flavor of what engineers actually do and also could learn the basic elements ofthe design process by being involved in real design projects.This paper reports on the development and execution of a senior design course at an internationaluniversity, where practitioners played a major role, side by side with faculty members, inplanning and teaching the capstone design course. Development of the course plan coincidedwith a departmental decision to revamp and update the existing senior design course, to moreeffectively relate the concepts of design and to expose students to professional practice in theRegion. The restructured capstone course, co-taught by a local consulting firm, has met, inprinciple, the objectives behind the desired change, and
the requirements of ABETEC2000 in preparation for an ABET visit in September 1998. The assessment plans weredeveloped by four-person committees with on-going input from the other chemical engineeringfaculty. The NCA assessment plan was developed by the department’s Curriculum Committee.The ABET assessment plan was developed by an ad hoc ABET/Assessment Committee. Two ofthe faculty on this committee had worked on the NCA assessment plan developed by theCurriculum Committee.The department’s assessment plan consists of four major goals that can be related to the ABETEC2000 outcomes (a) through (k) and to the AIChE Program Criteria: (1) Students shouldmaster chemical engineering fundamentals necessary to function as a professional in
of the group. One approach that may prove promising forincreasing STEM education and employment opportunities for IwD is spatial visualization skillsinstruction, and some research suggests such an approach may also be beneficial for IwD. Thisresearch team implemented two pilot studies to explore: 1) how a curriculum designed forimproving the spatial skills of first-year engineering students contributes to the development ofspatial skills for IwD; 2) what modifications are needed to make the curriculum more accessiblefor IwD; 3) what are the limitations or benefits of virtual versus in-person teaching for thisparticular population; and 4) what are the perceptions of IwD regarding the curriculum and theircapacity for success in STEM. Results
provide for increasedintegration of biomedical concepts throughout the entire curriculum. Every engineering studentwill be exposed to BME concepts and measurements and gain awareness of the importance ofhuman considerations in all design. A mini-lecture with homework concerning BME applicationsis developed for core areas of engineering and made available for instructors at LeTourneauUniversity, and elsewhere upon request. This approach serves to further integrate the engineeringcurriculum by means of a “BME concepts across the curriculum” approach.Six modules have been completed and used in the following courses: • Dynamics – Muscles forces across the elbow
understanding of marshalling of the resources needed to accomplish a specific goal. Mostimportant, the engineers ECU seeks to produce also receive the basis and values to be life-longlearners, able to adapt and master changing technologies, methodologies, and organizationalstructures. By producing graduates with these competencies, the ECU program hopes to lead inproviding professionals with the engineering skills sets necessary to address the dynamic, global,evolving, competitive challenges characteristic of the economies and societies of the emergingtwenty first century and confront the economic development challenges of eastern NorthCarolina.The underlying curriculum philosophy of ECU’s BSE rests on a design-oriented, project-basedinterdisciplinary
NSF and the Center for Innovation inProduct Development (CIPD) at MIT, a university consortium was formed in 1998 todisseminate a Master of Science program focused on product development leadership. Thispaper reviews the evolution of “PD21”, the “Education Consortium for Product DevelopmentLeadership in the 21 st Century,” from creation of the template Master’s degree program atMIT and formation of the consortium, to the transfer of curriculum to three other memberschools (RIT, the University of Detroit-Mercy, and the Naval Postgraduate School), to thefuture of the consortium. 1 Attention is given to the complexities and challenges associatedwith collaboration within and between universities.IntroductionRecognizing the intimate relationship
Construction IThas been proposed by a consortium of nine universities and granted by the EuropeanERASMUS/ SOCRATES program in 2001.2. European Master in Construction ITThe main objective of the project was to develop a curriculum for IT in Construction to givestudents the possibility for extending their knowledge in the application of IT in the BCrelated disciplines. The curriculum is focused on students who have finished theirundergraduate studies with a university degree in civil, building or structural engineering,surveying and construction. A roughly estimated average of 10 students per participatingcountry per year would give about 50 students in the first year [15]. It is, however, expected,that the number will increase in the following years
