for NewSchools were equipped with the aid they needed to recruit and train new teachers and schoolleaders and to create new and innovative charter schools. b Other corporate entities like CapitalOne and Walmart also allocated money to either establish their own charter schools, donatemillions to other local and national non-profits operating in the area, or directly support the RSDin redesigning school plans.28Privatization of Engineering Education in New OrleansThe not for profit organization Building Louisiana Science & Technology (BLaST) was foundedin 2003 as a gateway for bringing science and technology programs to enrich the learningexperiences of Louisiana students.32 The organization is made up of members from industryacademia and
, programs to grow the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics(STEM) pipeline are a priority due to the fact that advancements and innovations in STEM fieldsare indicative of a growing and progressive society. Within the United States (US), an agingNational Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) and Department of Defense (DoD)workforce, as well as the need to create a more diverse STEM workforce, are impetuses foraccelerated efforts that focus upon STEM education and careers. Such efforts are alsocontinuously gaining traction in South Africa; a nation dedicated to overcoming the negativeeducation disparities that resulted from apartheid. As the result of a mutual interest in promotingSTEM education and careers among Kindergarten
. (2003). Introduction to the SCALE-UP (Student-Centered Activities for Large Enrollment Undergraduate Programs) Project. Proceeding of the International School of Physics.17. Haller, C.R., Gallagher, V.J., Weldon, T.L., & Felder, R.M. (2000). Dynamics of peer education in cooperative learning groups. Journal of Engineering Education, 89(3), 285-293.18. Biggs, J. & Tang, C. (2011). Teaching for quality learning at university (4th ed). Berkshire, England: Open University Press, McGraw-Hill Education (UK).19. Lopez, J.A., Love, C., & Watters, D. (2014). Clickers in biosciences: Do they improve academic performance? International Journal of Innovation in Science and Mathematics Education, 22, 26-41.20. Felder, R.M. &
environmental engineering, a depart- mental Scholars program allowing highly qualified students and accelerated program to earn their MSCE in addition to their BS degree, the interdisciplinary ideaLAB promoting innovation in engineering, and the cross-disciplinary MSCE/MBA and MSCE/JD dual-degree programs. Fridley has advised 32 masters and doctoral students to completion. His former students have moved into leadership positions in industry, public service, and academia.Dr. W. Edward Back, University of Alabama Professor, Dept. of Civil, Construction and Environmental Engineering Director, Center for Sustainable Infrastructure
Record Journal, International Journal of Construction Education and Research, Construction Manage- ment and Economics, an ASCE special publication on Alternative Project Delivery, Procurement, and Contracting Methods for Highways, and Handbook of Research on Pedagogical Innovations for Sustain- able Development. In addition to being an active reviewer for and serving in the editorial board of ASCE Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, Dr. Ozbek is a reviewer for many other journals and conference proceedings. He serves in four national committees related to construction and infras- tructure: (i) Transportation Research Board Maintenance and Operations Management Committee, (ii) ASCE Construction
with faculty to publish educational research. Her research interests primarily involve creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship education.D. Jake Follmer, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park D. Jake Follmer is a doctoral candidate in educational psychology at The Pennsylvania State University. His interests are in issues related to learning, assessment, and program evaluation. Page 26.31.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 A Cross-Sectional Study of Engineering Student Perceptions and Experiences Related to Global
course in which the abstract concepts aretaught. Similar to the UK laboratory exercises, the labs are very proscribed. Opportunities todemonstrate creativity in design are left for extracurricular design competitions and projects Page 26.153.6constructed in Innovation Centers. However, participation in the competitions and access to theInnovation Centers is limited to students with excellent grade point averages. IV. Descriptive and Proscribed Assessment of Student Learning ⊂ Assessment Technique Selected by Instructor ⊃ Proscribed Assessment (a) University of GlasgowThe contribution of the summative assessments for homework
available onlineare given to students to learn how to use the software. Audacity is also used to analyze theirfinal prototypes. Students generate a spectrum using Audacity and compare the location of thepeaks to the desired fundamental frequency. This helps them complete the design cycle byanalyzing the performance of the prototype.Their design prototypes are assessed based on a set of criteria: ability of each instrument toproduce multiple tones; overall quality of the track (a different weighting factor is used for eachsong based on its level of difficulty); tone quality produced by instruments (based on maximumpercent deviation from theoretical fundamental frequencies for high/low notes for eachinstrument); creativity and innovation; cost
was performed to guide the development of afreshmen year experience. A wide variety of freshmen engineering curricular design isavailable, and this paper is not intended as a review of these. Brannan and Wankat4 report on asurvey of first year programs, noting in particular that many innovative, large freshmen programsfocus on laboratory and design content.5-8 Several other specific examples will be mentioned inthe following sections.After reviewing the literature and the goals of the entire four year Mechanical Engineeringprogram, the faculty identified the main objectives of the freshmen year redesign. • Knowledge of the Mechanical Engineering Discipline: Introduce students to the field of mechanical engineering with the goal of
are confronted with a myriad ofbarriers and challenges to generate innovative ways for instructional effectiveness so theirprogram graduates are fully prepared to take on the many challenges twenty-first centuryengineers face. This presentation provides an overview and summary of leadership competenciesthat have been produced over the last 75 years and its relationship to engineering education.Some suggestions as to how these needed competencies may be implemented in engineeringprograms will be discussed.Workshop – 3Title: Green Lean ManufacturingPresenters: Engineers of the Texas Manufacturing Assistant Center at XXXWorkshop Abstract: This 90-minute workshop will introduce participants to the systems ofsystems attributes of Lean
