Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education Session # 3425 Three goals were established for development of a mid-program assessment instrument that focused on engineering design: (a) To create a tool for assessing the effectiveness of design learning accomplished via different instructional approaches found in community colleges, four-year colleges, and research universities, (b) To communicate a set of design education outcomes for lower-division courses, and (c) To provide a learning experience that
. (Interdisiplinary Engineering, and holds a Six Sigma Black Belt from Mikel Harry's Six Sigma Management Institute. Page 13.1082.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Six Sigma: Does it belong in the Manufacturing Curriculum?AbstractSix Sigma has morphed through three generations: focus on quality to focus onprocess improvement (cost reduction) to focus on value (a strategic managementstrategy). This paper will discuss the three generations of Six Sigma, compare the tenets ofSix Sigma to Lean Manufacturing and evaluate whether it has a place in themanufacturing curriculum.IntroductionIn a recent review of several “Lean
Paper ID #39835Work-in-Progress: A Multidisciplinary Hands-on Course to GuideEngineering Students Toward Becoming Blended Digital ProfessionalsDr. Jaskirat Sodhi, New Jersey Institute of Technology Dr. Jaskirat Sodhi is interested in first-year engineering curriculum design and recruitment, retention and success of engineering students. He is the coordinator of ENGR101, an application-oriented course for engineering students placed in pre-calculus courses. He has also developed and co-teaches the Fundamen- tals of Engineering Design course that includes a wide spectra of activities to teach general engineering students
of increasing complexity. The teamsdevelop models, test their models with laboratory experiments, and validate their models withexperimental data. At the conclusion of the course, freshmen gain an appreciation for the powerof modeling physiological systems and can propose their own hypothesis, which they can thentest in lab. With practice, freshmen become more comfortable with the modeling process [3].They understand the value of solving challenging, open-ended problems with multiple potentialsolutions. Engineering students must learn to creatively ideate and assess numerous approaches,often with conflicting outcomes, starting their freshmen year. Modeling and design team-basedprojects engross students in learning beyond lectures and
shows that project-based and inquiry-based learning in networkingclasses has generated positive impact on students’ mastery of related course concepts.Particularly, students working collaboratively in a well-established team environment tend tohave a higher satisfaction in their learning and can better achieve the learning outcomes. Some ofthe assessment data were presented in ASEE conference last year.In this paper, we focus to answer one question “How to effectively incorporate collaborativeinquiry-based learning in undergraduate computer networking curriculum”. First of all, the paperintroduces a general framework derived from our best practice for integrating inquiry-basedlearning into the classroom that can be applied to any engineering
recentadvances in WSN in undergraduate measurement and instrumentation courses of engineering andtechnology (E&T) curricular. Implementation of the modules is ongoing. Small successes have been documented in termsof student responses to the effectiveness of the modules. Further evaluation of studentperformance will allow for more concrete statements regarding whether students have madegains in learning about WSN concepts and skills. During the project, tremendous effort from theinstructor and teaching assistances is required. However, as the project takes root, we areconfident that instructors using the developed module will need to exert comparable effort whenpreparing for a new course. The modular nature of the learning modules makes it
across the Undergraduate Curriculum: Preliminary Results from the Collaboration Across Boundaries (CAB) Pedagogical StudyS. Monisha Pulimood1, Diane C. Bates2, and Kim Pearson31Department of Computer Science, The College of New Jersey2Department of Sociology, The College of New Jersey3Department of Journalism and Professional Writing, The College of New Jersey1. INTRODUCTIONDespite the growing need for scientific literacy, colleges and universities offer most scientificcontent in courses offered in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics). Thispaper reports on the evaluation of the Collaboration Across Boundaries (CAB) pedagogy, whichincorporates project-based, community-engaged learning in
," J. of Engineering Education, ASEE, Vol. 87. NO.2, 1998.4. Shaeiwitz, " Classroom Assessment," ," J. of Engineering Education, ASEE, Vol. 87. NO.2, 1998.5. McKenna and Agogino, " Integrating Design, Analysis, and Problem Solving in an Introduction to Engineering Curriculum " ASEE proceedings, 19986. West Point Bridge Designer, Dept. of Civil and Mechanical Engineering, USMA, West Point, NY 10996Biographical InformationISMAIL I. ORABI, Professor of Mechanical Engineering at University of New Haven. He received his Ph.D. fromClarkson University, and his MS degree from the State University of New York and B.S. from Cairo Institute ofTechnology, all in Mechanical Engineering. In the past 10 years, He has established three
