learners. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Syllabi Indicators of Learning Community Supports in Civil Engineering ClassroomsAbstractLearning communities in formal educational settings act as support systems for students,facilitating increased motivation, student success, and feelings of belonging. Learningcommunities can be compromised by instructional conditions due to institutional, national, orglobal disruptions, leaving students vulnerable to being disconnected from their peers andinstructors. This study explored the impact of a disruption on instructor facilitation of learningcommunities. The research question was: “How does a disruption impact instructor
students mustdemonstrate “an ability to communicate effectively with a range of audiences.” And ABET SO #5states “an ability to function effectively on a team whose members together provide leadership,create a collaborative and inclusive environment, establish goals, plan tasks, and meet objectives.”Therefore by the end of the program, engineering students must be able to engage and interact witha wide range of audiences verbally or in written communication.The written and oral communication assignments implemented in this foundational engineeringcourse create a context for technical communication in the discipline. These assignmentsencompass elements of technical writing with a clear purpose, an audience in mind, logicallyutilized format and
engineering-related identities may form. Professor David Beach, the Director of thePRL explains that: “learning [in the PRL] aims to engage the whole student through a process ofall-in creation” [13, p.4].Stanford students join the PRL community through research, personal projects, and roughly 35courses that use the space each year. A primary gateway into the PRL is ME203:“Design andManufacturing,” a longstanding course in which students practice designing and making througha series of hands-on labs (e.g., milling, turning, sand casting, forming, welding) and thedevelopment, design, and fabrication of an individual project. Projects are encouraged to bemeaningful to each student and range widely from, for example, “Cezve,” a machined Turkishcoffee
/essential-learning-outcomes, retrieved 19 December 2019.[3] H. P. Sjursen, “The new alliance between engineering and humanities educators,” Glob. J. Engng. Educ, vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 135—139, 2015.[4] B. Al-Sheeb, M. Abdulwahed, and A. Hamouda, “Impact of first-year seminar on student engagement, awareness, and general attitudes toward higher education,” Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, vol 10 (1) pp. 15-30, 2017.[5] D. Budny, “Integrating the freshman Seminar and Freshman Problem Solving Courses,” proceedings of the 31st Frontiers in Education Conference, October 10-13, 2001, Reno NV, 2001.[6] National Academy of Engineering, “Understanding the Educational Careers and Pathways of Engineers,” National
engaging with the idea of exploring afunding opportunity. Other times, an intriguing Program Solicitation (e.g., NSF), Request forApplications (NIH), Broad Agency Announcement (DOD), Funding Opportunity Announcement(DOE), or another communication piece from funding agencies may aid in the generation of ideasfrom which proposal development coalesces from various seemingly unconnected pieces already inplace within the collaborating team. Ultimately, the pre-proposal submission process iscomplicated, highly non-linear, very interactive, and driven by the continued fuel from ideas byteam members. We argue that such a rich process is, at the same time, navigable and majorlysuccessful due to this driving force centered on teamwork, which requires a
active and collaborative learning in engineering education. Eleanor has a B.S in Electrical Engineering from the University of Calgary and both a M.Eng and a Ph.D in Electrical Engineering from McMaster University. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 An Undergraduate Independent Study Project on the Design of a Home Automation System using Global System for Mobile CommunicationAbstractThis paper explores how to expose undergraduate students to topics in wireless communicationsthrough an independent study in the area of Global System for Mobile Communication (GSM)technology.With a rigorous Electrical and Computer
stoppedcomplaining because it did not result in change. Felder, for example, did not institute discussionabout gender issues within groups and did not provide any additional team dynamics training inresponse to the students’ complaints. We believe that understanding informal communicationexperiences are critical to understanding why there are not more women in engineering. Haller, Gallagher, Weldon, and Felder 8 took a different approach to studying a specificaspect of informal oral communication. They focused on the interactional dynamics amongstudents engaged in group problem-solving sessions, using conversational analysis to identifytwo types of teaching interactions: transfer-of-knowledge sequences and collaborative sequences.They recorded the
