very specific to the company. Internship and co-opprograms also prepare students and make them more “hirable”. In the current competitive environment,for both students and companies, new approaches need to be designed that support development ofcompetencies and skills needed by new graduates to be productive from start of their career.1.2 Industry and academia partnership to develop competenciesCorporations and employers have frequently pointed to a lack of professional awareness and low levels ofcommunication and teamwork skills in engineering graduates [11-14] These issues have led the U.S.Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) [15] to transform their accreditationcriteria from a content-based approach to an outcomes
could best benefit students.The process of adopting a shared vision started by holding lunch meetings where all facultybrainstormed how they envision "Engineering with Engineering." These brainstorming sessionsled to planning sessions surrounding curricular change discussed in the Curriculum sectionbelow. The “critical doing” of developing the new curriculum allowed the faculty to examine thecurrent system, identify issues to be addressed, and build the shared vision.Faculty reached the consensus on bringing industry practice to our students and sharing thevision of “Engineering with Engineers” during the first year of this project.b. Revised department mission. A department vision day was held for faculty to discuss andupdate the department
mandatory and expandingit to five units was readily accepted by the faculty. The change has been most difficult for theARCE department due to a highly impacted curriculum of typically 3 unit courses.One concern initially expressed by ARCE faculty was what existing courses would be sacrificedto make room for this new 5 unit course? It appears that this question has been answered withthe new interdisciplinary project based course replacing a prior 3 unit “senior project” course.The additional 2 units for the new interdisciplinary course were gained by eliminating a 4 unitgeneral numerical analysis course taught by computer science and replacing it with a 1 unitfocused numerical analysis lab taught by ARCE faculty. The changes were difficult but seem
for power grid cyber security are not yet robust enough toensure against such threats. According to a January 2011 Department of Energy audit, the currentstandards are not “adequate to ensure that systems-related risks to the nation’s power grid weremitigated or addressed in a timely manner.” While the 2012 cyber security act did not pass, thisissue remains one of great concern to many, the Department of Defense has deemed this issue ofenough importance to increase its dedicated workforce from 900 to 4000 with a goal of growingit even more across sectors in the coming decade. 1. Sources Elisabeth Bumiller, “Pentagon Expanding Cybersecurity Force to Protect Networks Against Attacks,” The New York Times, January 27, 2013. 2
Arthur Lakes Library supports Mines faculty inadapting existing OER or creating their own open materials.Some faculty at Mines have been using free resources in their courses for years, however theofficial “OER movement” on campus is relatively new. This movement was sparked by the workof a student group, For OER At Mines (FOAM), and a grant from the Colorado Department ofHigher Education (CDHE). In 2017, Colorado established a state OER Council to developrecommendations to support OER adoption at public higher education institutions [2]. The nextyear, the Council funded $550,000 in individual and institutional-level grants to foster theadoption, adaption and creation of OER across the state. During the first grant cycle, CDHEfunded Mines
, informalconversations with faculty members to get their individual ideas. We have followed the process outlined in this paper to develop an initial draft of thecurriculum that will be used after the semester transition. This was submitted to our collegecurriculum committee, and we will be provided feedback that we will have the opportunity toaddress before the plans are sent to the provost’s office.Summary of lessons learned • Keep the whole process student-centered. There were several other constraints that came up as concerns from a variety of people (e.g. faculty workload, lab space, ownership of certain courses). When these issues came up, they were often very concerning and stressful for those who were worried about them
difficulty isthe fact that institutions place constraints on engineering curricula in order to meet very restrictiveaccreditation requirements. The institutions, however, derive substantial benefits from accreditation.Consequently, relevance and suitability are critical issues that will always confront attempts to reviseengineering curricula. Curricular constraints, therefore, must be addressed explicitly by new or emergingprogrammatic directions, such as expanding the availability of environmental engineering course work tostudents enrolled in other programs. Institutions could respond in a variety of ways to the needs of engineering students to have bettercomprehension of environmental issues and, more specifically, how these issues
