background and execution process to studentsduring orientation sessions. Subsequently, 313 students belonging to mechanical, production engineering,metallurgical, and civil engineering registered for the program and indicated their preferences for different areas.The paper analyses data of 273 students. All but fifteen students were allocated their top preferences. The fifteenstudents did not get their top preferences because their top areas were chosen by less than ten students and hencewithdrawn. Those students were provided their next priority areas. The director also allocated faculty mentors todifferent areas.Subsequently, the faculty mentors conducted meetings with their area students to arrive at various sub areas,clusters of about fifteen
are not very conducive to promoting critical thinking about thesolution during that process. In order to promote critical thinking, instructors should continuallyquestion students about the credibility of their solutions.Instructors need to model critical thinking about, reflecting on, and assessing the validity ofsolutions, particularly during the introduction of new materials. Students cannot be expected tomake critical judgments about something they know relatively little about.24 Instructors shouldcarefully explain their thought processes when assessing the validity of a solution. This can bedemonstrated most effectively when the instructor gets an invalid solution while working out aproblem because of an inadvertent mistake in the
providing explicitguidance and developing activities for investigating and negotiating contested claims” (NAE andNRC, 2009, p. 142).The concern with allowing students to fail is also shared by many teachers, although they cometo it from a different perspective. Lottero-Perdue and Parry (2014) found that a majority ofteachers had an overall negative connotation of failure and that teachers were inclined to scaffoldto avoid failure. However, many of these teachers associated failure with mistakes or saw failureas a personal trait, which is not consistent with the engineering view of failure as an “essentialfeedback mechanism” (p. 3).Research questions and contributions of the current studyThe literature reviewed above suggests that failure during
]. When asked to identify experiences that influence their self-efficacyor confidence in their engineering abilities, undergraduate engineering students often cite suchchallenges and experiences, mentioning successes in their course work and the design of afunctioning device [9] [10] [11]. Similarly, engineering students refer to their understanding andlearning of course material, their own motivation, and their course-related abilities as influencingtheir self-efficacy to perform well in a given course [11]. Project-based first-year engineering courses provide mastery experiences for students andhave been shown to positively impact students’ confidence in their tinkering and engineeringskills, along with their motivation to continue
introducing more complex problems5. An additionaladvantage of the software is that it allows the students to visualize the transport processestaking place.Other studies have also used computers to help students learn concepts in chemical Page 12.746.2engineering education. This includes that of Thompson6, who has used the partialdifferential equation (PDE) toolbox within MATLAB to visualize steady laminar flow ina finned heat exchanger, transient and steady heat transfer in a finned heat exchanger, andwave propagation in a heterogeneous material. Sinclair7 has used FLUENTcomputational fluid dynamics software within the undergraduate curriculum. Besser8
material have been validated and tested in several industryand university (live and virtual) classes, involving hundreds of undergraduate andgraduate students at NJIT in Industrial Engineering, Mechanical Engineering, ComputingScience and Information Technology, as well as on a wider US and international basis, atDundee University in Scotland, at Nottingham in the UK, at Imperial College in London,at Old Dominion in the USA, at the University of Michigan, in Ann Arbor, in Sweden, inHungary, in Mexico, in Hong Kong, in Singapore, in Switzerland, at Kyoto and KobeUniversities in Japan, and at many other institutions and companies world-wide. We arepleased to report that our methods, and several 3D multimedia resources have beenadopted for university
Paper ID #22008Communicating Findings about Online Forum Use among Undergraduatesin Distance-delivered Calculus: Developing a Help Seeking Usage ModelDr. Angela Minichiello P.E., Utah State University Angela Minichiello is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University (USU) and a registered professional mechanical engineer. Her research examines issues of access and inclusivity in engineering education. In particular, she is interested in professional formation, engineering problem-solving, and the intersections of online learning and alternative pathways for adult
engaging in-class learning activity. Results and analyses from the study willbe used to inform future activities and advance the overall research aim. The two distinct studentcohorts came from two existing courses, both focused on “sustainable energy.” One is a 1st-year,science-core course with 90 primarily non-STEM majors, and the other is a 4th-year technicalelective course with 33 engineering majors. The 1st-year course has no pre-requisites, and thushas students from almost every major and at every level in the university; the bulk of this studentcohort are 1st and 2nd year students from non-STEM majors. The 4th-year course has pre-requisites of engineering thermodynamics and materials science, thus limiting this student cohortto upper-level
