Asee peer logo
Well-matched quotation marks can be used to demarcate phrases, and the + and - operators can be used to require or exclude words respectively
Displaying results 2461 - 2490 of 38830 in total
Conference Session
International Division (INTL) Poster Session
Collection
2025 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Xinfeng Quan, Westlake University; Jing Wang
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
International Division (INTL)
assessment tools such as the EBAPS.We present data from one Chinese university showing that, while overall EBAPS scores arecomparable to those of U.S. students, Chinese students score significantly lower on theEvolving Knowledge and Source of Ability to Learn axes. Additionally, weaker inter-itemcorrelations among certain items suggest the current EBAPS may not accurately reflectChinese students’ EB.To address these gaps, we conducted interviews and introduced new survey items designed tocapture naïve dialecticism – a cognitive pattern emphasizing contradiction, change, and holism– which influences Chinese learners’ perspectives on knowledge and learning. We show thatstudents’ limited understanding of epistemology and learning science may contribute
Conference Session
SD Technical Session: Tricks of the Trade
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jennifer A. Turns, University of Washington; Brook Sattler, University of Washington; Kathryn Ann Mobrand, University of Washington; Drew Paine, Human Centered Design & Engineering, University of Washington
Tagged Divisions
Student
Paper ID #10173Connecting Research to Action: A Useful ProcedureDr. Jennifer A Turns, University of WashingtonDr. Brook Sattler, University of WashingtonDr. Kathryn Ann Mobrand, University of WashingtonDrew Paine, Human Centered Design & Engineering, University of Washington Page 24.313.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Connecting Research to Action: A Useful ProcedureIntroductionIn recent years, the engineering education community has invested significant energy andresources in the creation of a
Conference Session
Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED) - Case Studies in Design Education
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Melissa Lepe, University of California, Irvine; Natascha Trellinger Buswell, University of California, Irvine; Jacqueline L. Huynh, University of California, Irvine
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education Division (DEED)
in their programrequirements. The study assessed the impact on student confidence in using these tools beforeand after the course, aiming to better understand their experiences and create course materialsthat more accurately reflect the challenges of aerospace engineering design. A backwards designapproach was employed in the development of the modules, and a thematic analysis wasconducted on student reflections. The analysis underscored the importance of challengingprojects supplemented with supporting modules in gaining insights into engineering design toolsfor aircraft design.IntroductionWith the fast and ever-changing growth in the aerospace industry, it is necessary to meet thedemands of the industry with individuals who are capable of
Conference Session
Mr. Burns' Brainchild: AI in the Springfield STEM Classroom, Release the Hounds!
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Geling Xu, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach; Milan Dahal, Tufts Center for Engineering Education and Outreach; Brian Gravel, Tufts University
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education Division (PCEE)
Emerging Technologies through Co-design Workshop (RTP)AbstractArtificial Intelligence(AI) and Machine Learning (ML) touch every aspect of modern life andwill continue to influence us more than ever in the future. Schools and teachers should beprepared to let the children explore ML to help them understand how the world around themfunctions. It has been shown that children as young as three years old can not only interact withML technologies but also produce ML data sets and models[1].In this paper, we explore factors influencing the growth of teacher confidence in implementingemerging ML technologies within engineering educational settings. Five teachers from St. Louis,USA, engaged in a co-design workshop to explore an emerging ML toolkit and to
Conference Session
Aerospace Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Marty Mathews Jr., University of Wisconsin, Platteville; Antonette T. Cummings P.E., University of Wisconsin, Platteville
Tagged Divisions
Aerospace
Bell Helicopter for seven years, earning airplane and helicopter private pilot ratings. She has a Professional Engineer license in Texas in Thermal/Fluid Systems. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2018 Mapping Design Processes to Practicing Engineers’ Perceptions of Uncertainty in Aerospace Design Student PaperAbstractUncertainty is an unavoidable aspect of design. We discovered there are many different types ofuncertainty in complex systems, however these can be condensed into a few categories.Significant research exists on epistemic uncertainty, but proper understanding and managementof other forms of uncertainty are less
Conference Session
