theories and previousconducted research by Müller et al. 7 andothers.14 The students became aware ofchallenges and shortcomings of previousdesigns to make sure they would not repeatthe same mistakes in their design. In thesecond phase, which covered two months,the team evaluated size and designrequirements of the rig based on pastpractice by MSU’s team, geometricalconstraints, and using analytical predictionsto come up with a preliminary design. Forinstance, one-dimensional analytical design Figure 2: Computer aided design.tolls were used to determine inlet/exit port sizes, rotor and turbine blade shapes, rotorspeed, and selection of the required electric motor for the rotor shaft. Students had to use
Engineering Educationrequired to partially dismantle a power electronic converter to enable a closer examination ofits construction and operation. They were also required to study the interconnection ofcomponents, conduct performance tests, collect data, and develop a detailed computersimulation model for the system. Such model would be adequate for system redesign. To be successful in this project students need basic knowledge of power electroniccircuits, understanding of the design of automatic control systems, familiarity with softwaremodeling tools for electrical network and systems, and a sufficient amount of time within thenormal semester. The students involved in this project were in their final year, and wereenrolled in their first
Airport.Gina Howe P.E., Seattle Pacific University BS degree in Electrical Engineering from Seattle Pacific University in 2003, and currently pursuing a MS degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering from Purdue University. She also worked in the industry for 15 years and is a registered professional engineer.Dr. Melani Plett, Seattle Pacific University Prof. Melani Plett is a Professor in Electrical Engineering and the Director of Engineering and Computer Science at Seattle Pacific University. She has over twenty years of experience in teaching a variety of engineering undergraduate students (freshman through senior) and has participated in several engineering education research projects, with a focus on how
Capstone teams since 2012. Mr. Stresau has also taught a variety of Aerospace courses for the MAE Department. Prior to joining UCF, Mr. Stresau was a faculty member at Eastern Florida State Col- lege (2006-2012). Mr. Stresau began his industry career in mechanical design and manufacturing (1998), and joined United Space Alliance as an engineer on the Solid Rocket Boosters (SRB) for the Space Shuttle Program in 2000. In 2004, he transitioned to a senior engineering position in Engineering Integration and Project Management, working with mechanical, thermal, hydraulic, electrical, pyrotechnic, and propul- sion subsystems. Mr. Stresau served in that capacity until the completion of the Space Shuttle Program in 2011. Mr
equipment are relying on computers to control system parameters. Al- though embedded computers are powerful and flexible tools for industry, these very advantages have contributed to a corresponding increase in system complexity. In order to adequately prepare today’s computer science, computer engineering, and electrical engineering students for their future careers, the special problems with embedded sys- tems development must be adequately addressed in their education. In this paper, we report on our multi-pronged approach to curriculum development that specifically incorporates embedded systems into a suite of relevant courses: software engineering, operating systems, digital system design, and computer system
. Studentsenrolled in these campuses follow the same general curriculum, however each campus enjoys alarge degree of autonomy. It is not typical to see students (or instructors for that matter)establishing intra-campuses communications. When such a communication occurred, it waslimited to the postal mail, phone, and fax, the communication reported here is Internet-based.Students enrolled in EET-310 Analog Signal Processing at two of DeVry’s campuses (Atlantaand Toronto) were encouraged to technically communicated using the Internet and form workingteams although they never meet face to face. These students are in their 6th term of study (out ofnine terms required to complete their degree) since the project described here was a pilot project,it was essential
non-nursing projectgroups, at two time periods. An Empathy survey developed by Hess et al. was used to compareempathy between nursing and non-nursing project groups, at two time periods.Using the StRIP survey and qualitative analysis, we determined that LUC Engineering first-yearstudents are engaged in their first Engineering design course. This course and all the courses inthe B.S. Engineering curriculum are taught using active learning. Using the Empathy surveyand qualitative analysis, we determined that Engineering first-year students are also empathic,regardless of whether the design process is taught as a human-centered design process or 2kfactorial design process. The first-year design instructor emphasized solving a sponsor’s