boat would look like and briefly describehow it would operate. This prompt specifically does not include such constraints as how manypeople (if any) it should hold, how fast it should travel, and cost. In order to keep the problemfrom getting too extreme, some specificity is provided, such as Atlantic Ocean, the term ‘boat’rather than the more generic ‘vessel’.Developing Mind Stories and ImageryStories and imagery can help students learn and retain engineering concepts. The graphicalportrayals of engineering principles and illuminating stories can help students preserveknowledge long after the final exam.Students in an introductory mechanical engineering course are asked to draw images related tothe following: 1) epistemology, 2) mechanics of
. il/05mower/05mow.htm) are discussed.The Micromouse competition is the primary course focus as it is interdisciplinarycombining electrical sensing and mechanical problem solving requirements used inembedded systems applications. The best designs result by taking the “Mechatronics”approach. That is to consider first how the microcontroller can be used to simplify thedesign of the electronics and the mechanics. The higher level logic used in the mazesolving algorithm is more easily realized using a higher level language like ‘C’. The lowlevel problem of controlling the robot dynamics reliably becomes even more of a Page 4.227.2challenge. Here, an assembly
online discussions ina computer science course; using regression and correlation analysis, they found that the numberof posts responding to others correlated with project grades [17]. A researcher at Stanford [18]used the framework to analyze students working on an engineering challenge where studentswere required to think aloud about how to design and build a variety of mechanical andelectronic devices; the results suggest that simply word counting can reflect the learner’s affect,interest, and identify towards engineering.2.2 Survey Data Collection and Analysis: Student Perceptions of the KEEN-FocusedDiscussion AssignmentThe survey data collection and data analysis required a similar three-phase approach. First, theonline discussion prompts
of career change.During the interview process, faculty and administrators typically emphasize what is expected ofnew faculty and the amount of work required for success, especially during the first several yearswhile developing lecture notes and course materials. Potential faculty members must discussthese demands of the position with family members and emphasize that everyone would have towork together to prioritize their activities to help with the balance between professional andpersonal activities. These discussions need to be considered when deciding whether or not toaccept a faculty position.Although the decision often relates to only one individual’s career goals, the decision mustconsider the goals of others in the family. When
ES Texas A&M (’15, Physics)*Chemical & Biomolecular Engineering (CHBE), Mechanical Engr & Materials Science(MEMS), Electrical & Computer Engr (ECE), Physics & Astronomy (P&A), Earth Science (ES);Chemistry (CHEM), Bioenineering (BIOE)ContinuationThe Nanotechnology REU with a Focus on Community Colleges is actively recruiting for the2017 cohort. We will again bring the top students from non-university campuses to RiceUniversity for a 10-week research internship. We plan to enroll 10 students with one returningfrom the prior year to serve as a peer mentor to the group. We have Rice faculty interested inhosting REU students and they are working with graduate student and post-doctoral mentors toplan summer research
-all. A non-provisional application must befiled within a year.Patents and the CurriculumThe best place to find the emerging trends is the newly published applications or issued patents.An actual search of the patent databases is recommended. Two freely available web sites areU.S. Patent Office web site for Patent Full-Text and Full-Page Image Databases:7 Issued Patentsand Patent Applications. The European Patent Office offers its excellent esp@cenet8 database.Design projects may be an appropriate place to introduce patents. Faculty members in the Schoolof Mechanical Engineering at Purdue University have included a basic introduction to patentsand their subject classification in sophomore level design classes for many years. Thisintroduction
Copyright 2001, American Society for Engineering Educationstunning testament to the importance of industry partnership in sustaining our laboratory-basedcurriculum.Recently, advances in computing technology have created the opportunity to bring massivecomputing resources to bear on engineering problems. Algorithms have been developed to bringcomputing into engineering synthesis, not simply data acquisition and analysis. Computingsystems hold the promise of renewing education itself, not simply by changing delivery modes, butby allowing us to more clearly understand and couple to human learning mechanisms. In the1990’s, computing brought us the information age – and computing revolutionized thecommunications industry. In the next decade computing
