Paper ID #8488Using Teacher Feedback to Improve the Design of a Fourth Year High SchoolMathematics CurriculumSara Hahler, Louisiana Tech University Sara Hahler is a graduate student at Louisiana Tech University. She received her Bachelor of Science in mathematics education in 2012 from Louisiana College and is currently enrolled in the Computational Analysis and Modeling PhD program at Louisiana Tech. During her time as an undergraduate, she served as a tutor for the mathematics department at Louisiana College. Currently, she is performing research in the area of mathematics education exploring the connection between high
Paper ID #28846Multi Institutional Collaboration in Additive Manufacturing: LessonsLearnedMichael Littrell, Tennessee Tech University Michael Littrell is a graduate research and teaching assistant at Tennessee Tech University. He is pursuing a PhD in Exceptional Learning with an Emphasis in Program Planning and Evaluation. He is interested in quantitative research methodology in education, student assessment, and applied statistics. Michael Littrell has conducted research and evaluation of a wide range of education and non-education focused programs.Dr. George Chitiyo, Tennessee Tech University George Chitiyo is a
idea that he or sheexperimental work. To counter these could derive a result with 8 significant figures. Atdeficiencies, a new lab course procedure was this session it was emphasized that in the fluidsinitiated. In this program, the students are lab 3 significant figure results are probablyrequired to write initial library research reports somewhat optimistic and data should be recorded with this in mind. This problem with thethat focus on some facet of significant figures, correct use of significant figures is furtherunits, or error analysis. These reports are
Professor at the University of Texas, Pan American. He received his Ph.D. degree in mechanical engineering from the University of Illinois, UrbanaChampaign in 2007. He conducts research on convective heat transfer enhancement and condensate retention management in compact heat exchangers. He teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in thermal-fluid sciences and computational methods. Page 25.291.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Challenge-Based-Instruction in Measurements and Instrumentation CourseAbstractThis paper describes a newly developed Challenge-Based-Instruction
, integrated STEM education, and sustainability of teacher PL outcomes.Min Jung Lee, University of North DakotaProf. Ryan G. Summers Ryan Summers is Assistant Professor of Secondary Science Education in the Department of Teaching and Learning. Originally from southern Illinois, Dr. Summers obtained his B.S. in biological sciences, with a minor in chemistry and teacher’s certification, at Eastern Illinois University in Charleston, IL. He taught high school science, array of biology, chemistry, physics and other offerings in rural and suburban settings, before leaving to pursue his graduate studies full time at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. Dr. Summers completed his Ph.D. in May of 2016 at UIUC in Curriculum
Paper ID #43311Board 351: Preparing Early Engineers Through Context, Connections, andCommunityProf. Eric Davishahl, Whatcom Community College Eric Davishahl serves as professor and engineering program coordinator at Whatcom Community College in northwest Washington state. His current project involves developing and piloting an integrated multidisciplinary learning community for first-year engineering. More general teaching and research interests include designing, implementing and assessing activities for first-year engineering, engineering mechanics, and scientific computing. Eric has been an active member of ASEE since
to understand, and allow students to refine skillslearned in studio labs. Students are required to work in groups to complete laboratory projectsoutside of class8. The projects chosen for this course are applications of signal processingconcepts to audio processing and computer vision. These applications were chosen becausestudents are able to hear, in the case of audio processing, or see, in the case of computer vision,the direct results of their efforts.Student groups are required to research topics related to each project and propose a topic forfurther study by submitting an abstract that explains the proposed work. The student groups thenare required to attempt to develop a novel advancement in the field of audio processing orcomputer
andexperiences, while also enabling faculty to evaluate bids holistically between teams.The capstone marketplace gives students access to a vast array of information about their peersand the status of the course. The dashboard displays their status in the project selection processwhere they can view information about groups, projects, and bids. Student schedules, unlike withCATME, are not considered as the students had a common studio and lab times for the capstonedesign courses studied in this research. The page is dynamically updated depending on thecurrent stage of the course. In the first stage, users are not in teams yet, so they see informationabout their group prospects (invitations and join requests) and their project interests. Once theyhave
