considered, the quality ofessay responses was viewed as evidence of entrepreneurial and creative potential of theapplicants and thus given greater weight. Ten applicants were selected to participate in Year 1 ofthe program. The scholar class included seven male and three female students. Three studentsreported their race as other than white/Caucasian.Degree program interests of the scholars consisted of 20% in the Bachelor of Science inElectrical and Computer Engineering Technology (BSECET), 10% in Bachelor of Science inElectrical Engineering (BSEE), 60% in the Bachelor of Science in Engineering (BSE -Mechanical Engineering concentration) and 10% the Bachelor of Science in EngineeringTechnology (BSET). The financial need of the scholars was
manufacturing, and more. Most of our doctoral programs are inSTEM, including Computational Data Science and Engineering, Computer Science, ElectricalEngineering, Industrial and Systems Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, andNanoengineering. N.C. A&T also offers a doctoral program in Applied Science and Technologywith available concentrations in applied chemistry; applied physics; atmospheric, environmentaland energy science; bioscience; data science and analytics; information technology; STEMeducation; and technology management. N.C. A&T continues to expand its doctoral programs; inJanuary 2021 the University of North Carolina System Board of Governors approved our requestto establish a Ph.D. in Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, slated
University, Germany. Antonie teaches courses on new product development, entrepreneurship, and technology marketing to graduate students in en- gineering. Her research interests are in new product development, managerial cognition, and decision making.Dr. Gerald W. Recktenwald, Portland State University Gerald Recktenwald is an Associate Professor in the Mechanical and Materials Engineering Department at Portland State University. His current research interests are in improving engineering education, and in the numerical simulation and measurement of fluid flow heat transfer in electronic equipment, energy efficient buildings, and other industrial applications. c American Society for
stop at identifying and studying causes. We need effective solutions. Wealso cannot go about solving this problem the way engineering imitators might. Most engineeringprograms are trying their best to fit more in the engineering curricula and to expose students tomore material. But this approach has been tried for a long time, without significant success. Weneed new approaches.In order to get a fresh look at the problem and possible solutions, we propose to look at theproblem we have identified through the lens of John Dewey’s philosophy of education andtheory of inquiry. The influence of John Dewey, a foremost American philosopher in thetradition of pragmatism, on every level of the education system in the United States has beenimmeasurable
curriculum intro- Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2005, American Society for Engineering Educationduced students to (1) mathematical problem solving using the Matlab system, and (2) the C pro-gramming language, as well as to calculus and physics courses. In the sophomore year the cur-riculum builds on the first year's foundation of calculus and physics, and covers analog circuits(e.g., solutions to linear differential equations by classical and Laplace transform methods),solid-state materials, and digital circuits (combinational logic and finite-state machines). Re-quired courses in the junior year of the curriculum introduce concepts in
format involved determining the sections to be included in the portfolio, a brief description of each section, examples of items to be included in the portfolio, as well as a listing of sources where students could gather information.4) Developing a Mechanism for Updating and Maintaining Portfolios: Once a format was determined, a method was developed to update and maintain undergraduate portfolios. This step involved determining the roles and responsibilities of students, faculty, and staff. These roles and responsibilities were defined in such a way that they would yield the most efficient and effective method of portfolio upkeep.3.0 DEVELOPING UNDERGRADUATE PORTFOLIOS3.1 The
, which limits the number of groups that can perform field sampling duringeach session. Time management would also be a challenge since the nature of the openexperiments dictates that some sessions must be performed outside the scheduled class hours.AcknowledgementsThe author would like to thank the following people for providing valuable feedback and advice:Susan Creighton of the College Evaluation Office, Dr. Steve McAnally and Dr. Adrienne Cooperof the Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, and Dr. Jed Lyons of the Departmentof Mechanical Engineering. This effort was supported in part by the National ScienceFoundation (BES 97-33377). Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendationsexpressed in this material are those of