. labor force [3].The challenge for engineering educators, specifically those educators within this specificworkforce development program, is twofold. One challenge is ensuring that students learn andretain the unique technical and professional skills and abilities needed for the microelectronicsworkforce, which can be lost if not properly taught and reinforced [5]. The other challenge issetting students up for success as lifelong learners by instilling a sense of professionaldevelopment in the students who already have a full curriculum [6]. As workforce developmentprograms grow and expand in the engineering education space, there is a need to develop betterways of ensuring that students retain their technical and professional skills while
University consulted and worked as a team with a faculty member at Texas A&MUniversity to draw his experience in new engineering technology program development.In this paper, the process for the new program development and the resulting curriculum arepresented.Engineering vs engineering technologyThe first question was what name should the new program adopt? It may seem trivial, but thename of a program can play a critical role for future students and their parents when they choosemajors and when students look for jobs5. This is important to the success of the new programsince many engineering technology programs are struggling with enrollment and recruitingproblems4.Many potential students, their parents, and even some employers are confused
curriculum was being developed (reshaped), the company President helped theDean of the School of Technology form the ―Dean’s Executive Council (DEC)‖ which wouldultimately serve as the advocacy group to support the development and approval of the programby the commission of higher education. The DEC also helps sustain the program through gift-in-kind for laboratories, cash for student scholarship, and experiential learning opportunities for thestudents in the Mechatronics program. Furthermore, the company president provided significantfinancial backing and technical support on a regular basis and personally funded an endowmentto support the program. The initiative to develop and implement the Mechatronics Engineering Technologyprogram was a
example, Ochs, et. al.5 indicate that the mostreported problem with their entrepreneurship activities was related to teaming skills, both withinstudent teams as well as between teams and their faculty advisors. Additionally, as Buckenmyer6asserts, “the negative experiences that students often have with course team assignments can sourtheir attitudes toward all team participation, which may affect their performance in teams in lateremployment. Many negative experiences can be attributed to lack of development in teamprocesses.” Students graduating from our course consistently report that the skills they developduring the weekend seminar and the subsequent course curriculum are especially useful insecuring employment and performing successfully in
person. Figure 2 shows an excerpt from the neuralnetworks tools and environments entry.4. CONCLUSION The last few years have seen great advances in AI and have witnessed rapid growth in its practicalapplications to diverse fields. This growth has in turn created discussion regarding the role of AI in computerscience and generated calls for the incorporation of AI into the undergraduate curriculum. This paper presentedpreliminary work on the development of an AI Educational Repository available on the World Wide Web,whose aim is to provide instructors of the Introductory .41 course with a teaching educational tool that fullyexplores the potential of the Web in the design and creation of course material. The reposito~ is an on-goingproject
Monterrey Tech (ITESM-Monterrey Campus). Teaches courses in CAD/CAE, Mechanical Design, Fi- nite Element Method and Optimization. His interest are in the area of product development, topology optimization, additive manufacturing, sustainable design, and biomechanics.Dr. Alamgir A. Choudhury P.E., Western Michigan University Alamgir A. Choudhury is an Associate Professor of Engineering Design, Manufacturing and Management Systems at Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo, Michigan. His MS and PhD are in mechanical en- gineering from NMSU (Las Cruces) and BS in mechanical engineering from BUET (Dhaka). His interest includes computer applications in curriculum, MCAE, mechanics, fluid power, and instrumentation & control
Session _______ Development of Engineering Management Course at Southern University Ghanashyam Joshi, Ph.D., P.E. Mechanical Engineering Department Southern University, Baton Rouge, LA 70813AbstractThe Master of Engineering degree curriculum at Southern University, Baton Rouge (SUBR)includes a required core course titled “Engineering Management”. The course material wasplanned and developed for a period of over a year before the first offering in spring 2002semester. The engineering management course covers the management principles
