confirmed the scholarship effect in Georgia public universitiesand found similar increases in SAT and high school ranks in six other merit-based scholarshipstates, except for Florida and Louisiana. They attributed the mixed effects in Florida (reducedSAT scores but improved high school class ranks) and negative effects in Louisiana (reducedSAT scores and high school class ranks) to changing and less rigorous scholarship requirements.Prior studies have examined how college costs and financial aid affect first-time student patternsuch as the fraction of in-state students, socioeconomic status, and student quality. However,little is known about how financial factors affect the cohort pattern in engineering fields. Ourstudy is unique in that we study
exerciseauthority over students. Additionally, many graduate students, especially younger ones, canexperience impostor syndrome.18 It is crucial that the faculty member is aware of these issues toassist in TA development. We suggest instituting course policies that assign difficult decisions tothe faculty member. However, involving TAs in the decision-making process improves theirconfidence and promotes their development as teachers.TrainingTrain TAs in effective teaching techniques both on the job and through formal pedagogycoursework. First, we consider the opportunities you have to serve as a role model to the TAssimply through teaching the class. Formal pedagogy coursework also promotes effectiveteaching skills and professionalism.In a lecture class
objectives can be summarized and describedas follows:By the completion of these courses, students will be able to: 1. Define innovation and entrepreneurship, 2. Understand the entrepreneurial mindset and assess and develop their entrepreneurial identity, 3. Identify problems and opportunities for improvement, 4. Generate novel and innovative ideas, 5. Collaborate and lead others in innovation, 6. Communicate and pitch ideas effectively to a broad audience, and 7. Summarize the availability of innovation and entrepreneurship campus resources at the University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign and understand how to utilize them.These objectives are designed to expand students’ knowledge, skills, and attitudes in a way thatwould
classroom culture and department vision. For the new adjuncts to feel athome and become effective members of the university community, they need to understand themission, prevailing practices, and goals; and, also, the traits of student population such as:scores, interests, capabilities, and a wide range of relevant statistics. To improve the teachingeffectiveness of novice adjuncts, they need to be exposed to pedagogical training in the form ofspecialized seminars, workshops, or short courses. Many adjuncts, particularly part-timers, mayresist getting any formal training on the ground that their time is limited and their primary job isoff-campus and not teaching. The administration may not be able to convince all, but the factremains that exposure
most recent performance results. It alsoincludes an analysis to determine if there was a statistically significant difference in the resultsbetween the most recent group of SFIP participants (2015) and the previous groups (2012, 2013,2014). There are several factors, most of which are uncontrollable, that could affect the SFIPresults from year to year; for example, changes in program content from one summer to the next;the effect of different personalities and teaching philosophies of each faculty member; the degreeof resistance to change of each faculty member; external factors affecting each faculty memberas well as the program director; and the structure and content of each particular course in thatsome are more suitable than others to
, others on sustainability, and still others on thescalability of firms.To address these challenges, the authors of this work propose a framework for aligning institutionalculture and entrepreneurial ambitions with program design. The process of constructive alignmentwill provide a better understanding of the current practices in engineering entrepreneurshipeducation and bring clarity to the diverse approaches used in pedagogy. By developing astandardized framework, educators and funders will be better equipped to evaluate and comparedifferent programs, ultimately leading to improved outcomes for both students and educators.Keywords:Entrepreneurship, Innovation, Canadian Education, Program Design, Constructive Alignment1. Introduction:Currently
PerformanceLearning Environments (Hi-PeLE) often leads to a need for assessment techniques different than those oftraditional lecture based courses.The Hi-PeLE characteristics described above bring a challenge for the facilitator of learning in identifyingan effective assessment approach with a goal of maximizing student learning. Certainly, traditional “mid-terms” for the traditional based delivered courses are not the most efficient for Hi-PeLE activities.Instead, the facilitator of learning may want to take advantages of the multi-dimensional nature of the Hi-PeLE and use a variety of tools to assess student learning and progress. In order to make the most of thelearning experience for the student, each type of activity requires a unique type of
