AC 2011-188: STRENGTHENING THE COMMUNITY COLLEGE EN-GINEERING PIPELINE USING TABLET PCS AND ONLINE INSTRUC-TIONAmelito G Enriquez, Canada College Amelito Enriquez is a professor of engineering and mathematics at Canada College. He received his PhD in Mechanical Engineering from the University of California, Irvine. His research interests include technology-enhanced instruction and increasing the representation of female, minority and other under- represented groups in mathematics, science and engineering. Page 22.1327.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011
, and energy-education specialistshas been essential for creating the instrument development framework and pilot instrument. Thesix-member panel includes a middle school science teacher, two energy education specialists, theexecutive director of an energy efficiency advocacy and technical services non-profitorganization, a professor from St. Lawrence University’s Department of Environmental Studieswho teaches courses on energy and energy issues, and a mechanical engineering professor fromClarkson University whose research focuses on wind energy and energy efficiency. Thisdiversity of backgrounds provides a range of perspectives for evaluating the criteria againstwhich energy literacy is measured (thereby providing construct validity), and is
AC 2012-5166: PHYSICAL EXPERIMENTS TO ENHANCE MODEL-ELICITINGACTIVITY IMPLEMENTATIONDr. Andrew Kean, California Polytechnic State UniversityDr. Brian P. Self, California Polytechnic State University Brian P. Self obtained his B.S. and M.S. degrees in engineering mechanics from Virginia Tech, and his Ph.D. in Bioengineering from the University of Utah. He worked in the Air Force Research Laboratories before teaching at the U.S. Air Force Academy for seven years. Brian has taught in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo since 2006. During the 2011-12 academic year he participated in a professor exchange, teaching at the Munich University of Applied Sciences. His engineering education
disciplinesconsidered in this pilot included chemical, civil, electrical, mechanical, and general engineering.An invitation to participate in the pilot study was sent in advance to faculty representing thesedepartments at a selected set of 30 institutions; the list drew from institutions represented at the2007 National Capstone Conference, randomly chosen across a range of Carnegieclassifications1. Faculty members were also asked to forward the student survey to theirstudents. A similar invitation to participate was made to 35 industry representatives. Thecompanies were across industry sectors representing commercial, industrial, and military productand services, e.g., automation, computer, construction, financial, medical device, software,transportation, and
fields, and factors influencing students’ learning and development. Author of 6 books, over 75 journal articles, more than 100 conference paper and abstracts, Strayhorn is co-editor of Spectrum: A Journal on Black Men and member of several boards.Mr. Leroy L. Long III, Ohio State University Leroy L. Long III earned his master’s in Mechanical Engineering at Ohio State University and his bach- elor’s in Mechanical Engineering at Wright State University. He is now a doctoral student in STEM Education within the School of Teaching and Learning at Ohio State, where he studies topics including but not limited to cognitive development, learning, teaching, and the social contexts within which they occur. He is a Lead Graduate
attainment of underrepresented groups across different engineering fieldsprovides an opportunity for creating interventions that support broader inclusion. For instance, studies have ledto recent incorporation of more inclusive K-12 and undergraduate engineering curriculums that are focused onreal world applications and team work, while still maintaining technical STEM content and rigor [6].This exploratory study aims to further understand gender and ethnic diversity differences between BME and otherengineering majors, namely, Mechanical (ME), Chemical (ChE), and Materials Science Engineering (MSE), asthey pertain to undergraduate students’ career attainment. As typical with many BME programs, the BME majorat a large Midwestern research university
Michigan. He completed the Ph.D. at Michigan State University in 1997 and continued to serve there as a Visiting Assistant Professor until 2004 when he accepted an Associate Professor position at the Virginia Military Institute (VMI) in Lexington, Va. He currently serves as a Professor of Mechanical Engineering at VMI. Page 22.105.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 A Student-Built Internal Combustion Engine Simulation Using ExcelAbstractA numerical model for an internal combustion engine has been developed for use in a seniorelective course on internal combustion engines. The