Development of a STEM Program for Teacher Educators Joanna A. Badara1 [Buket Barkana, Nelson Ngoh, Allen Cook]The School of Engineering and The School of Education at a regional higher educationinstitution currently collaborate on developing a STEM curriculum for secondary scienceteachers. This involves the development a new STEM-based course (Neuroscience for Teachers),improve an existing STEM-based course (STEM for Teacher Educators), and to provide scienceteachers with high-quality professional development opportunities. The Neuroscience forTeachers course will be designed to provide participants with an overview of human cognitivedevelopment, including theory and research concerning new
(Dr.) Keith Stein is a professor in the Department of Physics & Engineering at Bethel University. He has a Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering, with past research activities focusing on the modeling of parachute dynamics and fluid-structure interactions. He is currently involved in student-faculty studies utilizing advanced optical and high-speed video imaging techniques to study a number of applications involving compressible flows, shock waves, and thermal convection.Karen Irene Rogers (Director of Engineering Programs) © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Developing optical devices and projects for teaching
enabled addition of anotherengineer on a tenure track and provided the opportunity to develop an engineering curriculum whichconformed to the standard of other liberal arts majors at the college. The college responded to theawarding of the grant by adding a fourth engineer so that the engineering program at Hope Collegenow has a faculty of three mechanical engineers and one electrical engineer all with Ph.D. ‘s. , Page 1.152.2. ..G,.g,,,, 1996 ASEE Annual Conference Proceedings
goals and that utilizes the resources provided by their university and relevantprofessional societies.” Recommendation 4.2 Career Exploration [1] states: “Institutions shouldintegrate professional development opportunities, including relevant course offerings andinternships, into curriculum design.” and “Industry, nonprofit, government and other employersshould provide guidance and financial support for relevant course offerings at institutions andprovide internships and other forms of professional experiences to students and recent graduates.”An alignment framework for master’s degree programs produced by the Council of GraduateSchools [2] informed the National Academies of Science, Engineering and Medicine (NASEM)recommendations and provides
address issues of sustainability and international development is to introduce newrequirements/outcomes into the curriculum. Or they can take existing outcomes and mold theeducational methods used to achieve these outcomes, in such a manner so that sustainability andinternational development engineering problems are addressed. ABET has established a list ofprogram outcomes under Criterion 3: Program Outcomes and Assessment for accreditingengineering programs. Outcomes “3c,” “3f,” “3h,” and “3j” c. an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability
of the faculty are funded mostly from discretionary accounts. Because gifts make asizable portion of departmental discretionary account one could say our benefactors indirectlysupport our labs and partially support the professional development of faculty.This paper discusses an alternative approach to alumni giving with a direct impact upon theexperiential learning environment.Figure 1: Light analogy of the current state of technology. The EE curriculum at senior and MS leveltraditionally resides to the left deeper into the individual technical fields while the changes we experiencetoday are arguably fueled by the confluence. 2. How Can Alumni Help Realize the Full Potential of a Lab-Intensive Curriculum?While our program has a long
designeducation3. TIDEE is “an interdisciplinary community of engineering design educatorscommitted to developing, implementing, and refining processes which lead to measurableimprovements in the readiness of our graduates for team-based design in the modernworkplace.” Over the last eight years TIDEE has provided regional leadership in designeducation that has resulted in:q Consensus on: • attributes of a quality engineer • learning outcomes associated with design • performance criteria at critical points in engineering degree programsq Best practices for: • designing curriculum for engineering design • creating assessment tools • facilitating student growth in professional skills • measuring student performance in a team-based
: Page 9.439.3 Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright ©2004 American Society for Engineering Education - Ability to appreciate the big picture - Communication skills - Understanding of non-technical issues - Systems orientation - Team member and team leader skills - Multidisciplinary viewAs used here a multidisciplinary view means an understanding of issues and an ability to applysimple concepts from other disciplines. The design of the traditional curriculum prevents moststudents from developing many of these attributes. Consider the way discipline-specific coursesare generally taught, as