PCEE Technical Session 8: Engineering Design in Elementary School
Collection
2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ron Skinner, University of California, Santa Barbara; Danielle Harlow
© American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.com Recognition of Design Failure by Fourth Grade Students During an Engineering Design Challenge (Fundamental)AbstractThe practice of persisting and learning from design failures is essential to engineering design andoffers unique ways of knowing and learning for K-12 students. To understand how studentsengage in the practice of persisting and learning from design failures, we must first understandhow, if at all, they recognize that a design failure has occurred. We studied a classroom of fourthgrade students engaged in an engineering design challenge and examined the ways in whichdesign failure occurred and
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division – Design and Entrepreneurship
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Bryan O'Neil Boulanger, Ohio Northern University; Joe Tranquillo, Bucknell University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
 experience. Specifically, this paper utilizes Leximancer (natural language analytics software) to perform comparative analysis of student reflections and authoritative literature to identify themes within the student reflections that overlap with the entrepreneurship and design knowledge base. The outcomes of this research will inform educators as to the utility of design­based immersive learning experiences in blending engineering design and entrepreneurship.   Methods  There are several survey­based methods for tracking mindsets. There are instruments to measure attitudes toward, and interest in, entrepreneurship education (Duval­Couetil et al., 2012); a propensity for creativity and innovativeness (Ragusa, 2011); an understanding of innovation
Conference Session
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED) Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Adel Alhalawani, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Renee D. Rogge, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Bill Weiner, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology; Alan Chiu, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Biomedical Engineering Division (BED)
©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work in Progress: Teaching Fundamental Design Principles Through Integration of Knowledge and Curriculum DesignIntroductionCurriculum integration is “a way of thinking about what schools are for, about the sources ofcurriculum, and about the uses of knowledge” [1]. Curriculum integration requires, and should bebased on, deep thinking and understanding of the problem [2,3]. In the current system of education,the problem is not about the discipline of knowledge but with the approach and the representationof that knowledge in a way that satisfies a broad population of customers. Are students able toimplement and apply the knowledge they learn in school to solve real-life problems
Conference Session
K-12 and Precollege Engineering Curriculum and Programming Resources, Part 2 of 2
Collection
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Pramod Rajan, Laboratory for Innovative Technology & Engineering Education (LITEE); P.K. Raju, Laboratory for Innovative Technology & Engineering Education (LITEE); John Timothy Gill, Lee-Scott Academy
Tagged Divisions
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering
to a group of senior levelhigh school students. The main objective of the game is to teach the engineering design processto the students in a fun gaming environment. The game has different levels (tutorial, water towerlevel & train bridge level) and progressions, and uses a tower building simulation as an exampleto explain the design process and to assess their understanding of the game. The goals (forexample: achieve a minimum height, do not exceed a maximum cost, and bear a minimum load)of the game are clearly defined at the beginning of each level. After learning the engineeringdesign process through the game, the students work on a hands-on design project applying thedesign process. The effectiveness of the game is examined through a
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH) Technical Session 10: Capstone and Design Education
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sean Tolman, Utah Valley University; Matthew J Jensen, Utah Valley University
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering Division (MECH)
four distractors and generally out-performed the second-year andthird-year students. This result seems to support the hypothesis that students are generallylearning the taught engineering design process in their first year but begin to forget the specificsin later years without any formal coverage of the design process in any courses taken duringthose years.To better understand the students’ general ability to recollect the steps in the design process, asimilar dataset was created by providing students credit for identifying the correct step +/- 1 spot.Students were marked correct if they were able to accurately identify a step in the engineeringdesign process, and listed that step in either the appropriate order, or off by only one spot
