course in which the abstract concepts aretaught. Similar to the UK laboratory exercises, the labs are very proscribed. Opportunities todemonstrate creativity in design are left for extracurricular design competitions and projects Page 26.153.6constructed in Innovation Centers. However, participation in the competitions and access to theInnovation Centers is limited to students with excellent grade point averages. IV. Descriptive and Proscribed Assessment of Student Learning ⊂ Assessment Technique Selected by Instructor ⊃ Proscribed Assessment (a) University of GlasgowThe contribution of the summative assessments for homework
available onlineare given to students to learn how to use the software. Audacity is also used to analyze theirfinal prototypes. Students generate a spectrum using Audacity and compare the location of thepeaks to the desired fundamental frequency. This helps them complete the design cycle byanalyzing the performance of the prototype.Their design prototypes are assessed based on a set of criteria: ability of each instrument toproduce multiple tones; overall quality of the track (a different weighting factor is used for eachsong based on its level of difficulty); tone quality produced by instruments (based on maximumpercent deviation from theoretical fundamental frequencies for high/low notes for eachinstrument); creativity and innovation; cost
was performed to guide the development of afreshmen year experience. A wide variety of freshmen engineering curricular design isavailable, and this paper is not intended as a review of these. Brannan and Wankat4 report on asurvey of first year programs, noting in particular that many innovative, large freshmen programsfocus on laboratory and design content.5-8 Several other specific examples will be mentioned inthe following sections.After reviewing the literature and the goals of the entire four year Mechanical Engineeringprogram, the faculty identified the main objectives of the freshmen year redesign. • Knowledge of the Mechanical Engineering Discipline: Introduce students to the field of mechanical engineering with the goal of
are confronted with a myriad ofbarriers and challenges to generate innovative ways for instructional effectiveness so theirprogram graduates are fully prepared to take on the many challenges twenty-first centuryengineers face. This presentation provides an overview and summary of leadership competenciesthat have been produced over the last 75 years and its relationship to engineering education.Some suggestions as to how these needed competencies may be implemented in engineeringprograms will be discussed.Workshop – 3Title: Green Lean ManufacturingPresenters: Engineers of the Texas Manufacturing Assistant Center at XXXWorkshop Abstract: This 90-minute workshop will introduce participants to the systems ofsystems attributes of Lean
a windmill designing project, aPeak Oil game, use of an “Energy Bike” that transforms pedal power into electricity, havebeen incorporated within many programs at Cabrillo and in the community. Examples are given below of ways that faculty may adopt other pieces of the curriculumas it fits their courses.Strategies transferable to regular courseworkDesign or invention of the day. Show a video of a new invention or research that haspotential to shift the way we do things or improve life. Due to the rapid pace oftechnological innovation many students will end up working
Paper ID #12973Institutionalizing Ethics: Historical Debates surrounding IEEE’s 1974 Codeof EthicsDr. Xiaofeng Tang, Penn State University Xiaofeng Tang is a postdoctoral fellow in engineering ethics at Penn State University. He received his PhD in Science and Technology Studies from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute.Dr. Dean Nieusma, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute Dean Nieusma is Associate Professor in Science and Technology Studies and Director of the Programs in Design and Innovation at Rensselaer. Page 26.977.1
. Brown Department of Electrical and Computer En- gineering and Vice Provost for Educational Innovation and Interdisciplinary Studies at the University of Virginia. He received the B.S.E.E. degree from the University of Texas, Austin, in 1991, and the M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in electrical engineering from the University of California, Santa Barbara in 1992 and 1997 respectively. He joined the faculty at the University of Virginia in 2007. Prior to this position, he was on the faculty at the University of Texas at Austin where he held the Lybarger Endowed Faculty Fellowship. His current research interests include the design of novel infrared optoelectronic devices and how instructional changes can help students more