Paper ID #45669Work-in-Progress: Introducing First-Generation, Low-income (FGLI) Studentsto Math and Engineering through a Music-Themed Summer ProgramDr. Vicki V. May P.E., Dartmouth College Vicki V. May, Ph.D., P.E. is an Instructional Professor of Engineering at the Thayer School of Engineering and Associate Dean for Undergraduate Education at Dartmouth. Her research focuses on engineering education and K-12 outreach. She teaches courses in solid mechanics, structural analysis, and design.Prof. Petra Bonfert-Taylor, Dartmouth College Petra Bonfert-Taylor received her Ph.D. in Mathematics from Technical University of Berlin
: University of California Press.14 Herbert Hoover, (1922), American Individualism, New York: Doubleday, Page and Company.15 Herbert Spencer, (1883), Data of Ethics.16 Joseph Fletcher, (1966), Situation Ethics: The New Morality, Philadelphia: The Westminster Press.DAVID R. HAWSI have degrees in Civil Engineering (BS, MS, PhD), English (BA, MA), and Instructional and PerformanceTechnology (MS). I teach structural design, soil mechanics, and university core classes in applied ethics (The MoralDimensions of Technology), and in the social implications of engineering (Engineering for Humanity). My currentscholarly activities include the preparation of text materials, readings in moral philosophy, and philology
Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Education” 12possible that these support mechanisms help counter the “chilly” classroom experiences andincrease their interest in the field of engineering.For institutions wishing to improve the undergraduate experience for engineering students, wesuggest a self-analysis of specific learning practices as outlined in Kuh, et. al. text. Thefollowing questions are designed to help institutions reflect on their commitment to studentsuccess:Are students academically challenged in their coursework? What expectations do faculty have forstudents? How are these expectations communicated in
Session 3280 Physics + Writing = A Match Made in Heaven? Teresa Larkin-Hein & P. Kelly JoynerTeresa Larkin-Hein, P. Kelly Joyner American University Washington, DCAbstractDuring the fall 2000 semester, a joint study was undertaken between the Physics and LiteratureDepartments at American University. The study involved the linking of an introductory physicsclass for non-majors with an introductory college writing class. One goal of the study was toprovide more content-specific writing assignments within the college writing class by linkingthem to material
outcomes with a considerably greater specificity than the ABET criteria. For example, BOK Outcome 1 (an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering) is nominally identical to ABET Criterion 3(a); however, the text associated with BOK Outcome 1 also calls for coverage of mathematics through differential equations, probability and statistics, calculus-based physics, biology, chemistry, ecology, geology/geomorphology, engineering economics, mechanics, material properties, systems, geo-spatial representation, information technology, and several recognized major civil engineering areas. None of these subjects are specified under Criterion 3(a); thus, ABET’s prohibition on supplementing the
National Science Foundation Award# 0737616, Learning through Engineering Design and Practice.John Thieken, Arizona State University John Thieken, MEd., is currently a high school mathematics teacher at the Paradise Valley School District and a doctoral student in the PhD in mathematics education at Arizona State University. He has a Bachelor of Science in Mechanical Engineering from Northern Arizona University and a Masters in Secondary Education from Old Dominion University. He is currently involved in doctoral research (Learning through Engineering Design and Practice, National Science Foundation Award# 0737616) where he engages in research methods, measurement, data analysis
education courses, in which hermotivation was lowered. She said "I learned so much worse because I'm just like not interested inthe class, so I don't really want to learn the material…,” but that she was lucky to have a[language] minor so that the majority of her general education requirements were filled by morerelevant courses. Additionally, one key reason for her switch in engineering discipline was shefound IE material more relevant than ChemE. Besides course material, she described relationshipbuilding, along with problem-solving, leading, networking, and communication as important,which she is learning in school: “You're going to be working with different engineers, you'regoing to be working with chemical engineers, mechanical, anything
bioengineering (or biochemical engineering, biological engineering, biomedicalengineering) to tie into the design challenge, but also because this discipline integrates featuresfrom numerous other engineering disciplines including chemical, mechanical, and electricalengineering. We spoke about the broad array of topics bioengineers work on including humanhealth, energy, and the environment. We tried to make this introduction as broad as possible topique the interest of as many students as we could, but also show the students that there are severalengineering disciplines that they could explore in the future that work on complex biologicalproblems related to human health.On day 2, we narrowed the focus of the discussion to a particular application