doctorate in Engineering Education from Virginia Tech where she was the first to graduate from the program. Her creative passion for teaching introductory engineering and design coursework through a ”learn-by-doing,” hands-on approach is focused on inspiring student success and innovation. From her many varied instructional and professional development experiences, she believes in the power of communication, collaboration and community for a brighter healthier future. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Emergency Transition of Intro Communication and Design Course to Remote TeachingAbstractDue to the COVID-19 induced
Session 2425Role of the Community in Teaching Undergraduate Engineering Design James C. Squire, D. Todd Smith Virginia Military InstituteAbstract: The local communities surrounding universities provide a wealth of opportunities forengineering students to practice engineering design while making real contributions that affectpeople’s lives. Such design projects also directly address ABET EC2000 criteria that studentsshould understand the impact of engineering in a societal context. This article identifies severalsources within the community that supply engineering problems suited for
onthe types of support and professional development needed to adequately prepare teachers todeliver the new curriculum. The SLIDER Fellows are an integral part of this professionaldevelopment, spending one day each week in a classroom with the SLIDER teacher, and so it isessential to determine the Fellows’ impact on curriculum implementation and teacherdevelopment. Our purpose in studying factors such as power distribution, ways teachers andFellows interact, and interdependence is to discover ways to leverage positive aspects of theteacher-Fellow relationship and identify and improve any difficulties so Fellows will have thegreatest impact possible in the classroom, both in their interactions with students and withteachers.Fellows Programs
becomes more common.What was once two different communities of researchers has blended into a singular communityof practice centered around engineering education research.Figure 2. Journal use of Methods, between 2009-2018Theme 2: Topics of Focus Over Time As shown in Table 4, commonly frequent topics across both EEJs and OEJs across the 10years of publication were student content knowledge (8.6%, 10%, respectively), the impact ofthe engineering design process on student learning (8.0%, 8.2%), and impact of specificcurriculum implementation on teacher/student understanding of engineering (6.3%, 7.1%). Onthe other hand, EEJs publications were heavily focused on the application of science andengineering practices (13.1%), whereas OEJs
, and node and label size is based on term centrality within the network. Thecolor and width of edges represent the frequency of word cooccurrence between responses.Figure 2 Filtered network of terms used to respond to the why prompt. Node and edge colorsreflect communities, and node and label size is based on term centrality within the network. Thecolor and width of edges represent the frequency of word cooccurrence between responses.DiscussionThese results provide a novel way of exploring how engineering students conceive of ethics, andthis research could be used to facilitate ethics education.Regarding examples of unethical behaviors, “company” was the most used and central term,followed by “people,” “public,” and “product” (Figure 3). Since
students participate in the same extent, some ofthem due to positive deactivating emotions, such as relaxation or relief [9], that maygenerate variability in the engagement level of the whole group.As a response to the need of boosting engagement in students, several authors have studiedthe use of technology during classes, finding empirical evidence of a positive impact instudents’ engagement when using technology within blended learning methodologies [10].Particularly in Mathematics, literature shows that use of technology enables learning toextend beyond the classroom, contributing to a better communication, collaboration, andexploration of new topics [11]. However, other studies have also found that technology inexcess may decrease student
in the College of Engineering at Texas A&M University. She also serves as Director of the Craig and Galen Brown Engineering Honors Program. She received her BS, MS, and PhD from the College of Engineering at Texas A&M. Kristi works to improve the undergraduate engineering experience through evaluating preparation in areas, such as mathematics and physics, evaluating engineering identity and its impact on retention, incorporating non-traditional teaching methods into the classroom, and engaging her students with interactive methods. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019 Hands-on Exposure to Unconventional Applications of Aerospace at the High
about program level results, but does notcompile or influence the program level assessment data collection or analysis. Finally, the authoris an alumna of the department, but expanded on that experience with a graduate degree fromanother institution and industry experience before returning as a faculty member to thedepartment.Defining Educational Outcomes and Performance IndicatorsThe department has adopted student outcomes that are identical to the ABET Student Outcomesincluding the focus of this paper, outcome 3, “an ability to communicate effectively with a rangeof audiences,”[2]. While this does meet the minimum requirements for accreditation, it does notfollow best practices as recommended by ABET. Evaluating the program using the