Paper ID #15169Professional Development through Situated Learning Techniques Adaptedwith Design-Based ResearchMr. Matthew Moorhead, New York University Matthew Moorhead received his B.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Nevada, Reno, in 2014. He is currently pursuing a M.S. degree in Mechanical Engineering at NYU Tandon School of Engineering, Brooklyn, NY, where he is a teaching fellow in their GK-12 program. Matthew also conducts research in the Mechatronics and Controls Laboratory with an interest in robotics and controls.Colin Hennessy Elliott, New York University Colin received his B.S. in
years of structural engineering consulting experience. He currently consults on learning and talent development programs within the architecture, engineering, and construction industry. Mr. Leidig has focused on community-engaged engineering and design for over fifteen years.Eric Holloway (Sr Director - Industry Research)William C. Oakes (Director and Professor) William (Bill) Oakes is a 150th Anniversary Professor, Director of the EPICS Program, Professor of Engineering Education at Purdue University, and a registered professional engineer. He is one of the founding faculty in the School of Engineering Education having courtesy appointments in Mechanical, Environmental and Ecological Engineering and Curriculum and
Lawrence Technological University (LTU)], to better prepare students for the high-tech, global environment in which they will be working in the next millenium.2) to share what was learned from an NSF-ILI grant awarded to WSU with the two partner universities through (a) the set-up of the WSU’s digital laboratory and (b) making the laboratory materials and the Altera User Manual developed by the WSU available at these schools.3) to diffuse what was learned in the WSU setting into K-12 educational settings, in an effort to infuse “the joys of technical education” into youngsters, particularly young women.4) to facilitate the exchange of ideas, practices, and application about digital design courses through service as a national
greatest concern from the participants in the original VISION project was the overwhelming amountof material that the teachers covered during the three weeks. The industry experiences were packed withactivity from 7:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. The teachers felt that time was needed to process some of what they haddone in the activity. In VISION 95, the participants had at least an hour each day to discuss the activity with theother teachers. If needed, industry hosts were available during that time for consultation. Another complaint of the initial VISION participants was that the required drop-in lesson plan requiredmore preparation time than allotted. In the initial project, the lessons were presented at the conclusion of thethree weeks to local
Paper ID #36558Conducting In-Person Project Critique Sessions to Enhance CommunicationsSkills in Technology Educational ProgramsDr. George D Ford, Mississippi State University Dr. George Ford P.E. is on the faculty of Mississippi State’s Building Construction Science Department. He holds an Ed D from Western Carolina University, NC; a master’s degree in civil engineering from the University of South Carolina; and a bachelor’s degree in mechanical engineering from Clemson Univer- sity, SC. Dr. Ford has 15 years of industrial experience including corporate work, and 21 years of teaching experience at the post-secondary
preclinical and clinical testing, in order to prepare them to succeed in a regulatory-basedenvironment.This is a case-study based course, where cases range from small in-class examples that facilitateactive student engagement in the material, to large cases that span multiple lessons andincorporate out of class assignments and projects. Cases are selected and presented such thatstudents gain insights into the progression and complexities of “real-life” devices, while learningin vitro and in vivo preclinical evaluation techniques, clinical trial guidelines, FDA processes andrequirements, and overall regulatory constraints.IntroductionFDA regulations are a large part of many facets of life in the medical device industry. In rolesranging from business
participated in separate but related projects, and the faculty received astipend of $1750 each instead. Faculty participants can choose any consecutive four weekswithin the summer for their program. The programs topics are listed in Tables 1 and 2.Table 1: 2015 Summer Programs Discipline Topic Biology Research in Human Physiology Computer Driving Enjoyment Detection from Video of the Frontal Face Science Computer Home Energy Monitoring and Control System Engineering Computer Coding and Decoding of Information in Mobile Communication Engineering Engineering Study of Mechanical Behavior of Hydrocarbon-bearing Rocks Sciences Engineering Determination of Injection Well Location
. Feedback is alsoessential during the concentrated learning course itself, whether it be informal end-of-day-typefeedback, or a more explicit assessment of the learner’s knowledge, such as a quiz orexamination. Post-class assignments are also an important feedback mechanism, especially as itrelates to the student’s ability to reflect upon the course material after the class meeting time hasconcluded.V. How Can Institutions Begin Offering Courses in Concentrated Formats?Literally every institution of higher education has the opportunity to experiment with offeringsome of its courses in concentrated formats. After determining the viability of teaching aparticular course in a concentrated format, one of the first steps a faculty member must take
