that question is great because it shows that it comes from a person who is thinking about policy. And I would encourage that person to go even further [beyond asking how to get a utility to do more], and ask the question, “what’s the purpose of the utility?” Now, if what we’re asking is, “how do we get a utility to constantly be creative and innovative and look for ways to do more with less – to get a better product for less money” – then that’s awesome! As long as we’re not doing that in a way the destroys morale, and that would be great. But the kind of notion that, “wouldn’t it be great if our bureaucrats just worked harder and spent more money than what was required…” well then they wouldn’t have the money to do the other
of low-income college students, there existtendencies in metacognitions and feelings among this group that systematically operate toprevent academic success and retention in STEM fields. This lack of diversity can negativelyimpact innovation in STEM majors through a lack of diverse perspectives and untappedpotential. The lack of low-income students in STEM is also problematic, since STEM careersare generally high paying; the continued education of certain groups of people at the exclusion1 Miami University, Oxford, OH This work is supported by NSF EEC Award 1530627.of those from lower-income families intensifies the stratification of wealth in society [3]. Thispopulation of students from low-income families may also aid in overcoming a
- cluding the Journal of Career Development, the Academy of Management Executive, the Psychology of Women Quarterly, Journal of Management Development, the Journal of Business Ethics, Human Re- source Management Journal, and The Diversity Factor. Dr. Blake-Beard is co-editor of a volume focused on women’s careers (Handbook of Research on Promoting Women’s Careers) and a 2017 volume on mentoring (Mentoring Diverse Leaders: Changing People, Processes and Paradigms). She received a 2010-2011 Fulbright Award to support her project entitled ”Systems of Sustenance and Support: Explor- ing the Impact of Mentoring on the Career Experiences of Indian Women,” in partnership with the Center for Leadership, Innovation and Change at
having “complained” about white,heteronormative masculinity in mathematics and: According to Professor Luis Leyva, children are implicaitly taught from an early age to associate innovate problem-solving with masculinity while viewing conformity and "meekness" as feminist traits.14 [sic]The piece contains so many typos it is unintelligible and Leyva’s actual argument is renderedunrecognizable. There was a time when we would have ignored or dismissed such arguments asinvalid, and such shoddy and sloppy writing as drivel. However, many students struggle withinformation literacy and are still developing their ability to evaluate the quality of informationand argument; we cannot afford to ignore this reality. 22It is crucial in our
become more “reflectivelearners” while also providing instructors the opportunity to understand student learning in anengineering design course. We frame the course around competency-based education. Mistree [8] indicates that theprimary competency needed by engineering graduates today is the ability to adapt; this is largelydue to the way that engineering practice is changing rapidly due to technological innovation andglobalization. Further, we have, in prior iterations of the course, structured our course around 7competencies identified by ABET [9], Eggert [10], Lahidji [11], and others [12-15]. Weconsider the challenges in incorporating the project-based learning construct and
. smoothness. The findings were used to adapt and improve the design of visuo-hapticsimulations to teach the concept of friction.IntroductionDesigning educational tools to develop conceptual understanding is a complex procedure.Educational tools need to bring together technological, educational, scientific, and socialinformation into a single design solution. Therefore, incorporation of new learning tools ineducation should be a rational process guided by research. Early focus on the learners during thedesign of educational tools can facilitate deep thinking about concepts, operations, and relationsinstead of merely problems associated with usability considerations.Learning innovations include the adaptation of tools used in non-educational contexts
have completed three ofthe four years of my undergraduate education and don’t feel I have the technical expertise to betrusted with technological innovation, nor the necessary skills or experience to advocate forspecific technological interventions through public policy. This lack of preparedness scares mebecause even though I identify as one of the “engineers of 2020,” I don’t believe I have acquiredthe competence necessary for the role NAE is calling me to play. Suddenly, I notice that the questions I am asking myself have shifted from “how will Iapply the technical knowledge gained from an undergraduate education to serve society?” to “doI even have the most basic technical knowledge that I need to serve society?” As I read