studies focused explicitly on engineering instructors or courses. Amongthese, Tinnell et al. [70] and Tharayil et al. [67] exclusively investigated engineering faculty,utilizing semi-structured interviews to examine instructional practices. The reviewedliterature indicated that active learning strategies frequently used in engineering educationinclude collaborative problem-solving, peer discussions such as think-pair-share, team-basedprojects and assignments, case-based learning, and incremental task scaffolding. Given thenature of engineering education, which integrates problem-solving, design projects, andlaboratory-based learning, these findings underscore the need for discipline-specificapproaches to implementing active learning
-conditioning is also studied usingprinciples of thermodynamics.Thermodynamics is taken by students in the majority of engineering majors- mechanical,chemical, civil and electrical, as well as by students majoring in physics and chemistry withsome variation in the topics covered. In engineering, the first course in thermodynamics is takenearly on by students, and is considered a difficult course by students, and as a filtering course bysome instructors in some engineering programs. In mechanical engineering, thermodynamicshas been described as the gateway course, meaning students’ performance in thermodynamicscorrelates well with how students do in the rest of the courses in the curriculum.1 Fuchs2 statedthat thermodynamics is considered to be one of
NAE GrandChallenges, generally2, (2) Read the paper “Is disaggregation the holy grail of energy efficiency?The case of electricity” by Armel et al.11 to learn about the use of smart energy meters anddisaggregation algorithms to maximize energy savings presented from many perspectives:economical, behavioral, and technical, and (3) Check out the online description of the project ledby Dr. Bradbury noting, in particular, the diverse areas of expertise of the project participants.12 Page 26.48.7With this background preparation, students were asked to prepare three questions for Dr.Bradbury, who came to class the following week to give a guest
. Students will gainexperience working with a real-world customer (or at least the best one the instructor canimpersonate) and will be forced to complete the project under real-world circumstances wherethey are not necessarily given sufficient information, or even given incorrect informationinitially.3. ImplementationThe framework detailed above was used to develop a course project in a system dynamics coursefor the entire cohort of junior mechanical engineering students at Ohio Northern University, asmall, private, undergraduate institution. Traditionally, students would complete a projectencompassing the simulation and analysis of an electromechanical system such as a conveyorsystem or hybrid-electric vehicle. This would allow students the ability
an important aspect of engineering practice during the second industrial revolution, which started in the late 19th century. Today, the importance of teamwork skills for engineers is codified in the ABET accreditation requirements (ABET 2021). Too often, we, as instructors, put students in teams and assume they will learn teamwork skills organically. As a result, the majority of students report at least one type of interpersonal problem on projects and many report reduced learning as a result (Wolfe et al. 2016). In most cases, we don’t learn about the problems until reading student peer evaluations or we don’t learn about them at all. Either way, the opportunity to correct the situations has passed and the damage is done. In
data acquisition system design, human machine interface design, finite elementstress analysis, and data processing system design. We discuss two projects here, both of whichinvolved designing and prototyping mechanical testers. Project 1 involved designing apharmaceutical vial seal force tester in collaboration with a local equipment manufacturingcompany. Seal force is the integrity of the sealing quality of the rubber stoppers that cap thepharmaceutical drug vials. The usual process of testing it is by performing a compressive test.The entire task was distributed between mechanical and electrical engineering students. Project 2was an independent undertaking which was conducted over a period of 2 semesters during whichthe student-faculty team
schools and engineering studentsare becoming more interested in experiences and careers that have the potential for positive societalimpacts (Leydens and Lucena, 2019). Examples of these trends are given across differentengineering schools (see, for example, Engineers in Technical Humanitarian Opportunities ofService Learning (ETHOS) at the University of Dayton; Engineering Projects in CommunityService (EPICS) at Purdue University; Community Assessment of Renewable Energy andSustainability (CARES) at the University of California, among others). We argue these trends willhelp motivate other programs and students to adopt new paradigms of engineering focused onhuman and societal challenges. Desha et al. (2019) also describe efforts by
: Adapting and Implementing the SCALE-UP Approach in Statics, Dynamics, and Multivariate Calculus. He is also supported by an NSF Mathematics Education CCLI grant: Adapting K-8 Mathematics Curricular Materials for Pre-Service Teacher Education.Dorothy Moss, Clemson University Dot Moss is a lecturer in the Department of Mathematical Sciences at Clemson University where she serves as Project Director of Math Out of the Box™, a K-5 curriculum and teacher professional development project. She has a BS from Bob Jones University, a Masters from Clemson University, and thirty hours above a Masters in Library Science. In addition to serving as one of the principal authors of Math Out of the Box
