decision, increasing its transparency andinteroperability. Yeonju Jang et al. [23] used XAI to enhance understanding of at-risk students. Inthis study, SHAP global explanations identified specific homework evaluation scores as the keypredictor, while local explanations highlighted specific assignments and peer enrollment as themost important features to find at risk students. Researchers concluded this insight could helpeducators provide targeted support. Asma Ul Hussna et al. [24] applied SHAP to assess theimpacts of COVID-19 on students' social lives, mental health, and education using a range ofpredictive models. These studies show the growing importance of SHAP in making complexmodels more interpretable, thereby enhancing the transparency of
beans' weight before andafter roasting, observing how chaffing reduced weight, which introduced concepts of materialproperties and mass conservation.After roasting, students ground the beans into powder using various grinder settings, whichproduced a range of coffee particle sizes and enabled them to explore the role of mechanicalengineering principles in the process. Students observed how particle size impacts flavor profile,linking mechanical precision's importance to optimizing downstream processes. The studentsthen brewed coffee using methods such as drip brewing or a French press, applying chemicalengineering concepts to assess variables like pH and turbidity, highlighting the importance ofsolution chemistry and quality control in product
Regional Development from UC Davis.Dr. Matthew Sleep, University of Cincinnati Matthew Sleep is an Associate Professor Educator at the University of Cincinnati in the Civil and Architectural Engineering and Construction Management Department. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025Work in Progress Defining Design: How Undergraduate Civil Engineering Students Think of DesignEngineering design is a critical element of undergraduate engineering programs and is an integralcriterion in ABET assessment. Despite being a foundational element of engineering instruction,there is no single definition of design in engineering and the definitions of engineering designhave shifted
impacts their academic success.The COVID-19 pandemic led to a shift in instructional and assessment methods, necessitatingadaptations to remote and hybrid learning environments. This study conducts a comparativeanalysis of the academic accommodation available across various types of higher educationinstitutions, including public institutions (research-intensive (R1) and teaching-intensive (R2)),private universities, community colleges (CC), and minority-serving institutions. Additionally,it examines how institutional policies and resources influence students’ access to theseaccommodations and explores trends before and after the pandemic. The findings will providevaluable insights for future educational practices.Research Overview:The research
as supported by a collaborativeNSF CSforAll award. The work seeks to develop high school teachers’ content knowledge andpedagogical skills in order to offer high-quality, equity-focused instruction of the AdvancedPlacement (AP) CS Principles curriculum. This was done through summer training and a uniquecapacity-building model where high school teachers co-teach with a university instructor for onefull year. This paper presents a preliminary study of student attitudes from the 2022-2023 and2023-2024 academic years as an indirect means for assessing the implemented approach toteacher development and the program overall. Across a diverse set of circumstances—differentinstructors, student grade level, student preparation, student race/ethnicity
embed diversity, equity and inclusion principles into decision making frameworks. Assuch, JHU will consult with higher education faculty with DEI expertise to help integrate equityconsiderations into the policy development process for the promotion and tenure committee and facultygovernance structures. Building on successful initiatives and the momentum of the Project ELEVATEgrant, JHU will implement innovative approaches to sustain and strengthen mentorship practices byconsidering implementing a similar model of cross institutional mentorship, as demonstrated by ProjectELEVATE.4. Assessment The work of the evaluation team is designed to assist Project ELEVATE in developing a model topromote equitable advancement of early career tenure
intuition. For example, reflection emerged as a new code to beexplored further by the research team. These initial efforts are providing seeds for further refinement of theLITES codebook definitions, which will be a useful next step for ensuring other scholars are able to applyemergent codes as intended. Refining definitions in the LITES codebook and assessing new potentialemergent codes are the team’s immediate focus as we seek to transition from pilot interviews to full-scaledata collection efforts.Broader ImpactsIntuition has emerged as a critical skill in expertise development but is also seen as secondary and lessimportant to data when solving an engineering problem. Findings from this work will shine a light onintuition, while providing a