delivery, including online lab courses. Ms. Schiorring is also evaluating a project that is part of the California State University system’s new ini- tiative to increase first year persistence in STEM. In 2014, Ms. Schiorring was one of the first participants in the NSF’s Innovation-CORPS (I-CORPS), a two-month intensive training that uses an entrepreneur- ship model to teach participants to achieve scalable sustainability in NSF-funded projects. Past projects include evaluation of an NSF-funded project to improve advising for engineering students at a major state university in California. Ms. Schiorring is the author and co-author of numerous papers and served as project lead on a major study of transfer in engineering
fuel economy standards on consumer behavior. As the governmentcontinues to raise fuel economy standards for vehicle manufacturers, manufactures must respondwith innovative technological changes in order to meet these standards including new materials,electric options, weight reduction, and aerodynamic styling. Consumer habits also change as aresult with some customers valuing fuel economy highly while other customers place moreimportance on vehicle features, cargo space, safety, color, or other options. This projectincluded researching the history of governmental policy regarding fuel economy standards,examining the technology used to increase fuel efficiency and the methodology used to rate avehicle at a certain fuel efficiency as seen on
both engineering and non-engineering communities. Results of this quantitativeand qualitative work were used to further refine the quantitative instrument that is to be used insubsequent phases of the project.Addressing student perceptions that they do not fit in engineering can begin to staunch theexodus of talented individuals from engineering majors. The use of practical methods in thisstudy to understand students' identities as they relate to engineering can be used to attract morestudents into engineering. An increase in the number of students in engineering will help initiatea much-needed shift toward a more innovative approaches to engineering solutions than may bedevelop by traditional “normative” groups. We are refining our
“architect” is important. The low-assertiveness Amiable group describedfacilitation and communication of everyone’s ideas, whereas high-assertiveness Expressive andDriver groups described collaboration associated with accountability. Other social media skillsbelieved important to engineering leadership represented by the student included “producer” –creating content, “analyst” – staying abreast of innovations, and “recipient” – managingcommunication overflow.In using data collected from the course, natural connections between social media, engineeringand leadership appear to have emerged for these students. Looking at the course as a wholerather than at the individual connections, information presents itself as to what coursemechanisms were or were
4. 3-D Printing 5. Medical Innovations 6. High-Speed Travel 2 7. Robotics 8. Blockchain Technology 9. Autonomous Vehicles 10. Advanced Virtual Reality 11. Renewable EnergyStudents and universities must anticipate these disruptive technologies, assess their impact onsociety, and adapt to their influence on the future of engineering. University engineeringprograms must provide the technical foundation and equip students with the tools to recognizethe technologies and assist them in adapting to the impact these
Engineering ContentThis paper describes an innovative approach to the integration of social science and engineeringcontent within the context of a field-based course. The class, titled “Oregon Bridges,” combinesinstruction about both the history of the construction and maintenance of major bridges inOregon and the fundamental engineering design principles of bridge building. Studentsparticipated in a nine-day field trip along the Oregon Coast and the Columbia and WillametteRivers, followed by classroom instruction and development of a portfolio of the bridges visited.The central theme of the class is the life of the bridge engineer Conde McCullough, best knownas the designer of the major bridges on the Oregon Coast [4], and his continuing influence
they or others inthe larger cohort might attend. The goal was for them better understand how conferences cansupport their professional development and to generate and describe the possible opportunities.The intent was for the team to work together to build the team’s knowledge about theseopportunities and design an innovative approach for sharing the information with the rest of theREU cohort. Page 26.1704.8Alternative TechnologiesIn addition to native tools, the REU leadership explored the potential of an online tool calledInterLACE developed at Tufts University(12) to help with the exchange and organization of ideas.The tool provides a
