Paper ID #46459Development of Virtual Labs for Soft Robotics Courses to Enhance StudentLearning and Support Faculty TeachingFahim Dorsey, Kennesaw State UniversityConnor Joseph Talley, Kennesaw State UniversityDr. Razvan Cristian Voicu, Kennesaw State University Dr. Razvan Cristian Voicu is a faculty member in the Department of Robotics and Mechatronics Engineering at Kennesaw State University. His research interests include artificial intelligence, robotics, and the development of AI-driven systems for knowledge transfer and adaptive learning. Dr. Voicu is dedicated to exploring innovative applications of AI to enhance learning
Melbourne, Florida. He has his Ph.D. from Florida Tech. At present he is completing his Master's Degree in Systems Engineering at Florida Tech. Dr. Shaikh participates regularly in Florida Tech's outreach and experiential entrepreneurship programs. Page 12.1339.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Systems Engineering Entrepreneurship – A Unique Convergence of the Business and Engineering Realms Carmo D’Cruz, Muzaffar Shaikh, Wade Shaw Florida Tech, Melbourne, Florida 32901AbstractEngineering Entrepreneurship, Engineering Management and
Paper ID #12360Effect of extended use of an executable flowchart for teaching C languageProf. Cho Sehyeong, MyongJi University Professor, Department of Computer Engineering, MyongJi University Page 26.576.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 Effect of extended use of an executable flowchart for teaching C languageTeaching computer programming to students is a daunting task, especially to those without anybackground or experience in computer programming. Even simple assignment statements orarithmetic operations
AC 2011-2607: A COMPREHENSIVE STUDY TO DESIGN HVAC SYS-TEMS AND EVALUATE ENVELOPE PERFORMANCESAhmed Cherif Megri, University of Wyoming Dr. Ahmed Cherif Megri, associate professor of architectural engineering at the University of Wyoming (UW), teaches several HVAC and energy courses. Dr. Megri is also teaching a course titled ”Compre- hensive Performance of Building Envelope and HVAC Systems” for Summer School at UW, and ”Smoke and Fire Dynamics” during summer session at Concordia University, Canada. His research areas include airflow modeling, zonal modeling, energy modeling, and artificial intelligence modeling using the support vector machine learning approach. Prior to his actual position at UW, he was an
Session 2358 Engineering Education in the 21st Century Ralph O. Buchal The University of Western OntarioAbstract Changing educational needs and reduced funding for traditional educational institutions are forcing a re-examination of the educational process. At the same time, emerging information technologies are enabling atransition from traditional instructor-centred teaching to a new model based on student-centred collaborativelearning. The importance of the physical university is diminishing as information technology
Session 2358 Engineering Education in the 21st Century Ralph O. Buchal The University of Western OntarioAbstract Changing educational needs and reduced funding for traditional educational institutions are forcing a re-examination of the educational process. At the same time, emerging information technologies are enabling atransition from traditional instructor-centred teaching to a new model based on student-centred collaborativelearning. The importance of the physical university is diminishing as information
Paper ID #48086”I’m allowed to be my own person in engineering”: How gender identity-basedengineering student organizations support women’s engineering identity developmentAndrea Lidia (Lili) Castillo, Arizona State University A.Lili Castillo is a third-year graduate student in the Engineering Education Systems and Design PhD program at Arizona State University. Lili is a recipient of the 2022 National Science Foundation’s Graduate research fellowship. Her research interests include engineering identity formation, high-impact learning experiences, and Latino/a/x & first-generation college student pathways in engineering
Paper ID #23473Incorporating Ethics Education into an Electrical and Computer Engineer-ing Undergraduate ProgramMs. Mahsa Ghorbani, Colorado State University Mahsa Ghorbani is a PhD student in Program of Systems Engineering at Colorado State University. She received her BSc in Industrial Engineering from University of Yazd, Yazd, Iran in 2009 and her MSc degree in Industrial Management from University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran in 2012.Dr. Anthony A. Maciejewski, Colorado State University Anthony A. Maciejewski received the BS, MS, and PhD degrees in electrical engineering from Ohio State University, Columbus in 1982, 1984