computer software. Theexperimental projects and on-campus construction project required considerable planning,coordination, and meetings prior to the start of the semester with graduate students, campusofficials, contractors, and engineers. Although this preparation requires additional time, it helpsensure students have valuable project experiences. In addition, the instructor has found that manystudents will eagerly volunteer to participate in hands-on research projects for class credit alone.Mentoring teams also requires a considerable commitment of time. The author has mentored anaverage of nine teams per semester at CSUS. Teams discuss their project with the instructorbefore they submit the project proposal, and usually each team makes an
Paper ID #43713Navigating the AI Revolution in Engineering Management Education: Strategiesfor Detection, Integrity, and Pedagogical EnhancementDr. Raymond L. Smith III, East Carolina University Dr. Smith is an assistant professor of engineering in the College of Engineering and Technology at East Carolina University. Dr. Smith’s research focuses on developing and applying operations research and applied statistics methods to provide model-based, implementable solutions for complex systems. His teaching interests include operations research, simulation modeling and analysis, systems optimization, systems engineering and
presentations by the ASI teamscheduled for Case Study discussions in two graduate classes on Strategic Marketing conductedby Prof. Pam Barr in mid-March 2000. The experience gained from these efforts, beyond theimmediate value to team participants, is aimed to develop larger programs where engineering Page 5.79.7and business students collaborate on identifying, brainstorming and developing businessconcepts.X. Faculty Advisor's RoleThe faculty advisor is as much a learner as the students are, in this project. Unlike a formalcourse on entrepreneurship, the learning had to be done on-the-job; however, this projectprovides excellent
AC 2007-472: FROM TOOTSIE ROLLS TO COMPOSITES: ASSESSING ASPECTRUM OF ACTIVE LEARNING ACTIVITIES IN ENGINEERINGMECHANICSJulie Linsey, University of Texas-Austin JULIE LINSEY is a Ph.D. candidate in the Mechanical Engineering Department at The University of Texas at Austin. Her research focus is on systematic methods and tools for innovative and efficient conceptual design with particular focus on design-by-analogy. Contact:julie@linseys.orgAustin Talley, University of Texas--Austin AUSTIN TALLEY is a graduate student in the Mechanical Engineering Department at The University of Texas at Austin. His research focus is in design methodology and engineering education. He received his
at UMD, she was the co-chair of the Women in Engineering Student Advisory Board and a student ambassador for the Clark School of Engineering. Emilia is currently working in industry, and hopes to eventually pursue graduate studies in Engineering Education. Her research interests include emotion in design and empathetic classroom practices. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Designing a Seminar for Peer Educators in Undergraduate Engineering Design CoursesAbstractLearning Assistants (LAs) are undergraduate peer educators who participate in weekly pedagogyseminars and work alongside faculty instructors in active-learning based undergraduate
described.IntroductionAlthough calculus I is a traditional entry point for first-year engineering students, for a variety ofreasons the course generates a high failure rate. Poor performance in this “gateway” course nodoubt leads many students to reexamine their decisions to study engineering. Compounding thescenario are widespread efforts to diversify the student population of engineering with the verystudents who are statistically most likely to graduate high school underprepared for direct entryinto calculus I—minorities, women and first-generation college attendees. Thus, achievingdiversity in engineering is linked to the performance outcomes in mathematics of studentshistorically underrepresented in engineering, including the underrepresented minority (URM
research, theauthor has considered [1] this high level of expenses, as well as the high rate of increase in thecost of these over time. These included costs of over $300 for individual textbooks [2] and over$1200 a year [3], and a rate of increase of three times the overall rate of inflation, since 1970 [4].The author also researched the associated negative consequences. These included directconsequences like avoidance of textbook purchases [5], avoidance of necessary courses withhigh textbook costs [6], and poor course performance [7], and indirect consequences, like delaysin student graduation, increases in student attrition, and avoidance of “high-cost” majors (likeengineering and technology) [6]. Earlier measures used by students to mitigate
