Undergraduate Security Project Garry Ingles and Aaron Carpenter {inglesg, carpentera1}@wit.edu Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering Wentworth Institute of TechnologyRecent studies have shown new opportunities for the integration of cybersecurity courses andprojects into Electrical and Computer Engineering (and related) departments. This is followingthe growth of the field in both industry and research. While past research discusses what does anddoesn’t work, from the perspective of faculty and the department, they leave out an importantviewpoint by not including the perspective of the student researcher.In this work, the authors fill that knowledge
biomedical case studies exclusively, and eventhe helpful guide for administrators published by the Council of Graduate Schools in 2006,Graduate Education for the Responsible Conduct of Research, was developed from a project totrain graduate students from the behavioral and medical sciences.24 Whitbeck has recently(2004) presented guidelines on authorship and encourages the development of “field-specific andinstitution-specific” ways of working out differences on publication questions.25 And Loui’sdiscussion of plagiarism (2002) has focused attention on what constitutes plagiarism in variousfields. Loui presents guidelines for defining plagiarism, including the finding that “quotingoneself is not plagiarism,” but he also observes that “[d]ifferent
University of North Carolina at CharlotteAbstractThe authors of this study conducted a critical review of common measures of college studentsocial engagement as well as the research literature on the role of peer-oriented socialengagement in predicting retention and academic performance of engineering students. Theanalyses revealed limited evidence of reliability and validity of social engagement measures.Related to the importance of peer-related social engagement for student success, engineering orSTEM-related social engagement was more frequently observed as a significant variable thannon-engineering related/general social engagement. The construct of social engagement is alsofound to be more important among traditionally underrepresented groups
and Major GRE scoresQualifying exam completion (PhD) – Assessing preparation for graduate research and outcome #1 Core coursework fulfillment and classroom performance Written & oral exam performanceComprehensive exam completion (PhD) – Assessing outcomes #2 and #3 Comprehensive Exam Rubric (in preliminary stages of implementation)Doctoral defense and dissertation (PhD) – Assessing all outcomes Graduate Learner Outcomes Dissertation RubricPlan of study and annual progress review – Assessing outcome #4 Time to completion of the PhD Publication Record AwardsAlumni follow-up – Assessing Outcomes #4
maintaining these relationships. In addition to their research mentoringrelationships, they also have to balance their personal and professional life, while carrying outtheir research. Because of their many responsibilities, it is not surprising that graduate studentsoften have a poor work-life balance, which has been linked to their poor mental health status [6].This decline in mental health can negatively impact their ability to carry out their work andpersist within their program [7], while simultaneously impacting their overall self-awareness.The increase in studies within the last five years shows that graduate students’ mental andphysical wellness is a growing problem [6], [8], [9], [10]. Even though graduate students are inmentoring
: Assistant Professor of Civil Engineering, Purdue University North Central (2013 - Present) Engineering Intern, Watrous Associates Architects, (2011 - 2013) Graduate Research and Teaching Assistant, University of Louisville, (2006 - 2011) Tata Bluescope Steel Ltd Designation: Design Manager Publications: Desai, N., & McGinley, W.M. ”A study of the out-of-plane performance of brick veneer wall systems in medium rise buildings under seismic loads.” Engineering Structures 48 (2013) 683 694. Desai, N., & McGinley, W.M. ”Effects of brick veneer wall systems loaded in-plane on the seismic re- sponse of medium rise buildings.” Proc. The 12th Canadian Masonry Symposium, Vancouver, Canada, June 2013. Awards
participants to pursue graduate studies in science, technology, engineering andmathematics (STEM) programs. The NSF Engineering Research Centers (ERC) Program, whichis designed to foster multi-institutional, interdisciplinary, and systems-oriented approach tocollaborative research, is a favorable environment for development of a rich REU experience.Following completion of a successful three-year REU program at Virginia Tech and theUniversity of Puerto Rico Mayaguez (UPRM), CPES successfully proposed a three-yearcontinuation of the program at both universities. During this period, CPES also sought tobroaden its approach to the REU program goal of expanding linkages to curriculums designed toincrease participation of students from under-represented
