Paper ID #24991Black Men in the Making: Engaging in makerspaces promotes agency andidentity for Black males in engineeringMr. Michael Lorenzo Greene, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Michael Greene is a PhD Student in the Shifting Perceptions, Attitudes and Cultures (SPACE) Lab at Arizona State University. He is pursuing his degree in the Engineering Education Systems and Design program concurrently with a Master’s degree in Engineering. Michael received his B.S. in Mechanical en- gineering from the University of Pittsburgh in April 2018. His research interest lies in diversity, inclusion and K-12
, Inc. 1992.3 Bordogna, Joseph. “Making Connections: The Role of Engineers and EngineeringEducation.” The Bridge (A Publication of the National Academy of Engineering), Spring, 1997. Volume 27,Number 14 Wulf, William A., and George M.C. Fisher. “A Makeover for Engineering Education.” Issues in Science andTechnology, Spring 2002.5 http://www.abet.org/downloads/EAC_99-00_Criteria.doc 20086 Cooper, C. "Product Innovation and Technology Strategy." Research / Technology Management, Vol. 43, No. 1,2000, 38-41.7 Salamon, N. and R.S. Engel. "A Management/Grading System for Teaching Design in Mechanics of Materials andOther Courses." International Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 16, No. 5, 2000, 189-196.8 Schlater, N. and Hillary Grierson
, systems design, and enterprise processes; and (4) a research thesis thatideally encompasses and integrates material from the subjects. To provide context for theirstudies, students are also expected to gain exposure to the practice of systems engineering in asummer internship or prior industrial experience. The program is loosely structured (in contrastto the following two programs) with students developing their own learning objectives andcourse of study. Further descriptions of this program can be found in Reference 7. SYSTEMS ENGINEERING & ELECTIVES ARCHITECTING
ofmicrofluidic technology requires the expertise in a number of STEM disciplines includingchemical, biomedical, electrical, or mechanical engineering in addition to chemistry, biology,and physics. Many research teams that develop these devices include one or more experts inthese fields. This interdisciplinary nature provides a unique outreach opportunity for K-12students as the students can see applications and learn about core topics in a number ofdisciplines. Moreover, in the state of Louisiana, chemical engineering is largely associated withthe petrochemical industry, thus most K-12 students believe that the only thing that an engineeror chemist can do is to work in the oil & gas industry.Due to all of these factors, we set out to develop two of
Paper ID #8380Invited Paper - Virtual Environment: A Tool for Developing Students’ Abili-ties to Apply Mathematics to Real-life ProblemsDr. Olga V Shipulina, Simon Fraser University EDUCATIONAL AND TRAINING BACKGROUND SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY, Canada, 2008 –present Faculty of Education Ph.D. (c) in Mathematics Education MOSCOW STATE AUTOMOBILE & ROAD TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY, Russia, 2004 Institute for Professional Development, Two year course in ”Engineering Education” TOMSK STATE UNIVERSITY, Russia, 2000 Department of Mechanics and Mathematics Ph .D. in Ap- plied Mathematics (Russian equivalent) TEACHING
exercise, short paper or extendedabstract; or 3) a “research portfolio” which documents the impact of their team trainingexperiences. The purpose of the portfolio is to provide material for eventual graduate schoolapplication or future employment. While the core experience for Track Two participants isinvolvement in the research experience itself with the benefit of several role models and mentors,students will also attend three half-day workshops on effective mentoring and advanced team Page 7.981.3“Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition CopyrightÓ 2002, American Society for
AC 2007-31: THE REGIONAL MOONBUGGY COMPETITION: A UNIQUE,YEAR-LONG OUTREACH PROGRAM TO HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTSJames Rogers, Murray State University JAMIE ROGERS is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering and Physics at Murray State University. He is also director of the West Kentucky Regional Moonbuggy Competition. He received his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from the University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign in 2002. His engineering education research includes the use of emerging technology to enhance instruction, K-12 outreach, and engineering activities for freshman.Steve Cobb, Murray State University STEPHEN COBB is professor and chairman of the Department Engineering and
