providing inexpensive labor. 5. At the same time the university would like to increase the Return on Investment (ROI) it has made in its knowledge capital (faculty, students, labs, and other infrastructure). Universities, after all, need funds to operate and given the current financial crisis the need for external funds is even greater. The above are only a subset of a long list of issues. For each point listed above, industrialcollaborators respond with their own concerns and issues. David Wisler (WISLER1) points out inhis paper the contrasting set of expectations in academic and industry. While all the criticismsone can make against such collaborations have been made, it is also true that university
of a novel faculty teaching evaluation process with directengagement of student and industry review teams; (3) the launch of a new course series,Professional Formation of Engineers 1, 2, and 3 to provide electrical engineering students withprofessional skills and career development guidance to broaden their education experience andsupport them in better understanding their discipline and potential future careers; (4) Study ofthe impact of action-state orientation on student success. An overarching theme for the project isthat the new completely connected department model will engage all stakeholders in sharing theresponsibility to empower students to Take Responsibility to Understand Engineering (TRUE).INTRODUCTION The department of
scores rendered will accurately represent a list of “the best colleges and universities,”nor should that be the goal. The real concern is the way these rankings are now being viewed bythe public and the hype that accompanies their release. Critics of the ranking process are quick to challenge the suggestion that an undergraduateeducation experience can be reduced to a statistical score.8,11 Even with their self cautionaryadmonishments to the contrary, some publications like U.S. News & World Report, Barron's Top50, and Money Magazine appear to do just that by using a variety of evaluation criteria that insome cases fluctuate from year to year,10,12 which is why it is not unusual for these rankingagencies to show dramatic changes in
, integratedengineering curricula allow learners to significantly improve humanities-related professionalskills in cross-disciplinary programs,10,14,18 avoiding curricular repetition,14 and encouragingcloser student-faculty connection and mentoring that enhance learners’ sense of community.19Froyd & Ohland14 also highlighted the importance of collaboration among faculty with diversebackgrounds to ensure appropriate integration of liberal education concepts. Such collaborationshould be egalitarian in order to support an equal and free exchange of ideas. However, there is acontinuing concern that a humanist approach to learning in engineering and technology shouldtake on humanistic concerns without attempting to replace or “colonize” liberal education.20The
issues regarding the implementation ofPBL, and discusses student reactions to a PBL course. In short, this paper offers anevaluation of the learning outcomes achieved and presents some insights gained by ourexperience.Introduction Historically, the educational goals of our laboratory focused on having studentsemploy and verify theory learned in core courses. Feedback from our alumni indicatedthey appreciated the strong fundamentals that our laboratory instruction helped themlearn. However, both alumni and ABETi seem to agree that new industrial processes andthe modern work environment demand that students should be able to apply fundamentalsto a wide variety of problems. Further, graduating students must be skilledcommunicators, possess
instructors). This will be followed by an interactive discussion between thepanelists and the audience. The goal of this panel is to familiarize students, faculty, and staff atthe College of the multiple challenges different students face while attending school. Hopefully,this will lead to added awareness and activity towards improving the climate for every student.The panel will be followed by detailed seminars focused on specific concerns regarding Page 6.1088.3classroom climate and teaching. Faculty, staff, and GSIs will be strongly encouraged to attend “Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference &
experiment and evolve in order to keep pacewith advances in knowledge, changes in professional practice, and shifting conditions in society.The need for responsive academic programs is particularly a concern in scientific andtechnological fields where the growth of knowledge is exponential (Rugarcia, et al.,[1]). Achemical engineering department at a big research extensive university developed andimplemented several strategies to address these issues: (1) curriculum content reform anddevelopment; (2) faculty and students assessment activities; (3) integrated assessment plans andprocesses throughout the chemical engineering curriculum. The research points out that a majorchallenge is not initiating curricular reform but institutionalizing the reform