completing research. In addition, we will be asking the department to considerrequiring students working on any type of research to attend a series of one-hour seminars. Eachsemester, all new research students would be required to attend a one-hour seminar that reviewsprocedures, potential products, and other research issues that faculty members often take forgranted. We would also hold one or more seminars per semester on a range of topics related toresearch (e.g. networking and presenting at a conference, writing a journal article, preparing aneffective poster, etc.).We have noted that the percentage of students involved in research seems to be increasing. As adepartment, we need to discuss what an “appropriate” number of students working on
philosophy departments are ill equipped to handle the demand created by a required engineering ethics course. As with engineering faculty, philosophy faculty are already committed to research in their own discipline and to maintaining programs of study such as the philosophy major. Some philosophers have told us that they would be unwilling to sacrifice attention to their own programs to respond to required courses in the so-called service areas such as engineering or business ethics.EAC offers a promising alternative. It exposes all engineering students to ethical issues andproblems without overburdening them. It also engages engineering and non-engineering facultywithout forcing them to sacrifice other vital concerns by…· Exposing
(2023), these tools are being widely adopted across among engineering students at the University of New higher education institutions due to their ability to Haven. It investigates engineering students' perceptions improve operations and enrich educational content. regarding the role of AI in their education, the challenges However, they caution about the risks to academic encountered with its integration, and the ethical concerns integrity as AI-generated content may often blur the lines related to AI applications in engineering. Utilizing between student originality and automated output. questionnaires, this study collects data from a diverse This concern is recalled by
and finances amongcontributing disciplines [9]. When these conditions are met, fully collaborative andmultidisciplinary team teaching can generate interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary thinkingwhile providing a more inclusive experience for faculty and students, given the inherentheterogeneity in background, experience, interests, and learning styles [9].Process for Course SelectionIn general, any faculty member may design and propose multidisciplinary, collaborative, and/orteam-taught courses. However, the implementation of new courses within existing teachingloads, expectations, and curricula can be difficult, bringing about concerns of time management,compensation, and loss of autonomy in the case of team-taught courses [7]. At Union
authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. • Collaborative leadership throughout the project shared by administrators (e.g., department heads and graduate program directors) and other faculty members involved in the change initiative • Robust project design that presents a clear picture of the future, includes goals and objectives related to the realization of that picture, and has the flexibility to allow adjustments to new opportunities • Staff and faculty development opportunities for individuals to acquire new knowledge and skills related to issues
different in 2010 and beyond. While we havebeen responsive to, and the subject of, events and forces requiring change in the past, it appearsthat now a variety of factors will truly change the way that engineering education is carried in theUnited States in the future (cf. The Engineer of 2020: Visions of Engineering in the New Centuryand Retooling.) The key questions for us then become “How will the faculty, staff, and studentsof the College of Engineering (COE) of the University of Wisconsin-Madison respond to currentchallenges such as changes in demographics, scarce resources and globalization?” and “Will thecollege make the optimum use of the available people, skills, and resources to not only meetthese challenges, but at the same time, become
communication and presentation skills, and scholarlydiscussions of current technological or educational issues related to the students research interests.These first two aspects should also include the exploration of new ideas and issues.Courses and experiences needed in the technical area can be built into the student’s program of study.This characteristic is especially crucial to the college or university faculty member who sees the needfor technical competencies as part of the doctoral program. Individuals with the career intent ofteaching in the discipline of industrial technology, at the collegiate level, will find ample opportunityto take technical courses and gain experiences to build upon their previous degree work and upontheir teaching
-focused positions and findings from other researchers and educators, we propose anasset-based approach to building faculty competencies for ethics instruction and describe threesets of faculty assets for practitioners to consider. Given that questions concerning the morepersonal, self-directing side of an educator’s professional growth have only been systematicallyexplored in literature outside engineering education, we hope that our examination of the roles offaculty and their assets may begin a similar dialogue in engineering education.IntroductionWith the growth of publications and shared resources coming to light for the engineeringeducation community, instructors are continually presented with new approaches and strategiesthey can apply in