toownership, maintenance, and use of a computer. The EF1015 syllabus includes an introduction tothe profession, examination of ethics and ethical theories, traditional pencil-and-paper problemsolving techniques, algorithm development and graphing. These skills are then translated tocomputer solutions, currently via MATLABTM.EF 1016 addresses traditional engineering graphics and computer graphics, with one desiredoutcome an enhanced ability to visualize in three dimensions. This year, Virginia Tech is usingAutodesk's Mechanical Desktop Release 6.0. We intend to introduce NC milling into theEF1016 course this semester. EF1016, like its sibling EF1015, meets for two 50 minute classeseach week and is a 2 credit course. As many of our students have no
Session 2522 Web-based Distance Learning Environment To Teach Computer Aided Engineering Design and Analysis Tools Rujin Cheng, Keith Adolphson, Kurt Gramoll Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering University of OklahomaAbstractComputer aided engineering design and analysis technologies have become very important inengineering development. They increase product reliabilities and decrease product developmenttime and cost. Many engineering students hope to learn and use these tools for their researchprojects and in their future careers. This paper
and Doctoral degrees, was launched in2015. The program is organizationally and intellectually unique. The administrative structure issuch that all core faculty in EEE hold joint appointments in other engineering departments,including Agriculture and Biological Engineering, Civil Engineering, Industrial Engineering,Materials Engineering, and Mechanical Engineering. In addition, some EEE faculty hold jointappointments in the sciences, including Agronomy or Forestry and Natural Resources.Currently, there are 16 core EEE faculty. These core faculty teach graduate level courses in EEE,oversee EEE research projects, and mentor EEE graduate students. This structure offers theimportant advantage of breadth of knowledge and perspective, which supports
disciplines of mathematics, science, communications, and basictechnology into a sequence of problem-based learning, integrated modules employing activelearning strategies to prepare the students to enter into any number of engineering technologymajors (AMS). These modules will utilize contextual examples from industry and model theworkplace environment.The AMS will revise major curricula to build on the skills learned in the core and incorporatenew and emerging technology programs.The ET Core is designed around six major physical systems, electrical, mechanical, thermal,fluid, optical, and material (figure 4) that form the basis for the AMS. Development teamsconsisting of faculty from mathematics, science, technology, and communications were
to be moreaware of environmental issues. Environmental engineering is no longer just the domain of civiland chemical engineers. Environmental issues span the entire engineering profession. Toaddress the growing influence of environmental issues in engineering, the Systems EngineeringDepartment at the United States Naval Academy has introduced a track in environmental systemsengineering.In the Systems Engineering curriculum at the United States Naval Academy, students study theinteraction between mechanical, electrical, and computer systems. The curriculum focusesmainly on linear systems theory, feedback control, and mechatronics. It is a four year,undergraduate, ABET accredited, engineering program. Throughout the curriculum studentslearn
disciplines include Aerospace, Chemical, Civil,Mechanical, Electrical, Computer, Industrial, Manufacturing, and Engineering Technology.ProcedureThe specifications and rubric for the mini-float are developed each year by a group of professorswho teach the lab during the Winter Quarter. Each year the group of 5 to 7 professors review andmodify the previous year’s specifications. This year there were six professors teaching 10 sectionsof EGR100 Lab. The float speed was changed from 4 feet per minute to 5 feet per minute. Thetheme for the 2015 Rose Parade was announced on January 15th and this theme is the one usedfor the mini-rose parade float. Shown on the following pages are the specifications and rubric forthe 2014 mini-float competition. The
Paper ID #47594Lessons Learned in Developing ROS Asynchronous Tutorials for Roboticscourse: Guided versus Inquiry based LearningEvan Kusa, Duke UniversityProf. Siobhan Oca, Duke University Siobhan Rigby Oca is an assistant professor of the practice in the Thomas Lord Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science at Duke University, NC, USA. She received her B.Sc. from Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Master in Translational Medicine from the Universities of California Berkeley and San Francisco. She completed her Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering in 2022 from Duke University. Her research interests include
appear to be but there are material that was are someCoverage important aspects, overemphasized large omissions prescribed. It is omissions or and without or or large amounts irrelevant, or material that is including any underemphasized, of unrelated addresses another only tangentially extraneous relative to their material