argumentsfrom the other doctoral granting institutions in the state, and had to leave no questionsunanswered for the SBOE. The level of scrutiny for the program was exceptionally high and allefforts needed to show the benefit to the state and how the new program would fill an importantgap statewide. The issue of duplication within a state is often the limiting factor, so the fact thatthe region was not being well served from the other doctoral granting institutions was critical.Other lessons learned relate to program growth, and cost to the university. While this doctoralprogram broke the barrier of being the first doctoral degree in the college of engineering, it wascostly, with only one program benefiting; this limits the set of qualified faculty who
knowledge with practice on challenging design projects. The MDL provides acapstone experience intended to prepare students to enter the workforce. The projects areopen-ended, technically challenging design problems that encompass a broad array ofimportant contemporary issues. In addition to defining an important problem, sponsorsprovide a significant grant and their direct participation with the students, faculty andstaff who work to provide design solutions. Lessons learned over the past five years haveopened our eyes to some of the major changes needed in how to educate engineers andprepare them to enter the workforce. These lessons are expected to influence changesaffecting our entire curriculum.IntroductionThe engineering profession is at a
EAC Criteria 3 – J) was lacking. After extensive study anddebate by the curriculum committee and faculty, a new two-credit Professional Issues course wasadded to the curriculum to address these weaknesses.Course Learning GoalsThe Professional Issues course had eight learning goals. Seven of these mapped directly tooutcomes articulated in the ASCE BOK. The goals presented to the students in the coursesyllabus were: 1. Explain the importance of professional licensure2 and the path to become a licensed PE a. Describe the knowledge, skills, and attributes required to become a PE, based on the ASCE BOK b. Prepare to pass the Fundamentals of Engineering (FE) exam (review topics, develop test taking strategy) 2
campuscommunity.In addition to these routine efforts, Advocates regularly assume a leadership or support rolewhen various campus issues and concerns occur. For example, when state lawmakers targetedresearch by two women faculty aimed to reduce teen pregnancy, Advocates helped providesupport and pressure to challenge the legislative over-reach. When the possibility was raised ofclosing the on-campus daycare center, and when recent discussions occurred of replacing snowdays with virtual classes, Advocates emphasized the differential impact the decisions would haveon women faculty. In situations like these, Advocates have the responsibility to ensure thatequity, and particularly gender equity, are at the forefront when important decisions are made.Workshops
-based assessment canbe done, but whether it can be done on a limited budget.The software engineering program at the University of Wisconsin - Platteville involves just fourfull-time faculty in a department of nine. One faculty member is new, so just three of the facultymembers did the assessments described here. Building the process certainly took time, but theongoing costs are quite reasonable. The indirect measures are generally very easy to perform –typically a few minutes of class time for a survey. Many of the direct measures are based onexisting exam questions and assignments. For these, the incremental cost consists of convertingscores into the 1-5 scale with possible adjustments for non-assessment-related issues (such as latepenalties
additional sites will allow foradditional insight and statistical confidence that results from additional samples. Learning moreabout how respondent departments handle academic integrity concerns will also inform theinterpretation of the growing body of study results.References[1] T. J. Ryan, C. Janeiro, and W.E. Howard. “Perception of Academic Integrity among Studentsand Faculty: A Comparison of the Ethical Gray Area”. Paper presented at 2016 ASEE AnnualConference & Exposition, New Orleans, Louisiana. 10.18260/p.25878https://peer.asee.org/25878[2] T. J. Ryan, C. Janeiro, W.E. Howard, and P.F. O'Malley. “ A Longitudinal Study of thePerception of Academic Integrity among Students and Faculty”. Paper presented at 2017 ASEEAnnual Conference &
our ongoing research and design efforts. They arebeginning to address issues that had been identified previously, as well as to identify new socialchange efforts that can effectively respond to recent calls for action related to racial disparities.The design thinking mindset is encouraging the departments to involve stakeholders inidentifying and respond to new needs and issues brought about by online/remote participation oncampus.Conclusions and future workOur research has identified ways in which student and faculty understandings of diversity andinclusion are impacted significantly by the local contexts of their school and compounded by thelarger college, university, and discipline-wide understanding of who is an engineer and whatskills
the rank of Senior Lecturer in 1999. Since then she has been primarily teaching first and second year undergraduate courses such as digital systems, introductory electronics, electric and magnetic fields, circuit analysis, electrical fundamentals, computer fundamentals and calculus. She also serves as the P. Eng. Czar in the ECE Department since 2007 engaged in the promotion of the Professional Engineer designation amongst faculty members. She was promoted to Associate Professor, Teaching Stream in July 2015. Professor Wang, in collaboration with University of Waterloo has produced a set of new online learning modules that support the teaching of foundational level electromagnetics and circuits in engineering