model 3. Overview of SMARTER Teamwork toolkit DEMONSTRATION 1. Sample research interface / tutorial COMMUNITY OUTCOMES 1. Teaming theory 2. Testing new user interfaces 3. Viewing student and faculty interface Equip 2. Best practices Research 3
potential of the newspace was made. Participants agreed that the Center will play a very important role in theeducation of our students and furthermore, they are excited about the possibilities the Center mayplay in recruiting future students.Potential Use - Opportunities and BarriersWhile the Innovation Center is framed as an exciting opportunity, making the most of the spacewill take careful planning. Indeed, respondents are anticipating innovative and new ways toutilize the center with their students; however, there is some concern that demand will be so highthat there could be competition over the usage. Amongst faculty members especially wereassumptions and expectations that specific courses would have required innovation center usage,but how
and mismatches among subjects offered by the mathematics department. Thenext step was to identify issues arising either from comments by faculty or by gaps of instructionfound during the analysis. We finally added resources and recommendations by listing courses,textbooks, specific lectures, and other resources that are relevant to the skills needed. Anexample from the analysis of Functions is shown in Figure 2.This investigation resulted in identification of a number of issues and potential barriers, leadingto recommendations for curriculum modification and development of supplementary materials.The example above concerns one of the major findings – conceptual problems with the meaningof function, its formulations and applications in
didn’t work the last time I tried it? • How much effort with this take for me? • What if I cannot close the loop on issues that they bring up? • What if the students come to inappropriate conclusions? • Isn’t reflection something that is more important for students in the humanities than students in engineering? • How will I explain it the other engineering faculty? • What if the students bring up uncomfortable maybe even personal subjects? • What if I don’t want to be responsible for supporting reflection? • What if I don’t believe in the value of reflection? • Will I get labeled in a strange way if I try something related to reflection?When we look across these different concerns, it is possible to see
original process.However, what we collected were skills and behaviors that industry has already identified asnecessary based on their current experience with these processes. We had not yet lookedspecifically at these new technologies and procedures and considered skills and behaviors thatcould allow industry to better utilize these technologies and techniques. This issue was ofparticular concern to us in Manufacturing because of the notion that many companies ‘don’t domanufacturing anymore”. This while a frequently stated opinion is in fact misleading because Page 10.1381.5any company with a tangible product still has to make it, and is still
OK if I use it as a template for my work this fall? • What kind of information can I use from a website and how can I use it? • There is a lot of programming code available for free on the Internet. May I use it for this project?Review of the LiteratureRecent literature addresses numerous concerns and indicates that academic honesty continues tobe an issue for faculty and students alike, and it reports on the impact of technology and existingperceptions.Technology and Academic Honesty Academic honesty is a pervasive issue for educators suchas reported by Jordan & Elmore,12 Bikowski and Broeckelman,1 and Cordova and Thornhill. 4Indeed, Whitley 21 reported on more than 100 research studies on cheating in a 30 year
method that emphasizes individual engineering program outcomes assessment.The most significant change of the new engineering criteria, EC 2000,1 is the accountability andresponsibility placed upon faculty for measuring the success of their own program. Initially, EC2000 impressed the already taxed engineering program faculty as a burdensome process.Knowing that being accredited was directly related to faculty involvement in this self-assessing,continuous improvement process added even more stress to a process that had not yet been fullyestablished. This unknown process was facilitated at the local level with minimum disruptionand reached its culmination during the fall 2002 ABET visit.Beginning in the spring of 1998, orientation workshops and
being reported to be used to produce essays, poems, prompts,contracts, notes, computer code, and reports [5]. Many concerns are being raised, especially as itcan be used to commit plagiarism [6]. Faculty members have encountered instances ofsuspicious writing and, in response, have issued warnings of academic consequences forsubmitting work predominantly sourced from ChatGPT [7]. An author admitted using AI to helpwrite parts of a book that won a prestigious writing award [8]. ChatGPT is being used to writeproduct reviews and social media posts, which are inundating the internet [9]. Detecting AI-generated writings can be challenging, unless someone mindlessly duplicates specific phraseslike “As an AI language model ...” or “I’m sorry, but I