job training and placement. Page 23.1089.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 Strategy to incorporate BIM curriculum in Planning and Scheduling classesAbstractArchitect-Engineer-Construction (AEC) employers have begun expecting that constructionprogram graduates have a working knowledge of Building Information Modeling (BIM). Thispaper is an attempt to adopt this new skill-set in educational institutions along with thefundamental techniques of Planning and Scheduling already being taught. To incorporate theBIM curriculum pertaining to the
are an effective way to engage these students, explainthe mission of ASEE, and offer them the opportunity to help organize the new ASEE studentchapter.One approach is to identify certain courses that are likely to draw education-minded engineeringstudents. For example, the University of Illinois offers a College Teaching course that attracts anumber of engineering graduate students who are excited about engineering education. Thesearch for Illinois ASEE student chapter officers included contacting current and pastengineering students in the College Teaching class.A second approach is to identify other university programs or groups that attract the involvementof students with a strong interest in transforming and improving engineering
Page 7.328.4 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering 4 Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright ©2002, American Society for Engineering Education Session 3560include simple designs that improve the students’ grasp of the basic theory while applying thedesign notions and tools.Group design projects provide an opportunity to take on larger, more complex design problems,while giving the students experience in group dynamics. Hints and new design approaches areprovided in the lecture and in meetings with the student groups. Cost, size, and
with step-by-step instructions showing how to build and troubleshoot the motor. In addition, preliminaryexperiment testing and student reactions are presented.1) IntroductionMotors are an important part of the mechanical engineering (ME) curriculum as well as incurricula developed for high school science and robotics clubs – in fact, this experiment wasdeveloped as part of a curriculum to accompany the Navy’s SeaPerch program1, which focuseson junior high and high school students. In college ME programs, motors are introduced infreshman and sophomore introduction to engineering courses, and then elaborated upon in higherlevel classes, such as system dynamics, control systems, and mechatronics. Most commonly,experiments involving motors focus
, curriculum, courses, et cetera. • Seek ways to collaborate with other departments on campus.ConclusionFirst-year engineering professors find themselves in a unique situation, often coming frompositions at the height of their technical careers while perhaps lacking certain skills in the area ofteaching. The aim of this paper has been to offer a host of practical suggestions from theviewpoint of two new professors. One final piece of advice – recognize that you will make somemistakes! Most of your colleagues – and even your students – will understand your position andwill be forgiving of errors. With strong efforts to improve your teaching style and a positiveattitude in the classroom, the success you experienced as a graduate student will find its
thequality assurance of engineering higher education. It is when we all recognize thechanges needed, prepare for the future, and become systems thinkers that we will meetour goals of preparing well-rounded engineering graduates for the workplace. ABETrecognized the needed changes years ago and this is why future employers recognizeaccreditation as assurance of a well-educated and well-prepared entry-level employee.IntroductionA recent study by the American Society for Engineering Management listed sevensocioengineering areas where there are “perceived gaps in the value of the organizationversus preparedness for new BS engineers.” Studies by EAC/ABET have identified skillgaps engineers and engineering technologists lack upon graduation. Some of the
type(s) of career or advanced schooling being prepared for. Giventhat, the group felt that we could produce a working document that defined the content, i.e., thecommon body of knowledge across all discplines and types of programs, but that meaningfuldefinition of scope would need to be more detailed and granular according to program type.We have utilized a logic model approach and specficially the backward design model (5) to guidethe process of defining the core curriculum. The backward design model is derived from thefundamental systems/program logic model whereby antecendents, transactions, and outcomes arelogically linked in an apparent and systematic way (Figure 1). antecedents transactions