significant improvements in students’ learning when the instructors use computersimulations in fluid mechanics.With this theory in mind, we developed a spreadsheet-based simulation model as the IEchallenge activity in an introduction-to-engineering course. The purpose of this user-friendlysimulation tool was to raise students’ understanding of IE and introduce a few common IE tools.This challenge allowed the students to directly apply the Operations Research and HumanFactors concepts learned in the IE lessons of the course. The scenario behind the challenge wasthe realistic case of designing a commercial passenger airplane and scheduling its operations.Rather than a traditional test on the IE material presented during the three IE lessons
retention, higher-level thinking skills, motivation to learn new material, teamwork, interpersonal skills, andcommunication skills, all of which encompass the goals of our capstone design course7.Conclusions • The project team developed a small power source contained in a backpack to enhance the students’ education in rural areas which do not have reliable electric power. • This project provided an excellent design development experience for the four mechanical engineering students. It followed the classic design procedure of defining the problem, brainstorming, determining specifications, locating components, making other components, assembly, testing, and field evaluation. • The addition of AC charging capability greatly
ofengineering as a major while approximately 12% indicated their family pressured them to studyengineering. There was concern that students leave engineering in their freshmen year becausethey have insufficient academic preparation in math and chemistry. Only 35.7% reported feelingthey had adequate high school preparation in chemistry while 68.4% said they had adequate highschool preparation in math. These results are consistent with the responses of students to similarquestions. When asked if they were struggling with the material in their chemistry or mathclasses: 34% agreed they were struggling with the material in their chemistry classes while 18.5%claimed to be struggling with the material in their math classes. The students were also asked ifthey
the end of eachsemester and as a result faculty members are not particularly motivated to improve their teachingskills. The lectures are delivered with a sink-or-swim perspective and marginal students are notprovided with necessary support mechanisms such as tutoring, mentoring, or counseling. It is asystem where students with good study and time management skills thrive, the students who lackthose skills struggle. As a result of this culture, most students have a relaxed attitude towardslectures and class attendance in between mid-term exams and try to get good grades by studyinghard few days before the tests. The exams are typically challenging and try to gauge students’intelligence by requiring them to apply their knowledge of the material
to one solution or one approach to a problem (mechanized thought), which follows a previously laid-out pattern, and prevents the consideration of all relevant knowledge and experience which should be brought to bear on the given problem [10-12].3. Divergent Thinking: imagining any possibility, head off in many directions, deliberately diverge from the conventional, explore possibilities while temporarily suspending criticism and judgment [13].4. Convergent thinking: narrow down the options to one or more choices, deriving the best Page 24.260.4 solution from available information, conventional
Paper ID #17150On Bridging the Gap between Academia and Industry in the Arab Gulf States:Views, Challenges, and Potential RewardsDr. Waddah Akili, Iowa State University Waddah Akili has been in the academic arena for over 40 years. He has held academic positions at Drexel University, Philadelphia, Penna (66-69), at King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia (69-87), and at the University of Qatar, Doha, Qatar (87-00). Professor Akili’s major field is geotechnical engineering and materials. His research work & experience include: characterization of arid and semi arid soils, piled
Paper ID #30481Communities Support Engineering as a College Major ChoiceStacey L. Vaziri, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education Stacey Vaziri is a PhD candidate in the Department of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. She received her M.S. in Materials Engineering from Purdue University and her B.S. in Chemical Engineering from North Carolina State University. Her research interests include access to higher education and broadening participation in engineering.Dr. Marie C Paretti, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Marie C. Paretti is a Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech
