cultural expectations. Initial trainingof university teachers has been established in almost every university in the United Kingdom,Norway and Sri Lanka. It is also becoming increasingly common in many other countries. Frombeginning as small in scale, low in credibility and poorly supported, substantial training of 120-500 hours duration is now well embedded in many institutions across multiple nations, is oftencompulsory and is sometimes linked to probation or tenure. Major programs include a coherentseries of meetings and various learning activities spread over a period of 4-18 months, usuallywith elements of both formative and summative assessment. Many of these programs are so-called postgraduate certificate courses subject to formal academic
conceptualunderstanding or developed skills. The teachers therefore felt ill-prepared to assess achievementbased on the students’ completed products.When the academy was created, the acquisition of disciplinary knowledge and skills wasdownplayed in lieu of more “universal” skills (e.g., communication) and engineering habits-of-mind, particularly collaboration, critical thinking, and affect towards the profession. However,calls to shift the direction of the program emerged, in part due to a substantial number of recentgraduates who were not prepared to enter engineering college because they lacked corecompetencies, particularly in math. To address this issue, the teachers expressed a desire toidentify methods by which students’ knowledge and skills could be
mechanism to achieve this aim. Rather than allowing aIndex Terms - Community of Practice, Identity, New community of practice to form organically as the students,Program, Professional Development faculty, and staff act, react, and interact, the School of Engineering takes a deliberate and holistic approach to INTRODUCTION developing each student’s unique engineering identity. ThisCampbell University is a small, Southern, rural, liberal-arts approach goes beyond typical engineering coursework,institution drawing a primarily in-state student body employing numerous interconnected
Computer Systems Computer Systems RAM program Farmingdale State College, NY Farmingdale State College, NY Farmingdale State College, NY aydini@farmingdale.edu villanmv@farmingdale.edu cullinlm@farmingdale.eduABSTRACTFarmingdale State College (FSC) is primarily a commuter four-year college within a large statecollege system. Computing degrees at FSC have traditionally struggled with gender disparity inenrollment, consistent with many other national and global computing degrees. While the studentenrollment in FSC computing degrees has doubled, the female population has hovered at 8-15%over the last decade. This research study focuses on designing an orientation program for womencomputing
Engineering Education, 2015 Project-based learning in a high school pre-engineering program:Findings on student behavior (K-12 & Pre-College Engineering, RTP, Strand 3)The STEM academyAfter nearly two years of research and preparation to rejuvenate a downward-sliding high school,a STEM academy opened in a newly-constructed wing of the school in the fall of 2009. Theintent of the program was not simply to cater to the highest achievers, but to serve the needs ofthe community, one in which a large minority population resided. Though the program carriedthe ‘STEM’ label, engineering was always intended to be the primary focus. Courses weredesigned to introduce students to engineering, and it was hoped that many would consider thefield for college
increased interest and offerings of higher education facultydevelopment programs in recent years, coaching in higher education settings, particularly in the engineeringdisciplines, remains relatively rare. If coaching does take place, it typically occurs on a small-scale or in singlediscipline programs. Rarely, if ever, does intercollegiate coaching occur. This study reports on the effectiveness ofa large-scale coaching effort, with 73 faculty participants from 15 engineering disciplines at more than 30universities across the country.Beginning in the summer of 2019, a diverse group of engineering faculty participated in the InnovatingCurriculum with Entrepreneurial Mindset (ICE) faculty development workshop. This intensive three-dayworkshop
existing structural design andcomputer simulation project. The focus of this paper is to assess how well our current project ismeeting our objectives, and to what extent the desirable features of the current project can beretained in a new project. The paper describes the existing project, summarizes its desirablefeatures, and statistically analyzes some characteristics of the student designs so far. Statisticalanalysis of past student designs demonstrate the effectiveness of the current project.Assessment of learning objective achievement by students shows, however, that the courseoverall fails to meet objectives with respect to computer programming instruction. The newculminating hands-on design experience will involve design and testing of a
using practices by Purdue University’s EPICS Program.The instrument had 26 statements from which students gave themselves a rank using a scale of 1(low) to 10 (high). The areas of growth included industry skills, the value of civic engagement,awareness of engineering as a global profession, global and cultural skills. The results from thestudents’ self-assessments showed an average increase of 32% or 2 mean points before vs. afterthe Engineering Abroad program. Students experienced change and noticed their skills andabilities were enhanced after the abroad experience.Cabrillo CollegeCabrillo College was established in 1958 and is an accredited community college located on theCalifornia central coast serving all of Santa Cruz County, the
