, assessment methods, the students' backgrounds,and their feedback.IntroductionProject-based learning, particularly design-based projects, represents an extraordinarily effectivepedagogical method [1]. Similar to problem-based learning, design-based projects engagelearners actively in solving real-world challenges. This approach is widely acknowledged amongengineering educators as a means of shifting from passive to active learning paradigms withinthe classroom [2] [3] [4]. In this paper, I elucidate the integration of a design project into a bridgeexperiment within a Statics class, exemplifying the practical application and benefits of thiseducational approach.Class ProfileStatics, a fundamental branch of mechanics within engineering education, holds
authors also suggest the use of active pedagogies(guided practice, learning by doing), and integration of ethics issues in design courses, whichinherently consider ethical tradeoffs presented by design problems [6].The importance of instruction in ethics and professionalism has been recognized generally by thebusiness and higher education communities. Consider, for example, Bryant University andBentley University – two business-oriented universities that showcase a focus on “ethicalreasoning” (an element of Bryant’s First-Year Gateway core curriculum), and a “commitment tobusiness ethics” where students learn about “management and moral behavior (highlightedthemes of Bentley’s general academic approach of integrating business studies with
has presented at many national conferences including American Association of Engineering Education, National Career Pathways Net- work, High Impact Technology Exchange, ACTE Vision, League of Innovation and others. Dr. Barger serves on several national panels and advisory boards for technical programs, curriculum and workforce initiatives, including the National Association of Manufacturers Educators’Council. She is a Fellow of the American Society of Engineering Education, a member of Tau Beta Pi and Epsilon Pi Tau honor societies. She is a charter member of both the National Academy and the University of South Florida’s Academy of Inventors. Dr. Barger holds a licensed patent and is a licensed Professional
duties[Program Manager (PM), personal communication, September 6, 2017]. All intervieweesstressed the importance of hopefuls having knowledge of the job and its associatedresponsibilities. While on the subject of appropriate education, one manger said that whileinstitutional prowess can be a differentiator, he and others alike maintain objectivity whenperforming preliminary reviews of either a resume or curriculum vitae (CV). He furtherexplained, "While a degree from top tier school with a reputation for producing technicallycompetent individuals is a good indicator of knowing the educational theory, one should notimmediately discount someone else for attending a lesser known institution, becauseuncontrollable variables may have limited where
Session 1455 Understanding and Utilizing Adjunct Professors for Non- traditional Engineering and Technology Graduate Education D. D. Dunlap, 1 R. E. Willis2 D. A. Keating, 3 T. G. Stanford, 3 R. J. Bennett, 2 M. I. Mendelson, 4 M. J. Aherne 5 Western Carolina University 1 / St Thomas University 2 / University of South Carolina 3 / Loyola Marymount University 4 / University of Alberta 5AbstractRe-envisioning adjunct faculty members for non-traditional engineering graduateeducation is developing ways to effect a national dialogue on how to re-envision
Paper ID #31108Innovation-Based Learning: Enhancing Innovative Problem Solving andHigher-Order Thinking in Education through MultidisciplinaryCollaborationMs. Ellen M Swartz, North Dakota State University Ellen Swartz is currently pursuing a M.S. degree in Biomedical Engineering at North Dakota State Univer- sity. Her research interests include STEM education, innovation-based learning, agent-based modeling of complex adaptive systems, and bioelectromagnetics. She previously received her B.S. degree from North Dakota State University in Electrical and Computer Engineering.Mary Pearson, North Dakota State University Mary is
incorporate it into their undergraduate experience.2.0 THE GLOBAL ENGINEERING COLLEGETo make international engineering training more relevant and accessible to all engineeringundergraduates, we have developed a novel curricular model for engineering education called theGlobal Engineering College (GEC) that injects international perspectives into every aspect ofthe curriculum. In addition to comprehensive internationalization of our engineering curriculum,the GEC concept leverages recent technological developments to create a single “virtual”engineering college that integrates selected NAU courses with parallel courses at our partnerinstitutions abroad. Students at one university will be able to participate via internet in designcourses offered at any