Objects and Embracing Chaos in Collaborative Work," Computer Supported Cooperative Work, vol. 16, 2007: 335.35. D.H. Jonassen and W. Hung, “All problems are not equal: Implications for problem-based learning,” The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, vol. 2, pp. 6-28, 2008.36. O. Pierrakos, A. Zilberberg, and R. Anderson, “Understanding Undergraduate Research Experiences through the Lens of Problem-based Learning: Implications for Curriculum and Translation,” The Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-based Learning, vol. 4, pp. 35-62, 2010.37. A. Strauss, "The Articulation of Project Work: An Organizational Process," The Sociological Quarterly, vol. 29, pp. 163-178, 1988.38. A. Strauss, "The
a mechanism for enhancing the engagement and performance of underrepresented groups(UGs) in spatial learning [1], physics [2], computer science, general engineering [3], softwareand electrical engineering [4] – [17], mechanical engineering (ME) [18] – [25] computer aideddesign [26], and aerospace engineering [27]. Less than a handful of these studies have exploredgames’ appeal, efficacy or UG performance as a function of gender. For example, Joiner et al.,[19] who studied a population of 138 ME UGs (15/138 female) found that there was nodifference in “motivation towards engineering” (4.2 + 0.5, pre- and post-survey results) or in“perceived engineering competence” (3.4 + 0.7, pre-survey to 3.3 + 0.4, post-survey) after videogame use for
CoursesAbstractRobotic motion control methods and Programmable Logic Controllers (PLCs) are critical inengineering automation and process control applications. In most manufacturing and automationprocesses, robots are used for moving parts and are controlled by industrial PLCs. Properintegration of external I/O devices, sensors and actuating motors with PLC input and outputcards is very important to run the process smoothly without any faults and/or safety concerns.Most traditional electrical and computer engineering (ECE) programs offer high level of motiontheory and controls but little hands-on exposure to PLCs which are the main industrialcontrollers. This paper provides a framework for a hands-on project to integrate PLCs in robotarm motion control
focuseson content but also emphasizes the importance of developing communication and collaborativeskills24. Engineering organizations focus on teamwork because of its ability to help spark Page 13.1289.2innovative ideas and allow participants to produce higher quality projects 18, 23. As a result,interdisciplinary or cross-functional teams are a required part of an accredited undergraduateengineering curriculum. The teams are typically involved in a range of functions that includedesign, development and manufacturing. This move to a curriculum that includes teamworkskills is in response to the engineering industry need for engineers who are
low computationalonboard power would be to add a small PC. Sahin et al. [21] designed microrobots to teach undergraduate and graduate students aboutmultidisciplinary engineering projects. These same robots were also used for graduate andundergraduate research, clubs, and organizations. This worked used microbots, which were aswarm of small, inexpensive, autonomous agents. These robots were able to quickly and cheaplycover more ground and were good for reconnaissance, search and rescue, and wildfire detection.The swarm of micro agents were referred to as MEMScouts and these were categorized asSensScouts, GroundScouts, and AirScouts. For example, the GroundScouts had a modulararchitecture that included locomotion, communication, control
competencies based on their spatial abilities," Computer Applications in Engineering Education, vol. 30, no. 6, pp. 1857-1871, 2022.[16] J. Garcia-Zubia et al., "Empirical Analysis of the Use of the VISIR Remote Lab in Teaching Analog Electronics," IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 60, no. 2, pp. 149- 156, 2017, doi: 10.1109/TE.2016.2608790.[17] G. Geaney and T. O’Mahony, "Design and evaluation of a remote PLC laboratory," International Journal of Electrical Engineering Education, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 212-223, 2016.[18] I. Gustavsson et al., "On objectives of instructional laboratories, individual assessment, and use of collaborative remote laboratories," IEEE Transactions on learning technologies
definitions were analyzed by expert judges. Before judges proceeded withofficial scoring, they engaged in training and calibration sessions.1. Expert JudgesTwo judges analyzed student sustainability definitions. The first judge was a PhD student inCEE, while the second judge held an advanced degree in Electrical and Computer Engineering.Both judges completed sustainability-related courses, conducted sustainability-related research,and have been involved with Engineers without Borders (EWB), an organization dedicated toimplementing sustainable engineering projects worldwide. Both judges extensively reviewedrecent publications related to sustainability and sustainability education prior to scoring studentdefinitions.2. Judge Training and
