BOARD # 291: Progress in Evaluating Hands-on Learning Module Implementation and Considerations of Social Cognitive Theory

Riley Jackson Fosbre; David B. Thiessen; Bernard J. Van Wie; Olusola Adesope; Prashanta Dutta; Faraz Rahimi; Md Shariful Islam

Download Paper | Permalink

Conference: 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Location: Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Publication Date: June 22, 2025
Start Date: June 22, 2025
End Date: August 15, 2025
Conference Session: NSF Grantees Poster Session I
Tagged Topic: NSF Grantees Poster Session
Page Count: 8
DOI: 10.18260/1-2--55656
Permanent URL: https://peer.asee.org/55656
Download Count: 14

Paper Authors

biography

Riley Jackson Fosbre Washington State University

visit author page

Riley Jackson Fosbre is a graduate student at Washington State University, Pullman. He is pursuing his PhD in Chemical Engineering, and currently possesses a MS without a thesis. His research interests involve engineering education and technology.

visit author page

biography

David B. Thiessen Washington State University orcid.org/0000-0003-4283-5914

visit author page

David B.Thiessen received his Ph.D. in Chemical Engineering from the University of Colorado in
1992 and has been at Washington State University since 1994. His research interests include fluid
physics, acoustics, and engineering education.

visit author page

biography

Bernard J. Van Wie Washington State University orcid.org/0000-0001-7382-9715

visit author page

Prof. Bernard J. Van Wie received his B.S., M.S. and Ph.D., and did his postdoctoral work at the University of Oklahoma where he also taught as a visiting lecturer. He has been on the Washington State University (WSU) faculty for 42 years and for the past 27 years has focused extensively on novel team-interactive hands-on learning with miniature Desktop Learning Modules that represent physical equipment used in industry. Bernie and his cross-disciplinary team have shown markedly enhanced learning of concepts at higher Bloom's levels and student motivation through use of these modules. He has about 100 publications in the areas of biotechnology and engineering education and about 70 ASEE full-length publish-to-present publications.

visit author page

biography

Olusola Adesope Washington State University

visit author page

Dr. Olusola O. Adesope is a Professor of Educational Psychology and a Boeing Distinguished Professor of STEM Education at Washington State University, Pullman. His research is at the intersection of educational psychology, learning sciences, and instructi

visit author page

biography

Prashanta Dutta Washington State University orcid.org/0000-0001-5082-3994

visit author page

Prof. Prashanta Dutta has received his PhD degree in Mechanical Engineering from the Texas A&M University in 2001. Since then he has been working as an Assistant Professor at the School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering at Washington State Universit

visit author page

author page

Faraz Rahimi Washington State University

biography

Md Shariful Islam Washington State University

visit author page

I am a Ph.D. student at the WSU Pullman campus. My primary research areas are Machine Learning (ML), Physics-informed Neural Networks (PINN), and Heat transfer. I also conduct research on low-cost desktop learning modules.

visit author page

Download Paper | Permalink

Abstract

Over the course of a seven-year study, our team created and disseminated several Low-Cost Desktop Learning Modules (LCDLMs) used to teach college students difficult engineering principles. The goal of this project is not only to elevate students' understanding of engineering concepts by learning in a hands-on manner, lowering the associated cognitive load, but to allow them an opportunity to work in interactive groups. This approach is inspired by Social Cognitive Theory (Author, 2011), which posits learning is a social process, and thus complex ideas are learned best collaboratively. LCDLMs are thus meant to help students visualize the concepts to be learned and create an environment where students can make observations and test hypotheses together, sharing and evolving their understanding through their differing perspectives. Students are asked to participate in pre- and posttests to assess learning of the associated concepts, and a survey to gauge their motivation inspired by using the LCDLMs.

Now that the project has been running for several years, and data have been collected in several classrooms at universities across the country, it is worth examining whether instructors have embraced this approach to enhance their own learning strategies as well as for us to assess student learning within the classroom. The LCDLMs were disseminated to instructors who agreed to participate via a “Hub and Spoke” model, where workshops were held in different regions at various “hubs” across the US to instruct professors on appropriate uses of LCDLMs. Feedback was gained through post-implementation forms with written responses submitted semesterly. The intent is to remove any barriers instructors may have in implementing LCDLMs effectively, such as lack of funds, poor technical support, insufficient how-to information, as well as to include their suggestions about more effective strategies for using the LCDLMs and collecting test scores and survey information from their students.

