contemporary models of entrepreneurship. In one of the first effortsto explain what makes up an entrepreneur, Blake and Saleh1 combine personality factors,Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & ExpositionCopyright © 2004, American Society for Engineering Educationknowledge, managerial mechanisms and environmental forces in a schematic that traces out theentrepreneurial process. In this model, the entrepreneur begins a venture by coping withenvironmental change through three critical responses: 1) uncertainty management 2) knowledgefiltering and 3) the exploitation of environmental change. What the individual does in thisprocess is helped or hindered by personality characteristics that play a role in
company. The evolution and decision-makingassociated with the case are examined and a report made to the others in the cohort. Mostexamples have centered on advanced trouble-shooting or design optimization. The topicis consistently given the highest feedback ratings by all participants.The intensive class dialog and case studies have served to illustrate some definingfeatures of complex systems. One of the most obvious is that systems are built usingmany skills and engineering disciplines. The structure is illustrated in figure 2. Materials a1 a2 a3 a4 a5 Mechanical b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 Electronics c1 c2 c3 c4
conducts research in microwave imaging and electrical impedance tomography.Paul Klenk, Duke University PAUL A. KLENK is a doctoral candidate in Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science at Duke University's Pratt School of Engineering where he received a B.S.E. Degree in 2001. He just finished his fourth year as a Graduate Student Coordinator for the Techtronics After-School Program at Rogers Herr Middle School. He has taught engineering courses for the Talent Identification Program at Duke University and is working with the team creating the TeachEngineering Digital Library. In addition to his K-12 outreach work, he is researching novel therapeutic radiation delivery methods for
Paper ID #19104BYOE-Cold BoilingDr. Kristen Ann Thompson, Loras College Dr. Kristen Thompson is currently an Associate Professor of Engineering at Loras College. She teaches Thermodynamics, Fluid Mechanics, Dynamics Systems, and Introductory Physics courses. She earned her Ph.D. from the University of Wisconsin - Madison and her B.S. from Michigan Technological Uni- versity both in Chemical Engineering. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Cold BoilingThe goal of this experiment is to help students overcome misconceptions about the
Paper ID #11324A Guided Approach to Technical Report Writing for Undergraduate Engi-neering StudentsDr. Lindsay Corneal, Grand Valley State University Lindsay Corneal is an Assistant Professor in the Padnos College of Engineering and Computing at Grand Valley State University. She received her B.A.Sc. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Windsor, a M.B.A. from Lawrence Technological University, and a Ph.D. from Michigan State University in Materials Science and Engineering. Page 26.51.1
Paper ID #13229The Wright State Model for Engineering Mathematics Education: Longitu-dinal Impact on Initially Underprepared StudentsProf. Nathan W. Klingbeil, Wright State University Nathan Klingbeil is a Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Dean of the College of Engineering and Computer Science at Wright State University. He is the lead PI for Wright State’s National Model for Engineering Mathematics Education, which has been supported by both NSF STEP Type 1 and CCLI Phase 3 awards. He has received numerous awards for his work in engineering education, and was named the 2005 Ohio Professor of the Year by the Carnegie
. Essentially, their training served as apreparatory class for the CCT exam. However, other benefits outside of the exam wereidentified. They included improved efficiency and knowledge of calibration issues, establishmentof a common vocabulary about calibration, and development of a professional development pathfor technicians. According to the Cummins, Inc. charter, “at the end of the day value will beadded to Cummins as data quality, productivity and efficiency improve.”After conducting the class once, Cummins decided it was too costly for them to continue andapproached the Purdue University College of Technology in Columbus, Indiana about offeringthe class as part of their curriculum. The mechanical engineering technology (MET) departmentof the
: Did the instructor present the material necessary to meet the stated objectives? Do you feel you meet the stated objectives of the course?All of this course material goes to the area subcommittees for verification and additionalevaluation. A report on the results is forwarded to the Undergraduate Curriculumcommittee and the Department Chair.The graduating senior exit interviews have been restructured and formalized to provide foradditional measurements on the program. In addition, a new alumni survey form has beencreated and will be mailed out periodically. The Industrial Advisory Board and the IEEEStudent Branch will also be asked to continue to provide input on the program objectives.All of these inputs will go to the Undergraduate