publications relevant to leadership needs within civil engineering.This pilot study will provide a framework to complete a larger analysis across numerousengineering disciplines in an effort to address LEAD strategic initiative four.Since the target audience and primary authors of professional society’s publications includeacademics and practitioners within that society’s field, this research will use professionalsocieties’ publications as an assumed representative sampling of the opinions of academic andindustry professionals in the discipline of civil engineering. This pilot research begins withusing ASCE literature representing the discipline of civil engineering due to the large number ofjournals which include journals specifically related to
for a REEFE at Cal Poly University, a teaching-focused institution. Their experiencerepresents our final data collection for this project. As the project winds down, we are workingon papers that will present our research findings from two studies. The purpose of the first studywas to gain feedback from stakeholders in the engineering education academic community onthe current state of professional development opportunities for engineering education graduatestudents. To this end, we conducted a qualitative study using the action research model todetermine essential characteristics and opportunities for improvement as they relate to theprofessional development of engineering education graduate students. From these results, wegenerated four key
project gives students a unique opportunity to undertake a research projectsimilar to that which would be expected in a Masters level program. This allows preparing to bemore successful as they move onto graduate research studies. Throughout the year, studentssubmit periodic progress reports and give presentations summarizing their research efforts,current problems, and future directions, providing an opportunity for real-time feedback andtailored guidance leading to more successful project outcomes. The undergraduate students whoworked on the projects not only completed their research project goals, but also submittedabstracts of their work to international research conferences, and two students extended theirresearch as NSF Research Experience
be used by graduate students for further research in noise and vibrations in electric motors. This Special Problem is in progress at the writing of the paper.IV. ADVANTAGES OF SPECIAL PROBLEMS USED FOR UNDERGRADUATE RESEARCH After making intensive use of ELEG 488V − Special Problem for approximately two years,the following advantages are perceived:Advantages for the undergraduate students• Improved motivation: In general, these undergraduate students seem to improve their motivations for their studies leading to better grades in other courses.• Ability to perform independent (research) work: Students have an opportunity to find resources, innovate and come up with ideas which are part elegance and
). Page 15.289.3 BS/MS thesis vs nonthesis option BS/MS thesis vs BS/MS nonthesis option thesis students 0.0% 20.0% 40.0% 60.0% Figure 1. Percentage of BS/MS students choosing thesis versus non-thesis optionUpon initiation of the BS/MS program in mechanical engineering, the goal was to retain the topundergraduate students at Georgia Tech to pursue graduate studies. The hope was that many ofthese students could be introduced to research, work closely with a faculty member, andpreferably choose the master’s thesis
I am a PhD student in Educational Leadership and policy studies with emphasis in higher education. I earned his Bachelor’s degree in Industrial and Systems Engineering and Master’s degree in Engineering Management both from Florida International University. I worked in companies such as CommerceBank, Johnson & Johnson, Electrolux and others as part of the operations, quality control, quality assurance and management teams. I started working at the office of Community College Research and Policy (OCCRP) as a Graduate Research Assistant in February 2009. I am currently working on a National Science Foundation funded project entitled the Pathway2STEM as Project Manager. I am also working in the Biomedical
goals for this course are: (1) to provide a general approach to scientificresearch and graduate school preparation, and (2) to prepare the students for the subsequentEngineering Honors laboratory experience course, ES 4580 Undergraduate Research (again,cross listed across the college), or for Honor’s students as either HP 4975 (Independent Study) orthrough the undergraduate research course number in the students home department.. Thesebroad goals were then separated into individual learning objectives as reflected below. Two required textbooks will be used for the course: The Craft of Research by Booth,Colomb and Williams[17], and The Craft of Scientific Presentation by Alley.[18] In addition,On Being a Scientist: Responsible Conduct in
undergraduate researchinto the curriculum has been extremely positive and well supported. Industry has anacademic collaborative partner with resources available for projects. Other departmentson campus view our lab as a new untapped resource available for future collaboration.Industry certifications are becoming key elements to the curriculum to bring the hardwork of the students and faculty to fruition. Students are now getting back into thelaboratory prior to graduation to take part in this research effort while improving theirtechnical skills. The advantages continue for a student beyond undergraduate leveltaking them into research careers, graduate studies and professional testing labs.Works CitedAbudayyeh, Osama, “Undergraduate Research Mentoring
