STEM students to further connect them with their identity, and is passionate about understanding and dismantling the systems in engineering that marginalize students.Prof. Mia K. Markey, The University of Texas at Austin Dr. Mia K. Markey is a Professor of Biomedical Engineering and Cullen Trust for Higher Education Endowed Professorship in Engineering #1 at The University of Texas at Austin as well as Adjunct Pro- fessor of Imaging Physics at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. Dr. Markey is a 1994 graduate of the Illinois Mathematics and Science Academy. She has a B.S. in computational biology (Carnegie Mellon, 1998). Dr. Markey earned her Ph.D. in biomedical engineering (2002), along with a
allowed for more formal training in onlinepedagogy, but there is still area for growth in the quality of course design. As the push foronline educational opportunities continues to grow and the demand for quality increases, WPIhas invested in instructional design resources to help develop online courses through acollaborative design model, moving away from instructors developing their coursesautonomously and in seclusion. Adopting a collaborative course design model requires a culturalshift for faculty in how they approach their course design and facilitation processes. Instructorswho have participated in the quality design in online courses pilot program have been targeted towork one-on-one with an instructional designer to work in collaborative
students see themselves experiencespositively represented and experience a sense of Builds community and trust betweenbelonging conducive to emotional well-being for students.learning. Encourages participation from all students through meaningful individual and/orEngage small group activities in the classroomInstructors who engage students purposefully select and/or online.research-based techniques to ensure that students Connects content to real-life applicationsactively participate in the learning process and take and examples and/ or current research
this by establishing ahypothetical model of a design division and used the model for the specifiedcompany. The feedbacks from students suggest that the case study method showedthem how to use the knowledge acquired through the taught courses in solving real-life problems.1 IntroductionInvestigating what is typically involved in the Engineering Management (EM)master’s degrees as offered by the larger programs, Peterson and Humble [1]identified 28 topics or courses. Since all 28 topics cannot be included in any singleprogram the universities choose the topics in accordance to the requirements of theirconstituencies. Engineering Management is the process of planning, organising,staffing, leading and influencing people, and controlling activities
’ perceptions of soft skills, industry expectations, and career aspirations," J. Prof. Issues Eng. Educ. Pract., vol. 142, no. 1, p. 04015005, Jan. 2016. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000247.[7] M. S. Rao, "Enhancing employability in engineering and management students through soft skills," Industrial and Commercial Training, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 42-48, 2014. doi: 10.1108/ICT-04-2013-0023.[8] L. Fernández-Sanz, M. T. Villalba, J. A. Medina, and S. Misra, "A study on the key soft skills for successful participation of students in multinational engineering education," Int. J. Eng. Educ., vol. 33, no. 6, pp. 2061-2070, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/11268/6929.[9] Stamer T, Steinhäuser J, Flägel K, “Artificial intelligence supporting the
BSMEprogram moved from the now defunct ABET Student Outcomes a-k to the new ABET StudentOutcomes 1-7 for the 2019-2020 academic year. The new Measurement Systems course wasidentified as an appropriate course to assess ABET Student Outcome 6 that states that studentswill have “an ability to develop and conduct appropriate experimentation, analyze and interpretdata, and use engineering judgment to draw conclusions” [5]. This outcome differed slightlyfrom the previous Student Outcome b; thus, a new assessment was developed.A final significant factor in the course development was the multiyear effort at LTU toincorporate entrepreneurial education throughout the engineering curriculum [6, 7, 8]. As apartner school in KEEN, LTU uses the KEEN framework to
students still have rather limited practicalunderstanding of how to apply these basic principles to laboratory measurements thatinvolve real time-varying signals. Courses involving the detailed statistical treatment oftime-dependent random signals are not part of the MNE curriculum since they generallyhave prerequisite requirements beyond the reach of our typical undergraduate students.In addition, while available course textbooks (e.g., [1], [2]) usually provide a gooddiscussion of the statistical treatment of random errors, they do not generally address thepractical issue of how to actually perform independent sampling of time-series data.The Sampling ProblemIt is typically assumed that the samples of measured variables used in statistical
