ScienceFoundation’s (NSF) Division for Research on Learning in Formal and Informal Settings for aprogram known as the Innovative Technology Experiences for Students and Teachers. Myproposal, Learning through Engineering Design and Practicei, intended to provide middleschool students with in-depth experiences with engineering-related and project-basedchallenges.i This material is based upon work supported by the Learning through Engineering Design and Practice,National Science Foundation Award# 0737616, Division of Research on Learning in Formal and InformalSettings, under Information Technology Experiences for Students and Teachers (ITEST) Youth-based Project.Opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the
to reflect on the experience to promote new learning. 25 Instructional game designersaccomplish these goals by asking students to make choices in the game based on their existingunderstanding of the particular context, allowing them to see the consequences of those actions,motivating them to find the additional information needed to improve these choices (informationliteracy), and encouraging them to collaborate and learn from each other.26,27The Shortfall GameWe use the game Shortfall, developed by researchers at Northeastern University. The goal for Page 15.208.4Northeastern’s project is to create an innovative tool to educate future
community. For example, it is argued that successfultechnical innovations introduced by engineers require social development including improvedgovernance systems, training in entrepreneurship, access to credit and a supporting policyenvironment to facilitate adoption, diffusion and sustainability10. In a recent study by Richter andParetti, the authors analyzed papers presented at the 2007 American Society for EngineeringEducation conference and found 86 papers considered interdisciplinary issues12. The authorsconclude that the complexity of contemporary engineering projects require skills that go beyondthose of a single discipline and require that engineers develop expertise in interdisciplinary work.Furthermore, in a study conducted by the authors
innovations. Similarly the 1970’s and 80’s produced abody of research focused on teacher’s concerns and viewpoints, which has had a similarly lowimmediate impact on educational practice. The article suggests that the educational research lacks thesocio-political ‘authority’ to bring about systematic reform. Regardless of the reason it is clear thatresearch in the field of education has not produced a history of usefulness for educators.Our particular situation is complicated further in that we have a long time scale, one semester per year,and low numbers, 12-30 students per year. This has made it difficult to conduct true rigorous controlledexperiments. Additionally our assessments have been performed on extra-credit assignments where
ispossible through the proper use of instructional technology. Sound innovative? Sounds new? Notreally, these types of techniques have been used for many years at the United States MilitaryAcademy and probably at most schools at the turn of the century. Hands-on models were oncethe corner stone of every class in mechanics, but many classrooms today are only equipped witha textbook, a chalkboard (if lucky), and a computer projection system. Is this enough? No! Howcan faculty return to a style in today’s classrooms that is more conducive to student-centeredlearning? This paper will present the daily classroom activities in a basic Mechanics course (andother courses as well) that greatly improve the quality of the instruction and student
all aspects oftechnology, the issue of the quality of undergraduate education delivered to futureengineers/educators has hardly ever been as pronounced.In this highly information technology (IT) driven era, the challenge for engineering schools and theireducators is to provide the needed brain power and innovation not only to information-basedcompanies, but also to those that operate in what we might call the “old economy”- the companiesthat make “things” rather than just move information. [1] Page 7.768.2Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002
education.He was the founding Director of the Center for Innovation in Engineering Education (CIEE) in Page 7.145.15ASU's College of Engineering and Applied Sciences, and became director of CRESMET when itwas created out of CIEE. His interests, and those of CRESMET, center on assessment(particularly, outcomes-based assessment) of education in the sciences, mathematics, andengineering, and the appropriate use of technology in support of student learning. Page 7.145.16
with Codes of Practice· The properties of particular materials· Factors of safety· Intuitive knowledge of structural behaviour· Experience· Engineering judgement [2]Hence successful structural design requires an engineer to possess theoretical, practical andexperiential knowledge as well as skills such as innovation, translating concepts into details, andthe ability to create designs which can be built easily and cheaply.Although design is the primary role of structural engineers, there is continued concern that it isnot properly taught or given sufficient emphasis in current university programs [e.g. 3,4]. Thetypical structural engineering specialisation within the majority of civil engineering degreeprograms involves two “streams
for problems in the educational system, andthat hypermedia alone cannot equitably replace human interactions that contribute to learning.Bibliography1. Zywno, M.S. & Pereira, D., Innovative Initiatives in Control Education at Ryerson Polytechnic University - Fuzzy- Logic Control of the 3D-Helicopter Simulator, Proceedings of 2000 American Control Conference, Chicago, IL, (2000).2. Zywno, M.S. & Kennedy, D.C., Integrating the Internet, Multimedia Components, and Hands-on Experimentation into Problem-Based Control Education, Proceedings of 30th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, Session T2D-5, Kansas City, Missouri, (2000). Online at: http://fie.engrng.pitt.edu/fie2000/papers/1120.pdf3. Zywno, M.S., &