; therefore, the“engineering design” requirement was achieved.The team used engineering standards such as the Building Code Requirements for StructuralConcrete (ACI 318-19) as well as the Federal Highway Administration’s “Structural Design withUltra-High-Performance Concrete” (FHWA-HRT-23-077), which provides specific guidance forUHPC structures. The team also two American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)standards related to the casting and testing of the specimens: ASTM C1437: Standard Test Method for Flow of Hydraulic Cement Mortar ASTM C1856: Standard Practice for Fabricating and Testing Specimens of UHPCThe capstone project considered constraints identified in previous literature and practice,particularly the high initial
) formulate educational outcomes for the integration of micro- andmacroethics in graduate science and engineering education; 2) develop and pilot different modelsfor teaching micro- and macroethics to graduate students in science and engineering; 3) assessthe comparative effectiveness of the instructional models; 4) facilitate adoption of theinstructional models and assessment methods at other academic institutions; and 5) provide forwidespread dissemination of course materials and assessment results in the engineering, science,and ethics education communities. The project has four components: a Coordination Workshop;development of four instructional models for integrating micro- and macroethics in graduatescience and engineering education
. Page 25.314.2IntroductionEducating future engineers depends on an instructor’s ability to develop students’ knowledge andskills based on a coherent, philosophical continuum: capture interest, integrate theory withapplication, encourage creativity, convey professional relevance, and promote engagement.Crucial to this learning continuum are the mechanics of course management that form aframework: establish clear student goals and objectives, implement a teaching philosophycoherently, design effective assessment tools, create a diverse and welcoming learning climate,and encourage teamwork. The core of the authors’ engineering teaching philosophy embracesthe critical integration of theory and application into an active learning environment
AC 2007-1727: DATA-MINING AN ONLINE HOMEWORK SYSTEMAndrew Bennett, Kansas State UniversityEric Lawrence, Kansas State UniversityGenevra Neumann, Northern Iowa UniversityElena Verbych, Kansas State UniversitySteve Warren, Kansas State University Page 12.440.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Data-Mining an Online Homework SystemAbstractOnline homework systems are becoming increasingly popular since (when they work)they are convenient for both faculty and students. Systems that rely on mechanicalgrading are naturally best adapted to more mechanical types of problems, raising issuesof whether an increasing reliance on such systems will privilege the
Paper ID #39062Entrepreneurial Mindset and 3D-Modeling: Three Mini-ProjectsDr. Joshua Gargac, Ohio Northern University Joshua Gargac is an associate professor of mechanical engineering at the Ohio Northern University. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Entrepreneurial Mindset and 3D-Modeling: Three Mini-ProjectsIntroductionThe Kern Entrepreneurial Engineering Network (KEEN) outlines the 3C’s of the entrepreneurialmindset (EM) as curiosity, connections, and creating value. Incorporating EM into curriculumcan help students understand the bigger picture, recognize opportunities, and
in concert with previouslyacquired material from earlier classes. The fact that groups will complete assigned projects atdifferent rates allows the instructor to see which teams may be weak in their overall design andorganization skills.Included in the specifications of these small incremental designs is the requirement that eachgroup “paper design” their designs prior to committing them to a computer simulation scenario.This concept was suggested by one of the industry advisors who claimed that design engineersusually “jump” directly to the computer simulator without ever putting pencil to paper. Thisadvisor claimed that without initial preparation and forethought, designs take longer. It was alsosaid that this longer design time made for
such as biomedical or chemical engineeringwhile students who enrolled in Honors Innovation Experience are more likely to choose asystems-based engineering field such as mechanical or industrial engineering. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2021 2021 ASEE Midwest Section ConferenceOf the over -prepared students who choose to leave engineering after the first year,approximately half of the students select a major in a different college (e.g., arts and sciences,architecture, agricultural life sciences, business and education and health professions) while halfleave the University altogether. We have observed in the classroom that any student canstruggle. Just