Conference Session
Creativity and Innovation in Engineering Design
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Charles Camarda, NYU; Sven Bilen, Pennsylvania State University; Olivier de Weck, MIT; Jeannette Yen, Georgia Institute of Technology; Jack Matson, Pennsylvania State University
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
lecturers could refer to and helpintegrate throughout the lectures and sessions to positively reinforce and provide relevantexamples of how these themes were/are used in real projects (Fig. 6).   The human Arrogance is the Understand the Failure is not an mind – use it enemy of creativity mechanisms of option…it’s a failure requirement Pan out and zoom in Allow ideas time to Everyone is creative during the design incubate processFigure 6. – Innovative Engineering Design thematic icons.The
Conference Session
Mechanical Engineering Division Technical Session 2
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Daniel D. Jensen, U.S. Air Force Academy; Kristin L. Wood, Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD); Aaron P Bauer, United States Air Force Academy; Blake Perez, Singapore University of Technology and Design; Milton Doria, United States Air Force Academy; Michael Lawrence Anderson P.E., United States Air Force; Luke Jensen, CREO
Tagged Divisions
Mechanical Engineering
design of Micro Air Vehicles, development of innovative de- sign methodologies and enhancement of engineering education. Dr Jensen has authored over 100 refereed papers and has been awarded over $4 million of research grants.Dr. Kristin L. Wood, Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD) Dr. Kristin L. Wood is currently a Professor and Head of Pillar, Engineering and Product Development (EPD), and Co-Director of the SUTD-MIT International Design Center (IDC) at the Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD). Dr. Wood completed his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in the Division of Engineering and Applied Science at the California Institute of Technology, where he was an AT&T Bell Laboratories Ph.D
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Micah Lande, South Dakota School of Mines & Technology; Yue Liu, Arizona State University
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Design Process Concept MapsIntroductionIn our ongoing exploration of this EAGER EEC NSF-funded project, we share results of thedesign concept maps part of our research project. This paper is intended to share formativedevelopment of a coding scheme to assess and evaluate drawings by undergraduate engineeringstudents of their engineering design process. There is a spectrum of student responses anddeveloping a taxonomy, or categorization, is helpful to better understand where students beginand end from a design project learning experience. This can then inform and illustrate the waysin which students balance breadth and depth and learn and apply their engineering know how.Design may appear throughout a curriculum or be substantiated as a capstone
Conference Session
Engineering Professional Development using Robotics Activities
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Hye Sun You, NYU Tandon School of Engineering; Sonia Mary Chacko, NYU Tandon School of Engineering; Sheila Borges Rajguru, NYU Tandon School of Engineering; Vikram Kapila, NYU Tandon School of Engineering
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education
into the NGSS. According to the NGSS [3] andthe Framework [18], DCIs are a small set of the fundamental, overarching ideas that are necessaryfor understanding and explaining scientific phenomena. Moreover, the eight SEPs identified inNGSS [3] reflect the major activities that scientists and engineers use to investigate the naturalworld and design the engineered world. Finally, the seven CCCs of NGSS [3] can be used to offeralternative perspectives and make connections across disparate disciplines or situations for makingsense of phenomena or solving problems.The NGSS is structured as performance expectations (PEs) that integrate the three dimensionstogether and that require students to build a conceptual foundation for explaining phenomena
Conference Session
K-12 Professional Development II
Collection
2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jeremy V Ernst, Virginia Tech; Aaron C. Clark, North Carolina State University; Vincent William DeLuca, North Carolina State University; Laura Bottomley, North Carolina State University
Tagged Divisions
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering
-design content knowledge and instructional skills ofteachers. Upon completion of professional development training through T2I2, teacherswill have been exposed to a representative portion of National Board Certification (NBC)requirements. NBC has many advantages such as expansion of teacher expertise andinfluence, and increased portability and salary potential. A focal emphasis is creatingdynamic learning environments for students to improve competency in engineering-design content through enhanced teacher practices and knowledge. In addition toadvancing student subject knowledge, creating dynamic learning environments includesusing validated assessment techniques to understand student needs, constructing mutualand supportive classroom