developing and implementing effective capstone andmaster’s projects.Introduction A capstone course can provide an invigorating experience to students in theirprogram of study since it integrates the concepts and skills they learned during theiracademic tenure. Final program projects (typically ‘master’s projects’ at the graduatelevel and ‘capstone’ at the undergraduate) are intensive experiences in critical analysis,and are designed to broaden students’ perspectives and provide them with an opportunityto integrate the information obtained from their various courses into their area ofspecilization. Typically, projects focus on the application of materials learned throughoutthe program to solve multi-faceted problems such as those students
the faculty prioritized ensuring that our students have “anability to…create a collaborative and inclusive environment” upon graduation. Our approach tointroducing DEI pedagogy was to focus on a first-year course, Grand Challenges in Engineering(GCE), and a second-year course, Engineering Mechanics: Statics (Statics). GCE is the firstfoundational design course in the program, where ABET Student Outcomes (SOs) 2-6 areintroduced. This was a natural fit for introducing DEI concepts, since they tie well with SOs 3(effective communication) and 5 (function effectively on a team). While Statics is a less obviouschoice to integrate DEI instruction, it was an opportunity to explore innovative ways toemphasize the importance of DEI in engineering in a
institution to offer engineering to women in Saudi Arabia in 2006. Among various otherdepartments, its college of engineering offers a degree in electrical and computer engineering, aswell as architecture [27]. KAU (King Abdulaziz University) also witnessed the establishment ofthe first college of engineering in a Saudi public university to offer an engineering degree forwomen in 2013, with departments of electrical, computer, and industrial engineering [28].KAUST, which was established in 2009, is another private institution that offers engineering forboth males and females (namely in electrical, chemical and biological, biological andenvironmental, earth, material, and mechanical engineering) but only on the master’s anddoctorate levels [29]. PNU
Paper ID #26743Transitioning to Engineering Without Losing Experiential LearningDr. Jeffrey L. Newcomer, Western Washington University Dr. Jeffrey L. Newcomer is a Professor of Manufacturing Engineering and Chair of the Engineering and Design Department at Western Washington University. He received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.Ms. Nikki Larson, Western Washington University After receiving my bachelor degree in Mechanical Engineering from Bradley University, I started working for Boeing. While at Boeing I worked to receive my master’s degree in Mechanical Engineering with an
education and engineering programs at Case Western Reserve University.Dr. Kenneth A. Loparo, Case Western Reserve University Kenneth A. Loparo is the Arthur L. Parker Professor in the Department of Electrical, Computer and Systems Engineering, holds academic appointments in the Departments of Biomedical Engineering and Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering in the Case School of Engineering and the Faculty Director the Institute for Smart, Secure and Connected Systems. He has received numerous awards including the Sigma Xi Research Award for contributions to stochastic control, the John S. Diekoff Award for Distin- guished Graduate Teaching, the Tau Beta Pi Outstanding Engineering and Science Professor Award, the
spanning access and [56]. This offers opportunities for learning experiences that arequality variations in training. Innovation offers opportunities for more individualized and adaptable, in addition to streamliningcooperative learning, customized learning, and more elevated administrative procedures.levels of understudy inclusion [57]. The foundation of anessential framework and nonstop improvement for teachers is Electronic books, interactive simulations, instructionalimportant for the innovation mix. Teachers' digital literacy and videos, and virtual labs are some examples of these materials. Bypedagogical practices must align with technological instruments using these advancements, teachers can
Virginia Tech. He holds degrees in Engineering Mechanics ( ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Hi everyone! Today, we are going to be talking about an effort we’ve implemented with ourcolleagues to support rural K-12 teachers in Southwest Virginia in integrating engineering intotheir curriculum, which involves surveying and interviewing K-12 teachers about theirperceptions of effective and ineffective professional development opportunities, as well as whatthey want to know about engineering and incorporating it into their curriculum, developing andfacilitating a two-day professional development workshop for some teachers over the summer,and maintaining the relationships formed during the workshop