Item Brief Description Endeavor Change Develop a revised mission Faculty identified issues with the previous mission statement using a custom statement and agreed on aspects to be included in the process revised mission statement [2]. Product- New department The new collaboratively written Department mission mission statement statement can be found in Ref. [2]. Design and deploy identity We track how student’s identity changes, using both the (ESIS and IAT) measures
considering profitable avenues for the newengineering librarian to increase subject knowledge and make valuable connections. Bennetttells us that “The benefits of [non-library professional] membership include improved currentawareness of the discipline, both its research trends and issues of practical concern; opportunitiesto interact with non-librarians as colleagues; enhanced prestige among disciplinary faculty;insight into other perspectives on the role of the library and librarians in academia; cultivation oflibrarians’ identity as subject experts; and new avenues for professional service and scholarlyactivities [25].”Professional engineering conferences are also an ideal place to meet representatives from subjectspecific presses. While the
nuclearpower plant construction is being spurred by increased electricity demands and the incentives inthe Energy Policy Act of 2005 3 as well as concerns about greenhouse gas emissions and relianceon foreign energy resources. As NRC Chairman Dale Klein has noted, the nuclear workforce isgraying, and the NRC is poised to hire hundreds of new employees in preparation for theexpanded workload, including the staffing of the recently added Office of New Reactors 4.Others have also noted the staffing shortfalls in the nuclear industry 5 as well as the electricpower industry in general. In fact, estimates are that 50% of the utility engineering workforcewill retire within 10 years 6.In recognition of the nuclear revival, the NRC initiated a grant program to
groups of three or four members.Student opinions regarding the space and design of these classrooms were evaluated by paper-based surveys in the Introductory Solid Mechanics course during the Spring 2015 semester.Results are shown in Fig. 5. The results confirmed anecdotal feedback from students andteaching assistants: the classroom was too crowded and the chair arrangement did not facilitate Figure 1: Diagram of classroom layout in active learning configuration.collaborative learning. [11, 29, 32] To address this issue, a new active/flexible learning classroomwas created to host discussion sections for all three introductory mechanics courses.The initial planning of this active learning classroom began in February 2015. The selection
know what they can do to address these issues. The Advocacy Tips Initiative does just that – create awareness and describe how individuals can advocate for their colleagues. At our institution, we advertised the Advocacy Tips Initiative on our campus-‐wide newsletter. I make sure to forward the tips to faculty, both women and men. Panelist 4: As in my previous comments, change in policy (or top-‐down) change is not sufficient to promoting a new culture. As is well understood and reported in the literature, departmental and university culture is dictated by the attitudes and behavior of the majority, especially those in leadership
. Page 7.981.1“Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition CopyrightÓ 2002, American Society for Engineering Education”Examples can be found in norms, policies and practices within an organizational system.Occupational stereotyping, occupational discrimination and a paucity of role models, mentorsand collegial support (in other words, lack of a critical mass) are other examples of externalbarriers. A common issue for female faculty members is involvement in activities that womentend to be motivated to undertake due to personal values, for example mentoring. These types ofactivities, referred to as “shadow jobs”, can be time consuming and without reward in thepromotion and tenure process10
; Exposition Copyright Ó 2002, American Society for Engineering Education” as irrelevant by students until they realize that these methods are routinely used in industry. · Importance of Economic Analysis: The importance and relevance of engineering economic analyses is almost always emphasized when students discuss their projects with practicing engineers. Without this interaction, students sometimes consider economics to be irrelevant to design – a subject for business students. · Importance of Non-Technical Issues: Frequently the success or failure of a new product or design is due to non-technical issues. Engineering students often underestimate the importance of marketability, legal issues