, havedisabilities, or have children. The program provides mentoring academic support, andprofessional development through impactful workshops on understanding your strengths, beingsuccessful as a woman in a field highly populated by men, and preparing for graduate school. Inaddition, support is provided for student travel, to increase professional development andpreparation to work in a global society. This paper reports on the ENGAGE 2BE programincluding program motivation, operations and management plans, as well as current assessmentdata and lessons learned. The information provided will aid others who are interested instrengthening support networks for undergraduate students in engineering.I. IntroductionThe American Society of Engineering Education
concentrates on scientific studies in support of arts and cultural heritage conservation. Page 23.258.2 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Building bridges between the engineering classroom and the research laboratory: nanoscience at Union College supported by the NSF NUE programAbstract. This project focuses on building connections between the classroom andundergraduate research in nanoscience and on developing novel art-science activities as avehicle for outreach. Through support from the NSF NUE program, we have developeda new undergraduate nanoscale
, institutional structures that encourage transformational learning, and integrating engineering, the social sciences, and the humanities. Page 22.200.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011An Overview of US Optics Programs Page 22.200.2AbstractOptical engineering has existed as a specialty within electrical engineering, physics, materialscience, and other academic departments and as a significant industry focus for over 70 years.For most of that period only a few degree-granting programs existed in the United States, withthe first at the University of Rochester
an accurate perspective of the lifecycle of ET education.2.0 Engineering and Engineering TechnologyIn the educational arena, the topic of engineering education versus ET education is passionately Page 15.47.2debated. Often, this debate is shrouded in misunderstanding, ultimately ending in a declaration ofsuperiority from one side or the other, without regard to the function of the opposing side.Classically, engineering programs teach students to design and develop systems and structureswhile engineering technology programs teach students to apply knowledge to solve problems.1This results in a symbiotic relationship between engineering and ET
Paper ID #37701Measuring Systems Thinking Using Stealth AssessmentIng. Andrea Ramirez-Salgado, University of Florida Andrea is a doctoral student at the University of Florida specializing in Educational Technology within the Curriculum and Instruction program. She has a master’s degree in Education and ICT and a bachelor’s degree in Software Systems Engineering. Andrea has been teaching undergraduate and graduate courses for the past thirteen years covering topics such as algorithms, process engineering, instructional design, and applications of technology in education. Her research interests include understanding the
ofeducational outcomes implies they have been based on a system of beliefs, whether or not thosebeliefs are stated explicitly.Engineering, like other disciplines, has underlying belief systems which are shared to a greater orlesser extent by those who teach engineering. Compared with many other disciplines theunderlying belief systems are in engineering education are more explicit [3], [6] due to regular,high-level reports; these have been reviewed elsewhere [7]. The first of those reports in the USwhich laid the foundation for many engineering degree programs was the Mann report [8] whichwas released in 1918 to contrast how the aims of engineering education developed with a rapidlyincreasing need for engineers in industry. While the majority of the
has a broad background in mechanical and electrical engineering, and physiology with specific training and expertise. His work includes mod- eling the cardiovascular system, ventricular assist devices, cardiac physiology, instrumentation systems and leadless cardiac pacing. He help developed and was the inaugural director of a project-based-learning engineering curriculum. As Chief Innovation and Culture Officer in industry, He is now involved in discovery-based-learning on multi-disciplinary teams.Mr. Ronald R. Ulseth, Itasca Community College Ron Ulseth directs and instructs in the Iron Range Engineering program in Virginia, Minnesota and he teaches in the Itasca Community College engineering program in Grand
in delivering accredited undergraduate Computer Science and Management Information Systems programs, as well as an undergraduate Software Engineering and graduate Computer and Information Science program.Dr. Richard W. Moodey, Gannon University Dr. Moodey received his PhD in sociology from the University of Chicago in 1971. He has taught at Loyola University of Chicago, Allegheny College, and is currently chair of the department of Criminal Justice and Social Work at Gannon University.Dr. David Arthur Nordquest, Gannon University David A. Nordquest is Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Gannon University.Mr. Krishnakishore Pilla P.E., Gannon University