support their students for future success byincluding communication skills learning objectives in all years of undergraduate coursework.This paper discusses a writing assignment used in 2020 and 2021 in an upper-level StructuralEngineering class at Case Western Reserve University. The assignment follows a lesson plandeveloped by RePicture and the American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC).The assignment was designed to help students in several ways, including: • Practice writing skills • Engage with technical concepts and relate what they are learning to actual projects • Better understand the breadth of their engineering career options • Create online material that they can include on their resumeThe structural engineering
business. ALIVE provides a practical and consistentmeans of developing realistic problem solving skills in engineering and business studentsreaching a variety of learning styles.Student assessment within the ALIVE system is achieved through an authentic assessmentprocess. The process uses instructor, industry, and student/peer feedback according to the sixlevels of authentic assessment: Basic Knowledge, Inquiry, Explanation, Problem-solving,Representation of Knowledge, and Metacognition. Rubrics are developed for each evaluationsource to encourage development of skills relevant to practice throughout the curriculum. Ascoring mechanism is described to alleviate the tension in student peer assessment betweenloyalty and honesty. Though this paper
accountability measures put enormous pressure on the school todemonstrate year-to-year growth for every child. A most effective way of initiating such arelationship would be to contact the school principal and the person responsible for curriculumintegration or instructional resource. School system personnel are very receptive to specificoffers of assistance. Specificity goes both ways—universities are often very willing to provideexpertise and/or materials to K12 educators if needs are identified clearly—and the universitymakes it’s interests known. Working through parent groups is another possibility. The alreadyestablished networks of Parent Teacher Associations/Organizations (PTA/PTO) are a direct pathinto the school’s population and its calendar of
: Computation – This first course introduces students to the design and development of computer applications for engineers using the Python programming language. As a secondary goal, the course introduces students to the different engineering disciplines, engineering design, and pathways to success in engineering. • Experimental Physics and Engineering Lab II : Mechanics - The second engineering course is designed to complement the first lecture-only physics course and includes laboratory assignments as well as the description and application of laws of physical motion to the solution of science and engineering problems. The course also includes non-technical topics such as ethics and art-in-engineering
AC 2007-828: LABORATORY PRACTICUM IN COMBUSTIONDavid Blekhman, California State University Los Angeles David Blekhman is an Assistant Professor at Grand Valley State University. He holds M.S. in Thermal Physics from St. Petersburg State Technical University, Russia and a Ph. D. in Mechanical Engineering from the State University of New York at Buffalo. Since joining GVSU, he has taught courses in the Mechanics and Thermal-Fluids sequences. He has also focused on developing courses in Combustion and Alternative Energy. Page 12.1001.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007
andfeedback. Frank Owen, a Mechanical Engineer, and I decided to meet a few weeks into thequarter for a pre-visit conference to map out areas for improvement. Responding to commentson student evaluation forms, we both sought ways to improve teaching effectiveness whileminimizing the intimidation factors due to our presentation styles and due to the technicalchallenges in difficult courses. We also each face a “difficult” section occasionally, meaning asection that seems less willing than most to participate in class and provide active feedback.The day after Frank visited my classes, we met for a one-hour post-visit conference. SinceFrank’s notes were copious, complete, and useful, the session was quite valuable. Some of themore valuable comments
Textbook Library across the topics of Civil Engineering, Mechanical Engineering,and Materials Science. Though arguments can be made about what counts as engineering and thecategorizing of some OER into engineering or non-engineering bins, this fact supports a generallack of OER in engineering. Figure 1: Number of OER by subject area in the Open Textbook Library.Further illustrating this need for more OER in engineering, when Moore and Reinsfelder [8]surveyed engineering mechanics instructors who had gotten to the stage of evaluating OER fortheir classroom and found that the number one reason cited for not adopting OER was that theywere unable to find an OER for their subject, or at least they were not able to find an OER
on the first day of instruction, students are encouraged to explore how the use ofsupplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) can increase the amount of recycled content in theconstruction of a building. This theme continues as the students are required to develop and implement aplan to optimize the amount of granulated ground blast furnace slag, fly ash, and silica fume that can beincluded in a concrete mixture without adversely affecting characteristics such as strength, stiffness, andworkability. After gathering data through hands-on laboratory testing, the students prepare a reportrecommending an optimal SCM content. This instruction method can fit easily into the existing curriculum of most undergraduatereinforced concrete design
