material, one of which must be transparent. The two types of OLEDs are polymer-based and small-molecule-based. Apart from that, it functions somewhat differently as a light-emitting electrochemical cell (LEC) due to the presence of mobile ions. Active-matrix (AMOLED) or passive-matrix (PMOLED) addressing schemes are utilized in OLED panels. As a result of
AC 2007-2524: BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING SIMULATION USING VISUALBASIC MACROS IN MICROSOFT EXCELLanny Griffin, California Polytechnic State University Lanny Griffin received his Ph.D. from the University of California at Davis in Materials Science and Engineering. He also has a BS degree in Mechanical Engineering from California Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo. Currently, he is a Professor of Biomedical Engineering at California Polytechnic State University in San Luis Obispo. He is also on the Mechanical Engineering faculty of the US Military Academy at West Point as an Army Reserve Officer. Dr. Griffin’s research interests are in bone mechanics and biomaterials and has been the
of the control cabinet. The mill was operated by aproprietary printed circuit board based controller connected to a desktop computer runningproprietary software via a RS-232 parallel port. Mechanical specifications for the CNC machineare shown in Table 1 below: Table 1 Mechanical Specifications Working Table Surface:360mm x 130mm (14" x 5.125") Longitudinal Travel (X): 225mm (9") Cross Travel (Y):150mm (6") Head Travel (Z): 115mm (4.5") Machinable Area: 225mm x 115mm (9" x 4.5")The original computer control software on the machine was no longer functioning, which left theNovaMill CNC machine inoperable. Desiring a control upgrade, the
a software construction class, they did not yet learn how to create complexproduction-ready web and mobile applications, or embedded and IoT-based applications. Thiscreated a unique challenge for curating courseware and other resources as much content is tied tospecific vulnerabilities and defense mechanisms associated with deep application areas (e.g., anXSS style of attack on web applications, or a SQL injection on a database application).Under these constraints we looked to design and assemble content for our new security course.There are a number of open courseware repositories and multiple textbooks related to security.Software engineering textbooks now often include a separate chapter on security. Our programuses Ian Sommerville’s
’s, 20% of women in engineering was stable – however, only due to a growth in new typesof engineering programs that attracted women such as Architecture and Design (A&D), Bio-technology,Health Technology, Global Management. At the traditionally ‘hard core’ technology based programslike Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering, and Mechanical Engineering, civil engineering,women take up no more than 5% by proportion, for example, among all the present students (around 400)at Department of Electrical, Electronics and Computer Engineering (EE) in autumn, 2003, there werealtogether 9 female students. Whereas at the comparatively ‘newer’ programs like EnvironmentalManagement Engineering, Health Science and Technology, Architecture and
despite lacking technical expertise. It also gave me insight into the career center, which will be a great resource going forward 10. Most of the topics that were covered in this class were very useful. How I can make myself more confident in job seeking 11. It gave me a much sharper idea on what I had to get done 12. It centralized this information and gave me initiative, as a sophomore, to begin thinking along these tracks 13. Although I came into the course with my job search well underway, all my relevant materials/skills improved as a result 14. All! Confidence boost! 15. I was able to perfect my resumes and job searches 16. It really forced me to
Marie SchmiedekampDr. Peter J. Shull, Pennsylvania State University, Altoona Campus Dr. Peter J. Shull is an associate professor of engineering at Penn State University. He received his under- graduate degree from Bucknell University in mechanical engineering and his graduate degrees from The Johns Hopkins University in engineering science. Dr. Shull’s research has two main foci—nondestructive evaluation methods as applied to process control (NDE) and pedagogical methodology. Dr. Shull’s peda- gogical efforts include meta-cognitive strategy learning to improve student academic success, an interest in women’s issues within the engineering environment, integrated, experiential techniques to improve engineering students
2025 ASEE Northeast Section Conference, March 22, 2025, University of Bridgeport, Bridgeport, CT, USA. Challenges in Integrating Artificial Intelligence (AI) into Engineering and Higher Education PS. Dhanasekaran Department of Mechanical Engineering Technology State University of New York (SUNY Canton), Canton, NY USA. dhanasekaran@canton.edu evolved into intelligent tutoring systems (ITS), whichAbstract