students Academic success classes and seminars (e.g., study skills and test-taking techniques, resume workshop) A student mentorship program where sophomore, junior, and senior peer volunteers are assigned to Regents’ Scholars to meet with them throughout the semester and provide encouragement, advice, and support National and state-wide scholarships to further support students’ education and on-time graduation Professional development and industries mentorship • Halliburton Engineering Global Programs (HEGP, engineering.tamu.edu/academics/global/index.html) o Develops and
operating rooms. Details on these courses can be found on our website.viiObservationsWe have found in all of our graduate programs that industry has the need for applied engineeringleadership programs. These needs may be “unarticulated”, however, and it takes experiencedprofessionals to sort out the needs from the fads. Our experienced adjunct faculty and industryadvisors have done an excellent job at identifying the real needs, and of transforming ideas intopractice. This is particularly true in the area of medical device graduate education. In fact,students have also helped in shaping the program. The clinical studies class, for example,emerged as a need that was identified by students who wanted structured learning in this topic.One large
home. He speculated that students, for whom English was a second language,may fear being placed into what they may have perceived to be undesirably ESL streams. Nochanges were made to our survey, but this was noted as a possible source of error.Education Graduate StudentsAn early study model was brought to a survey research graduate class for discussion. Based ontheir suggestions, we acknowledged that exposure should be considered as a modifier andsubsequently added the third research question to our survey.Engineering Undergraduate StudentsTwo senior undergraduate students were asked to give feedback on the survey. Their majorcomment was to shorten the survey in order to improve the sustained engagement of participants.Cognitive
Session_______ “The Use of Six Sigma to Improve The Quality of Engineering Education” Mira Lalovic, Richard L. Shell, Ali A. Houshmand Graduate Student, Department of Mechanical and Industrial Engineering, University ofCincinnati / Professor of Department of Mechanical and Industrial University Engineering, University of Cincinnati / Dean of Goodwin College of Evening and Professional Studies, Drexel UniversityIntroductionOne of the most powerful business strategies for improving quality is Six Sigma, a breakthroughmethodology [25]. If
conceptual framework of culturally responsive pedagogy and andragogy for teaching diverse populations of students in virtual learning environments. Dr. Rigden earned her Doctor of Education in Educational Leadership with a concentration in Teacher Education in Multicultural Societies from the University of Southern California. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021AbstractThis presentation illustrates the creation of the WEM3UR (Women in EngineeringMulti-Mode Mentoring and Undergraduate Research) Program to increase therecruitment, retention and graduation of female engineering students through amentoring network that includes undergraduate research engagement
given theresearcher’s role as the “instrument” of analysis [21]. Just as in technical engineering whereinstudents are taught to consider how their instrumentation might affect the system they are tryingto measure; narrative researchers must consider how their identities influence not just theanalysis of the data but also its collection. For example, in a study focused on gathering theexperiences of graduate students, a researcher should consider that students are more likely toshare their authentic thoughts and experiences when interviewed by a peer as opposed to afaculty member around whom their communications are likely to be more restrained. Thus, evenbefore the interview, the difference in status between the interviewer and interviewee
Solver When facing an engineering problem, the engineer produces solutions that properly address critical issues and assumptions and that are conceptually and contextually valid. Designer When facing an engineering design challenge, the engineer develops designs that satisfy stakeholder needs while complying with important implementation, societal, and other constraints. Researcher When conducting applied research, the engineer designs and conducts studies that yield defensible results and answer important applicable research questions. Interpersonal Roles
University. One of his current research projects, sponsored by Louisiana Board of Regents and the Department of Defense (DoD) is on "High Temperature Materials Research: Study of Elastic Anomaly and Grain Agglomeration Features in the Superalloy IN738LC." His research work has been primarily on mechanical characterization of engineering materials, and impact damage of polymer composite materials. His past funded research projects have been from the Louisiana Board of Regents, National Science Foundation, DoD, the Louisiana Space Consortium (LaSPACE), and private industries. His has over 30 publications in the related areas. In addition to research, he is also a recognized expert in minority