this Work in Progress paper, we describe the program curriculum,management and evaluation structure, the launching activities, and provide project lessonslearned over the course of the first two years in the project’s life cycle.The PAtENT project has been developed and applied in multiple STEM departments in theCollege of Engineering at the University of North Carolina Charlotte (UNC Charlotte) through aNational Science Foundation award. UNC Charlotte is an ideal location for this novel model ofgraduate education, because the institution is a large, research institution that is situated in anurban region with significant entrepreneurial activity. There is more entrepreneurial activity percapita within this region than elsewhere, providing an
summer research internship open to students over the ageof 16 attending eligible high schools in Massachusetts and is located at a large state university campus.Eligibility is determined by the Massachusetts Life Science Center, the funding entity, and incudes Chapter 74Vocational Technical High Schools, high schools located in “Gateway Cities,” and high schools in cities with apopulation of at least 25% classified as low income [1]. High school students participate in projects sponsoredby Principal Investigators with daily mentorship provided by graduate students and post-doctoral candidates inthese labs.The internal program goal is to provide as many of the research internship spots to potential first-generationcollege students and
Engineering Ira A. Fulton Schools of EngineeringProf. Stephen J. Krause, Arizona State University Stephen Krause is professor in the Materials Science Program in the Fulton School of Engineering at Arizona State University. He teaches in the areas of introductory materials engineering, polymers and composites, and capstone design. His research interests include evaluating conceptual knowledge, mis- conceptions and technologies to promote conceptual change. He has co-developed a Materials Concept Inventory and a Chemistry Concept Inventory for assessing conceptual knowledge and change for intro- ductory materials science and chemistry classes. He is currently conducting research on NSF projects in two areas. One is studying
analysesof students’ demographic characteristics over the past three academic years reveal that studentswho are underprepared tend to be female and from underrepresented minority backgrounds.Table 1 outlines the differences in retention between these groups. Female students who leaveSCE tend to do so even with higher SAT Math and math placement test scores, indicating theyare academically capable of remaining in the program but still decide to leave. Additionally,students who identify as underrepresented minorities tend to achieve lower SAT Math and mathplacement test scores, which may influence a decision to leave SCE. The connection FA has todiversity in the talent pipeline prompted a corporate partnership with a large manufacturingcompany to fund
3 4.67 4.0 6.0 science concepts. Participating in K12 InVenture Prize has increased my students' confidence with math 4 4.50 4.0 5.0 concepts. Teachers’ motivation for participating in the program was assessed with a modification ofan existing scale for assessing teachers’ motivation for a variety of work tasks [15]. This scaleassesses five types of motivation, two of which are thought to be largely positive (IntrinsicMotivation, in which the task or experience is in and of itself pleasing or rewarding to theindividual; and Identified Regulation, in which the task or experience aligns with the individual’spersonal values or goals), and three of which are thought to be largely
but to spread the collection and analysis of SO to many classes. Other than capstonesenior design classes, each required class collects and analyzes data for only two SO although manycourses address more than two. In the past cycle, the curriculum committee has worked to distributethe SO throughout the program so that there isn’t an imbalance with many courses providing datafor a SO while few courses contributing to another SO. This mapping of SO throughout thecurriculum is evaluated and adjusted at the beginning of an assessment cycle. Overall, each coursehas a reduced documentation load and more faculty become involved in the continuousimprovement process. This broader participation has encouraged faculty to document topics in theircourses
these studies, of N=121, with intentional cultural mentoring there was an average mean IDI gain of 5.17 compared to a mean gain of 2.37 points for generic study abroad programs (N=1163) Spenader A, Reka P, Pedagogy . Frontiers: The Interdisciplinary Journal of Study Abroad. 2015.It is important to look at the research already conducted regarding various studyabroad program formats. This 2015 study created 8 programs of varying locationsand instruction to assess IDI gains. In these studies of N=121 with intentionalcultural mentoring : average mean IDI gain was 5.17 with some programs showingan increase of almost 10 and others showing 0 to negative gains.They did find that the