casestudy on the implementation of CPBL in the Process Control and Dynamics course for third yearchemical engineering students is reported. During the course, students go through six CPBLcycles to solve four problems that cover all the course outcomes in one semester. Selectedconstructs of Pintrich’s Motivated Strategy for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ) relevant to aCPBL class, which are intrinsic and extrinsic goal orientation, task value, control of learningbelief, organization, critical thinking, effort regulation and help seeking, were administered todetermine the effect of CPBL. The results showed a significant increase in students’ engagementand motivation in learning. These findings are further supported by students’ reflections made atthe
. Page 22.1341.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Student teams, a simulation or a real team experience?AbstractThe tradition in engineering education places students in teams during their senior year; likely aspart of a capstone laboratory or design course. In most cases teams were done on a “pick yourown partners” basis. Furthermore, no time was spent discussing teamwork, the importance ofteams, how teams should be structured or the skill set one needs to be an effective team member.To some extent, changes made by ABET to their accreditation criteria in 2000 have forced theengineering community to at least assess student teamwork. This, in turn, has motivated many totake a
Page 22.181.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 1An Inquiry-Guided Learning Approach to Process Integration, Simulation, and Economics Lale Yurttas1, Houssein Kheireddine, and Mahmoud El-Halwagi Chemical Engineering Department, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USAThis paper provides an overview of how inquiry-guided learning (IGL) has been introduced intothe first senior-level design course at Texas A&M University (Process Integration, Simulation,and Economics). This has been part of an NSF-sponsored project to reform the chemicalengineering undergraduate
” [27]. These claims highlightthe relevance of ST in the early stages of innovation in start-ups and provide evidence forST’s use in complex environments that include innovation and venture creation.Environment and Sustainability programs make use of ST and its tools by exploring thepositive and negative feedback loops, relationship maps, developing skills to understandthe complexity within systems, and applying a systems approach to understand thesocietal challenges of what?[36]. The deliverables of the courses include critical conceptsabout how ecosystems work, examining threats and solutions to current environmentalchallenges, and the effects of carbon cycles in urban ecosystems and climate change[37,38].The two engineering courses taught
is usually developed over time through determination,personal effort, and years of practice, and teaching is no different! It is a skill that canbe acquired and improved with the right information, practice, and correctivemeasures through proper feedback (9, 10) .An increasing number of engineeringeducators are sharing valuable approaches, strategies, and techniques on teaching andlearning. Characteristics such as “enthusiasm”, “care”, and “knowledge of subjectmatter” show up almost on everyone’s list of the qualities of a good teacher. But, it is becoming increasingly clear that effective teachers do possess some basicunderstanding of the learning process (i.e., they are able to make the connectionsbetween what students already know and
(Rashid, 2019).While both high school and university level courses tend to aim at some of the same knowledgeand skills, the curricula often do not speak to each other; and there are not intentional designchoices to create a pipeline. This is a missed opportunity. Many different versions of “pipelines” have been created, in other areas, between highschools and universities. For example, dual credit programs aim to allow high school students totake university-level courses (with university sourced curriculum) while in high school. Dualcredit programs have proven successful in increasing the numbers of students who are ready for,enter, and are retained by tertiary institutions (Bowers, 2016; Allan and Dadgar, 2012). Thisincrease in readiness
Paper ID #17657A Graduate Research on the Cost Effective Analysis and Environmental Im-pact of Using Industrial Byproducts as Supplementary Cementitious Materi-als in Building ConstructionDr. Fazil T. Najafi, University of Florida Dr. Fazil T. Najafi For more than forty years, Dr. Fazil T. Najafi has worked in government, industry and education. He earned a BSCE in 1963 from the American College of Engineering, in his place of birth, Kabul, Afghanistan, and since then came to the United States with a Fulbright scholarship earning his MS in civil engineering in 1972 and a Ph.D. degree in transportation in 1977. His
AC 2009-486: TECHNOLOGY CURRICULA IN CHINA AND THE UNITEDSTATES: WHAT ROLE DO "SOFT SKILLS" PLAY?Xian Zhao, Inner Mongolia University of Technology Xian Zhao, ABD, is an Associate Professor of Management at Inner Mongolia University of Technology (IMUT) in Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China, where she teaches courses in Finance, Investment, International Business and other related subjects.Joy Colwell, Purdue University, CalumetCarl Jenks, Purdue University, Calumet Page 14.1169.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009 Technology Curriculum in China and the United States: What Role