Conference.AcknowledgmentsWe are grateful for the support of the National Science Foundation through Grant 1545667.References[1] M. W. Ohland and R. A. Long, “The Multiple-Institution Database for Investigating Engineering Longitudinal Development: An experiential case study of data sharing and reuse,” Advances in Engineering Education, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1-28, 2016.[2] https://engineering.purdue.edu/MIDFIELD, Date Accessed February 8, 2021[3] S. M. Lord, M. W. Ohland, R. A. Long, H. Ebrahiminejad, H. Al Yagoub, M. K. Orr, and R. A. Layton, “Expanding Access to MIDFIELD: Strategies for Sharing Data Infrastructure for Research,” Proceedings of the 2020 Frontiers in Education (FIE) Conference, Uppsala, Sweden, October 2020.[4
the Lunch Buddies program, which pairs college female engineering students with 6th and 7th grade girls every Friday to do STEM activities. She has also served as the director of Camp Invention, a program that fosters creativity and invention among K-5th graders.Dr. William M. Jordan, Baylor University WILLIAM JORDAN is the Mechanical Engineering Department Chair at Baylor University. He has B.S. and M.S. degrees in Metallurgical Engineering from the Colorado School of Mines, an M.A. degree in Theology from Denver Seminary, and a Ph.D. in mechanics and materials from Texas A & M University. He teaches materials related courses. He does work in the area of mechanical behavior of composite materials. He is also
). Plagiarism in programming assignments. IEEE Transactions on education, 42(2), 129-133.[5] Daly, C., & Horgan, J. (2005). Patterns of plagiarism. ACM SIGCSE Bulletin, 37(1), 383-387.[6] Devlin, M., & Gray, K. (2007). In their own words: A qualitative study of the reasons Australian university students plagiarize. High Education Research & Development, 26(2), 181-198.[7] Aasheim, C. L., Rutner, P. S., Li, L., & Williams, S. R. (2019). Plagiarism and programming: A survey of student attitudes. Journal of information systems education, 23(3), 5.[8] Le, T., Carbone, A., Sheard, J., Schuhmacher, M., de Raath, M., & Johnson, C. (2013, March). Educating computer programming students about plagiarism through use of a code
large deliverablescovering modeling and analysis of a dynamic system, sensor and actuator design and integration,and feedback control was deployed [9, 10].The Fall 2014 problem, “Wrongful Injury Lawsuit: Who’s at Fault?”, provided in Appendix A.Additional detailed instructions were provided to guide student work through the system modeling,analysis, system integration, and feedback control phases. Despite the naming of a specific clientand stakeholders, students made little to no effort to connect with the client, consider theeconomics of the problem, or think about the bigger picture. Aside from requesting specific detailsabout the manufacturing plant layout, students were generally content to ignore the problemstatement and consider only the
Session 3453 Texas Tech University’s College of Engineering Building Computers, Families, and Communities After-School Program John R. Chandler, Ph.D., and A. Dean Fontenot, Ph.D. College of Engineering, Texas Tech UniversityAbstractThe Texas Tech University College of Engineering has developed an after-schoolprogram with local junior high schools to establish a practical means for getting seventh-through ninth-graders excited about science, engineering, and technology. The pilotoffering suggests the program has significant potential to attract students frompopulations that
through August 2014 during which time the organization experi- enced membership growth and strong metric focus towards goal attainment. Page 26.34.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 A DESCRIPTION OF THE STATISTICS BEHIND ANALYZING PERFORMANCE DATA: A Five-Year Study of a Summer Bridge Program for Incoming URM FreshmanThe Purdue University Minority Engineering Program initiated the EngineeringAcademic Boot Camp (ABC), a summer bridge program, in 2005 to address anine percentage point difference between the 2004 underrepresented minority(URM
design and manufacturing of microturbomachinery. Some students study materials, dynamics, or thermal aspects ofturbomachinery, while others explore and develop various micromanufacturing technologies formicroturbine fabrication. The nature of micromachinery requires the development of novelmicromanufacturing technologies for superalloys and other robust engineering materials. Theselected participants study micromilling, electrical discharge micromachining, electrochemicalmicromachining, and vacuum assisted microcasting. They complete a research methodologyworkshop and then apply to their own projects through setting objectives, planning schedule,performing experiments, documenting data, presenting results at the campus-wide poster session
in the School of Systems Engineering at Stevens Institute of Technology. Her research area is based on systems thinking in K-12 education. She graduated from Stevens Institute of Technology with a Masters degree in Computer Engineering, and then she worked with Lucent Technologies as a software developer first in embedded systems and then she held a position as a software designer/architect for CDMA2000 project where she participated in numerous projects developing several features to enhance the existing software system. She is now participating in a project to create a model curriculum in software engineering.Lawrence Bernstein, Stevens Institute of Technology