created that allows students to work on their own unique project. Lab exercises, instructionalvideos, and project working space were developed to support the open-ended projects thatrequired the use of the makerspace. An end-of-semester survey was conducted to see if theparticipants in the RAD project benefited from the makerspace training and if the projectsimproved their engineering design abilities. A timeline of events and descriptions of the trainingare documented for others to reproduce.IntroductionThis complete research paper will describe a study of training, assignments, and projects thatencourage students to use makerspace and bring their designs into reality. This addresses thefirst-year programs division topics of interest for project
. Gere, Theory of Elastic Stability. 2nd ed. 1961, New York: McGraw-Hill. ZAYD C. LESEMANDr. Zayd.C.Leseman currently serves as an Assistant Professor of Mechanical Engineering Department at the Universityof New Mexico, Albuquerque. His research interests include design, fabrication and analysis of novel MEMS/NEMSdevices and experiments in order to study the surface, mechanical, and electrical properties of materials at the nanoscale.Additionally, he creates bioMEMS devices to perform studies in single-cell mechanics and nano/microfluidics. Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference The University of New Mexico – Albuquerque Copyright
indicated that they now consider biomedical engineering as a potential careeror graduate school option. Again, since all of these students came to a non-biomedical engineer-ing program, we conjecture that all of them got interested in this field largely in-part because ofthis one exercise. Based on this preliminary analysis, we believe that this simple experiment hada significant impact on students, and opened a field of study that they previously did not consid-er, or perhaps were not even aware of. These results are consistent with the results of the largerscale attitudes and interests survey administered to all freshmen.Muscles - Movement and Control of MovementBirth defects, illnesses, and injuries can lead to the loss of muscle or muscular
2006-2207: INTERNATIONAL CITIZENSHIP AND GLOBAL SERVICELEADERSHIP – THE ROLE OF INTERDISCIPLINARY TEAMS INENGINEERING EDUCATIONSarah Freeman, Tufts University Ms. Freeman is a current MS graduate student in the Civil and Environmental Engineering department at Tufts University. She received her BS degrees in Mechanical Engineering from Tufts and served as the 2005 President and co-founder of the Tufts Engineers-Without-Borders student chapter. Her teaching and research interests lie in the areas of water resources, sustainable development and appropriate technologies.Douglas Matson, Tufts University Dr. Matson is an Associate Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department at Tufts
, there are factors unrelated to instructor teaching effectiveness (and outside of theinstructor’s control) which have been shown to affect SET ratings. Cashin11 has monitored thesubstantial research compiled on SET ratings since 1971 and has noted the following variables ofconcern when weighing an instructor’s SET ratings: Student motivation or reason for taking the course. (Where students have prior interest in the subject matter, SET ratings tend to be higher.) Level of the course. (Higher level courses, particularly graduate courses, may yield slightly higher SET ratings.) Academic field. (Humanities and arts type courses yield higher ratings than social science type courses, and both of these
innovation andcompetitiveness will not be too appealing to engineering firms. It is heartwarming to see thatsucceeding business models to the Business Model Canvas, among which is the Innovationcanvas have come to quickly fill the gap and are expected to help develop other valuable modelsto enhance ability of engineering firms to operate better and make more money.References [1] Pekuri, A. (2015). “The Role Of Business Models nn Construction Business Management, University of Oulu Graduate School”. University of Oulu, Faculty of Technology, Acta Univ. Oul. C 527, 2015 [2] Petre, M. (2003). “Disciplines of innovation in engineering design. In N. Cross and E. Edmonds (eds) Expertise in Design”. Design Thinking Research Symposium 6
developing aDesign Learning Simulator (DLS). The DLS consists of three components - processes andprocedures that are embodied in a product realization process, tools that support those processes,and a domain knowledge base from which to gather information to complete tasks. The Design-Learning Simulator may be accessed on the World Wide Web at"http://www.srl.gatech.edu/DLS/". In this paper, we describe a Function-Behavior-Structure model, which is embodied in a part of our Design Learning Simulator, for convertinginformation that characterizes the needs and requirements for a product into knowledge about theproduct.1 Graduate Research Assistant2 Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Director, Systems Realization Laboratory3 Assistant
low computationalonboard power would be to add a small PC. Sahin et al. [21] designed microrobots to teach undergraduate and graduate students aboutmultidisciplinary engineering projects. These same robots were also used for graduate andundergraduate research, clubs, and organizations. This worked used microbots, which were aswarm of small, inexpensive, autonomous agents. These robots were able to quickly and cheaplycover more ground and were good for reconnaissance, search and rescue, and wildfire detection.The swarm of micro agents were referred to as MEMScouts and these were categorized asSensScouts, GroundScouts, and AirScouts. For example, the GroundScouts had a modulararchitecture that included locomotion, communication, control