of Chemical Engineeringat Louisiana State University (LSU). The authors noticed in recent years that many undergraduatestudents avoid enrolling in graduate school because they believe the only path for someone with aPh.D. in engineering is as a faculty member. To address this limitation, the authors have developeda 10-week program that couples traditional research-related activities with training inentrepreneurship. The concept was to show students how both fundamental and applied researchcan lead to start-up companies, patents, and industrial partnerships. Additionally, in the part of thecountry where LSU is located, there are numerous small universities and colleges that do not offerresearch programs for undergraduates, so this REU site is
science and engineering research and education. In many ways, S&T government agencies’ focus areas are aligned with corporate labs’ research focus in that both sponsor and engage "where discoveries begin." Many S&T Government entities’ programs not only provide opportunities to discover and develop new technologies, but also provide a vehicle to transfer these technologies for new business creation that stimulate technological innovation and new business creation in the private sector. These programs strengthen the role of small business concerns in meeting national/regional research and development needs, increase the commercial application of supported research results, and foster and encourage participation by
program also had different goals and expectations, which further made it difficult to designcourse content that was appropriate to all and also meet the program requirements. To addressthese issues, in 2013 the thermodynamics course was split into two separate courses for ME andMET students, with very similar student pre- and co-requisites, similar program objectives, andcurriculums established specifically for each program.Throughout the development of the new ME program, student learning data was collected for allstudents going through both the ME and MET thermodynamics course (as well as other courses),in order to help inform the faculty on how well the courses were meeting objectives. Twospecific assessments were used: a student survey
Information Science in the Luddy School of Informatics, Computing, and Engineering at Indiana University Indianapolis. As an information and learning scientist, her research agenda has focused on transforming rural libraries as facilitators for children’s engineering learning by expanding the benefits of makerspace and online space. She received her Ph.D. from Learning, Design, and Technology program at the Pennsylvania State University.Dr. Gi Woong Choi, University of Cincinnati Gi Woong Choi, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor of Instructional Design and Technology. Dr. Choi received his Ph.D. in Learning, Design, and Technology from Penn State University and has a background in human-computer interaction and user
First-Year EngineeringIntroductionThe First Year Engineering (FYE) program at the University of Kentucky commenced the Fallsemester of 2016. At that time, a transfer student in the College of Engineering would enroll inEGR 112, a version of EGR 101-Engineering Exploration I specifically for transfer students, andthen in EGR 103-Engineering Exploration II the next semester. EGR 112 did not adequatelymeet the needs of transfer students as most of them already had some fundamentals ofengineering background and knew their intended major. EGR 112 was redesigned to include aprofessional development component and more in-depth work in Microsoft Excel, which wouldhelp them in other courses such as physics. Making these changes reduced complaints from
in the freshman engineering program and the mechanical engineering program. She is also the Co-Director of the Grand Challenges Scholars Program (GCSP) at ASU. In this role, she focuses on student support and tracking, curriculum, program requirements, as well as programming for current students in GCSP. Dr. Zhu was also involved in the ASU ProMod project, the Engineering Projects in Community Service program, the Engineering Futures program, the Global Freshman Academy/Earned Admission/Universal Learner Courses Program, and the ASU Kern Project. She was a part of the team that designed a largely team and activity based online Introduction to Engineering course. She has also co-developed two unique MOOCs
users [1]. Recent advancements in LLMs have enabled them to generatecomputer code in response to user prompts [2]. In addition to generating code, these tools canalso assist with explaining, commenting, translating, debugging, and optimizing code [3], [4].LLM-based tools are transforming programming education by providing real-time assistance andpersonalized feedback to students. However, they also present challenges, including the risk ofstudents becoming overly reliant on AI to write code, which may hinder their understanding offundamental programming concepts, as well as their critical thinking and problem-solving skills[5], [6], [7]. When using AI to generate code, students must still be able to interpret the outputsand assess their
robotics, manufacturing, and electronics, as wellas a general concentration. After the move to the satellite campus, a two year degree program inelectronics technology was merged into the department as well. This is a small department withfive full time faculty members and around 100 majors in the four year degree program.Initially, the department was based on the main campus of the university, and occupied the oldindustrial arts building. This campus operates on traditional sixteen week semesters, and catersprimarily to traditional students and others who can take courses during regular daytime hours.The department could easily draw on courses in other departments as major requirements. Somedepartments, including engineering technology, offered a