leadership and policy. His research and teaching interests in engineering education include first-year engineering pedagogy and problem-based learning. His professional areas of expertise include technical project management and technology strategy. He advises the Dean of Engineering on strategy and is Communications Director for the School of Engineering. He is past-Chair of the First-year Programs Division of ASEE and member of ASEM. Page 23.705.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Implementing a Student-Suggested Course in Engineering Career
Paper ID #36739Caregiver-Child Communication of STEM concepts withEngineering Design Tasks (Fundamental)Amber Simpson (Assistant Professor) Amber Simpson is a Assistant Professor of Mathematics Education in the Teaching, Learning and Educational Leadership Department at Binghamton University. Her research interests include (1) examining individual’s identity(ies) in one or more STEM disciplines, (2) understanding the role of making and tinkering in formal and informal learning environments, and (3) investigating family engagement in and interactions around STEM-related activities. Before joining BU, she completed a
communication skills andprowess from engineering practitioners we observed on-site. Confirming this finding, asurvey deployed simultaneously, polling a different set of alumni engineering graduates(N=162)13, confirmed our on-site findings. Communication skills are the top demand andmost prized skill in engineering.The Studied Engineers Also Call for Better Engineering CommunicationAs instructors, we are in the unique position to be teaching graduate students who arealso practicing professionals in various engineering enterprises. For admission to theUW-Madison engineering graduate programs that employ us, students must be at leastfour years into their career paths. They work for organizations big and small, private andpublic, including automotive
profound connection between identity and practice. Developing a practice requires the formation of a community whose members can engage with one another and thus acknowledge each other as participants. As a consequence, practice entails the negotiation of ways of being a person in that context. … In this sense, the formation of a community of practice is also the negotiation of identities.‖35Along these lines, the retention of students in engineering can be viewed as moving studentstoward full membership in the engineering community of practice, including facilitating theirpersonal identification with engineering.The question then becomes, how can the entry into the engineering community of practice befacilitated? One
students different social identities, it's important to recognize that we all have more than one. in cases where the students are in more than one minoritized category, we have to consider intersectionality, which we will also address in more detail in a few slides.Project Context Computing Identity Development for Latin* Students ▪ Engagement and centeredness with Latin* communities was important for transfer students(Herrera & Sanchez, 2022) ▪ Few scholars have directly addressed the experiences of Latin* students and STEM identity, let alone the disaggregation by computing discipline, specifically within Hispanic-serving community college settings
Senior Design in the fall 2013, and wetracked and observed their progress from sophomore design to senior design. Our hope was thatthe results would justify full implementation into other ECE courses by the fall of 2014.This paper describes the process we followed to implement this emphasis on oralcommunication. This paper also presents a comparison of oral communication performancebefore and after the emphasis on oral communications was implemented. Data collected is frommeasurement tools put in place six years ago for ABET Student Outcome reporting.IntroductionThe Electrical and Computer Engineering (ECE) department and the Communication Across theCurriculum (CAC) program worked together on a three-year research project to study the impact
similarities and use this awareness to develop stronger relationships.2. Develop professional skills such as team working, communication, leadership, etc.3. Familiarize students with the technical jargon used in each nation in their respective language.4. To build strong working relationships among UTEP and CETYS faculty participating in the program.5. Learn about the challenges of sustainability in the modern world.6. Use life cycle assessment as a technique to measure environmental impact of infrastructures, processes, or services.7. Understand the principles of design for sustainability, with an emphasis on the built environment.8. Be involved in community-driven
Effectiveness (CATME) TeamMaker tool [8], [9]. This tool optimizes students out-of-class schedules and creates diverse teamswithout isolating minoritized students. In these groups, students were encouraged to rotateassigned roles regularly, participate as engaging and contributing members, and focus oncommunication. They were also given explicit instruction on how to practically enact thoseeffective teaming behaviors.Teams of students were selected for a in-depth study based on the average variation of students’in a team responses on a quantitative survey measuring their attitudes about diversity. Weselected teams with low and high variance in diversity attitudes as well as teams with low andhigh mean diversity sensitivity. This process was done to