on the mechanism to evaluate the competence and positive or negative behavior,achievement goals are subdivided into approach vs. avoidance categories [27]. In the approachcategory, two commonly used goals are mastery goals and performance goals. The mastery goalfocuses on learning and understanding materials, whereas the performance goal focuses onperforming well compared to others [13]. In the avoidance approach, performance-avoidancegoals may be associated with adverse academic outcomes [34]. Also, it is noteworthy that studieshave mostly focused on three types of achievement goals, which are mastery, performance-approach, and performance-avoidance (e.g., [35], [36]). For example, Jagacinski [37] conducteda study on gender-based
mechanism to align the pixel data with the beginning of aframe and the beginning of a line. The timing diagram of the horizontal scan andsynchronization are shown in Figure 13. Although the CRT technology is outdated, the moderndisplays continue to use the horizontal and vertical synchronization signals. These signals can beconsidered as “markers” within the pixel data stream. VGA synchronization core contains a frame counter that generates “two-dimensional”counting signals. The signals correspond to the x- and y-coordinates of the frame and can bedecoded to generate VGA display’s horizontal and vertical synchronization signals. The coremay need to include a dual-clock FIFO buffer if the pixel clock tick cannot be directly derivedfrom the system
givenarchitectural building designs but are not told the design details of engineered systems thatsupport the building’s architecture. Each team must select, refine, narrow, and then optimizesolutions for their discipline while integrating with other disciplines. In a given year, the numberof teams has ranged from one to five. Teams have had between 8-10 students with the exceptionof the first three years (4-7 students) during the pilot stage. The now standard team formatconsists of between 8 to 10 students composed of two students in each of the four AE disciplines(structural, mechanical, lighting/electrical, and construction). The possible remaining twostudents can be from any discipline but no discipline can have more than three. To date we havehad 25
widely used to detect colon cancerDr. Khalid M. Khan, Sam Houston State University Dr. Khan’s multidisciplinary research encompasses a broad area of environmental epidemiology with specific emphasis on vulnerable populations including children and adolescents. His current research ac- tivities can be categorized into two major areas. He investigates the neurobehavioral (NB) health effects of environmental and occupational exposures as well as the mechanisms of action of neurotoxic con- taminants. Furthermore, he evaluates the efficacy of community-based interventions for reducing health disparities in the areas of water, hygiene, infectious diseases, and occupational noise exposure. Over the last couple of decades, he
Consumer. 4. The Cloud Consumer sends the public key to the Verification Engine. 5. The Verification Engine verifies the authentication of the VM template. Figure 5. Cryptographic Architecture of Amazon EC23.2 Concerns in Amazon EC2There are some concerns in the Amazon EC2 as well, which are as follows [11]: 1. Amazon is in control of your data You don't know where it is stored or how it is stored, and you have no control over the physical access mechanisms to that data. 2. Let's assume that Amazon is doing everything right. What if Amazon has a major, prolonged outage? What if they go out of business
curriculum is generally taught byindividuals who have never served within the environments they teach about. That is, althoughpurporting to teach about corporate finance or corporate management, most business schoolfaculty have never actually worked within the corporate environment. Likewise, mostentrepreneurship faculty members within the nation’s business school have never beenentrepreneurs (nor have most been practicing managers).The metric of success for the corporate centric education within the business school is based oncomparative exam performance. Students are evaluated relative to one another in their abilityprimarily to memorize course material. There is, usually, no further requirement actually toperform within the environment being
produce ordinary knowl-edge in the baccalaureate program through improved methods of teaching and learning.1 Further,students & faculty must also learn the processes to produce higher knowledge that will becomean important part of their future professional practice.Insight is important for knowledging, especially for conceiving higher knowledge. The domainof psychology divides insight into five commonly utilized progressive processes.6 These are: ‚" Completing a schema when an integrated component fits into a larger system. ‚" Restructuring the given material by first making a mental or spatial visualization of the problem before one attempts a reorganization of the visual picture. ‚" Reformulating or restructuring goals or givens of a
, mechanical engineering) Electron flow (electrical engineering) Traffic flow (civil engineering) Work flow (industrial engineering) Thus if student translation problems exist in one engineering discipline, they arelikely to be identifiable in others as well.Art of representation Perhaps we can learn from study of another language, music, discussed by DavidLevitan in his recent book The World in Six Songs2. He argues that music was inventedin man’s dawn as a logical result of brain developments which gave humans “threecognitive abilities that characterize the musical brain. The first is perspective-taking: theability to think about our own thoughts and to realize that other people may havethoughts or beliefs that