, environmentally focused human endeavor thatrelies on responsible business practices (The Lemelson Foundation, 2022). They showcaseengineers’ collaboration, teamwork, creativity, and commitment to sustainability.Data for this work-in-progress study are primarily drawn from two surveys implemented at thebeginning and end of the courses: (i) a ‘nature of engineering’ survey (Author, 2022) assessingPSTs’ views on engineering, and (ii) a new ‘sustainability’ survey that assesses PSTs’sustainability perspectives, interest in teaching it, and self-efficacy in addressing sustainability 2topics. Both surveys include a mixture of open-ended and Likert-type
learning), and vibrancy (engagingwith active participation). Each indicator is further broken into assessable principles (Figure 1),with observable behaviors aligned to the framework of community cultural wealth [viii]. ThePOTP includes the following features: (a) Customizable Focus: Faculty are observed on selected,specific observable behaviors (from a total of 55) to prioritize during observation, enablingfaculty to focus on their assets and encouraging targeted growth; (b) Reflective Process: Pre- andpost-observation meetings promote meaningful dialogue between the observer and the observee,enabling the sharing of insights and resources from the Eco-STEM Resource Repository [viii] (c)Flexible Usage: The tool can be used for peer-to-peer
supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF), the Department of Energy (DOE), and the Department of Defence (DOD). He is currently serving as an Associate Editor in the IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems and Frontiers in Control Engineering. Dr. Sahoo has received several awards and honors, including the 2024 NSF EPSCoR Track IV Fellowship, the 2023-2024 Joseph C. Dowdle ECE Faculty Award at UAH, the 2020-2021 University Assessment and Testing Award and the 2021 Faculty Award for Leadership and Abiding Commitment to Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Awareness at Oklahoma State University. In addition to his eight years of teaching experience, he also possesses 11 years of industry
,assessment questions will be developed for a pre- and posttest, such that the efficacy of themodule can be supported by data on a similar scale to prior LCDLMs.Acknowledgements:We acknowledge NSF support through IUSE #1821578 and 1821679References: 1. S. Freeman, S. L. Eddy, M. McDonough, M. P. Wenderoth(2014). Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. PNAS, Vol. 111. 2. B. Abdul, O. O. Adesope, D. Thiessen, B. J. Van Wie(2016). Comparing the effects of two active learning approaches. International Journal of Engineering Education, 32, 654– 669. https://s3.wp.wsu.edu/uploads/sites/2379/2019/02/07_ijee3197ns.pdf 3. N. J. Hunsu, B. Abdul, B. J. Van Wie, O. Adesope, G. R. Brown(2015
undergraduates understand that they will not jump directly into technical research tasksand may appreciate the value of their VIP experience even if their interests are not directlyrelated to their team project. Such a shift would require developing communication skillsoutcomes and assessment methods. These assessments would allow for program evaluation thatgoes beyond faculty leads’ impressions and students’ self-perceptions, providing more objectivemeasures of students’ growth. Finally, faculty and graduate student mentors may need to bebetter prepared for the challenges of working with novice undergraduates on their projects. Ourobservations suggest that the benefits to faculty and graduate student research take time, withmeaningful contributions
School of Engineering Dr. Jan Fertig is a professor in the Humanities, Social Science, and Communication Department at the Milwaukee School of Engineering (MSOE), where she has taught sociology, psychology, and addictions for over 20 years. She was recently awarded MSOE’s prestigious Karl O. Werwath Applied Research Award for her ongoing research on diversity in engineering education and currently collects data as Co-Principal Investigator on the National Science Foundation-Funded S-STEM Grant (Grant No. DUE-2027632).Mrs. Judith Eroe, Grand Canyon University Judith Eroe retired in 2022 after 35 years at Grand Canyon University. She taught German and ESL before becoming the Executive Director of Assessment. She
Revolutionizing EngineeringDepartments (RED) program to support the ideation and implementation of significant structural,organizational, and cultural changes in engineering education to better equip engineeringstudents with the technical and professional skills needed to holistically address complex societalproblems. NSF RED teams represent specific engineering or engineering technologydepartments or colleges, with department heads serving as principal investigators on the grant. Inaddition to departmental faculty co-PIs, NSF RED teams typically have members from non-engineering departments who can serve as social/organizational change experts, engineeringeducation experts, and assessment experts on the team.Members of each interdisciplinary RED team
critically assess emerging themes.Peer debriefing sessions were conducted to incorporate diverse perspectives and validate thefindings. Finally, an external audit was performed by researchers unaffiliated with the codingprocess to assess the coherence and credibility of the final interpretations.Preliminary Findings: Leah’s Narrative Leah is a disabled, Middle Eastern international student in her fifth and final year of abiomedical engineering undergraduate program. She is also a sister, a fierce advocate, and a deepthinker who contemplates her place in the world. Her journey through engineering is intricatelytied to her identity as an international student. “The place that I feel like I can occupy iscompletely defined by what my passport
