Continuing and Professional studies at Rose-Hulman of Institute of Technology. Prior to that, his teach- ings assignments focused on delivering graduate-level instruction in the operational and quality aspects of engineering management. Downing has more than 15 years of experience providing instruction in the areas of manufacturing, management, and mathematics at the post-secondary level. Additionally, he has amassed 13 years of industrial experience, four years
. Dr. Barger serves on several national panels and advisory boards for technical programs, curriculum and workforce initiatives, including the National Association of Manufacturers Ed- ucators’Council. She is a Fellow of the American Society of Engineering Education, a member of Tau Beta Pi and Epsilon Pi Tau honor societies. She is a charter member of both the National Academy and the University of South Florida’s Academy of Inventors. Dr. Barger holds a licensed patent and is a licensed Professional Engineer in Florida.Dr. Marie A. Boyette, FLATE Dr. Marie Boyette is the Associate Director for the Florida Advanced Technological Education Center of Excellence, FLATE, a NSF Center of Excellence located at
,” presented at the 2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access, Jul. 2021. Accessed: Jan. 04, 2022. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/diversity-and-inclusion-lessons-that-support-the-traditional-civil-engin eering-curriculum[34] K. Larsen and J. Gärdebo, “Retooling Engineering for Social Justice: The use of explicit models for analytical thinking, critical reflection, and peer-review in Swedish engineering education,” International Journal of Engineering, Social Justice, and Peace, pp. 13–29, Dec. 2017, doi: 10.24908/ijesjp.v5i1.8928.[35] D. I. Castaneda, J. D. Merritt, and J. A. Mejia, “Integrating an engineering justice approach in an undergraduate engineering mechanics course,” in 2021 IEEE Frontiers in
mechanics, and non-linear structural mechanics. He has ten years of full-time industry experience in steel manufacturing and has over eight years of part-time consulting experience in the areas of mechanical and civil design. He is currently pursuing a Ph. D. in the department of Mechanical Engineering at Virginia Tech.Olga Pierrakos, Virginia Tech Olga Pierrakos is currently a National Academy of Engineering CASEE AGEP Postdoctoral Engineering Education Researcher (PEER) at Virginia Tech in the Department of Engineering Education. Dr. Pierrakos holds an M.S. in Engineering Mechanics and a Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering from Virginia Tech. Her Ph.D. work pertained to vortex dynamics in left
make design decisions in an industrialsetting at the beginning of their careers.Introduction It is clear from engineering education research that no single style of teaching or learningcan be effective considering the diverse quality and background of engineering students1.Engineering educators find the use of physical and virtual learning aids especially effective forconveying concepts by providing the hands-on aspect desired by many students. Case-basedreasoning2 and educational pedagogies of situated cognition3-5 support providing students withconcrete examples of fundamental concepts. Further, this field includes multiple research effortsregarding the efficacy and best practices of teaching aids and their use in curriculum. However
Provost at Texas A&M University. He served as Project Director for the Foundation Coalition, an NSF Engineering Education Coalition in which six institutions systematically renewed, assessed, and institutionalized their undergraduate engineering curricula, and extensively shared their results with the engineering education community. He co-created the Integrated, First-Year Curriculum in Science, Engi- neering and Mathematics at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology, which was recognized in 1997 with a Hesburgh Award Certificate of Excellence. He has authored or co-authored over 70 papers on engineer- ing education in areas ranging from curricular change to faculty development. He is currently an ABET Program
knowledge to actual problems.7 In the Fall of 1993, an American Society forEngineering Education (ASEE) task force of engineering deans and industry leaders observedthat social conditions limit engineering design more than technological considerations do.8Three years later, in 1996, the IEEE Spectrum convened an "Employment Roundtable,"concluding that the “non-engineering context” plays heavily into engineers’ careers and that theymust actively participate in decision-making processes.9 Page 11.1054.3In spite of these and many other admonitions, engineering instruction has changed slowly.Course and curriculum integration such as that initiated at
AC 2011-2032: SERVICE-LEARNING PARTNERSHIPS: IMPROVING ED-UCATION AND ADDRESSING COMMUNITY NEEDSWilliam C. Oakes, Purdue University, West Lafayette William Oakes is the Director of the EPICS Program at Purdue University, one of the founding faculty members of the School of Engineering Education and a courtesy faculty member in Mechanical Engi- neering and Curriculum and Instruction in the College of Education. He is active in ASEE and has served on the boards of ERM, FPD and CIP and is a fellow of the ASEE and NSPE. He was the first engineer to win the Campus Compact Thomas Ehrlich Faculty Award for Service-Learning. He was a co-recipient of the 2005 National Academy of Engineering’s Bernard Gordon Prize for
Education, 2021 Integrating Public Health Topics in Drug Delivery System Education1. Abstract In drug delivery systems (DDS) research and education, the integration of biology, chemistry, engineering and medicine is imperative to design therapies that address medical problems and disease. Engineers rely on medical and clinical experts to translate DDS to the clinic and healthcare settings, making these relationships invaluable. Recently, trends in biology, medical education and biomedical engineering curriculum integrate social and public health aspects of medicine at all levels of study (undergraduate, graduate, and medical school), when traditionally, the curriculum taught basic science and social perspectives as two
project-based learning, which He will present his work-in-progress at the upcoming American Society of Engineering Education conference.Ning Fang (Professor) Ning Fang is a Professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University, U.S.A. He has taught a variety of courses at both graduate and undergraduate levels, such as engineering dynamics, metal machining, and design for manufacturing. His areas of interest include computer-assisted instructional technology, curricular reform in engineering education, and the modeling and optimization of manufacturing processes. He earned his Ph.D., M.S., and B.S. degrees in mechanical engineering. He is a Senior Member of the Society for Manufacturing Engineering
: An Applied Approach by Ahmed S. Khan (Pearson, ISBN 0-536-67051-X).For all circuit diagrams refer to pages 176-188 of Lab text.ObjectiveTo study various types of fiber attenuation mechanisms and to measure cable loss, and cablebending loss.IntroductionThe attenuation or transmission loss of an optical fiber is one of the important factors in thedesign of the system as it dictates (i) the spacing between the repeaters, and (ii) the type ofoptical modulator and demodulator to be used.As an optical signal propagates through an optical fiber, it undergoes attenuation. A number ofmechanisms contribute to the signal attenuation within the optical fiber. These mechanisms areinfluenced by the material composition, the manufacturing technique and the
sections. of building a functioning parabolic microphone. "This excerpt from the Science & Technology/Engineering and Mathematics Curriculum Framework and is included by permission of the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. The Science & Technology/Engineering Curriculum Framework is posted at www.doe.mass.edu/frameworks/current.html
doctoral candidate in the Department of Curriculum, Teaching, and Learning at the Ontario Institute for Studies in Education (OISE), University of Toronto with a collaborative specialization in Engineering Education. She also has an M.A. in Curriculum and Pedagogy from OISE and an M. Sc. in Computer Control and Automation from the Nanyang Technology University in Singapore. She worked as a senior research engineers at MIT developing navigation technologies for underwater robotics to model and predict environmental issues in the coastal regions of Singapore. As always interested in education, this led her to take up a position as a lecturer at Singapore Polytechnic. She spent the next five years developing