Paper ID #39808Addressing New ABET General Criteria Focusing on Diversity, Equity, andInclusionDr. Gary Lichtenstein, Arizona State University Gary Lichtenstein, Ed.D., is founder and principal of Quality Evaluation Designs, a firm specializing in education research and program evaluation. He is also Affiliate Associate faculty member in Rowan University’s Experiential Engineering Education department.Dr. Rocio C. Chavela Guerra, Rowan UniversityDr. Stephanie Cutler, Pennsylvania State University Dr. Stephanie Cutler has degrees in Mechanical Engineering, Industrial and Systems Engineering, and a PhD in Engineering
Paper ID #30709Year-Long Faculty Development Program for New Engineering Instructors:Description and EvaluationChris Migotsky, University of Illinois Chris Migotsky is the Coordinator of Faculty Teaching Programs within the College of Engineering at the University of Illinois. He also has college-level academic advising duties with undergraduate stu- dents from all departments. He focuses on faculty development, curriculum change, and assessment and evaluation related to teaching and learning. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Year-Long
Paper ID #32377”A New Way of Seeing”: Engagement With Women’s and Gender StudiesFosters Engineering Identity FormationDr. Jenn Stroud Rossmann, Lafayette College Jenn Stroud Rossmann is Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Co-Director of the Hanson Center for Inclusive STEM Education at Lafayette College. She earned her BS in mechanical engineering and the PhD in applied physics from the University of California, Berkeley. Prior to joining Lafayette, she was a faculty member at Harvey Mudd College. Her scholarly interests include the fluid dynamics of blood in vessels affected by atherosclerosis and aneurysm, the cultural
Ecuadorian villages and twovillages in Panama that did not have a reliable water source. The paper will discuss the creationof a new course that allows the university to offer an international design experience within thetraditional Capstone course, and it will further compare the outcomes of the international servicelearning frameworks to the standard senior design projects.IntroductionMany Engineering programs are becoming interested in including an international servicelearning project into the school’s curriculum [1-6, 8, 9, 12-20]. There are many components in atypical international service learning experience that can benefit both the students and the school.[7, 10] One of the first and well documented benefits comes from the value project
Polytechnic Institute (WPI) asan assistant professor in Fall 2018. She spent three years at WPI prior to joining the CMU Mechanical EngineeringDepartment in July 2021. © American Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Powered by www.slayte.comTitle: Compensatory Effects of Flipped Learning for Experienced & New Faculty IntroductionFlipping learning is an approach that has garnered attention in recent decades for providingdeeper learning experience to students. In traditional engineering classes the lecturer feedsknowledge to the students in a classroom, describing concepts and explaining how to use them tosolve problems, then students go off and
underpinnings, is a philosophy that needs to be adapted to thespecific condition and environment of the institution and the nature of the field in which it isapplied. This can be seen in the different models of PBL implementation throughout the world.There are, however, essential features of PBL. PBL is an inductive learning approach thatembeds small groups of students in the role of a professional and presents them with a messy,unstructured, realistic (if not real) problem, to solve. The problem should be well crafted toengage and immerse students in learning new issues, as well as challenge existing knowledge,skills and attitude. Students are guided by cognitive coaches through the PBL cycle to learn andsolve the problem. PBL sought to make students
world. Thegradual, but steady transition towards the concept of "Virtual Campus" [6] and interactive,distance-learning, opens up new opportunities for teaching and recruiting, but also changes thedynamics, and even the players, in the competition for new engineering students. In acontinuous quest to offer unique capabilities and services to prospective students, more and moreuniversities are expected to include opportunities for off-campus courses, or virtual-learning, as ahighlight of their recruiting strategies.II. Recruiting Approach at WVUAn intensive, multifaceted program, dedicated solely to the recruiting of new students, has beeninitiated by the College of Engineering and Mineral Resources (CEMR) at West VirginiaUniversity (WVU) in
perspectives students bring to such programs, we can assess the degree to whichdisciplinary background shapes their approach to teaching and determine whether a generalizedprogram can still align with their values and experiences.Data were collected from 68 students in a graduate-level capstone teaching course providedthrough the Center for Teaching and Learning at a large, public, research-intensive institution inthe southeastern United States. Of these students, 37 were in the College of Engineering, while31 were from other disciplines. Students participated in a semester-long mentored teachingexperience and completed the TPI around Week 3 of the semester. They were asked to write areflection on their scores and develop teaching philosophy