EOP framework [1] with the Foundry model [2] to guide students in the learning andimplementation of the sustainability principles suggested by the EOP. We have called this effortthe Bio-Foundry Initiative.2) Connections with the EOP FrameworkThe EOP framework is a very useful taxonomy of nine principles associated with best practices insustainability [1]. However, the ability to apply such principles might be enhanced through asystematic selection of challenges found within engineering applications that, afterwards, need tobe addressed by development of a Prototype of Innovative Technology (PIT). The integration ofthe EOP framework with the Foundry [2] is a key aspect we are interested in implementing incourses and then assessing the impact
. Such analysis assessed a possible increase in student learning due to theirinvolvement with ROLE.Participants Most student participants self-identified as Latinx or members of other minoritizedgroups, such as Native American and White women. In terms of declared gender, each cohortwas composed of half males and half females, with a higher percentage of junior and seniorstudents. Table 1 below shows other important characteristics of student participants. Table 1. Other student demographics Cohort 1 Cohort 2 Cohort 3 6 students 8 students 9 students First-generation Yes
-Aguidelines to avoid presenting incorrect summaries due to missed evidence. They suggestincluding trained experts to improve the quality and accuracy of the reviews. The study alsohighlighted the need for improved reporting standards and adherence to the best methodologicalpractices in the field.On the topic of identifying current trends in EE, Katz, et al. [4] provided an overview of researchtopics and methods published in the Journal of Engineering Education (JEE) over a 20-yearperiod. The report outlined trends in research topics, such as engineering learning mechanisms,learning systems, diversity, and assessment. It emphasized the importance of publishing researchgrounded in relevant theories, applying sound research methods, and addressing
(recitation) sections [7] [13]. While designand lab courses provide students with opportunities to exercise and develop their engineeringjudgement, OEMPs can be designed to hone this judgement by using engineering science contentto make and justify assumptions. For the OEMP integrated into the dynamics course, studentswork in groups to develop mathematical models that describe a real-world scenario [7] [13],which requires that they employ engineering judgement to make assumptions andsimplifications, and to assess the reasonableness of their model and final answer. By placingthese projects in the engineering science courses themselves, it aids in helping students to relatethat course’s content to the engineering design process. At the end of each
systems, (3) mutually reinforcing activities, (4)continuous communication, and (5) backbone support organizations.Application to This Study: The common agenda ensures alignment among stakeholders towardimproving transfer pathways for historically marginalized engineering students [11], [37]. By identifyingshared objectives, institutions can collectively address systemic barriers [37], [38].A shared measurement system enables stakeholders to track progress and assess effectivestrategies [11], [37]. This study synthesizes qualitative insights from stakeholder discussions todevelop actionable recommendations for improving transfer outcomes.Continuous communication fosters transparency and trust, ensuring coordinated efforts acrossinstitutions [10
papers reviewed, the introduction of teaching kits followed a structured formatconsisting of three main stages: (1) a form of scaffolded instruction, such as a lecture, video, orpre-lab activity to prepare students, (2) hands-on use of the kit, and (3) a post-kit evaluation, whichcould take the form of a survey, formal academic assessment, or other measures. Additionally,many studies incorporated a short pre-assessment before students engaged with the kit to establisha baseline for evaluating learning outcomes. However, there were notable exceptions to this traditional approach. Garcia-Gonzalezexperimented with a problem-based learning (PBL) method, in which students actively engagedwith the kit without following a pre-formulated set of
with previous coding experience or natural aptitudes for programming. For example, thecapstone project for one cybersecurity-themed camp required students to develop a simple application thatcould accept user input (a password) and then assess the quality or strength of that password and providethe user with feedback. In its simplest implementation, this application requires a basic understanding ofthe following concepts: 1) the basic elements of Python code (data types, variables, operators), 2)programming syntax, 3) built-in functions and methods, 4) acquiring user input, and 5) flow control (e.g.,for loops, conditional statements). Many topics covered in traditional introductory programming coursesare not required for students to be able to
working with the Quanser platform and participating in the self-drivencar student competition the authors did not complete any assessment or surveys with the studentgroup, it is still to note that participating students were very excited about the work and found thetraining very valuable for their future careers. The faculty recognize that allocating more timewould have made a big difference in preparing for the competition, and for future iterations ofthe project an earlier starting point would be very important, with team recruiting being betterdone in the fall semester. However, with only few months to work on the project and very basicbackground to start with, the first student team accomplished the most important challenge ofsubmitting for