suited tobe competitive in obtaining internships and part time employment. This paper discussesthe MET programs first two years’ curriculum and how it prepares the students to enterinto the workforce competitively against the more senior engineering students.According US Department of Labor’s Bureau of Statistics (Occupational OutlookHandbook, 2006-07 Edition) many employers prefer applicants who have completedpostsecondary school training in drafting; this training is offered by many technicalinstitutes, community colleges, and some 4-year colleges and universities. Interest is highin applicants with well-developed drafting and mechanical drawing skills; knowledge ofdrafting standards, mathematics, science, and engineering technology; and a
Paper ID #25316Using More Frequent and Formative Assessment When Replicating the WrightState Model for Engineering Mathematics EducationDr. Leroy L. Long III, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Dr. Leroy L. Long III is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Fundamentals at Embry-Riddle Aeronau- tical University in Daytona Beach, FL. He earned his PhD in STEM Education with a focus on Engineer- ing Education within the Department of Teaching and Learning at The Ohio State University (OSU). He earned his Master’s in Mechanical Engineering at OSU and his Bachelors in Mechanical Engineering at Wright State University. Dr
needs. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Work in Progress: Integrating Writing throughout the Engineering CurriculumIntroductionCommunication skills continue to be a top ‘soft skill’ many employers consider weak, whileeducators believe engineering students possess strong communication skills upon graduation [1],[2]. In fact, in an ASME survey where 647 industry supervisors, 42 department heads, and 590early-career engineers responded to a question on mechanical engineering graduates strengthsand weaknesses, there was a discrepancy in how industry rated communication skills compare tothe other two groups [1]. Only 9% of the
(ECE) students cover the engineering economy materialswithin a one-credit course that meets in class once per week. ECE students are introduced toproject management distributed throughout their coursework, including a couple of lectures onthe critical path method in engineering economy, but do not have a stand-alone projectmanagement course. Civil Engineering (CE) students cover engineering economy within athree-credit course offered on project management. The sixteen-week CE project managementcourse includes a five-week module for engineering economy, corresponding to a course withapproximately one-credit hour of content covering engineering economy and two-credit hours ofcontent covering project management. Mechanical Engineering (ME) covers
that it combinesthe basic principles of chemical, mechanical, civil, and sanitary engineering in a technicalcurriculum to meet the current and future needs of the environmental engineering profession.This ABET accredited program evolved from a standard chemical engineering curriculum 30years ago. It did not join with the Civil Engineering Program to form a department until 1984.Despite the title, the department is not the traditional Civil and Environmental (Sanitary)Engineering Department. The ENVE major and support courses are only slightly different thanthose found in most chemical engineering programs. It is easier to think of it as anenvironmental chemical engineering program.Senior ProjectThe Environmental Engineering Senior Project is
for more than two decades. A strongargument for the use of circuit simulators in the classroom can be found in [3], where the authorsargue the superiority of the ‘learn by doing” approach to teaching circuit analysis. A more recentexample of this teaching paradigm can be found in [4] where circuit simulation software iscombined with Mathcad to permit student interactive experimentation.Incorporation of projects into lecture classes provides an added mechanism to align thecurriculum with the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) programoutcomes. Four of the relevant program outcomes are listed below.• Outcome a: "an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering" The proposed project requires the
refereed research conference articles, and 20 refereed pedagogical conference articles. As a PI or Co-PI, Traum has attracted over $841 K in funding for research, education, and entrepreneurial ventures from multiple sources including NSF, NASA, ASHRAE, AIAA, Sigma Xi, the Texas State Energy Conservation Office, and several industry sponsors including Toshiba and Oshkosh. Most recently as Associate Professor and Director of Engineering Programs at Philadelphia University, Dr. Traum led the Mechanical Engineering Program through a successful ABET interim visit resulting in no deficiencies, weaknesses, or concerns. Previously, Dr. Traum was an assistant professor at the Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE), one
the College Industry Council on Material Handling Education (CICMHE). She is an Associate Editor of the Engineering Ap- plications of Artificial Intelligence (Elsevier). She has been a principal investigator in several sponsored projects from National Science Foundation (NSF) and VentureWell.Dr. Abdullah Konak, Pennsylvania State University, Berks Campus Dr. Abdullah Konak is a Distinguished Professor of Information Sciences and Technology at the Penn- sylvania State University, Berks. Dr. Konak also teaches graduate courses in the Master of Science in Cybersecurity Analytics and Operations program at the College of Information Sciences and Technology, Penn State World Campus. Dr. Konak’s primary research interest