uncomfortable for most.ConclusionThe teaching of critical thinking in engineering judgment is critical to decrease the “context gap”undergraduate engineers face on entry into the workplace. The writing assignment presented in this paperand discussed in our interview explores how to teach critical thinking in engineering judgment throughthe student writing process. Though impossible to fully replicate the contexts of the professionalengineering environment, this assignment serves as an example of how to enable critical thinking througha semester-long research project. As technological innovation accelerates, the need for engineers to thinkcritically about engineering problem construction and framing, power relations, and other socialdimensions shaping
. ACM, 2019.[17] V. Rajanna, F. Alamudun, D. Goldberg, and T. Hammond, “Let me relax: Toward automated sedentary state recognition and ubiquitous mental wellness solutions,” in MobiHealth 2015 - 5th EAI International Conference on Wireless Mobile Communication and Healthcare - Transforming healthcare through innovations in mobile and wireless technologies, London, Great Britain, October 14-16, 2015.[18] V. Rajanna, R. Lara Garduno, D. Jyoti Behera, K. Madanagopal, D. Goldberg, and T. Hammond, “Step up life: A context aware health assistant,” in Proceedings of the Third ACM SIGSPATIAL International Workshop on the Use of GIS in Public Health. Dallas, Texas, USA: ACM, November 4-7, 2014, pp. 21–30, iSBN: 978-1-4503-3136-4
, University of California, San Diego Marko V. Lubarda is an Assistant Teaching Professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of California, San Diego. He teaches mechanics, materials science, design, computational analysis, and engineering mathematics courses, and has co-authored the undergraduate textbook Intermediate Solid Mechanics (Cambridge University Press, 2020). He is dedicated to engi- neering pedagogy and enriching students’ learning experiences through teaching innovations, curriculum design, and support of undergraduate student research.Dr. Saharnaz Baghdadchi, University of California, San Diego Saharnaz Baghdadchi is an Assistant Teaching Professor at UC San Diego. She
’ learning experiences through teaching innovations, curriculum design, and support of undergraduate student research. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Oral Assessments as an Early Intervention StrategyAbstractOral assessments, i.e., one-on-one interview-style questioning by an instructor, have been shownto be powerful pedagogical tools. Their main benefits include the ability to assess conceptualmastery in depth due to their adaptive dialogic nature, in addition to improving students’ verbalskills and serving as a tool to support academic integrity. However, assessments not only play animportant role in measuring the level of students' understanding, but the assessment method
Page 24.931.4trends and provide them (students) with the tools needed for the world as it will be, not as it istoday.” While acknowledging that certain basics of engineering will not change, the NAEdocument emphasized the explosion of knowledge, the global economy, and the way engineerswill work in the future. A 2007 successor document was ASCE’s Vision for Civil Engineering in2025, which defined the role of civil engineers as planners, designers, constructors, and operatorsof society’s economic and social engine, in the built environment; stewards of the naturalenvironment and its resources; innovators and integrators of ideas and technology across thepublic, private, and academic sectors; managers of risk and uncertainty caused by natural
while attrition rates for thosestudents starting in engineering increased2, 3. This was happening as the first wave of engineersfrom the baby boom years prepare to retire from the active workforce; thus, this creates a gapbetween the insufficient number of engineers (and other scientist & technology workers) enteringthe workforce and the number of technologically focused researchers and innovators needed tocontinue economic growth1. Fortunately, a growth trend for enrollment in engineering programshas been observed since 2000 with a corresponding increase in bachelor’s degrees awarded, anda sharp increase of freshmen enrolling in engineering has occurred since 2005 4,5Nationally, minorities and women continue to be under-represented in
doctoral student in education at Jackson State University. His primary research interest are on online learning, language acquisition, STEM learning, and early childhood education.Dr. Himangshu Shekhar Das, Jackson State University Dr. Das is an Assistant Professor at the department of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Jackson State University. He has more than 15 years of experience in teaching and research. Since his joining at Jasckson State University in 2008, he has been continuously using innovative tools and multimedia to engage students in effective teaching.Dr. Jianjun Yin, Jackson State University Jianjun Yin, Ph.D, is Professor of Education in the Department of Elementary and Early Childhood Educa- tion
Paper ID #8702Strategies for using on-line practice problemsDr. Jess W. Everett, Rowan University Jess W. Everett has worked in four distinct areas: waste management operations research, contaminated site assessment and remediation, education innovation, and sustainable engineering. He has employed a wide variety of techniques, including computer modeling, laboratory experiments, field testing, and surveys. His current research focuses on energy conservation, alternative energy generation, engineering learning communities, and hybrid courses (courses with classroom and on-line aspects).Ms. Kaitlin Engle Mallouk, Rowan