automatic control systems for continuous processes for more than 29 years. He is the Dean of Research and Graduate Program with the School of Engineering and Sciences at Tecnol´ogico de Monterrey. His re- search areas are: fault diagnosis, monitoring systems, automotive control system and educational systems in engineering. Dr. Morales-Menendez is a member of the National Researchers System of Mexico Level II, the Mexican Academic of Sciences and the Engineering Academic of M´exico.Pedro Orta, Tecnologico de Monterrey (ITESM) Professor at Mechanical Engineeering Deparment at ITESM Campus Monterrey c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Virtual Teams in Engineering
calipers, dial calipers, thread gauges,feeler gauges,analog and digital multimeters.The first task given to ED&G 100 students is to develop a new product or material orimprove an existing product. Examples are given in class of past patented ideas and howsome companies have increased their markets simply by just making variations of theirexisting product line. The students are asked to present their ideas in the form of aproposal using MS Word. The proposal is graded for market feasibility and grammar.Once approved by the faculty, the students are required to perform an Internet search fora company that may be interested in their product idea and write a formal business letterintroducing their idea to that company. It is the intent of the
material in the following order: { Executive Summary, one page. { The required plots { The tabulated data, spreadsheet. { The typed discussion of results • State what each graph is a plot of • State what each graph shows in terms of what effect the independent variable has on the dependent variable. • Mention any significant observations or resultsThe final part of the computer work is to plot the results of the experiments. The results are mostmeaningful if the students are able to see the cycle net work superimposed on the plots ofcompressor work and turbine work. Since the scale is common to all three lines, the relativevalues of the numbers is obvious
Page 24.992.6agricultural engineering.Table 3: Major and average number of pre-college engineering activities Average number Major (number of respondents) of activities Electrical and Computer (37) 2.7 Interdisciplinary/Multidisciplinary (5) 2.4 Mechanical (81) 2.2 Nuclear (11) 2.2 Chemical (30) 2.1 Aeronautical and Astronautical (41) 2.0 Civil (18) 1.7 Biological and Food Process (6) 1.7 Undecided (10) 1.6 Materials (11
Paper ID #18751Lane Keeping System by Visual TechnologyMr. Tony Fan, Wayne State UniversityDr. Gene Yeau-Jian Liao, Wayne State University GENE LIAO is currently Director of the Electric-drive Vehicle Engineering and Alternative Energy Tech- nology programs and Professor at Wayne State University. He received a M.S. in mechanical engineering from Columbia University, and a doctor of engineering from University of Michigan, Ann Arbor. He has over 17 years of industrial practices in the automotive sector prior to becoming a faculty member. Dr. Liao has research and teaching interests in the areas of hybrid vehicles, energy
students actively in thelearning process. The faculty, full-time and adjunct alike, are experienced in theindustrial world, with many currently practicing at leading regional companies.They bring their relevant experience to the classroom, and often bring additionaltalent through guest speakers. Many modes of learning are used, fromconventional lecture and readings to the use of case studies, projects and panels.The course that is the basis of this paper has been offered for many years. It istitled “Technology Transfer and Contemporary Issues”. While the course hascovered much of the same theory over the years, the specific topics and situationshave changed dramatically. For example, most of the course material in the earlyyears related to
technology programs wish to share their experience. There will also be a20-minute report on the progress of the two courses discussed in the previous semester,which have started implanting the integration.Activities - Seminar 1The invitation for Seminar 1 was sent out two weeks after the first survey. The seminarwas hosted by a faculty member from the Mechanical Engineering Technology (MET)program. A MET course was used as an example to demonstrate the integration of smartmanufacturing elements (SME) through a presentation and discussion. Nine facultymembers attended the seminar in person, while six participated online.The course selected as the example was Materials and Processes 1, a first-year collegecourse required for all MET students and also
to the project during the summer, and this student initiates a literature search andbecomes familiar with the technical aspects of the project before the semester begins. 2 When the semester begins, undergraduate students are matched to projects based on theirranked project choices and on the needs of the project. The professor provides a briefintroduction to the project, and the students are required to read introductory material forfamiliarization. Early in the semester, typically in the second week, the team meets withindustry representatives who provide an overview of their industry as well as a description ofthe technical problem that is to be addressed. At this meeting, students