Paper ID #11879Development of a course in energy management for engineering and technol-ogy programsDr. Radian G Belu, University of Alaska Anchorage Dr. Radian Belu is Associate Professor within Electrical Engineering Department, University of Alaska Anchorage, USA. He is holding one PHD in power engineering and other one in physics. Before joining to University of Alaska Anchorage Dr. Belu hold faculty, research and industry positions at universi- ties and research institutes in Romania, Canada and United States. He also worked for several years in industry as project manager, senior engineer and consultant. He has
interventions.Mr. Muhammad Faiz Shams, Museum of Science Muhammad Shams is a Research Associate who has been with the Museum of Science, Engineering is Elementary team for almost 2 years. He graduated from the University of Massachusetts Dartmouth with a Bachelors of Science in Mathematics. Prior to his time with EiE, Muhammad worked as an undergrad- uate researcher in the field of applied numerical analysis. Muhammad assists the team with quantitative analysis, paper writing, and database management.Jonathan D Hertel, EiE/Museum of Science Jonathan manages the Examining the Efficacy of Engineering is Elementary (E4) project (an NSF-funded study of the efficacy of the EiE curriculum), overseeing and organizing a research effort
integrated and incremental exposure to theGIS/GPS and its applications that teaches construction engineering and management studentsGIS/GPS technology. The knowledge and skills gained in the class will help students graphicallysimulate and operate construction process in a simple and effective way. The practice of classprojects give students the encouragement to pursuit the further study related to advancedtechnology. Through the exposure to these advanced technologies, the students will gain the solidfoundation to the construction process. The benefits for their future career are expectable.References1. Keshawarz, M. Seleh, et al. "Integration of GIS in Civil Engineering Curriculum." 2001 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
their work into several key categories,including technical problem-solving, interdisciplinary applications, societal impacts, anddiversity and inclusion initiatives. This classification is informed by KEEN cards, whichhighlight innovative teaching methodologies such as problem-solving studios, project-basedlearning, and entrepreneurship in engineering. Our analysis reveals trends in topics, teachingmethods, and content of the KEEN cards, offering insights into how fellows from differentdisciplines (e.g., mechanical, civil, and chemical engineering) bring distinct approaches tointegrating entrepreneurial mindsets in their curricula. We also identify workshops, such asProblem-Solving Studios and Integrating Curriculum with Entrepreneurial Mindset
Intellectual Property Management. Proceedings of the 2008 ASEE Gulf-Southwest Annual Conference The University of New Mexico – Albuquerque Copyright © 2008, American Society for Engineering EducationThe third workshop is on research in technical and science libraries and is presented bythe College of Technology Librarian.Guest Speakers-The guest speaker series is designed to introduce students to the realworld challenges. The speakers are engaged in the cutting age of their industry. Theyoften bring in a new perspective to the senior project. A few of the speakers are membersof the ET industrial advisory board and are familiar with the curriculum and providevaluable feedback for the improvement
a professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at McGill University and is the Academic Lead and Faculty Scholar of the Enhancing Learning and Teaching in Engineering (ELATE) initiative in the Faculty of Engineering. His research interests include faculty development and the intersections between the teaching and learning environments, identity, and equity, diversity, inclusivity, and accessibility.Paul Neufeld P.Eng., MBA, PMP, University of Saskatchewan Paul Neufeld is a Professional Engineer (P. Eng.) with 20 years of industry experience, holding a B.Sc. in Civil Engineering from the University of Saskatchewan, MBA from Aspen University, and is a certified Project Management Professional
Paper ID #6261Nuclear Workforce Development Scholarships and Enhancements ProgramPhase I: Outreach and RecruitingDr. Hayrettin B Karayaka, Western Carolina University Hayrettin Bora Karayaka, PhD Assistant Professor of Electrical Engineering Western Carolina University Department of Engineering and Technology Belk Building 339 Cullowhee, NC 28723 Bora Karayaka is an Electrical Engineering faculty at Kimmel School, Western Carolina University. With his over ten years of industry experience, he has extensive experience in project management, and a clear understanding of deadlines, industry requirements, safety and
issues of societal impact having to do with cultural issues, accessibility issues, computing and public policy, the impact of free and opensource software, and so on. The authors argue that one approach for introducing such topics into a curriculum is through capstone projects, e.g., that develop products to serve the 1, 2, 7, 8public good. A number of authors have developed “best practices” for teaching computer science ethics. Best practices typically involve the use of case studies, handson exercises, roleplaying, discussion sessions, written assignments, and project work. 2 Quinn surveyed 50 ABET accredited computerscience departments (out of 200 programs at