and zeta potential, nanoparticles tend to agglomerate and form a largercluster, which are generally less toxic than the individual nanoparticles since the smaller particlescan diffuse into the body faster than the larger particles and reach very sensitive areas, such asthe nervous system, bone marrow, brain, lymph nodes, spleen, and heart [5]. Individualnanoparticles can also create oxidative stress in the body, which in turn weakens it and causessickness in the long term [8].2. ISSUES IN NANOETHICSAlthough nanomaterials have superior properties, they can have harmful effects on the body dueProceedings of the 2010 Midwest Section Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education,Lawrence, KS, September 22-24, 2010
. Her research efforts at at the Center for Engineering Education and Out- reach focus on supporting discourse and design practi ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2023 Work in Progress: Using the Formative Assessment Enactment Model to Characterize Instructor Moves in a Learning Assistant Supported Mechanics CourseThe LA model, developed by the University of Colorado- Boulder, has been gaining momentumin engineering departments [1]–[4]. LAs are undergraduate students who facilitate studentthinking and encourage inclusive active learning in the classroom. They participate in weeklypreparation sessions with their supervising faculty, where they provide
Proceedings of 2014 Zone 1 Conference of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE Zone 1) Educational Computer Program for Simulating Behavior of Structures under Dynamic Loads Mohammed-Noor N. Al-Maghrabi and Ahmed A. Abdou El- Abbasy Engineering. In 1934 Professor Lydik Jacobsen and his Abstract— Saudi Arabia has constructed many universities in student, John Blume, developed the first field instrument forthe last decade. Civil, mechanical, and mining engineering strong shaking of structures and investigated the performancedepartments have courses deal
, depending on the skillset of those participating in the course. Page 22.945.7AssessmentsThere currently is one assessment which will be incorporated into the research, reflecting studentfeedback of the course, provided by the Office of International Education. The synopsis providedis from students in the second year (2010). Assessments from the first year are in the process ofbeing extracted, as the assessment software provider has changed, and system support isunavailable. Content areas are: a. Academic Quality (overall mean: 4.0 out of 5.0) 1. Relevant content 2. Engagement with host country culture and people 3. Quality of
supplement the more challenging first-year courses like Calculus and Physics, monthly social learning communities, progress reports,community volunteer activities, and program coaching [7].This project was reviewed by the Gonzaga IRB received exempt status under 45 CFR 46.101(b). 9References[1] Jones, Sharon; Caitlin Cairncross; Tammy Vandergrift; and Julie Kalnin. “Persistence of Students Who Begin Engineering Programs in Precalculus.” ASEE Advances in Engineering Education, Volume 9, Issue 4. 2021.[2] Tougaw, Doug. “Welcome Changes? The Choice is Ours.” ASEE Prism, Volume 33, Issue 1, Fall 2023.[3] Burtner, J., "The Use of Discriminant Analysis to Investigate the
AC 2010-1431: INTEGRATION OF GRAPHICAL PROGRAMMING INTO AFIRST-YEAR ENGINEERING COURSEGregory Bucks, Purdue University GREGORY W. BUCKS is a PhD candidate in the school of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He received his BSEE from the Pennsylvania State University and his MSECE from Purdue University. His research interests lie in the development of conceptual understanding of computer programming concepts and the exploration of the pedagogical benefits of graphical programming languages.William Oakes, Purdue University William Oakes is the Director of the EPICS Program and an Associate Professor and a founding faculty member of the Department of Engineering Education at Purdue
have drawn upon the researchliterature in science education to support this work due to the limited available evidence aboutengineering at the K-12 level and the similarities between science and engineering practices atthis level that would be likely targets for scaffolding. There is much less evidence in the literature regarding the use of scaffolding insummative assessments. The BioKIDS project classroom assessments that Mislevy and Haerteldescribe [15] include varying degrees of scaffolding in tasks intended to measure students’ability to construct scientific explanations in a program that helps students learn about inquiry.Two of the tasks from that program are shown in Figure 1. The first task is more highlyscaffolded than the