. He received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Kentucky in 1998. He specializes in FEA in Metalforming and Composite Materials. His current work relates to automotive windshield wiper systems, composite materials, finite element analysis and CAE. He is a member of ASEE, ASME, and SAE. Page 12.531.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2007 Development of a CAE Course Project Focusing on Data Management through a Windshield Wiper System DesignAbstractComputer Aided Engineering (CAE) has been a core course for Mechanical Engineering studentsat Kettering University
Communication in Engineering (Routledge, 2014). In 2016, Dr. Leydens won the Exemplar in Engineering Ethics Education Award from the Na- tional Academy of Engineering, along with CSM colleagues Juan C. Lucena and Kathryn Johnson, for a cross-disciplinary suite of courses that enact macroethics by making social justice visible in engineering education. In 2017, he and two co-authors won the Best Paper Award in the Minorities in Engineering Division at the American Society for Engineering Education annual conference. Dr. Leydens’ recent research, with co-author Juan C. Lucena, focused on rendering visible the social justice dimensions in- herent in three components of the engineering curriculum—in engineering sciences
Cooperation; Chair of the International Network for Engineering Studies (INES); past chair of the ASEE Liberal Education / Engineering and Society Division; and a former member of the Society for the History of Technology’s (SHOT) Executive Council. Publications include /Calculating a Natural World: Scientists, Engineers and Computers during the Rise of U.S. Cold War Research/ (MIT Press, 2006).Sarah Appelhans, University at Albany-SUNY Sarah Appelhans is a PhD candidate in Cultural Anthropology at the University at Albany (SUNY). Her dissertation research, ”Flexible Lives on the Integrated Circuit: Gender and Belonging in Semiconductor Manufacturing”, investigates the boundaries of membership in engineering in the
Engineering from Purdue University and a M.S. in Theory and Practice in Teacher Education from the University of Tennessee. He currently works as the education coor- dinator for the Center for Ultra-wide-area Resilient Electric Energy Transmission Networks (CURENT), a NSF/DOE engineering research center. His role at CURENT involves developing K-12 curriculum re- lated to electricity, renewable energy, and the electric grid for the center’s pre-college outreach programs. In addition, Mr. Wills serves the undergraduate and graduate electrical engineering program at the Uni- versity of Tennessee by arranging research and industry specific training for the students. Prior to joining CURENT, he worked as an operations engineer
Technological world St 11 Applying the design process. St 12 Use and maintain technological products and systems. St 13 Assess the impact of products and systems. The Designed WorldSt 14 Medical technologies.St 15 Agricultural and related biotechnologies.St 16 Energy and power technologiesSt 17 Innovation and communication technologiesSt 18 Transportation technologiesSt 19 Manufacturing technologiesSt 20 Construction technologiesInclusion and Procedures for the Systematized Literature ReviewWe selected the peer-reviewed journals based on the scope of this study. We used the keywords(“Sustainability Education” OR “Green Technologies” OR “Ecology Education” AND“Curriculum” OR “Plan studies” AND “STEM Education” AND “K-12”) in three
, (c) an ability to design a chemical engineering system, component, or process to meet desired needs, 90% (d) an ability to function on an inter-disciplinary team, (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems, (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility, 80% (g) an ability to communicate effectively, % of responding departments (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global societal context, 70% (i) an
achievement are not only a part of theimprovement process, but also expected of any program desiring accreditation.Without a doubt, a course housing the major design experience carries a greater responsibility inensuring that students achieve specified program educational outcomes. According to EC2000’s[3] Criterion 4, Professional Component, “the curriculum must prepare students forengineering practice culminating in a major design experience based on the knowledge and skillsacquired in earlier coursework, and incorporating engineering standards and realistic constraintsthat include most of the following considerations: economic, environmental, sustainability,manufacturability, ethical, health and safety, social, and political.” The literature [4-8
completely different. She accepted a job teaching chemistry and physics at Bayonne High School. Since then she was able to write curriculum for a science research program and an engineering program. Now she teaches mostly pre-college engineering. She also brought in many new programs to her school including FIRST Tech Challenge, Lemelson InvenTeam, Technology Students Association, and Society for Science with a local science fair and ISEF.Kathryn Hoppe ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Empowering the Future: Integrating Invention and Intellectual Property Education in P-12 Engineering to Foster Innovation (RE, Diversity, Curriculum)AbstractOver the years, the U.S