coordination, curriculum devel- opment, assessment and instruction in the Pavlis Global Leadership program. She received her BS in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Michigan and an MBA from Wayne State University and is currently working on her PhD at Michigan Technological University. Before joining MTU she held various engineering and management positions during a 15 year career in the automotive industry.Mrs. Abby Lammons Thompson, Mississippi State University Abby Thompson is the Entrepreneurship Program Coordinator in the Office of Entrepreneurship and Tech- nology Transfer at Mississippi State University. Through her current role at the University, Thompson works to cultivate a culture of entrepreneurship
and educational opportunities in which students engage authentically with bothsocial and technical aspects of learning. The complementary practices indicated in the data setthat were explored in this round of the research were: ● encouragement of risk-taking in learners ● building positive student-centered learning relationships in and outside classrooms ● prioritizing team building concurrently with technical assignments and course contentThe following section details the process of analysis and interpretation that produced theseemergent practices as well as implications for strategic focus on them by educators inengineering classrooms. Exploration in interviews of the insights behind faculty preparation ofthis material, or
sufficient experience doing simple tasks with the switch and lamp simulationpanel. Since we have only one of each simulator and 4 - 6 student groups in the lab, the studentstake turns with the temperature chamber, the mixing tank, and the elevator.. Since the studentstypically finish the introductory material at different rates, there is rarely a conflict over who isto use a process simulator at any given time. After the intermediate level process simulators,there follows several weeks of more advanced work with the switch and panel simulator beforethe four story elevator simulator is programmed as a final laboratory exercise.The capstone design experience (called the senior project at LTU) is a two course sequence, eachcourse receiving two semester
of the arm, the forcein the deltoid is approximately fifteen times the lifted load, assuming an angle, , ofapproximately 15o. In other words, lifting a ten pound weight requires 150 pounds of force to begenerated by the deltoid muscle. One of the main points that students learn with their arm modelis that not all variables are equally important. Students can demonstrate this mathematically byplotting the change in force that would need to be generated by the deltoid muscle in response tochanges in arm length, shape, angle of insertion of the deltoid muscle, and point of insertion ofthe deltoid muscle. Males have a mechanical advantage due to the fact that their deltoid muscleis inserted closer to the elbow than for females. Even with the
providestudents with strong skills and knowledge in different areas. The authors in [4] developed a CyberScience course associate faculty form mathematics, science, engineering, computer science, andliberal arts colleges. The course aims at teaching students the benefits and dangers of cyberspace,in addition to drive them to fundamental concepts across these disciplines.Creating larger populations of domain engineers with cybersecurity awareness explored in [5]illustrates that awareness can lead to expertise. The authors focus on cybersecurity betweenindustrial control systems and other disciplines such as chemical engineers design refineries, civilengineers design structures, and mechanical engineers design industrial robots.Multiple instructional
Paper ID #43759Demonstrating a Continuous Improvement Process in Action with an Initiativeto Adopt Computer Algebra System Calculators in an Engineering TechnologyDegree ProgramDr. John W Blake P.E., Austin Peay State University John Blake is a Professor of Engineering Technology at Austin Peay State University, Clarksville, TN. He received his B.S., M.S., and Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from Northwestern University, and is a registered Professional Engineer in the State of Tennessee. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Demonstrating a Continuous Improvement Process in Action
Department of Education. The goal of this project is to improve technology education. The mechanism is to developinteresting, team-based, hands-on educational modules that can be incorporated into existing courses. Thefocus is on associate degree programs in Engineering Technology, but a major thrust also goes towardsecondary school programs that might lead into associate degrees, and many of the modules could apply aswell to four-year engineering and technology programs. Four independent teams began late in 1994 to develop the modules that were the de] iverable itemsfor this grant. Theoretically, each team could have representation from seven different viewpoints: bothfaculty and students from the university, the high school and the