Conference Session
Technical Session V
Collection
2018 FYEE Conference
Authors
James R McCusker PhD, Wentworth Institute of Technology; Aaron Carpenter, Wentworth Institute of Technology
Tagged Topics
FYEE Conference Sessions
Paper ID #24441Work In Progress: Synthesizing design challenges to improve student effec-tiveness in first year engineering design coursesJames R McCusker PhD, Wentworth Institute of Technology James R. McCusker is an Associate Professor at Wentworth Institute of Technology in the Department of Electrical Engineering. Since joining Wentworth in 2010, he has been heavily involved with an array of interdisciplinary design courses that range from introductory to capstone courses.Prof. Aaron Carpenter, Wentworth Institute of Technology Professor Carpenter is an Assistant Professor at the Wentworth Institute of Technology. In 2012, he
Conference Session
Out-of-school-time Engineering: Implications for Underrepresented Students
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Aaron Kyle, Columbia University; Rachel Lauré Sattler, Columbia University, Biomedical Engineering Department; Hanzhi T. Zhao, Columbia University, Department of Biomedical Engineering; Christine Kovich, HYPOTHEkids
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Minorities in Engineering
foundation in a STEM field can open the doors to a variety ofexciting career options.Laboratory ProceduresThe biodesign instruction is complemented by hands-on, laboratory activities, which are criticalin getting the students excited about STEM and biomedical engineering. The lab sessions givestudents opportunities to design, build, test and refine their project efforts. The students typicallybegin our program with very little experience building biomedical devices. To get the studentsstarted and to establish their confidence in the lab, the first set of sessions involve a series ofwell-defined laboratory activities to enhance the students’ understanding of their biomedicalproblems of interest. The lab sessions take place in the afternoons on
Conference Session
ERM Technical Session 22: Perspectives and Evaluation of Engineering Design Education
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Lori C. Bland, George Mason University; Margret Hjalmarson, George Mason University; Anastasia P. Samaras, George Mason University; Jill K. Nelson, George Mason University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
engineering education as design is a crucialprocess in solving real world engineering problems [8].Challenges in Evaluating Design-Based ResearchOne challenge in evaluating DBR is unplanned, purposeful variation in design andimplementation in order to understand learning processes. Program evaluation has focused onhow a given educational intervention has solved an educational problem to produce specificlearner outcomes. Interventions typically address the introduction of a new curriculum orprogram. Often the evaluation focus occurs at a macro or systemic level where the goal is tominimize variation in implementation. However, the focus of DBR is geared towardunderstanding learning and solving real world classroom problems. The evaluation focus forDBR
Conference Session
Mentoring and Development of New Faculty
Collection
2009 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Donna Llewellyn, Georgia Institute of Technology; Marion Usselman, Georgia Institute of Technology; Richard Millman, Georgia Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
New Engineering Educators
AC 2009-545: DESIGNING EFFECTIVE EDUCATIONAL INITIATIVES FORGRANT PROPOSALSDonna Llewellyn, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Donna C. Llewellyn is the Director of the Center for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning (CETL)at Georgia Tech. Donna received her B.A. in Mathematics from Swarthmore College, her M.S. in Operations Research from Stanford University, and her Ph.D. in Operations Research from Cornell University. After working as a faculty member in the School of Industrial and Systems Engineering at Georgia Tech, she changed career paths to lead CETL where she works with faculty, instructors, and graduate students to help them teach effectively so that our students can
Conference Session
Engineering Education Research
Collection
2004 Annual Conference
Authors
Robin Adams; Reed Stevens; Lorraine Fleming; Cynthia Atman; Sheri Sheppard; Theresa Barker; Ruth Streveler
2004-1736 Studying the Engineering Student Experience: Design of a Longitudinal Study Sheri Sheppard, Cynthia Atman, Reed Stevens, Lorraine Fleming, Ruth Streveler, Robin Adams, Theresa Barker Stanford University/University of Washington/ University of Washington/ Howard University/Colorado School of Mines/University of Washington/ University of WashingtonAbstractThere is a need to study how students become engineers, and how they learn engineering anddesign concepts. The Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education (CAEE) isconducting critical research in
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 6
Collection
2018 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Jing Guo, Colorado Technical University; John M. Santiago Jr., Colorado Technical University
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