. This paper describes thecontent, implementation, and assessment strategies of the first two course offerings, anddescribes the key initial findings.IntroductionScientific and technological advances during the 20th century have shifted the emphasis of theUS economy from manufacturing to information, communication, and high technology.Continuing US economic and technological leadership will rely in part on engineers who canrecognize, understand, and integrate new developments in information technology,nanotechnology, and the life sciences. Engineering education programs must be responsive tothese trends and adapt existing curricula to train new generations of engineers who are able tofulfill the changing needs of our society.A significant growth
AC 2008-1576: DETECT: DEVELOPING SUSTAINABLE PATHWAYS TOWARDINNOVATIVE, SUSTAINABLE COLLABORATION BETWEEN FOURENGINEERING, DESIGN AND TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION INSTITUTIONSMichael Dyrenfurth, Purdue UniversityMike Murphy, Dublin Institute of TechnologyDonal McHale, Dublin Institute of TechnologyRichard Hayes, Dublin Institute of TechnologyRobert Herrick, Purdue UniversityDhushy Sathianathan, Pennsylvania State UniversityHeinz Schmidt-Walter, Hochschule DarmstadtEugeue Coyle, Dublin Institute of TechnologyRobert Simpson, Dublin Institute of Technology Page 13.381.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 DETECT: Developing Sustainable Pathways Toward Innovative
Session 2548 The Term (Project) Paper: A Viable Instructional Tool for Undergraduate Engineering and Technological Education Christopher C. Ibeh Pittsburg State UniversityAbstractThere is a growing consensus in academia and in the industry about the need for graduates ofengineering and technological programs to fortify their technical skills with effectivecommunication skills. The term paper concept at the undergraduate level addresses this need; ithas been proven to be a viable instructional medium for the reinforcement, development andacquisition of technical and
program at UGA. She is engaged in mentoring early career faculty at her university and within the PEER National Collaborative. In 2013 she was selected to be a National Academy of Engineering Frontiers of Engineering Education Faculty Member.Dr. Micah Lande, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus Micah Lande, Ph.D. is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering and Manufacturing Engineering pro- grams at The Polytechnic School in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University.Dr. Samantha Ruth Brunhaver, Arizona State University, Polytechnic Campus Samantha Brunhaver is an Assistant Professor of Engineering in the Fulton Schools of Engineering Poly- technic School. Dr. Brunhaver recently joined
using engineering concepts [29], and iv) the ability to reason andargue based on evidence [30].Second, the technology-educated student: i) will have clarity about current, developing, and futuretechnologies, ii) be able to recognize the advantages, disadvantages, and risks of technologies, andiii) know about the infrastructure that manufactures, operates, and maintains them [29].Third, the engineering-educated student: i) will be able to identify, decompose and solve problems,ii) will be able to recognize the relationship between the sciences, arts, and engineering, iii) will beable to identify the impacts generated by engineering artifacts [29] and iv) create and test solutionsfollowing the engineering design process [30].Finally, the
AC 2011-130: MULTI-DIMENSIONAL TELE-HEALTHCARE ENGINEER-ING UNDERGRADUATE EDUCATION VIA BUILDING-BLOCK-BASEDMEDICAL SENSOR LABSFei Hu, University of Alabama Dr. Fei Hu is currently an associate professor in the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering at the University of Alabama, Tuscaloosa, AL, USA. His research interests are wireless networks, wireless security and their applications in Bio-Medicine. His research has been supported by NSF, Cisco, Sprint, and other sources. He obtained his first Ph.D. degree at Shanghai Tongji University, China in Signal Processing (in 1999), and second Ph.D. degree at Clarkson University (New York State) in the field of Electrical and Computer Engineering (in 2002
and Society.Jackson, J. T. (2005). The Globalizers: Development Workers in Action. Baltimore, MD, John Hopkins University Press.Leydens, J. and J. Lucena (2009). "Listening as a missing dimension in humanitarian and sustainable community development efforts: The engineering curriculum as a potential learning inhibitor." IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.Lucena, J. (2005). Defending the Nation: US Policymaking in Science and Engineering Education from Sputnik to the War Against Terrorism. Landham, MD, University Press of America.Lucena, J. (2007). "De Criollos a Mexicanos: Engineers's Identity and the Construction of Mexico." History and Technology 23(3): 275-288.Mason, K. (2001). Brick by