Professor and the Civil Engineering Program Coordinator in Parks College of Engineering, Aviation and Technology at Saint Louis University. His experimental research interests focus on reinforced and prestressed concrete, while his engineering education research interests focus on experiential learning at both the university and K-12 levels. Dr. Carroll is the chair of ACI Com- mittee S802 - Teaching Methods and Educational Materials and he has been formally engaged in K-12 engineering education for nearly ten years.Dr. Shannon M. Sipes, Indiana University Shannon Sipes serves as the Scholarship of Teaching & Learning program Director and Lead Instructional Consultant in the Center for Innovative Teaching and
the hierarchy in Figure 1.Student managementThe five student managers illustrated in Figure 1 are not expected to perform game development.These managers, along with the faculty advisor, are collectively responsible for identifying andresolving problems within the teams, generating material for the weekly general meetings,grading, and reaching out to potential industry sponsors. In addition, individual management Page 24.1165.4members have other responsibilities outlined below. When a management position is available,any student that applies is interviewed by the current student management. After the interviewsand an advisory vote from all of
traditionalhomework in engineering education occurred [1-4], but the overwhelming majority ofengineering faculty members believe that homework is an indispensable component in thecourses they teach. As an analogy, students majoring in English need to write many essays forpractice, and they cannot master the skill of writing just by learning various writing skills andreading novels. In the same way, engineering students cannot grasp the necessary knowledge andskills without the struggling process in solving homework problems [5].Almost all the publishers of the textbooks provide the solution manuals to the instructors, andunfortunately, these materials are leaked to students through the internet. Some websites eveninvite students to provide quiz and exam
activities includedliterature searches, electronic and mechanical design, selection of materials, designing andconducting experiments with human participants, computer programming, and documenting theirwork. Occasionally lab work required visits to indoor and outdoor off-campus locations. Eachstudent lived in a private bedroom and shared a living area, kitchen, and a bathroom with threeother students in the program. Students attended weekly seminars with topics including programexpectations, written and oral communication, ethics, graduate school, the experiences of peoplewith disabilities, and job search strategies. Students created and delivered presentations for localhigh school students at the end of the summer program. Students made optional
thestudents and one of which (MATH 215) was being offered for the first time. Enrollments were 9and 5 respectfully for the WMU courses. Enrollment in IME 316 was limited due to its beingoffered at the same time as one of the required MCC classes (but this class has separate demandas a required class in the BSIM program).The faculty of the manufacturing engineering department taught all the above WMU courses,with the exception of IME 316 which is commonly taught by an adjunct faculty member.In the Winter 1998 Semester a full student load, 12+ credit hours, of WMU courses is beingoffered (MFE 120, ME 257 - Mechanics of Materials, MFE 440 - Production Engineering, andMFE 444 - Simulation of Industrial Operations). Two of these courses are to be taught
registered professional mechan- ical engineer with 15 years experience as a practicing engineer. She earned a BSME degree from the U.S. Military Academy at West Point, a MSME degree from the Georgia Institute of Technology, and is currently pursuing a PhD in Engineering Education at USU. She is Principal Investigator for Online Learning Forums for Improved Engineering Student Outcomes in Calculus, a research project funded by the NSF TUES program. Her research interests include engineering student learning, distance engineering education, and alternative pathways to engineering education.Dr. Joshua Marquit, Pennsylvania State University, Brandywine Joshua Marquit is an Instructor in the Psychology Department at Penn State
mobile web application toaddress these challenges by providing real-time bus arrivals, seat capacity information, servicechange or update alerts, and a mechanism for riders to provide feedback on their experiences. It isdesigned to enhance public transportation services and improve the commuting experience for adiverse group of riders in San Antonio.Two research studies were conducted to assess the impact of SmartSAT: a study on the analysisand evaluation of actual bus arrival times and a study on the commute experience of riders. Fromthe data collected in field tests on piloting routes, the first study focused on the analysis of thedifference between VIA’s scheduled and actual bus arrival times. The findings indicated thatcertain routes