Page 22.128.9matrix to connect course objectives to the program outcomes was inadequate. Improvements tobe implemented were primarily aimed at: (i) making the collection of course assessment datamore efficient, uniform, and effective, (ii) enabling instructors to directly contribute towardassessment of Program Outcomes, and (iii) ensuring sufficient assessment of all outcomes. Allof these improvements were implemented by constructing and using ACTS. As a result of ourmost recent ABET visit, the department decided to revise course outcomes to directly correspondto ABET a-k. A small amount of work was required to redefine some of the performancecriteria and change the linkages to specific ABET outcomes. The changes in ACTS itself weremade in
Energy Engineering program. The two single-credit courses during the freshman year, MEE practice I and MEE practice II are not prerequisites to any other course and may be taken by transfer students at any time during their studies. The main reason for the placement of these courses in the freshman year is to familiarize the students with the faculty and program of the Department and, thus, improve the retention of freshmen. There will be set of courses related to environmental engineering and other topics relevant to energy engineering under technical elective courses (TE) as listed above. Innovations in the Mechanical and Energy Engineering Curriculum: The principal innovation in this curriculum is its designation. While several Mechanical
related to analysis methods ofAC networks. The course was modified to put additional emphasis on topics related to methods ofanalysis and the Network Theorem of AC circuits. The average score on the EET2120 section ofthe exam for Spring 2008 has increased to 78%.Another significant improvement in scores for EET2220 resulted after increasing the emphasis ontransistor biasing circuits, both in the classroom and the laboratory, and designating more timetowards covering the basics of operational amplifiers. The EET2220 spring 2008 result increasedto 60% compared to 45% in spring 2007.The continuous improvement process is now in place and fully functional, we are continuing toobserve our processes and make appropriate changes to effectively improve
collaborative instructor (an adjunct). Theindustrial engineer was invited to bring engineering products to the classroom and demonstratethe latest design approach for the product’s improvement. Through the exercise, topics typicallynot covered in a traditional classical heat transfer course were discussed, and enhancements instudents’ learning of the course were measured using an evaluation tool specifically designed tothis purpose. Results indicated that students reacted very positively to inviting industrial adjunctfaculty. In addition, the qualitative perception of the authors is that students were more engagedin this interactive method than in the traditional method of teaching. Two limitations of the newmethod of teaching include the time
Fluids and Power Systems. As a capstone experience senior year METstudents from each of the focus areas are required to complete a team-based senior designproject. Students progress through a two semester sequence starting with Product Designand Development presenting integrated methodologies that examine marketing,manufacturing, and cross-functional teams including concurrent engineering and projectsutilizing CAD systems, and ending with a Senior Project course including evaluation anddesign optimization methods for efficient and cost-effective designs requiring anoral/written report. In the capstone sequence the student teams generate the design,optimize the design and document the design. Then, during the last semester the teamsplan for
helpedstudents better identify and connect with their program [2].UGTAs have been found to not only increase the outlook of a student’s perception on theirexperience, but to overall improve the comprehension of course material. Crowe analyzed theperformance of undergraduate sociology students by comparing the mastery of course objectivesfor students who in a section taught with the assistance of UGTAs and students who only had theinstructor to present the material [3]. The final results proved that students with access toUGTAs earned higher grades and performed better on at least half of the learning outcomes.While the results lead to a belief that the UGTAs provide additional content, conversations withthe UGTAs exposed that students used UGTAs as an
theuniversity mathematics ACCUPLACERTM placement exams. Having an online math course hashelped facilitate that task by allowing prospective engineering students refresh and improve theirmathematics skills. The use of online courses offers the most flexible and cost-effective way ofreaching out to prospective college students through their respective high school science andmathematics teachers.Fundamentals of Engineering (FOE) Course This course is a part of a seamless approach to learning math related STEM skills startingat the pre freshman level through the use of a FOM/ Fundamentals of Engineering (FOE)/Pre-calculus/calculus course sequence. The Fundamentals of Engineering course features a―dynamic‖ syllabus tailored to meet the individualized