a windmill designing project, aPeak Oil game, use of an “Energy Bike” that transforms pedal power into electricity, havebeen incorporated within many programs at Cabrillo and in the community. Examples are given below of ways that faculty may adopt other pieces of the curriculumas it fits their courses.Strategies transferable to regular courseworkDesign or invention of the day. Show a video of a new invention or research that haspotential to shift the way we do things or improve life. Due to the rapid pace oftechnological innovation many students will end up working
Paper ID #12973Institutionalizing Ethics: Historical Debates surrounding IEEE’s 1974 Codeof EthicsDr. Xiaofeng Tang, Penn State University Xiaofeng Tang is a postdoctoral fellow in engineering ethics at Penn State University. He received his PhD in Science and Technology Studies from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.Dr. Dean Nieusma, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Dean Nieusma is Associate Professor in Science and Technology Studies and Director of the Programs in Design and Innovation at Rensselaer. Page 26.977.1
. Brown Department of Electrical and Computer En- gineering and Vice Provost for Educational Innovation and Interdisciplinary Studies at the University of Virginia. He received the B.S.E.E. degree from the University of Texas, Austin, in 1991, and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the University of California, Santa Barbara in 1992 and 1997 respectively. He joined the faculty at the University of Virginia in 2007. Prior to this position, he was on the faculty at the University of Texas at Austin where he held the Lybarger Endowed Faculty Fellowship. His current research interests include the design of novel infrared optoelectronic devices and how instructional changes can help students more
. Joachim Walther, University of Georgia Dr. Walther is an assistant professor of engineering education research at the University of Georgia (UGA). He is a director of the Collaborative Lounge for Understanding Society and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER), an interdisciplinary research group with members from engineering, art, educational psychology and social work. His research interests range from the role of empathy in engineering students’ professional formation, the role of reflection in engineering learning, and interpretive research methodologies in the emerging field of engineering education research. His teaching focuses on innovative approaches to introducing systems thinking and
, an expanded version of the MOOC will be offered during Spring 2015.1. IntroductionDuring the past few years, many universities have developed and offered massive open onlinecourses (MOOCs) for a variety of reasons including outreach, extending access to education,promoting the university brand, increasing revenues, improving educational outcomes for bothMOOC participants and on-campus students, and conducting research on innovations in teachingand learning.1 MOOCs have the attractive characteristic of being able to reach thousands ofpeople per offering and may play an important role in higher education in the future. Mostuniversities do not offer official university credit through MOOCs, but participants often areeligible to receive a
years. Rachel works in a chemical engineering lab on campus, has held a co-op position at Davol, Inc. and will be completing another co-op with Entrega Biosciences.Ms. Emma Kaeli, Northeastern University Emma Kaeli is a second-year undergraduate student at Northeastern University, majoring in chemical engineering and pursuing a minor in mathematics. Outside of class, Kaeli works as a chemistry tutor and class grader, and she participates in undergraduate research in a materials science laboratory on campus. She also has held an engineering co-op position with Rogers Corporation’s Innovation Center.Ms. Kristen Barbara Coletti, Georgia Institute of Technology Kristen Coletti is recent graduate of Northeastern
experience would strengthen theties of community college faculty and students and community college and university faculty.25 Page 26.1576.11Rachel Hirst, et al, discuss a program at a four-year college for underrepresented communitycollege students that has the goal of increasing retention and transfer and to expand the capacityfor research for community college faculty. Two of the authors are professors at StonehillCollege and one of the professors is an associate professor at Massasoit Community College.The feature that stands out in this innovative program (unnamed in the article) is thecollaboration of community college faculty and the private
pace of lecture, lack ofreal-world application, and lack of meaning. For instance, when asked what she learned aboutdesign from Introduction to Engineering Design, she replies: R: Nothing. S: Ok R: Um, I learned more designing things probably playing with Legos and play dough when I was a kid. … It's that you're following the textbook steps on how to build it, But in fact what you're really, I think the whole what I learned was trial and error and planning. S: Mmhmm R: Not design. Design to me involves innovation and concept and there's supposed to be a message across like you're supposed to design something for purpose.Implicitly, the class (a group project to design a robotic
Paper ID #11993Tools for Transformation – How Engineering Education benefits from inter-active e-learning and the HumanitiesDr. Katarina Larsen, KTH - Royal Institute of Technology Katarina Larsen, researcher at KTH - Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden. Experience from teaching and course development in Engineering Education at Masters level and graduate courses level in areas of Organizational Studies. Ongoing research interests includes studies of institutional change, science and innovation policy, and sustainability in engineering education.Mr. Johan Gustav G¨ardebo, KTH Royal Institute of Technology Johan G¨ardebo
-confidence inteaching that subject, it is important to provide teachers with targeted professional developmentto bolster their skills as well as their confidence.MethodologyPilot Programs 2007 to 2010 Page 26.1259.7CCBC’s first pilot PLTW PD program was launched during the 2007/8 school year through agrant from the Technology and Innovation in Manufacturing and Engineering (TIME) Center, aNSF ATE regional center, and with the support of UMBC. The pilot program was designed tobuild technical competence and classroom confidence in Baltimore County middle and highschool teachers in the use of Inventor and fischertechnik, which were required for
a detailed description of the two-way exchange program and summarize resultsfrom a systematic analysis of five reflective learning prompts that were administered to thestudent participants throughout the program (i.e., 1 pre-program, 3 mid-program, and 1 post-program). As further background for these efforts, we summarize relevant prior literaturediscussing strategies for scaffolding and assessing learning outcomes, both in general andspecifically in the context of global engineering programs. Based on our preliminary results, wealso discuss both benefits and challenges associated with this innovative programmaticimplementation. Furthermore, we propose directions for improvement, with an emphasis onstudent recruitment, faculty involvement