previous training are difficult to measure. We planto develop both pre- and post-intervention assessment of the learning outcomes described here:experimental methodology, communication, and project management. We also plan to morethoroughly characterize the complexity of our operation, e.g. stabilization of writing rubrics ascommunicated here. The assessment design is ongoing and results will be presented in a futurepaper.Student perceptions are more commonly reported, and we report some here. In light of recentprogram changes, the following research question is asked: Have the changes in coursestructure, staffing, and enrollment come at the cost of student perceptions of the course? Thisquestion is addressed by studying student course evaluations
, and Interdisciplinary Humanities at Wake Forest University. He is also a Research Fellow with the Oxford Character Project. He holds a Ph.D. from Princeton University, a B.A. from Rhodes College, and a second B.A. from the University of Oxford, where he studied as a Rhodes Scholar. His research focuses on the role of virtues in public life and the education of character in the university. He is a co-principal investigator on character-related grants funded by the John Templeton Foundation, Kern Family Foundation, and Lilly Endowment. Prior to joining Wake Forest, he helped to launch the Oxford Character Project to help graduate students in business, engineering, government, law, medicine, and other fields think
Paper ID #38783Using Faculty Learning Communities to Create a Sustainable Community ofPractice That Promotes Curricular and Instructional ChangeDr. Megan Morin, ASHLIN Management Group Megan Morin (she/her) graduated from the University of Dayton with a bachelor’s degree in Middle Childhood Education and completed her Master’s and Ph.D. degrees at North Carolina State University in Engineering and Technology Education. Megan’s research interests include assessment, program devel- opment, faculty development, and workforce development. These have developed based on her previous work experiences as the KEEN Program
-Champaign I am currently the Associate Director of Assessment and Research team at the Siebel Center for Design (SCD) at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. I work with a group of wonderful and talented people at SCD’s Assessment and Research Laboratory to conduct research that informs and evaluates our practice of teaching and learning human-centered design in formal and informal learning environments. My Research focuses on studying students’ collaborative problem solving processes and the role of the teacher in facilitating these processes in STEM classrooms. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 WIP: Assessing Aerospace Students’ Human-Centered Engineering Design
/CAM software. These courses included Intro to CAD, Advanced CAD, CAD/CAM Applications, Engineering Design Using Solid Modeling, and Parametric Graphics Design. She also taught Descriptive Geometry, Manu- facturing Simulation (ProModel), Process Automation & Robotics, Production Planning & Process Con- trol, Statics & Strength of Materials, and Machine Design. As a Project Director, she managed several departmental projects funded by the institution’s Research, Scholarship and Professional Growth Com- mittee, the Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Utah Science Technology and Research initiative, and/or the Utah Center for Aeronautical Innovation & Design. She wrote proposals, acquired and managed
begun to address how computing education needs to change to reflect the newprofessional landscape graduates are entering where employees are expected to seamlesslyintegrate GenAI tools into their workflows for improved efficiency. Some faculty are providingGenAI tools to be used during the course, such as Harvard’s CS50 Duck Debugger, allowingstudents to practice leveraging such tools. Others are diving into the deeper pedagogicalimplications, such as Agarwal and colleagues [12], who highlight that teachers might need toshift focus from students' ability to write code from scratch to students' ability to critique code,potentially through the use of refute-style assessments.Turning to the students themselves, researchers conducted surveys to get
relying more on activeand group learning models. More “studio” classes are being used to improve learning.IntroductionThe University of Florida (UF) is conducting an experiment to improve the first two years of engineeringeducation. This time period in an engineer’s education is referred to as Stage I. This research is supported bythe Southeastern University and College Coalition for Engineering EDucation (SUCCEED), one of the NationalScience Foundation (NSF) engineering educational coalitions. This experiment represents one part of a largerSUCCEED project with other work being conducted at North Carolina State University (NCSU) under theleadership of Dr. Richard Felder. The UF portion consists of a radical change in the way we prepare