, business, and law students identify market opportunities, develop business plans, and produce prototype systems. Each ITV team is led by an experienced entrepreneurial CEO and features hands-on guidance from engineering, business, and law faculty. Prior to joining UF, Dr. Stanfill spent ten years with United Technologies where he designed fighter air- craft gas turbine hardware for Pratt & Whitney, served as a key resource to the Carrier Corporation New Product Development Council Steering Committee, facilitated Design for X (DFx) workshops internation- ally, developed business process linkages between new product development and lean manufacturing, and developed and implemented manufacturing systems software
Session 2561 Engineering Ethics at Drexel University Mark Manion, Moshe Kam Drexel UniversityI. IntroductionCriterion 3 of the new ABET Engineering Criteria 20001 has the potential to change the way thatengineering ethics and science technology and society studies are taught in the engineeringundergraduate major. One concern voiced by critics has been the shift in the humanities andsocial studies component from the previous “course requirements model” to a progressive modelfocused on assessments and outcomes. While some have regarded this change as a threat to
about 6000 students, the university has colleges of liberal arts, education, business,and technology. The EET program has an approximate enrollment of fifty-five and is one of fiveprograms comprising the Department of Engineering Technology. The rural environment andabsence of local high-tech industries present significant funding and educational challenges for ourEET program. Additionally, institutional support is sparse. However, the three-person faculty isrelatively autonomous, and functions as a well-knit team. Significant concerns for standards andquality are hallmarks of our program.Prior to our TC2K conversion, individual faculty members owned their courses. As a result,management of the program and curriculum tended to be reactive in
/Vice Provost for Faculty Affairs & Diversity at UTRGV. He is also a full professor in the department of Mechanical Engineering. Dr. Qubbaj received his Ph.D. from the University of Oklahoma with specialization in combustion and energy system. His research has been sponsored by NSF, the Department of Energy, and the Department of Defense.Liyu Zhang, University of Texas Rio Grande Valley Liyu Zhang is an Associate Professor in the Department of Computer Science Department of Computer Science at the University of Texas Rio Grande Valley. He received his Ph. D. in Computer Science from the State University of New York at Buffalo in September 2007. Before that he received his M. S. (2000) and B. S. (1997) from
implementation) the project was to redesign a smallquadrotor. Issues related to the characteristics of the project used for the designette as well asresults in the five assessment categories (time taken to perform the designette, increase in teamdynamics, increased familiarity and correct implementation of the design methods, change inteam motivation and increased familiarity with risk management and safety issues) wereassessed.4. ResultsThe following subsections of results come from several sources. The first year implementationof a mini-design/designette with a control group was assessed based on faculty and studentperceptions and reported in a previous publication.15 That research concluded that “the use of a[10 class hour] mini-design competition at
of manydifferent departments or colleges, it is not unusual for it to be a course that has had the specialinterest of the dean of a college of engineering. As such it might have been taught with thecourse prefix of General Engineering or Engineering. At some institutions the purpose mighthave been to involve engineering faculty in social issues that went beyond their narrow technicalinterests. Today this approach or concern is less likely to be the case since the course hasdeveloped a life of its own and has, today, broad acceptance in the academic world. This generation’s technology and society course explores the place technology has in societyand the various viewpoints held concerning technology. A course might emphasize the benefitsa
to ensure course quality. Instructors need and want to create acourse in the preferred mode of face-to-face delivery but know that the current chaos will requireall stakeholders to adapt to fully remote learning (synchronous or asynchronous) when required(pandemic or extreme weather event, etc.).Background: Hyflex Model with SwivlWith the abrupt movement to the remote learning mode, most of our faculty who had not taughtremotely experienced confusion when asked to implement the Swivl immediately. Somesearched for ways to connect with their students that would support their new ways of teaching.A corporate-level Zoom (https://Zoom.us/) package was quickly purchased by The Citadel andmade available to all faculty to use to connect and teach
, sustainability required finding out if other faculty would become engaged in the project.These results confirmed the suspicions that it was necessary to either 1) tie the “Taste” with existingcourses or 2) create a credited class in order for the program to be sustainable.4.2 NEW ACTION PLANWith the knowledge gleaned from the pilot, a new action plan was created (Table 1). This strategyaddresses a number of key issues: 1. It satisfies the requirements of the Clare Boothe Luce scholarships 2. It creates an interdisciplinary social nature to the meetings 3. It involves science and math faculty in the engineering process so they can better identify successful engineering students and relate their courses to engineering students