of thestudents’ first year. We recently redesigned the summer bridge component of our program,launching the redesigned version in the summer of 2024 for the entering cohort. Our summerbridge curriculum enhancements aimed to improve math preparedness and accurate courseplacement, ultimately contributing to higher retention and success rates. Changes includeddoubling the length of instruction from two weeks to four, building a new curriculum aimed atpreparing for university-level pre-calculus, and implementing weekly assessments to trackstudent understanding. We also improved the placement process by which we place programparticipants into the appropriate math course in the first term of their first year. Partnerships andinterdisciplinary
journal responses tomitigate the use of generative AI.Data AnalysisBoth qualitative and quantitative methods will be employed to analyze the data.Student reflections will be thematically analyzed to identify patterns in how they connectmathematical concepts to engineering and science applications. LIWC-22 (Linguistic Inquiry andWord Count), a validated text analysis tool, will be used to analyze the linguistic andpsychological features of student reflections. Key LIWC-22 metrics include: • Cognitive Complexity: Evaluating analytical and reflective thinking in students’ responses. • Emotional Tone: Measuring changes in confidence and anxiety about mathematics. • Engagement: Assessing the use of causal and insight-related language
, creating a centralized resource for efficient networking and communication.To support the Summit’s long-term impact, the project team employed an evidence-basedevaluation approach to assess its effectiveness and inform future iterations. Evidence-baseddesign enhances the Summit's effectiveness by aligning its structure with proven networking andjob placement methods, ensuring meaningful connections and successful outcomes. It alsoprovides data-driven insights to refine the intervention, increase its credibility, and supportscalability, sustainability, and long-term.MethodologyParticipant Recruitment and PromotionWe designed the Summit as a national, virtual gathering event to address inequities inpostdoctoral recruitment by fostering connections
emerged: the importance ofasking questions, soft-skills, and the level of education. Each theme is described below.Importance of Asking QuestionsWhen asked about student interns’ strengths, each industry mentor brought up the ability to askquestions in some capacity. Mentors admired students’ timing when asking questions as well asthe kind of questions they asked. When commenting on how asking questions helps an intern,mentor Ed said, “…he was eager to learn, he asked a lot of good questions. He definitely didn’thold back, and I think that helps an intern to be successful if they feel very free to ask questions.”All mentors’ names in this paper are pseudonyms to protect their privacy.Some mentors even looked to assess interns’ ability to ask the
predominantly white institution,” J. Res. Sci. Teach., vol. 61, no. 4, pp. 905–936, 2024, doi: 10.1002/tea.21911.[7] J. L. Huff and M. S. Ross, “Advancing an Integrative Perspective of Identity in Engineering Education,” Int. Handb. Eng. Educ. Res., pp. 183–198, 2023.[8] E. S. Abes, S. R. Jones, and M. K. McEwen, “Reconceptualizing the Model of Multiple Dimensions of Identity: The Role of Meaning-Making Capacity in the Construction of Multiple Identities,” J. Coll. Stud. Dev., vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 1–22, 2007, doi: 10.1353/csd.2007.0000.[9] R. Nazempour, H. Darabi, P. C. Nelson, R. A. Revelo, Y. Siow, and J. Abiade, “Execution Details and Assessment Results of a Summer Bridge Program for Engineering Freshmen,” presented at the 2019
diversity, facilitating theinclusion of students with special educational needs [7], [8]. Competency-based learning gained traction, with 68% of schools implementing it in 2022, toprepare students for an ever-changing job market. Continuous assessment also becameprominent, with 72% of teachers using this method in 2021 to provide constant feedback andbetter adapt to students' needs. These methodologies changes reflect the commitment of schools and teachers to improveeducation through personalisation, inclusion, and a focus on key competencies essential foraddressing 21st-century challenges [9]. At the same time, the curricula of degree programmes in education and master’s degrees forteacher training integrate active methodologies as a core
of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National ScienceFoundation.References[1] S. Stewart, D. H. Lim, and J. Kim, “Factors Influencing College Persistence for First-Time Students,” Journal of Developmental Education, vol. 38, no. 3, 2015.[2] S. L. Fletcher, D. Newell, L. Newton, and M. Anderson-Rowland, “The Wise Summer Bridge Program: Assessing Student Attrition, Retention, And Program Effectiveness,” presented at the 2001 Annual Conference, Jun. 2001, p. 6.1053.1-6.1053.7. Accessed: Jul. 19, 2024. [Online]. Available: https://peer.asee.org/the-wise-summer-bridge- program-assessing-student-attrition-retention-and-program-effectiveness[3] R. A. M. Hensel, J. Dygert, and M. L. Morris