year. The engineering electives can add depthby reinforcing the major or breadth by taking engineering courses outside of mechanicalengineering. Since the program is relatively small we cannot offer a large variety of mechanicalengineering electives. Consequently, some students elect to take graduate mechanicalengineering courses to help prepare them for graduate school. Some take non-engineeringcoursework to pursue other interests such as preparation for post-graduate professional study in afield other than engineering or to pursue a minor. The non-engineering elective courses addbreadth to the curriculum, complementing the General Education Curriculum. Since Union has astrong program in liberal arts, engineering students are encouraged to
thesis or dissertation. The acceptance of the Fellowship wasnot seen as a substitute for the research they pursue under a GRA, but rather an additionalactivity in which they could engage. None of the fellows planned to cut back on theirresearch commitments to engage in the Fellowship. Consequently, time is a major issue.Summer Training ProgramInterestingly, during the interviews the Fellows did not point to the summer trainingprogram as shaping their expectations about the teaching. Rather they viewed the trainingprogram as a resource for information about the craft of teaching rather than an explicitguide to what they would experience in the high school classroom.The overwhelming assessment of the Fellows was that the summer training program
resources. Thefollowing recommendations need to be implemented at the personal,program/departmental, and institutional levels to improve student learning/success byenhancing faculty technical currency and pedagogy.1. At the personal level: Faculty members should do a yearly self-inventory of theirteaching techniques and should identify areas of improvement and pursueprofessional development activities to enhance their pedagogical skills, and the do aself assessment of their teaching techniques.2. At the program/department level: Administrators/chairpersons need to realize theimportance of pedagogy. Moreover, they should provide training opportunities for facultyto enhance their teaching techniques in order to improve student learning/ success.3. At
program assessment for continuous improvement and is active in curriculum development. In addition, he is active in promoting engineering education to underrepresented groups. Ghassan’s research focuses on the application of fundamental engineering knowledge in the design and manufacture of sheet metal products of lightweight alloys. His work has significant industrial applicability and includes mechanical and metallurgical characterization of light alloys coupled with numerical models for predicting the material formability. Ghassan received his Bachelor of Science and Master of Science degrees in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Miami in 1986 and 1988, respectively, and his Ph.D. from the University
. The ITLPoffers hands-on learning experiences, lab space, engineering equipment, technical expertise, andcurricular support through lab modules and skill-building workshops for students in the Collegeof Engineering and Applied Sciences (CEAS). Our goals for this redesign are to align ITLPinitiatives with college strategic priorities by integrating Universal Design for Learning intohands-on engineering curriculum, to tie ITLP hands-on experiences to learning outcomes forcourses using the labs and resources, and to implement program assessment practices that allowfor continuous improvement.IntroductionOver the past half-century, graduation rates among U.S. engineering students have hoveredaround 50%. University of Colorado Boulder (CU), the
significant correlation is expected, but a correlation greater than 0.85 wouldindicate that the two constructs are not different enough from one another [11]. Next, t-tests were conducted to determine if there were significant differences in either ofthe constructs according to academic standing. It is reasonable to expect students who are fartheralong in their educational journeys to report higher levels of self-efficacy or judgement, thoughlongitudinal assessments of engineering self-efficacy do reveal stagnation in developing thoseconstructs throughout undergraduate engineering programs (e.g., [3, 9]). Finally, an analysis of variance (ANOVA) was also performed on the student outcomedata. The main factors of interest included
program building, higher education, corporate e-learning, and distance education. He is the founding Executive Director, New Engineering Education Transformation (NEET) at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, USA, an initiative that has come a long way since its launch as a bold educational endeavor in 2017. The academically and demographically diverse NEET student community now comprises 248 sophomores, juniors and seniors — larger than most majors — pursuing 21 majors in 11 departments, encompassing all five schools at the Institute. Mitra transformed a small e-learning R&D group into the profitable Knowledge Solutions Business at NIIT, Inc., Atlanta, Georgia, USA as its Senior Vice-President. He is a