In the past year, greater attempts have been made to communicate with participating instructors throughout the school year. Instructors have asked that the pre- and posttest results from the LCDLM activities be shared with them outside of workshops, not only to support the validity of use of the LCDLMs, but so the activities can be incorporated into their grade books. Additionally, we have compiled a list of “best practices” from both the researchers working on the project and the participants in the study to implement the LCDLMs more efficiently. To assess the effectiveness of this new initiative, we have called participants in for interviews to receive their feedback on the best practices and learn about their implementation process in greater detail, to formulate new hypotheses and identify misconceptions and misunderstandings. We have also gone over all the post-implementation forms reporting participant implementation strategies since the release of our best practices document in August 2023 and comparing said strategies to class performance.

Finally, new LCDLMs are under development to incorporate additional engineering topics not yet covered by the current set. A glucose analyzer LCDLM is being produced, tested, and prepared for implementation, while a recently developed fluidized bed will be used for a third time in the classroom and recent work includes use of a gel-immobilized enzyme. Results from implementations will be analyzed based on pre- and post-tests and motivational surveys.

Citation
Format

Fosbre, R. J., & Thiessen, D. B., & Van Wie, B. J., & Adesope, O., & Dutta, P., & Rahimi, F., & Islam, M. S. (2025, June), BOARD # 291: Progress in Evaluating Hands-on Learning Module Implementation and Considerations of Social Cognitive Theory Paper presented at 2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition , Montreal, Quebec, Canada . 10.18260/1-2--55656

TY  - CPAPER
AB  - Over the course of a seven-year study, our team created and disseminated several Low-Cost Desktop Learning Modules (LCDLMs) used to teach college students difficult engineering principles. The goal of this project is not only to elevate students&#39; understanding of engineering concepts by learning in a hands-on manner, lowering the associated cognitive load, but to allow them an opportunity to work in interactive groups. This approach is inspired by Social Cognitive Theory (Author, 2011), which posits learning is a social process, and thus complex ideas are learned best collaboratively. LCDLMs are thus meant to help students visualize the concepts to be learned and create an environment where students can make observations and test hypotheses together, sharing and evolving their understanding through their differing perspectives. Students are asked to participate in pre- and posttests to assess learning of the associated concepts, and a survey to gauge their motivation inspired by using the LCDLMs. 

Now that the project has been running for several years, and data have been collected in several classrooms at universities across the country, it is worth examining whether instructors have embraced this approach to enhance their own learning strategies as well as for us to assess student learning within the classroom. The LCDLMs were disseminated to instructors who agreed to participate via a “Hub and Spoke” model, where workshops were held in different regions at various “hubs” across the US to instruct professors on appropriate uses of LCDLMs. Feedback was gained through post-implementation forms with written responses submitted semesterly. The intent is to remove any barriers instructors may have in implementing LCDLMs effectively, such as lack of funds, poor technical support, insufficient how-to information, as well as to include their suggestions about more effective strategies for using the LCDLMs and collecting test scores and survey information from their students. 

In the past year, greater attempts have been made to communicate with participating instructors throughout the school year. Instructors have asked that the pre- and posttest results from the LCDLM activities be shared with them outside of workshops, not only to support the validity of use of the LCDLMs, but so the activities can be incorporated into their grade books. Additionally, we have compiled a list of “best practices” from both the researchers working on the project and the participants in the study to implement the LCDLMs more efficiently. To assess the effectiveness of this new initiative, we have called participants in for interviews to receive their feedback on the best practices and learn about their implementation process in greater detail, to formulate new hypotheses and identify misconceptions and misunderstandings. We have also gone over all the post-implementation forms reporting participant implementation strategies since the release of our best practices document in August 2023 and comparing said strategies to class performance.  

Finally, new LCDLMs are under development to incorporate additional engineering topics not yet covered by the current set. A glucose analyzer LCDLM is being produced, tested, and prepared for implementation, while a recently developed fluidized bed will be used for a third time in the classroom and recent work includes use of a gel-immobilized enzyme. Results from implementations will be analyzed based on pre- and post-tests and motivational surveys.
AU  - Riley Jackson Fosbre
AU  - David B. Thiessen
AU  - Bernard J. Van Wie
AU  - Olusola Adesope
AU  - Prashanta Dutta
AU  - Faraz Rahimi
AU  - Md Shariful Islam
CY  - Montreal, Quebec, Canada 
DA  - 2025/06/22
PB  - ASEE Conferences
TI  - BOARD # 291: Progress in Evaluating Hands-on Learning Module Implementation and Considerations of Social Cognitive Theory
UR  - https://peer.asee.org/55656
DO  - 10.18260/1-2--55656
ER  -