. Joachim Walther, University of Georgia Dr. Walther is an assistant professor of engineering education research at the University of Georgia (UGA). He is a director of the Collaborative Lounge for Understanding Society and Technology through Educational Research (CLUSTER), an interdisciplinary research group with members from engineering, art, educational psychology and social work. His research interests range from the role of empathy in engineering students’ professional formation, the role of reflection in engineering learning, and interpretive research methodologies in the emerging field of engineering education research. His teaching focuses on innovative approaches to introducing systems thinking and
, an expanded version of the MOOC will be offered during Spring 2015.1. IntroductionDuring the past few years, many universities have developed and offered massive open onlinecourses (MOOCs) for a variety of reasons including outreach, extending access to education,promoting the university brand, increasing revenues, improving educational outcomes for bothMOOC participants and on-campus students, and conducting research on innovations in teachingand learning.1 MOOCs have the attractive characteristic of being able to reach thousands ofpeople per offering and may play an important role in higher education in the future. Mostuniversities do not offer official university credit through MOOCs, but participants often areeligible to receive a
years. Rachel works in a chemical engineering lab on campus, has held a co-op position at Davol, Inc. and will be completing another co-op with Entrega Biosciences.Ms. Emma Kaeli, Northeastern University Emma Kaeli is a second-year undergraduate student at Northeastern University, majoring in chemical engineering and pursuing a minor in mathematics. Outside of class, Kaeli works as a chemistry tutor and class grader, and she participates in undergraduate research in a materials science laboratory on campus. She also has held an engineering co-op position with Rogers Corporation’s Innovation Center.Ms. Kristen Barbara Coletti, Georgia Institute of Technology Kristen Coletti is recent graduate of Northeastern
experience would strengthen theties of community college faculty and students and community college and university faculty.25 Page 26.1576.11Rachel Hirst, et al, discuss a program at a four-year college for underrepresented communitycollege students that has the goal of increasing retention and transfer and to expand the capacityfor research for community college faculty. Two of the authors are professors at StonehillCollege and one of the professors is an associate professor at Massasoit Community College.The feature that stands out in this innovative program (unnamed in the article) is thecollaboration of community college faculty and the private
pace of lecture, lack ofreal-world application, and lack of meaning. For instance, when asked what she learned aboutdesign from Introduction to Engineering Design, she replies: R: Nothing. S: Ok R: Um, I learned more designing things probably playing with Legos and play dough when I was a kid. … It's that you're following the textbook steps on how to build it, But in fact what you're really, I think the whole what I learned was trial and error and planning. S: Mmhmm R: Not design. Design to me involves innovation and concept and there's supposed to be a message across like you're supposed to design something for purpose.Implicitly, the class (a group project to design a robotic
Paper ID #11993Tools for Transformation – How Engineering Education benefits from inter-active e-learning and the HumanitiesDr. Katarina Larsen, KTH - Royal Institute of Technology Katarina Larsen, researcher at KTH - Royal Institute of Technology, Sweden. Experience from teaching and course development in Engineering Education at Masters level and graduate courses level in areas of Organizational Studies. Ongoing research interests includes studies of institutional change, science and innovation policy, and sustainability in engineering education.Mr. Johan Gustav G¨ardebo, KTH Royal Institute of Technology Johan G¨ardebo
-confidence inteaching that subject, it is important to provide teachers with targeted professional developmentto bolster their skills as well as their confidence.MethodologyPilot Programs 2007 to 2010 Page 26.1259.7CCBC’s first pilot PLTW PD program was launched during the 2007/8 school year through agrant from the Technology and Innovation in Manufacturing and Engineering (TIME) Center, aNSF ATE regional center, and with the support of UMBC. The pilot program was designed tobuild technical competence and classroom confidence in Baltimore County middle and highschool teachers in the use of Inventor and fischertechnik, which were required for