were giving autonomy to design their workshop schedule, select appropriate process and materials to achieve their creative expression. c. As the design challenge was presented at the beginning of the module students were given a scaffolded incubation period.2. Communication and Expression – Moving from the traditional deliverables of a predefined, prescribed practical artefact, requires a defining of not only the narrative skills to communicate your creative inspiration and design but also the defining of what is deemed appropriate deliverables. With the emphasis on both the mastery of craft skills and creative expression it is important that the mode and medium used to respond to the task is
Paper ID #13357Ideologies of depoliticization in engineering education: A Mediated DiscourseAnalysis of student presentations in a first year projects courseKevin O’Connor, University of Colorado Boulder Kevin O’Connor is assistant professor of Educational Psychology and Learning Sciences at the University of Colorado Boulder. His scholarship focuses on human action, communication, and learning as socio- culturally organized phenomena. A major strand of his research explores the varied trajectories taken by students as they attempt to enter professional disciplines such as engineering, and focuses on the dilem- mas
-yearCornerstone of Engineering course to address the need for building communication skills forfirst-year engineering students [10]. Even though this skill can be taught and assessed, the resultsof past surveys show that engineering students are inadequately equipped to meet this need. TheUniversity of Houston has a Technical Communication for Engineers class that focuses onengineering communication skills including written proposals, specifications, progress reports,technical reports, individual and group oral presentations, essays on engineering ethics,contemporary engineering issues, and the impact of engineering decisions [11]. Duke Universityoffers an Engineering Design & Technical Communication class for first-year students [12].Sorby and
and High SchoolsAbstractIncreasing diversity among engineering technology programs is a target by most colleges anduniversities. In an effort to raise STEM awareness and generate interest among underrepresentedgroups and to enroll more students from high schools, a team from xxxxx campus has designedand conducted a series of hands-on activities at a local urban high school starting in fall 2021.The activities that have been put into practice encompass topics related to mechanical andelectrical engineering technology. These include materials, manufacturing, hydraulics, electriccircuits, and programming. Students nurture their STEM interest through engaging in hands-onpractice in the areas of materials processing, data analysis, and model
research. While many programs share results with those in theirown community by means of conferences, presentations, and articles; more extensivedissemination would broaden the impact of NSF grant findings and other similar research efforts.The WEPAN Knowledge Center Professional Community is an online solution to addresschallenges such as dissemination and additional issues such as sharing information on grantsreceived, best practices in doing research and designing programs, and building a space forcommunity interaction.(4 screen shots and graphics to illustrate this section have been omitted because they containidentifying information about the authors/organization which cannot be removed; they will beinserted into the final paper, should the
engineering project management while immersed intheir role as PMs. They are responsible for setting agendas, ensuring quality of deliverables,setting deadlines, and managing conflicts. Several studies have revealed that in industry, the roleproject managers take have significant impact on project success [1], [2] and that teamwork waspositively correlated with project performance. Project success can be achieved with strongercollaboration, team cohesiveness, and team communication [1]. However, project management israrely discussed or taught in undergraduate engineering programs. In this paper, we analyze how upper-class PMs influence first-year students’ perceptionson team dynamics and stress as they go through their semester long design
experience and interest in interactive teaching. We define interactive teachingbroadly to include teaching that moves beyond lecture to engaging students in working with thecontent during class. This could include strategies as simple as a think-pair-share questions, shortitems with clicker response systems used during lecture or entirely flipped classrooms wherestudents spend the majority of class time working on tasks individually or collaboratively. Wefocus on the development of a community defined as “the development of a shared identityaround a topic or set of challenges. It represents a collective intention - however tacit anddistributed - to steward a domain of knowledge and sustain learning about it.” [1] (p. 9)ProjectOur lessons learned