AC 2012-4801: DEVELOPING CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT EDU-CATORS: IS INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, AND EVAL-UATION THE KEY?Mr. Kenneth J. Tiss AIC, CPC, State University of New York Mr. Kenneth J. Tiss, AIC, CPC is an instructor in the Department of Sustainable Construction Manage- ment at SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry. His research areas are in undergraduate and graduate education, curriculum, construction project management, construction safety, planning and scheduling, and equipment and methods. Page 25.426.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012
), AFIT Instructor of the Quarter twice, AFIT Eta Kappa Nu Outstanding Teaching Award for Electrical and Computer Engineering, and the AFIT Professor Ezra Kotcher Award Teaching Excellence Award for outstanding curriculum development. During his time at the Air Force Academy, he also received the U.S. Air Force Academy’s Outstanding Academy Educator Award, as well as the Brig. Gen. R. E. Thomas award for outstanding contribution to cadet education twice. Page 25.427.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Developing Cyber Warriors from Computer Engineers et
strengthened graduate program better prepares us to support regional aspirations for technology industry growth. 2. Enhancement of the undergraduate program. The ECE curriculum successfully meets ABET criteria for both Electrical Engineering and Computer Engineering. Assessment processes have been developed and validated. The ECE Program is now in a position to significantly enhance the undergraduate experience. We should build on our innovation strengths in instructional and experiential methods particularly to enhance the integrative, multidisciplinary laboratory components of the program. Program enhancements can provide new opportunities for specialization in keeping with significant technology trends
useful to developstrategies to increase the training that their students receive in product design and development.Product Development is a Means to Make Better Future EngineersProduct design and development is core to the educational mission of Mechanical Engineering atthe South Dakota School of Mines & Technology. The Mechanical Engineering Department hasa culture of product development promoted throughout the undergraduate curriculum by way ofa project-based learning product design spine, and supporting resources, to make better futureengineers.Our undergraduate curriculum injects product development across the curriculum completely,establishing learning experiences from first to senior year. Many courses throughout thecurriculum have
place. Engineering curricula, however, are primarilyfocused on teaching content knowledge, often resulting in a gap between what is taught and whatis learned. We propose that shifting some of the focus onto the process of learning that occurswithin the student and leveraging multiple known connections from educational psychology canresult in more effective engineering education. Here we define “effective” engineering educationas that which leads to greater retention of knowledge, accelerated skills development, andenhanced motivation for life-long learning. We have developed a curriculum design tool tofacilitate this shift. It is a diagram that makes explicit the connections between properties of the"learning environment" or "cognitive activity
the development of nationally competitive grant proposals. Withmany components required for a successful grant proposal, it is important for a potential granteeto develop a set of best practices when undertaking grant proposal writing efforts.The author of this paper has written a successful NSF Adaptation and Implementation grantproposal [1] entitled “An Integrated Internet-Accessible Embedded Systems Laboratory” and asuccessful NSF Department Level Reform grant proposal [2] entitled “Developing a ModernComputer Engineering Curriculum Focusing on Embedded Systems.” The goal of this paper is tosuggest best practices for proposals for people considering writing similar grant proposals.Considerations include properly addressing program
similar institution-types and create a platform forchange that moves away from narrowly-constructed and techno-centric epistemologicalapproaches. This work in process provides a descriptive overview of our progress to date.IntroductionTraditionally, engineering students are trained technically, with less focus on criticalexaminations of assumptions within engineering practice, and less emphasis on the largercontexts in which engineering is embedded. With funding from a National Science Foundation(NSF) IUSE/PFE: Revolutionizing Engineering and Computer Science Departments (IUSE/PFE:RED) (hereinafter referred to as RED) grant, our project team is working to create a curriculumto develop “Changemaking Engineers.” This enhanced curriculum will be
and courses at Sinclair Community College. He has published on building’s thermal loads and has presented at the 2007 Energy Sustainability Conference in Long Beach, California, the 2009 Energy Sustainability Conference in San Francisco, California, the Renewable Energy & Energy Efficiency Workforce Education Conference in Hudson Valley, New York, the Sustainability Symposium in Eugene, Oregon, and others. Page 22.1298.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Blueprint for Developing a Laboratory and Curriculum for Energy Efficiency, Renewable and