a detailed description of the two-way exchange program and summarize resultsfrom a systematic analysis of five reflective learning prompts that were administered to thestudent participants throughout the program (i.e., 1 pre-program, 3 mid-program, and 1 post-program). As further background for these efforts, we summarize relevant prior literaturediscussing strategies for scaffolding and assessing learning outcomes, both in general andspecifically in the context of global engineering programs. Based on our preliminary results, wealso discuss both benefits and challenges associated with this innovative programmaticimplementation. Furthermore, we propose directions for improvement, with an emphasis onstudent recruitment, faculty involvement
Page 26.1349.1 project, which is a NSF Foundation Math and Science Partnership to promote workforce development and to identify and cultivate the next generation of creative STEM innovators. Through my participa- tion in this project, I assist in writing middle school science modules and supporting teachers in their implementation. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Paper ID #12315Miss Nancy Anna Newsome, CEISMC - Georgia Tech Anna Newsome serves as an Educational Outreach Manager at Georgia Tech for two research projects funded by the Nation Science Foundation. She received a
the Trefny Institute for Educational Innovation at the Colorado School of Mines. She is also a senior associate editor of the Journal for Engineering Education. Her research interests include: measurement, assessment, outreach, and diversity.Ms. Deborath Silva, Colorado School of Mines Deborah Silva is a Graduate Research Assistant at the Colorado School of Mines. She is pursuing a M.S. in Electrical Engineering with interests in social justice applied to control systems engineeringMr. Justin Stephen Fantasky, Colorado School of Mines Justin Fantasky is an Undergraduate Research Assistant at the Colorado School of Mines. He is pursing a degree in Mechanical Engineering with a minor in Economics and Business with an
future generations.”SIDI: “The STEM Institute of Design and Innovation (SIDI) at Summit Parkway Middle Schoolis a magnet program focused on science, technology, engineering, and math education for up to80 students per grade level. This program provides students the opportunity to explore variousscience and mathematics strands from an engineering and technology standpoint. There is also astrong focus on careers in these areas of industry”.TWO: “Single Gender Program at Dent Middle School”All of the descriptions of the magnets are quoted from the Richland School District website.21In the past two years (2013-2014 and 2014-2015), Richland Two Gifted and Talented Programhas had 171 high school Gifted and Talented (State Identified gifted and
training was required every two years; the training consists of contentpresented in a linear fashion (as opposed to scenario based) and a follow-up quiz consists of fivemultiple-choice questions. While this training does not appear to be innovative, we hypothesizethat the requirement to take it every two years is a significant component in why these facultymembers were cognizant of proper procedures. As some participants and Tonso’s 11 example Page 26.1434.16indicate that face-to-face training can cause unsatisfactory results, we also hypothesize thatonline, scenario-based training may be more effective as a tool for spreading understandingabout
Foundation’s Alliances for Graduate Education and the Professoriate(AGEP) program on the national level is intended to increase significantly the number ofdomestic students receiving doctoral degrees in the sciences, technology, engineering, andmathematics (STEM), with special emphasis on those population groups underrepresented inthese fields (i.e., African Americans, Hispanics, American Indians, Alaska Natives, NativeHawaiians or other Pacific Islanders). In addition, the AGEP is particularly interested inincreasing the number of minorities who will enter the professoriate in these disciplines. Specificobjectives of the AGEP program are (1) to develop and implement innovative models forrecruiting, mentoring, and retaining minority students in STEM
humility. Engineers recognize that sociotechnical problems, solutions, and innovations are oftentimes complex and value-laden, even when developed by competent and well- intentioned engineers. Engineers acknowledge limitations in engineering understandings about the world and try to redress inequalities by privileging and partnering with silenced voices. In keeping with this principle, engineers acknowledge the imperfection and incompleteness of these canons and strive to improve the profession’s values, principles, and standards through inviting open feedback from others. ● Value: Dignity and Worth of the Person ● Ethical Principle: Engineers respect the inherent dignity and worth of the person. Engineers treat