grade in the course.The second strategy revealed that these students have an equal rate of succeeding in Calculus Ion their next attempt. Another early alert system was implemented in a Mechanics of Materialscourse [6]. The model developed a method for detecting students at risk of failing and helpingthem plan proactive approaches to be successful. It also predicted the performance of thestudents with exceptional accuracy. In a 2021 study [7], a comparison of students who completedproactive intervention behavior modules revealed a significant correlation between the numberof modules completed and the final grade obtained in the course.The purpose of this paper is to investigate the potential impact of an Early Alert & InterventionSystem
berequired to build the merry-go-round.Coincidently, she also exhibited mathematical Figure 3: Tabitha using the ruler as a visual aidthinking behaviors earlier than most of theparticipants. In figure 3, Tabitha can be seen using the ruler to provide her a visual aid andcontext for the dimensions she was creating. An example of feasibility analysis occurred whenshe considered the implications of using a specific material which will accommodate the weightof both children and adults. Her mathematical language and thinking included:radius, degree, tangent and applying that mathematical concept knowledge the given situation.Sarah: Early Focus on Design Thinking and Inarticulate Decision MakingDuring Sarah’s first hour she spent a majority of her
Section 3575 Learning to Juggle: A Model for New Engineering Faculty Development Rose M. Marra, Thomas A. Litzinger The Pennsylvania State UniversityIntroductionNew faculty are faced with many challenges, not the least of which is learning to juggle themany aspects of their new careers. While many universities and colleges offer new facultyorientations, many such activities feature an endless array of “talking heads” fromadministrators, or perhaps “how to” lectures on the mechanics of pedagogy. Having discussedsuch workshops with other new faculty (and, we admit
AC 2011-2207: E-QUALITY CONTROL METHOD FOR MEASURING SO-LAR CELL EFFICIENCYRichard Chiou, Drexel University Dr. Richard Chiou’s background is in mechanical engineering with an emphasis on manufacturing. Dr. Chiou is currently an associate professor in the Goodwin School of Technology and Professional Studies at Drexel University. His areas of research include machining, mechatronics, and internet based robotics and automation. He has secured many research and education grants from the NSF, the SME Education Foundation, and industries.Michael G Mauk, Drexel UniversityRobin Kizirian, Drexel University Robin Kizirian completed his M.S. degree in Computer Engineering at Drexel University in Philadelphia and his B.S
experience with content.All participated in at least two workshops where they learned and practiced how to use the ADBoards. Engineering educators experienced in the delivery of circuits and electronics intensivecourses using Analog Discovery, Mobile Studio and myDAQ shared their content and lessonslearned as they explored the wide variety of educational delivery made possible by low-cost,portable and personal instrumentation. They also developed and shared content and experiencesthrough a common website and bi-weekly online meetings organized by the 13 HBCU engineeringpartners in a collaborative project. Materials developed by other educators and collected bycolleagues from partner institutions were also shared through the website and meetings
, Buffalo, and an Ed.D. from West Virginia University. Before WVU, Hensel worked for the U.S. Department of Energy as a mathematician and computer sys- tems analyst, and as an Associate Professor and Department Chair at Salem International University. Her research interests include STEM education at all levels, first-year experience, and issues related to the transition from high school to college, and the retention and recruitment of women, and minorities to STEM fields.Ms. Marian G. Armour-Gemmen, West Virginia University Marian Armour-Gemmen is currently the Patent & Trademark Librarian at West Virginia University Li- braries. She is also the bibliographer for mechanical and aerospace engineering, as well as for
problem specified by an industrial partner that is typically a global company. Workers in such acompany require skills to collaborate with peers among multiple locations. Since many of ourstudents join global organizations, our capstone design emphasizes team, communication, andskills to use collaboration tools.Currently a typical team consists of seven students from multiple programs, such as BiomedicalEngineering, Computer System Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Industrial ManagementEngineering, Material Engineering, and Mechanical Engineering. Since students take anintroductory engineering design course that also includes teamwork and project managementskills in their sophomore year, the capstone design course is a semester long (15 weeks