engineering solution to meet customer requirements.Lab 5 CMOS and BJT. The original lab was design to help students understand the performanceand characteristics of CMOS and BJT technology. The title of this lab is changed to “whichtechnology could be used in Artificial Intelligence, BJT or CMOS?”To build an entrepreneurial mindset, the following EML objectives are added: • Demonstrate constant curiosity about our changing world. • Integrate information from many sources to gain insight. • Identify unexpected opportunities to create extraordinary value. • Persist through and learn from failure.The authors added the following content in the project description:Artificial Intelligence (AI) will change the world. And it should continue
Conference Session
1st and 2nd Year Instruction in Design
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Ruturaj Soman, Florida A&M University/Florida State University ; Nikhil Gupta, Florida State University; Chiang Shih, Florida A&M University/Florida State University
Tagged Topics
Diversity
Tagged Divisions
Design in Engineering Education
environments comprising of a democratic or committee nature while goingthrough the entire course.As pointed out by Chung et. al. [2], the most important attributes of a capstone course are [2] thatstudents in general should: 1. Have an insightful design project to be done as a team. 2. Be required to focus on knowledge gained throughout the curriculum. 3. Solve problems that represent real-life engineering. 4. Acquire an understanding of the professional aspects and culture of being an engineer. 5. Learn and practice project proposing, planning and control.The same paper also outlines efforts to understand how students perceive their capstone coursethrough the use of surveys that employ knowledge mapping. This method has limitations of
Conference Session
K-12 & Pre-College Engineering Division: Research to Practice: K-12 Engineering Resources: Best Practices in Curriculum Design (Part 1)
Collection
2016 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Roxanne Moore, Georgia Institute of Technology; Meltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology; Jeremy A. Lingle, Georgia Institute of Technology; Sunni Haag Newton, Georgia Institute of Technology; Jeffrey H Rosen, Georgia Institute of Technology; Marion Usselman, Georgia Institute of Technology
Tagged Divisions
Pre-College Engineering Education Division
for engineering design portfolios at the college level, there were nosuggested portfolio formats, and the rubrics were not piloted specifically at the K-12 level.To help students and teachers in K-12 settings navigate and assess engineering design, researchersat Georgia Institute of Technology have developed an electronic Engineering Design Process Logto guide the engineering design process, its documentation, and its assessment. This log, whencoupled with supplemental reflections, can be used in conjunction with a newly adapted set ofrubrics to assess student understanding and application of the Engineering Design Process (EDP)at the middle and high school levels. For students who are novices in following the EDP, such alog can also serve as
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2023 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
John Zachary Clay, The University of Texas, Austin; Xingang Li, The University of Texas, Austin; H. Onan Demirel; Molly H Goldstein, University of Illinois, Urbana - Champaign; Rundong Jiang; Charles Xie; Darya Zabelina; Zhenghui Sha, The University of Texas, Austin
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
the Pareto front are thenpresented to the human designer, who must then evaluate both the AI-generated designs and thehuman set objective space/rule sets that led to their generation [3]. Further iteration may then occuras the designer chooses one or more AI designs to optimize or returns to a previous task in thedesign process. Iteration offers the designer a deeper understanding of the design and solutionspaces, which may guide further design behavior [5].Generative systems have only begun to receive significant academic attention in the previous twodecades [4]. Thus, GD methodologies are relatively new in engineering contexts. The approachand technologies underlying GD have evolved from previous design methods, most notably thosedeveloped
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 5
Collection
2019 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Sandra Furnbach Clavijo P.E., Stevens Institute of Technology (School of Engineering and Science); Kishore V. Pochiraju, Stevens Institute of Technology (School of Engineering and Science)
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
teams.References: 1. D. W. Knight, L. E. Carlson, and J. F. Sullivan. "Improving engineering student retention through hands-on, team-based, first-year design projects." in Proceedings of the International Conference on Research in Engineering Education, Honolulu, HI, 2007. 2. B. N. Geisinger, and D. R. Raman, "Why They Leave: Understanding Student Attrition from Engineering Majors" Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Publications. 607, 2013. Available: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/abe_eng_pubs/607 [Accessed Oct. 4, 2018] 3. E. Seymour and N. Hewitt, Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave the Sciences. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 1997. 4. M. Besterfield-Sacre, C. J. Atman and L. J. Shuman, “Characteristics of