Operations Research andBiomedical Engineering, attracted high numbers of female students for whom mathematicsheld no fear. Mathematics was seen by these students as the tool that opened the doors toproblem solving and modelling that required innovative and quite creative thinking. Themodelling of real life, identifiable problems such as tidal flows, electrical activity round theheart, and fluid flow round sails was accessed through very specialised computationalmathematics techniques. These were applications seen by students as useful to people andchallenging intellectually: I always connected so much of the work going on in E. Sci back to people – the environmental fluid mechanics, the geothermal work – I wanted to do something that was
rather constitutes an important background towards mastering of the chemicalterminology in a systematic manner.The MethodologyThis work is structured in two parts.The first part is a theoretical analysis of the subject, subdivided in three stages: • Stage 1 - the links between the Language of Chemistry and Linguistics are identified; • Stage 2 - an innovative way of presenting common chemical process through macro- linguistics principles is proposed; • Stage 3 - the introduction to the software game CHICKA.The second part consists of the empirical research, subdivided in two stages. • Stage 1 – CHICKA has been used in the classroom to test the speed of Language Acquisition. • Stage 2 – Macro-linguistic concepts were used
) Page 12.1407.13Leading stimulating class 8 4 9 2 2discussions on physics topicsUsing inquiry-based learning 3 6 11 4 1techniques to teach physicsStrategies to teach critical 2 8 11 3 0thinking skillsTeaching applied physics 7 9 6 2 1conceptsAdopting innovative methods to 6 7 4 7 1teach applied physicsImplementing hands-on physics 6 9 7 2 0projectsUsing teaching methods to 6 7 8
goalsand objectives to Engineering Design courses offered by other educational institutions, in that itpromulgates teaching the principles of engineering through “hands-on” tasks for students in areassuch as creativity stimulation, construction work, and associated reporting in relation to projectsthe students produce in teams. The philosophy of the Engineering Program is reflected in thestudents’ first course in Engineering Design: Promote and deliver practical, memorable, appliededucation with requirements for technical knowledge, opportunities for innovation, and theprospect for recognition.At Northeastern University, the students’ introduction to the phases of the engineering designprocess is initially set out for them by use of the principles
support knowledgecapture and emergent collaboration. This website is named the Engineering Design Guide andEnvironment (EDGE), and will be explained in detail later. This paper provides an overview ofchanges to the MSD program in the key areas of course delivery, project definition, andcommunications infrastructure. Attention is given to innovative approaches to challengesinherent in serving a large and diverse constituency with limited resources. Companion papersoffer more detail on project definition14 and course delivery and assessment15.Project Definition Process ChangesA. Issues AddressedIn the recent past, projects were proposed primarily by industrial sponsors. These were usuallytopics that were of interest to them, but not ones that the
Workplace Cohort was referred to as Cohort 2 in the initial framing of APS.b In some publications and planning documents this Cross-sectional Cohort was referred to asCohort 1′. The “prime” indicates that it was a derivative of Cohort 1 in that it used the same PIEsurvey tool. It differed in that it was a cross-sectional study, whereas Cohort 1 was alongitudinal study.References1 Sheppard, S.D. and K. Silva. 2001. Descriptions of Engineering Education: Faculty, Student and Engineering Practitioner Perspectives. In 2001 Frontiers in Education Conference Proceedings, Reno, NV, October 9- 11, 2001.2 Silva, K. and S.D. Sheppard. 2001. Enabling and Sustaining Educational Innovation. In Proceedings of the American
Education, 1997. 86(4): p. 315-320.2. Cimbala, J., et al., Experiential Learning in a Fluid Flow Class via Take-Home Experiments, in 2006 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2006, American Society for Engineering Education: Chicago, IL.3. Hesketh, R.P. and C.S. Slater, Innovative and economical bench-scale process engineering experiments. International Journal of Engineering Education, 2000. 16(4): p. 327-334.4. Witkowski, T., et al., Characterizing the Performance of the SR-30 Turbojet Engine, in 2003 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 2003, American Society for Engineering Education: Nashville, TN.5. Layton, R. and J. Mayhew, Mechanical Measurements: Rewriting the Script, in 2006 ASEE Annual Conference &