ones strengths and weaknesses, makethose known to the group, and choose tasks accordingly. As some people have a greaterknowledge in one technical area than another it is important to recognize and apply thatstrength to maximize the student potential. The PASSat project also required that those involved become much moreproficient in certain technical areas. Within the aerospace group, numerous otherdisciplines were consulted as the knowledge required extended well beyond anyundergraduate aerospace engineering curriculum. Concepts from not only aerospace butelectrical, materials, mechanical and software engineering as well as computer sciencewere employed which required a significant amount of research and study. Overall, the
: the students. Encourage a lot of feedback from the students throughout the term.Establishing informal feedback mechanisms throughout the term provides an outlet for the students to expresstheir concerns, impressions, and ideas for improvement. We also maintained an open door policy andencouraged students to visit us to discuss the course. Anytime students visited our offices, they were asked tocomment on the course. After receiving the input from the students, we discussed it and made changes to thecourse if possible. Receiving and reacting to student feedback helped lessen the difficulties inherent in havingtwo professors. Waiting until the formal teaching evaluations at the end of the term would not have providedsome of the information
Session 2306 INTEGRATING ENGINEERING, ART, AND BUSINESS INTO A MULTIDISCIPLINARY ARCHITECTURE PROGRAM Daniel Davis, AIA University of HartfordAbstractAt the University of Hartford, we are establishing an architectural program that integrates art, engineering andbusiness with architecture. Architecture by its very nature is connected to other disciplines, however architecturaleducation is often criticized for a lack of integration in the curriculum. By increasing the awareness of theinterrelationship between different areas of
material, they had defined the design problem. Theirbasic requirements for an aircraft were: a) wing-like structures to lift (or support) the aircraft, b)a means of propulsion (propeller and engine), and c) a method of control and balance. Controland balance were recognized to be major problems and so they concentrated their effort on theseaspects. Because an aircraft can fly in three orthogonal directions and also rotate in threeorthogonal directions, learning how to fly is much more complicated than driving an automobilewhich translates and rotates each in one orthogonal direction. They therefore concentrated theirdesign effort on balance and control. Very few of their predecessors gave much attention to thisarea. In fact, although several
Biomaterial Considerations Visit Materials Characterization lab to see Sterilization SEM, AFM, and mechanical testing devices8 Transient Systems- Organ Systems Work on MathCAD – learn how to use a basic solve block9 Regulatory/Ethical Issues with Begin project design Biomedical Device Design10 Newer Artificial Kidney Designs Project design time ProfessionalismTable 1. Overview of the topics covered in the Artificial Kidney Project. Each topic was dividedinto a lecture style instruction and a hands-on laboratory
- cations on engineering education and design. His primary professional interest areas include: Engineering Education, CADD, Design, Fracture Mechanics, Materials Science and Alternative Energy Options. Dur- ing the 2003-2004 academic year, Dr. Pieri spent a sabbatical teaching math & engineering courses at Turtle Mountain Community College on the Turtle Mountain Reservation in North Dakota. Since the fall of 2008, Dr Pieri has held the position of Coordinator of Tribally Controlled Colleges NDSU Partner- ships under joint appointment to the Equity, Diversity and Global Outreach Division, Extension Service and Mechanical Engineering Department. In this unique position, he actively works to develop authentic
Paper ID #29362gruepr, an Open Source Tool for Creating Optimal Student TeamsDr. Joshua L. Hertz, Northeastern University Dr. Hertz earned a B.S. in Ceramic Engineering from Alfred University in 1999 and then a Ph.D. in Materials Science and Engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in 2006. Following this, he worked at the National Institute of Standards and Technology as a National Research Council postdoctoral fellow. He joined the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Delaware as an Assistant Professor in September 2008, leading a lab that researched the effects of composition
-sustainable in the long run. Some of theproject materials are used in several courses to enhance the current curriculum. Through theproduct development process, PID Initiative provides the students with entrepreneurialexperiences. Examples are provided to illustrate the PID Initiative process. To further increasethe impact, future plans include organizing student seminars and offering a certificate in newproduct development. Page 23.661.21. IntroductionEngineering students in different majors spend most of their time taking courses within their ownprogram/department in addition to common body of knowledge (CBK) courses such as Math,Physics, and