examine the effects of an innovative instructional approach – theinverted classroom approach – on students’ learning experiences and outcomes. Essentially, it isa study on the “within-college effects” on students’ subject matter learning according toPascarella and Terenzini’s framework 22. Our research design spanned over two years and relatedto two student cohorts exposed to the “traditional” approach and the inverted classroom approachrespectively. The research design allowed us to compare various aspects of student learningexperiences and outcomes. In terms of learning outcomes, we assessed both students’ conceptunderstanding and their analytical problem-solving capabilities in addition to their grades. Giventhe lack of research focusing on
of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign Dr. Geoffrey L. Herman is a visiting assistant professor with the Illinois Foundry for Innovation in Engi- neering Education. He earned his Ph.D. in Electrical and Computer Engineering from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign as a Mavis Future Faculty Fellow and conducted postdoctoral research with Ruth Streveler in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. His research interests include creating systems for sustainable improvement in engineering education, promoting intrinsic motivation in the classroom, conceptual change and development in engineering students, and change in faculty beliefs about teaching and learning. He is a recipient of the 2011
laboratory access iswithheld until all team members complete the assignments.IntroductionThe Integrated Product and Process Design (IPPD) Program1-4 is an innovative educationalinitiative at the College of Engineering of the University of Florida (UF). In weekly classesspanning two consecutive academic semesters, (eight months), students from various engineeringand business disciplines are taught how to design products and processes. Then, working in smallmultidisciplinary teams under the guidance of faculty coaches and industrial liaison engineers, Page 24.1240.2the students design and build an industrial product or design a manufacturing process
technicalperformance parameters by assessing the needs of prospective users of their system. Once thoseperformance parameters are established, the students are responsible for creating their own workbreakdown structure, as well as planning and executing the entire design and development effort.The only major milestones the students are required to meet are two formal design reviews forexternal evaluators at the end of the fall and winter quarters, and a public demonstration of thefinished product at an annual campus-wide innovation festival at the end of the academic year.An instructor of record is assigned responsibility for the course but there are no requiredtextbooks or formal lectures. The students jointly construct a common understanding of newconcepts
Director of Choose Ohio First,25 theDirector at SOCHE, the Senior Director at SOCHE, and SOCHE’s marketing intern. ChooseOhio First Scholarship Program is “part of [Ohio’s] strategic effort to significantly strengthenOhio’s position in world markets such as aerospace, medicine, computer technology, andalternative energy. The Choose Ohio First Scholarship Program awards Ohio colleges,universities and their business partners that have developed innovative academic programs torecruit and retain more Ohio students into STEMM fields.” 25Three Poster Session judges were chosen from the faculty in the six departments at thisinstitution. None of the judges had students presenting a poster. The judges were provided witha poster session rubric to evaluate
a lot of fun…and basically they gave me real work that any of the other peoplewould work on. I got my own projects…so they gave you real responsibilities, but then they werealso really willing to help, and they told you the resources to find…I would write them programsthat would actually do what they were doing by hand, and they were really impressed by that…Ireally helped to like innovate their process…I got a chance to use all the theory I’ve beenlearning.—White Female – 4th Year (P16) Page 23.1058.9Finally, some female stayers reported that they secured a job as a result of their internships or co-ops. These included post-graduation
clear purpose, motivation and suggest implications of this work. It should review the closely related technologies in the field giving historical context, current status, and importance for innovations in the field. o Edit and improve upon previous version of the opening intro paragraph by incorporating feedback and making it more succinct and informative § Directly state the purpose and scope of your current effort. Use scientific terminology in the field, directly state what is novel and why it is better than previous technology
Transactions on Education, 49(4):420–431, 2006.[12] Janet L. DeGrazia, John L. Falconer, Garret Nicodemus, and Will Medlin. Incorporating screencasts into chemical engineering courses. In Proceedings of the ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, 2012.[13] Jacqueline Delange. Quebec student protests: Tuition protests planned for Montreal and Quebec City. Huff- ington Post, June 2012. URL http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/2012/06/22/quebec-student- protests_n_1617840.html.[14] C. Demetry. Work in progress: An innovation merging "classroom flip" and team-based learning. In Proceed- ings, 40th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, 2010.[15] Morton Deutsch. A theory of cooperation and competition. Human relations, 2(2):129–152, 1949