that it is now more accessible and user-friendly.Alongside Mancus’s efforts to update and streamline the online course for NHV faculty, co-author Laura Heller began a months-long research project to locate, review, catalog, and share amore diverse set of curricular materials for optional use in conjunction with the lecture series andthe NHV textbook. What began as a personal project to diversify her own instruction became ashared database of links to hundreds of resources, including essays, news articles, book and filmreviews, podcasts, interviews, videos and films, and case studies. The resources are organizedinto two pages on CSM’s learning management system (LMS), one dedicated to materialsdealing explicitly with social justice issues
hence each program was taking toward not onlythe overall accreditation process but also the assessment of programmatic goals and outcomes.The COE was also quite helpful in providing support through workshops and seminars byoutside speakers on assessment methods and learning outcomes as well as inside speakers forcollege wide issues (e.g., co-op program and writing requirements/assessment). One area ofdiscussion that produced the greatest amount of concern (i.e., angst) among the coordinators wasassessment. Almost predictably, departments chose various assessments based on theirexperience with the particular method, the availability of resources, ease of implementation andother factors not necessarily related to the quality and /or quantity of
/pubs.cfm 4 Lau, R. S. M. (1996). Strategic Flexibility: A New Reality for World-Class Manufacturing. SAM Advanced Management Journal. Spring 1996, pp. 11-15. 5 Facts in Brief: Most American Believe International Education and Issues Are Important U.S. Concern. American Council on Education, Higher Education and National Affairs. http://www.acenet.edu/hena/facts_in_brief/2001/04_02_00_fib.cfm 6 Landis, R. B. (1995). Studying Engineering: A Road Map to a Rewarding Career. Burbank, CA: Discovery Press. 7 Report Shows Record Increase In Enrollment of International Students. American Council on Education, Higher Education and National Affairs. http
. These are two important groups atNY City College of Technology (City Tech, CUNY), a diverse school in the northeast.Program details and early first semester outcomes will be discussed. IntroductionThe under representation of minority groups in high end technical, engineering fieldscontinues as an issue of concern for engineering educators and college administrators.According a 2002 report by the GE fund 1, African Americans and Latinos make up lessthan 4 percent of the engineering workforce. Successful college programs are those thataddress institutional factors such as faculty involvement and its relationship to studentachievement and performance. A new program, the Adjunct Academy at City Tech, hasbeen
quarter, view theirdaily syllabus, participate in a class calendar, and access information about their instructionalteam. WebCT also carries a direct link to Course Sorcerer, an online tool used for journal entriesand course evaluations. The journal entries are tools for the administration and teaching team toobserve student’s attitudes towards specific issues throughout the quarter. These submissions arecompletely anonymous, yet instructors can view completion status. The written results arecompiled by graduate teaching assistants and can be shared with the class in order to address theirquestions and concerns. Course evaluations used at the end of the quarter and are designed toevaluate the overall effectiveness of the program’s objectives.3.0
womenof Color to become co-collaborators in research about themselves which works towardaddressing the of inclusion of women of Color in the research process. There is little researchutilizing PAR empowering and collaborative methodology concerning women of Color facultyin STEM spaces. PAR can reveal through the inclusion of women’s of Colorsvoices/experiences if (1) other issues need to be addressed, (2) gauge if the recommendations areworking, (3) empower women of Color to take charge and co-create outcomes for themselves,and (4) merit women of Color lived experiences. This paper digs into the barriers for women ofColor faculty in STEM, the opportunity for PAR’s employment, and the next phase of this initialwork to continue to expand women’s of
. Selecting appropriate andsimilarly challenging projects in terms of scope and discipline and assigning students provedchallenging yet manageable. For the initial term, these tasks were made easier by the small classsize (13 students) and the interest in participating by members of the Department‟s externaladvisory panel. While the partner companies suggested receiving more feedback on theirperformance in mentoring students, such measures are easily implemented, likely by an exitinterview held by the employer.The faculty workload was not significantly different under the new format. Given the variety ofprojects, there could be concern of a lack of faculty expertise to assist students. However, theindustry partners provided the majority of the