employed after graduation.7. ConclusionIn this work, we analyzed how the integration of the Mentor Graphics SystemVision softwarepackage could improve student learning of both theoretical and practical control system andmechatronic design. Integration of the software package into dynamic systems and control andintroductory mechatronic curriculums qualitatively was shown to successfully provide the bridgeneeded by students between theory and application of this material.After selecting and implementing two distinct integration methods, our experiences indicatedthat a mixture of both course projects and sequential homework assignments would prove to bethe most effective utilization of the educational value of the tool. Students applying bothmethods
, the pilot study to examine the effects of online quizzes and discussions toenhance learning outcomes was used in the Numerical Methods course taught by the author inthe summer session. The Blackboard Vista course management system (http://blackboard.com),was used to access the online course. The online activities, i.e. quizzes and discussions couldjust as easily have been used in other courses as well. Also it would perhaps be useful to set uptwo groups in the same course, one who participate in the online quizzes and discussions and theother group not participating in any online activity. One has to be careful in assessing the two Page
alternative to VHS tapes. As technology has improved, today more lecture material is directlydelivered through the internet in a streaming audio-video format.The lead author’s first experience with conducting a distance delivered course occurred in thesummer term of 2006. The purpose of this paper is to discuss pedagogical topics of thatexperience and to review the ongoing issues faculty members and students face in the distancelearning environment.IntroductionThe course venue described in this paper was a senior-level mechanical engineering elective instructural vibrations. Approximately five graduate students, and forty-five junior and seniorundergraduate students, attended the on-campus section. Six distance learning graduate studentsalso
skills will easily transfer to their independentwork. The use of study groups is expected to increase retention and graduation and decreasesuch detrimental practices as cheating.Mentor PreparationThe student peer mentors were hired and trained according to two Peer-Led Team Learningbooks: A Guidebook,6 and A Handbook for Team Leaders.7 Their hiring and training was doneby Prof. Ethan Munson of the Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Department, whoserved as the faculty member responsible for this program, and Ms. Marissa Jablonski, a Ph.D.student who serves as program coordinator responsible for many day-to-day activities. Mentorsare taught that peer-led learning can be more effective than the traditional lecture format ofcollege courses
energy systems, contaminated water purification systems and heart-lung systems. Thedesign project is introduced during class by having the students participate in hands-on activities.Freshman Course Goals The project based learning design projects have also allowed the course to fulfilladditional goals of the Chemical, Biochemical and Environmental Engineering department’sABET objectives and outcomes, known as the “5 C’s.” According to the “5 C’s,” studentsshould demonstrate, upon graduation, Competency in the discipline of chemical engineering,Critical thinking ability to solve complex problems, the ability to work in Cooperation withteammates, effective Communication skills, and Capacity for life-long learning. At thebeginning of each
University of Detroit Mercy have redundant direct measures formany of the more technical ABET outcomes from Criterion 3, including co-op employerevaluations, assessment of senior design projects by a jury of practicing engineers, and targetedassignments in sets of courses. Such redundancy is difficult to achieve for the outcomes that arebetter addressed by the liberal arts core. The outcomes for which core curriculum assessmentwould most strengthen the engineering program assessment process include: • (f) An understanding of professional and ethical responsibility; • (g) An ability to communicate effectively; • (h) The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global and societal context; • (j
strategies and tools are most effective in a “flipped” model nor the actual learningoutcomes achieved by participants of this model. Of the available literature, a majority evaluatesstudent perception in broad strokes with less focus on the component parts of the classroom flipor their effect on particular educational objectives or outcomes.In this paper, we present the results of a three year study of a “flipped” classroom pedagogicalapproach in a traditional computer architecture course and detail the various strategies and toolsused for both in- and out-of-class activities. We attempt a more fine-grained evaluation of thecomponents techniques of the "flipped" approach as well as the new active learning techniques
across country o Community Center: existing PV system was operating well below optimum efficiency; design an improved system to meet expanded needs for lighting, power for PCs, water pumping for community farming in a way that could be scalable up or down according to available resources To be cross listed as an engineering course st nd 1 offering was offered by US based visiting faculty, but 2 and future offerings will be taught by current UTG faculty. Currently the 2nd offering is underway with 10 enrolled students working on new projects.Current physics courses