study (instead of just studying intersectional populations). The final dayfocused on identifying the remaining tensions and focused on the next steps we (both theorganizers and participants) would take following the conclusion of the workshop.Session DetailsThe following tables provide a snapshot of the three days of the workshops and the specificsessions created. We note the general topic, session type, engagement mechanism, and whetherthe session featured an external speaker. We made extensive use of Google’s Jamboard feature toallow participants to interactively share their thoughts using virtual sticky notes and otherannotations in a cloud-based, collaborative environment. This had the added benefit of producingan artifact that documented
AC 2012-5014: GLAZING MADE SIMPLE: A DECISION SUPPORT SYS-TEM TOOL USING MS EXCEL VBAMr. Asaad Mohamed, Auburn University Asaad Mohamed has a diverse experience and holds several advances degrees in engineering and manage- ment. He is currently finishing up a master’s in information systems management from Auburn University.Ms. Emily Reynolds, Auburn UniversityDr. Chetan S. Sankar, Auburn University Chetan S. Sankar is the College of Business Advisory Council Professor of management information systems at Auburn University. He has received more than three million dollars from ten National Sci- ence Foundation grants to develop exceptional instructional materials that bring real-world issues into classrooms. He has
teachers.Dr. Krishnanand Kaipa, Old Dominion University Dr. Krishnanand Kaipa is an Assistant Professor and director of the Collaborative Robotics and Adaptive Machines (CRAM) Laboratory in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the Old Dominion University. Dr. Kaipa received his BE (Hons.) in Electrical Engineering from Birla Institute of Technology and Science, Pilani, India in 1998, and his MS in 2004 and PhD in 2008, both in Aerospace Engineering from Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore. He worked as a postdoctoral associate at Depart- ment of Computer Science, University of Vermont and later at Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, where he was also a research assistant
Session 1520 Course Websites: Are You Giving Your Students What They Want? Steven Braddom, Charles Campbell, Bruce Floersheim, Shad Reed Department of Civil & Mechanical Engineering United States Military Academy A year-long study of students and faculty members in the engineering program at theUnited States Military Academy in the 2002 spring and fall academic terms revealed a surprisinggap between what the creators of course web content perceived as most useful for students andwhat the students actually desired or used from various
engineering education. Brunhaver completed a B.S. in mechanical engineering from Northeastern University in 2008 and a M.S. in mechanical engineering with a focus in Design for Manufacturing from Stanford in 2010.Dr. Holly M. Matusovich, Virginia Tech Holly Matusovich is an Assistant Professor in the Department of Engineering Education. Matusovich earned her doctoral degree in engineering education at Purdue University. She also has a B.S. in chemical engineering and an M.S. in materials science with a concentration in metallurgy. Additionally, Matuso- vich has four years of experience as a consulting engineer and seven years of industrial experience in a variety of technical roles related to metallurgy and quality systems
established nearly a century ago, standards were primarily developed to support manufacturing and mechanical processes. In the present day, standards offer benefits to all segments of business and industry, government and consumers. They simplify product development, reduce unnecessary duplication, lower costs, increase productivity, promote safety, and permit interchangeability, compatibility, and interoperability. They help to advance scientific discovery, and keep people safe by minimizing injuries and protecting key environmental resources. A standard is "a recognized unit of comparison by which the correctness of others can be determined." Another definition is "a set of characteristics or
principles of engineering management to an undergraduate research program—student performance in the research project saw gains, and students also developed importantskills in project management and scheduling.14Although the benefits of engineering management education are significant, there are alsoseveral hurdles that minimize or prevent its inclusion in typical undergraduate engineeringprograms. The primary hurdle is the large amount of technical and non-technical material that Page 11.520.2already must be fit into a four-year engineering degree.15 As the non-technical expectations onengineering graduates continue to increase, the faculty and
Kissick, Dr. for developing the world concerns intopromoting diversity in Judy Collins, Dr. mechanics of teaching science andthe science and Saeed Khan, Mike diversity through technology throughtechnology classroom Wilson and Pedro science and related diversity issuesINITIATIVE Leite technologySt. Patrick’s day Faculty and Staff Celebration of an Irish An attempt to showLuncheon holiday that all individualsEVENT belong to a cultural group and