Paper ID #25445Techno-economic Modeling as an Inquiry-based Design Activity in a CoreChemical Engineering CourseDr. Jamie Gomez, University of New Mexico Jamie Gomez, Ph.D., is a Senior Lecturer III in the department of Chemical & Biological Engineering (CBE) at the University of New Mexico. She is a co- principal investigator for the following National Science Foundation (NSF) funded projects: Professional Formation of Engineers: Research Initiation in Engineering Formation (PFE: RIEF) - Using Digital Badging and Design Challenge Modules to Develop Professional Identity; Professional Formation of Engineers
andenjoyable, this approach to training had several serious drawbacks. It was difficult to find areplacement teacher for the teacher being trained. It was also difficult to find college coursesthat aligned themselves to the PLTW curriculum. Further, when the teachers returned to theirdistrict they did not have time to help other teachers learn the program and often had to relearnmaterial for courses they were not scheduled to teach for another year or two.A New Teacher Training Model That WorksBased on responses from school districts and their teachers, PLTW has refined its training planto focus on the specific training needs of the teachers coupled with intensive core training in thePLTW curriculum. The curriculum that the teachers use utilizes
the Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering Department at the University of New Mexico. The research in her lab is focused on understanding the dynamics and structures of macromolecular assemblies including proteins, polymers, and lipid membranes. Undergrad- uates, graduate students, and postdoctoral scholars are trained in a multidisciplinary environment, utilizing modern methodologies to address important problems at the interface between chemistry, physics, engi- neering, and biology preparing the trainees for careers in academe, national laboratories, and industry. In addition to research, she devotes significant time developing and implementing effective pedagogical approaches in her teaching of
Assessment Performance Criteria for a course, they are implemented asindicated in Figure 4.At the Program Level, loop PL in Figure 4, the Program Curriculum Committees are concernedwith the definition and subsequent monitoring of the Assessment Performance Criteria for thecourses in the individual programs and for setting achievement standards or metrics consistentwith those set for the engineering school. The standards are quantitative levels required for eachProgram Outcome. The data from distributed grading will be very relevant to this process.Overall course grades are the same so that new approaches can be compared with historicalcriteria.These objectives must be continually scrutinized by communication with the majorconstituencies of the
requirements of the LRFDbridge design code4. The target reliability index of 3.5 for calibrating the AASHTO LRFDBridge Design Specifications5 can be used as the criterion for evaluating the reliability of thebridges.Assessment of the bridges in terms of their safety and reliability may usefully be incorporatedinto the civil engineering courses. Development of “Reliability of Bridges” course may be asignificant addition to the civil engineering curriculum. The need for safe and reliable bridges isvery essential for the growth of the nation. Thus, offering a course that deals with reliability ofbridges is very significant.Course Description and ObjectiveThe Reliability of Bridges course will be a full three credit-hour undergraduate elective course ina
Session 1526 On Laboratory Development for a Curriculum in Particle Technology Rajesh N. Dave, Jonathan Luke, Robert Pfeffer, Doris Yacoub, Ian S. Fischer, Anthony D. Rosato New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ 07102AbstractThis paper discusses the development of laboratory facilities for use with an on going NSF-CRCD project that will establish a three-course concentration in particle technology at NJIT,offered across the engineering curriculum. The main objective of the NSF funded project is toaddress the urgent need for undergraduate and graduate education in this vital field
Paper ID #23636A Second Year Review of a New FYE ProgramDr. George D. Ricco, University of Kentucky George D. Ricco is an assistant professor of electrical and computer engineering at the University of Kentucky. He focuses his work between teaching in the first-year engineering program at UK and research in student progression. Previously, he was the KEEN Program Coordinator at Gonzaga University in the School of Engineering and Applied Science. He completed his doctorate in engineering education from Purdue University’s School of Engineering Education. Previously, he received an M.S. in earth and planetary sciences