Paper ID #16374Integrating Case Studies in an Online Asynchronous Learning Environment:An Empirical Study to Evaluate the Effect on Community College StudentLearning Outcomes and Engagement when Case Studies are Presented UsingVirtual RealityDr. Kapil Chalil Chalil Madathil, Clemson University Dr. Kapil Chalil Madathil’s area of expertise is in applying the knowledge base of human factors en- gineering to the design and operation of human-computer systems that involve rich interactions among people and technology. His research covers the entire spectrum of system design: from identifying the user needs to designing and
, andperceptions in grading complex academic work.3. Research Objectives and Questions3.1. Research ObjectivesThe primary goal of this research is to evaluate the potential of AI-assisted grading systems,explicitly using ChatGPT, for assessing theoretical and research-based assignments inundergraduate and graduate courses. This study focuses on five key objectives: evaluating theefficiency of AI-assisted grading compared to traditional human grading, analyzing itsconsistency in applying rubrics uniformly, exploring its fairness by identifying potentialbiases, assessing the quality of feedback it provides, and understanding the perceptions ofeducators and students regarding its advantages and limitations.3.2. Research QuestionsThe study aims to answer
AC 2007-2555: REDESIGNING A MAJOR: A CASE STUDY OF A CHANGINGCURRICULUMJonathan Bougie, American UniversityPhilip Johnson, American UniversityNathan Harshman, American UniversityTeresa Larkin, American UniversityMichael Black, American University Page 12.1232.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Redesigning a Major: A Case Study of a Changing CurriculumAbstractThis paper presents a case study of a significant change and reorientation in the curriculum andcourse progression of a physics program at a national university. Faculty designed this newcurriculum based on comparative research of 22 undergraduate programs in physics. Data fromthis study includes
differences, it is important to have cultural training and to experience anotherculture in that particular country. One of the best ways for students to experience another cultureis to take part in a study abroad course and to immerse themselves in another country’s traditionsand customs. The Commission on the Abraham Lincoln Fellowship Study Abroad ProgramReport concluded, “What nations don’t know can hurt them. The stakes involved in study abroadare that simple, that straightforward, and that important. For their own future and that of thenation, college graduates today must be internationally competent.”5Not only should graduates be internationally competent, research indicates links betweenstudying abroad and improved graduation rates, as well as
organized by the University's Office ofResearch and Advanced Studies. Assessment indicates that participants, both faculty andstudents, are uniformly enthusiastic about the Workshop. Current goals for the program includemaking the Workshop available to more graduate students and offering follow-up "refresher"Workshops to previous participants.2. A Survey of Mentoring ProgramsCurrently there are many initiatives to provide mentoring to women students in science andengineering. These include, for example, • organizations such as WEPAN1, the Association for Women in Mathematics3, the Computing Research Association’s Committee W (CRA-W) 4, and SYSTERS5, which provide information on the web and through publications, sponsor Workshops on
to encourage and enable academically talented but financially needy studentsto complete STEM degrees and enter the workforce. The SIIRE project addresses NSF’sprogrammatic goal by integrating external (industry supported) intern or co-op experiences ofstudents with ongoing on-campus engineering research activities to provide a guided pathway toa graduate engineering degree. The requested scholarship funds defray student educational costsduring their sophomore, junior, and senior years of undergraduate study and during 1.5 years oftheir graduate studies.The SIIRE program addresses the following objectives:1. To provide underrepresented and financially needy undergraduate students with information on the benefits and opportunities associated
, vol. 42, no. 5, pp. 518– 560, 2005.[11] B. Prayoonsri, S. Tatsirin, D. Suntorapot, and C. Jariya, “Factors affecting higher order thinking skills of students: A meta-analytic structural equation modeling study,” Educational Research and Reviews, vol. 10, no. 19, pp. 2639–2652, 2015.[12] M. E. Yigermal, “The Determinants of Academic Performance of Under Graduate Students: In the Case of Arba Minch University Chamo Campus,” Advances in Sciences and Humanities, vol. 3, no. 4, p. 35, 2017.[13] G. E. Okudan and S. Mohammed, “Task gender orientation perceptions by novice designers: implications for engineering design research, teaching and practice,” Design Studies, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 723–740, 2006.[14] M. W. Ohland, C. E. Brawner, M