UnitedStates Air Force Academy. Through 2011, Dr. Wood was a Professor of Mechanical Engineering, Design& Manufacturing Division at The University of Texas at Austin. He was a National Science FoundationYoung Investigator, the ”Cullen Trust for Higher Education Endowed Professor in Engineering,” ”Uni-versity Distinguished Teaching Professor,” and the Director of the Manufacturing and Design Laboratory(MaDLab) and MORPH Laboratory. Dr. Wood has published more than 350 refereed articles and books;has received more than 40 national and international awards in design, research, and education; and iscurrently a Fellow of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016
Paper ID #42968Communicating Effectively with a Range of Audiences: Audience Avatars inEngineering Design EducationDr. Amit Shashikant Jariwala, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Amit Jariwala is the Director of Design & Innovation for the School of Mechanical Engineering at Georgia Tech. He develops and maintains industry partnerships to support experiential, entrepreneurial, and innovative learning experiences within the academic curriculum of the school. He is a Woodruff School Teaching Fellow and strives to enhance education by developing classes, workshops, and events focused on implementing hands-on
groundingin content, which poses serious problems for curriculum and professional development,assessment, and standards development. In order to address this gap Custer, Daugherty, and Meyer,4 in a study funded by theNational Center for Engineering and Technology Education (NCETE)1 (an National ScienceFoundation funded center for learning and teaching), identified thirteen engineering conceptsdeemed to be core to engineering and appropriate for the secondary level. A full report of thatstudy is presented in the Journal of Technology Education, however an overview of this study isprovided in this paper as background to the focus group study conducted to investigate the use ofconcept mapping in pre-college engineering education. As a next step
includedengineers who were from varied industries, such as civil engineering constructionindustry, automobile manufacturing industry, software and information technologyindustry, etc. Moreover, thematic analysis was used to analyze interview transcripts[25]. Table 1 Demographic Information of Interviewees Pseudonym Gender Industry Work Cor.Type Education Position/Title Exp. (yrs) Allen M Automobile 1.5 State-owned Bachelor Process Engineer Bob M Information 1.5 Private Master Algorithm technology Engineer Carl
, and engineering,(b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data,(c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such aseconomic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability,(d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams,(e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems,(f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility,(g) an ability to communicate effectively,(h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global & societal context,(i) a recognition of the need for, and ability to engage in, lifelong
lecturers at the department. She has led the accreditation process and undergraduate curriculum of the department and has been greatly involved in outreach not only for the department but also for the College of Engineering & Computer Science. Her contribution to the engineering college was to bring the Girl Day in Engineering, a national celebration that focuses only on female students. She is also currently the chair-elect for the UTRGV Women Faculty Network. Edna Orozco is a former Specialist in the Texas Army National Guard and worked as an administrator in secondary education K-12 for 7 years.Thuy Vu, The University of Texas Rio Grande ValleyAngela Chapman, The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley
toengineering students5:(i) Engineers, with their awareness of technological developments, are in an excellent position to initiate new, technology-based enterprises.(ii) Entrepreneurship education offers engineering students the opportunity to become entrepreneurs, attracts and motivates them.(iii) Entrepreneurial education provides visibility and a potential for revenue to the university from successful start-ups created under the program.(iv) The community benefits from the employment and revenue generated through the start- ups and the support activities they require.(v) Successful entrepreneurship education has the potential to generate new industries that result in benefits for the entire
electronics. Many other books are available to the hobbyist, notably a series by ForestMims, including Getting Started in Electronics3, which was sold for many years at RadioShack®and is still available online. Mims drew his pages by hand, and his smiling but accurateelectrons have coaxed many young engineers over the years into the field.In an attempt to make electronics in our biomedical engineering curriculum more hands-on, wehave developed the PittKitTM. The PittKit a low-cost set of tools and components (less than$100) that each student owns through their standard laboratory fee. Included in the kit, inaddition to electronic components for a series of educational projects, are a digital meter, aprototyping board, hand tools, a tool-box, and a