Conference Session
Faculty Development I
Collection
2015 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Margret Hjalmarson, George Mason University; Jill K Nelson, George Mason University; Craig Lorie, George Mason University
Tagged Divisions
Educational Research and Methods
Paper ID #12969Teaching as a Design Process: A Framework for Design-based Research inEngineering EducationDr. Margret Hjalmarson, George Mason University Margret Hjalmarson is an Associate Professor in the Graduate School of Education at George Mason University and currently a Program Officer in the Division of Research on Learning in Formal and Infor- mal Settings at the National Science Foundation. Her research interests include engineering education, mathematics education, faculty development and mathematics teacher leadership.Prof. Jill K Nelson, George Mason UniversityCraig Lorie, George Mason University
Collection
2000 Annual Conference
Authors
Valana Baxter; Mark R Henderson; Jim Baxter; Alan de Pennington
Session 2425 The Global Engineering Design Team (GEDT)- Transatlantic Team- based Design for Undergraduates Mark Henderson, Alan de Pennington, Jim Baxter, Valana Wells Arizona State University/University of Leeds/University of Leeds/Arizona State UniversityI. IntroductionIndustries are becoming more global in nature, especially in their supply chains. Undergraduateengineering students rarely address this trend nor do they ever get to participate in internationalor non-collocated teaming. Furthermore, international companies have a desire to explore closerglobal
Conference Session
Programmatic Issues in Physics or Engineering Phys
Collection
2010 Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Evan Lemley, University of Central Oklahoma; Baha Jassemnejad, University of Central Oklahoma; Matthew Mounce, US Navy; Jamie Weber, Parsons; Sudarshan Rai, Unknown; Willy Duffle, University of Central Oklahoma; Jesse Haubrich, University of Central Oklahoma
Tagged Divisions
Engineering Physics & Physics
AC 2010-1861: LINKING SENIOR DESIGN PROJECTS TO RESEARCHPROJECTSEvan Lemley, University of Central OklahomaBaha Jassemnejad, University of Central OklahomaMatthew Mounce, US NavyJamie Weber, ParsonsSudarshan Rai, UnknownWilly Duffle, University of Central OklahomaJesse Haubrich, University of Central OklahomaBahman Taheri, Alphamicron Page 15.845.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 LINKING SENIOR DESIGN PROJECTS TO RESEARCH PROJECTSAbstractSenior design projects form an important capstone for most engineering disciplines and mustconsist of the realistic application of the engineering design process. Some senior engineeringstudents
Conference Session
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation Division Technical Session 7
Collection
2021 ASEE Virtual Annual Conference Content Access
Authors
Jaby Mohammed, Illinois State University
Tagged Divisions
Entrepreneurship & Engineering Innovation
. Exhibit 5: Project stagesThe product innovation of the identified product would be based on any of the followingquestions (not limited to) • How can we reach our customers more effectively? • How do we make our service more affordable for a larger customer segment? o It could be based on material selection / structural change etc. • Is our product easy to use? If not, how can the product be modified to be ergonomic? What issues are clients facing with delivery?During the first stage, it is pretty much on understanding and finding the sources of Innovationand strategy as simple rules. Engineering design plays a role in creating a flawless design thatwould suit the customers. In these stages, the discussion is also done on how
Conference Session
NSF Grantees Poster Session
Collection
2024 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
Authors
Corey T Schimpf, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Shanna R. Daly, University of Michigan; Leslie Bondaryk, The Concord Consortium; Jutshi Agarwal, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Carolyn S Giroux; Stephanie L. Harmon, PIMSER, Eastern Kentucky University; Enqiao (Annie) Fan, University at Buffalo, The State University of New York; Jacqueline Handley, Purdue University, West Lafayette; A Lynn Stephens, The Concord Consortium
Tagged Topics
NSF Grantees Poster Session
andpresent fortuitous or serendipitous opportunities that have emerged as part of the project, beforeconcluding.BackgroundFront-end DesignFront-end design is focused on early stages of design work, encompassing activities like understandinguser needs, gathering information, developing requirements, and generating concepts [14], [15]. Thecriticality of this phase in engineering design is underscored by studies highlighting that failures oftenstem from inadequacies or errors during front-end work [16], [17]. Successful front-end designnecessitates a deep understanding of user perspectives, incorporation of contextual factors, and creativeexploration that aligns with people's values and implementation contexts. As such, front-end engineeringdesign