, Electrical & Computer, and Mechanical Engineering.71% of students at the college have stated a long-term educational goal of transferring to a 4-yearinstitution. Thirty students initially started the journaling exercise, but we narrowed down ourdataset to include 20 students who not only gave consent to use their data for research but alsocompleted at least two of the four reflective journaling assignments during the semester.During the Fall 2022 semester study participants completed four journal reflection assignments.The four weeks of prompts asked students if they reached out to or participated with any of thefollowing categories: (1) faculty, (2) advisors, (3) student support staff, (4) classmates, (5)peers/friends, and (6) campus events or
Paper ID #37416Board 307: Imagining and Co-designing a Supportive College Experiencefor First Generation Students through an NSF S-STEM ProgramDr. Katherine C. Chen, Worcester Polytechnic Institute Dr. Katherine C. Chen is the Executive Director of the STEM Education Center at Worcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI). Her degrees in Materials Science and Engineering are from Michigan State University and MIT. Her research interests include pre-college engineering education, teacher education, and equity in education. She is currently on NSF S-STEM, RET, and Noyce grants.Haley McDevitt Haley McDevitt is an artist, graphic
anew set of PLC trainers that will be used in teaching the course. The paper discusses the rationalfor developing and building the trainers, and how the trainers will facilitate students learning.IntroductionThe curriculum of the Mechatronics Engineering Technology program, offered by the Departmentof Engineering Technology (ET) at Purdue University Northwest (PNW), includes a mandatorycourse on Programmable Logic Controllers (PLC). The course, which is also mandatory for allElectrical Engineering Technology, Mechanical Engineering Technology, and MechatronicsEngineering Technology students, includes hands-on activities that are necessary for engineeringtechnology students to know, which requires working on a dedicated PLC trainer. However
education. In particular the major concentrates oncontrol of electrical, computer and mechanical systems. In addition to several tracks, students havethe opportunity to independently research a field of interest. This is a great opportunity for teachersand students to pursue more in-depth analyses. This paper will describe one such experiment in thefield of metrology.Very often engineering laboratories at undergraduate schools are well equipped with power supplies,signal generators, oscilloscopes and general-purpose multimeters. This set allows teachers andstudents to set up test-beds for most of the basic electronics circuits studied in different engineeringtracks. Modern instrumentation is in general user-friendly and students like using the
determine if therewas evidence of the students using the design thinking process. These documents were selectedfrom 4 different semesters: Spring 2018 (n = 56), Fall 2019 (n = 32), Fall 2020 (n = 25) andSpring 2021 (n = 41). The SD design documents covered a range of topics related to theengineering disciplines taught in the College of Engineering. The student teams, which aretypically made of 3-4 students, could have members from any of the engineering disciplines,although students tended to select SD projects that best matched their major. The SD projecttopics tended to have a focus in one engineering discipline, for example Bioengineering, butcould have elements of other disciplines, such as Mechanical or Electrical engineering. Thestudents in
identifiesprogram benchmarks and goals. In the process of determining where the program is currently,there must be an assessment of the program and the abilities of its graduates to perform their jobsupon graduation. The goals can be determined by the use of input from the advisory committeeon desired capabilities of their hires from the program, and also from the third party orprofessional standards, as discussed above. Also, alumni are extremely helpful with reviewinggoals when they have been in the job market for a while. These graduates are excellent sourcesof appropriate benchmarks. The mechanism which seems to work best in overcoming lowresponse rates in surveys is to make it an easily returnable email survey with just a few essentialquestions. Since
Paper ID #15887Playhouse Modules for ChildrenProf. Janice M. Margle P.E., Pennsylvania State University - Abington Janice M. Margle received her MSc and BSc degrees in Mechanical Engineering from The Pennsylvania State University. She is a licensed professional engineer and has worked for IBM, the Navy, NASA, PPL Electric Utilities, and private industry. She actively promotes activities to increase the number of women and minorities in engineering. Currently, she is an associate professor of engineering at Penn State Abington where she teaches introductory thermodynamics to sophomores and introductory engineering