with several of the better constructedand empirically validated systems such as those suggested by Cannon-Bowers and Salas1 is thatthey are so complex and comprehensive that they beco me impractical in anything but the mostrigorous and resource-rich environments (which universities often are not). The present studypursued the less ambitious, but perhaps more practical, goal of attempting to develop andvalidate a relatively simple self-report instrument, The Team Process Check (TPC), for assessingthe functioning of teams in an educational setting.A number of researchers within the engineering field have been working on defining outcomes inteaming and developing multi-source feedback systems2,3. These researchers point out that manyof the
, and MRI is treated as a scientific discipline to be critically studied. MRI isalready being regarded as a sub-discipline and professional focus within Engineering, just asNuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) has reached that stature in Chemistry.The Web site described in this paper is largely supported by the National Science FoundationCombined Research Curriculum Development (NSF-CRCD) program. The NSF-CRCD Programis a joint initiative of the NSF Directorates in Engineering (ENG) and in Computer &Information Science & Engineering (CISE). The program supports development of curricula innew emerging technologies, and development of new ways of teaching that utilize the newcommunication technology. MRI is believed to be an important area of
deviceand the control system. This set up will form an integral part of the CNC machining cell withrobot interface for loading, unloading, and automatic actuation of the clamping device.VI. ConclusionsIn this paper, many concepts have been listed that when properly applied will lead a design teamto an optimal design of any product or service. Only by the skillful integration of design,manufacturing, and marketing an industry today can survive in this highly competitive worldwhere cost, time-to-market, and good quality are imperative for survival. The effective use ofsome of the concurrent engineering tools in engineering education presented and discussed inthis paper will certainly prepare the engineering graduates to meet the above challenges
Paper ID #12657Mapping Outcomes in an Undergraduate Aerospace Engineering ProgramMr. Joseph Seering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Joseph Seering is an Educational Researcher in the Aeronautics and Astronautics department at MIT. He graduated from Harvard University in 2013 with an AB in Social Studies. His primary research interest is interaction between users and virtual platforms, primarily but not exclusively in educational environments.Prof. Karen Willcox, Massachusetts Institute of Technology Karen Willcox is Professor of Aeronautics & Astronautics in the Aerospace Computational Design Lab- oratory at
Electrical Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology. He received his Bachelor of Science degree at University of California, Los Angeles. His primary interests involve machine learning and circuit design.Dr. Ying Zhang, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Ying Zhang is a Professor and Senior Associate Chair in the School of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the Georgia Institute of Technology. She is the director of the Sensors and Intelligent Systems Laboratory. Her research interests are centered on systems-level interdisciplinary problems across multiple engineering disciplines, with AI-enabled personalized engineering education being one of her current research focuses
Paper ID #30104Measuring student computational thinking in engineering and mathematics:Development and validation of a non-programming assessmentMr. Timothy Ryan Duckett, The University of Toledo T. Ryan Duckett is a research associate with Acumen Research and Evaluation, LLC., a program evalu- ation and grant writing company that specializes in STEM and early childhood education. He is a PhD student in the Research and Measurement department at the University of Toledo.Dr. Gale A Mentzer, Acumen Research and Evaluation, LLC Gale A. Mentzer, PhD, the owner and director of Acumen Research and Evaluation, LLC, has been a pro
Thinking in Parallel: Multicore Parallel Programming for STEM Education 1,* A. Asaduzzaman, 2 R. Asmatulu, and 1 R. Pendse 1 Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science and 2Department ofMechanical Engineering, Wichita State University, 1845 Fairmount St, Wichita, KS 67260 *E-mail: Abu.Asaduzzaman@wichita.edu; Tel: +1-316-978-5261AbstractAcademic research and engineering challenges both have increasing demands for highperformance computing (HPC), which can be achieved through multicore parallel programming.The existing curricula of most universities do not properly address the major transition fromsingle-core to multicore systems and sequential to parallel