on the first day of instruction, students are encouraged to explore how the use ofsupplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) can increase the amount of recycled content in theconstruction of a building. This theme continues as the students are required to develop and implement aplan to optimize the amount of granulated ground blast furnace slag, fly ash, and silica fume that can beincluded in a concrete mixture without adversely affecting characteristics such as strength, stiffness, andworkability. After gathering data through hands-on laboratory testing, the students prepare a reportrecommending an optimal SCM content. This instruction method can fit easily into the existing curriculum of most undergraduatereinforced concrete design
on the first day of instruction, students are encouraged to explore how the use ofsupplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) can increase the amount of recycled content in theconstruction of a building. This theme continues as the students are required to develop and implement aplan to optimize the amount of granulated ground blast furnace slag, fly ash, and silica fume that can beincluded in a concrete mixture without adversely affecting characteristics such as strength, stiffness, andworkability. After gathering data through hands-on laboratory testing, the students prepare a reportrecommending an optimal SCM content. This instruction method can fit easily into the existing curriculum of most undergraduatereinforced concrete design
Session 2166 Laboratory Experience with a Model Jet Turbine John E. Matsson Oral Roberts UniversityAbstractThis paper describes the experience gained from the operation of a JetCat model turbojetengine as part of an undergraduate mechanical engineering program. The engine wasremotely controlled from a laptop using Jettronic for Windows software for the serialinterface. Engine speed, fuel consumption, and exhaust gas temperature were measuredusing the software and the thrust was determined from a digital force gauge andcompared with calculations based on different readings
Engineer in the states of New York, Pennsylvania and Michigan, andmembers of ASEE, ASCE, and ACI. Dr. Haque received a BSCE from Bangladesh University of Engineering andTechnology, a MSCE and a Ph.D. in Civil/Structural Engineering from New Jersey Institute of Technology,Newark, New Jersey. His research interests include fracture mechanics of engineering materials, compositematerials and advanced construction materials, computer applications in structural analysis and design, artificialneural network applications, knowledge based expert system developments, application based softwaredevelopments, and buildings/ infrastructure/ bridges/tunnels inspection and database management systems
/technical societies also provide appropriate continuing education courses in electronic forms – see, for example the offerings of the IEEE.• Open courseware – The Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) has made a major commitment to sharing its expertise in engineering education by posting on the web materials from each of its courses, in its OpenCourseWare project. Materials posted for each course typically include syllabus, readings, calendar, lecture notes, tools and projects. Downloading of appropriate materials and adaptation to local needs can be a significant aid to engineering faculty members in developing countries.• Virtual exhibit – As noted above, the WFEO Committee on Capacity Building plans to
. IntroductionThe complexity of engineering problems tend to require a team approach in order to solve them.Thus, team projects are often part of the engineering curriculum. In addition, teamwork is oftenused as a learning mechanism and means for assessment. The intention is that students help oneanother through social construction so that they can tackle problems and projects of greater scalesand complexities than achievable individually, and that the team setting reflects the real context ofworking in industry. However, there are numerous questions and challenges to student teams. Inaddition to the usual challenges of student dissatisfaction with teams due to unfair distribution ofworkload and responsibilities, we have found that effective teamwork does
compact particles, show low permeability, restricting water flow.Similarly, the. Porosity (the total volume of pores) influences water storage, while the connectivityof these pores determines permeability. For instance, sandy soil may not store much water due tolarger, poorly retaining pores, but it allows fast infiltration, making it ideal for crops requiringwell-drained soils. Understanding permeability teaches students how soil affects water availabilityfor plants and ecosystems.The provided materials outline practical experiments to measure soil permeability. This methoduses funnels filled with soil types like sand, clay, and gravel. Students pour a fixed amount ofwater into each funnel and measure the time taken for water to pass through