of the Architecture /Engineering / Construction (AEC) industry.“Construction is a cyclical industry that tends to go through periodic robust expansions andpronounced contractions,” explains Adam Hadi of the Bureau of Labor Statistics.3 Thesecontractions are more pronounced than general job losses in the economy. The effects ripplethroughout the AEC industry, albeit with some delays in the professional services sectors. Iffailing to teach positioning relative to future waves dooms one as a surfer, why would weeducate engineers and construction managers to work in cyclical industries without addressingpositioning, given the pronounced ups and downs expected during a long career?Finally, the top twelve desirable skills [Mean significance values
the Poly- mers Division, studying polymers in microelectronics applications. His research projects at the University of Idaho center on thin-films based on hybrid materials, including silicates, polyoxometalates, and dia- mondoid polymers with funding from sources including the National Science Foundation, the Office of Naval Research, the Semiconductor Research Corporation, and the Donors of the American Chemical Society Petroleum Research Fund.Dr. Brian K. Johnson P.E., University of Idaho Brian K. Johnson received his Ph.D. in electrical engineering from the University of Wisconsin-Madison in 1992. Currently, he is a Distinguished Professor and Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories Endowed Chair in Power
thatseveral BOK outcomes underrepresented in coursework (often labeled the “challengingoutcomes”) could be addressed through HILPs at the approximate midpoint of the BScurriculum. The curricular requirement was instituted in the 2016-2017 academic catalog as a“zero credit hour course” that could be satisfied through a number of civil-engineering focusedactivities meeting the high-impact learning requirements, such as internship, co-op worksemester, study abroad, service learning, undergraduate research, directed studies, co-curricularleadership, and any other experience nominated by a student and approved by the department.The placement of the curricular requirement at the midpoint of the BS degree was purposelyselected to ensure students had a solid
necessitates taking the contextsof action into account in instructional design. From the perspective of assessment, “ethics inaction” is problematic for instructors who encounter students only in the classroom context. It isnonetheless quite useful because it provides an integrative, non-hierarchical framework thatallows us to think about engineering ethics education on a larger scale than we ordinarily do. Italso opens up the possibility of recognizing the structural factors that have made it difficult tointegrate ethics into the engineering curriculum on a systematic basis.Despite an abundance of resources available to support engineering ethics instruction, includingcases provided through the Online Ethics Center (OEC), “the engineering literature
AC 2011-1452: SPECIAL SESSION: MOVING TOWARDS THE INTENDED,EXPLICIT, AND AUTHENTIC: ADDRESSING MISALIGNMENTS IN EN-GINEERING LEARNING WITHIN SECONDARY AND UNIVERSITY ED-UCATIONKevin Anderson, University of Wisconsin-Madison Kevin Anderson is a Ph.D. candidate in the Educational Leadership and Policy Analysis Department at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. His research focuses on primary through university STEM education policy and practice, and the alignment of education with professional practice. He previously taught science and math at the secondary level and earned the distinction of National Board Certified Teacher.Sandra Shaw Courter, University of Wisconsin, Madison Sandra Shaw Courter is PI for the ”Aligning
over short periods of time, usually 4 to 6 years, often withlimited mentorship, usually via in-class evaluations conducted once a year by senior colleagues,and more recently, through additional university-level workshops.2 ScopeThe objective of this paper is to present a student-centered assessment model that providestimely actionable feedback allowing optimization of course instruction during the semester withthe goal of maximizing student learning and the overall student satisfaction. The proposed modelincorporates a simple structured approach that include questions requiring numerical scores andopen-ended questions to solicit student feedback, mechanisms to assess, address and implementthat feedback, and methods to validate the success of
AC 2010-1860: ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF USING A COMPUTERGAME TO BRIDGE A RESEARCH AGENDA WITH A TEACHING AGENDAKristen Sanford Bernhardt, Lafayette College KRISTEN L. SANFORD BERNHARDT is an Assistant Professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Lafayette College, where she teaches courses related to transportation, civil infrastructure, and engineering ethics and researches issues related to infrastructure systems modeling. Dr. Sanford Bernhardt received her Ph.D. and M.S. from Carnegie Mellon University and her B.S.E. from Duke University, all in Civil Engineering.Sharon Jones, Lafayette College SHARON A. JONES is a Professor at Lafayette College in both the Department of Civil
, ship design for the U.S. Navy, and improving equity and inclusion in engineering learning environments. James spent three years during his undergraduate education as an instructional aide for the design-build- test-communicate course described within this paper. Since leaving the instructional staff, James contin- ues to work with the course to research educational methods. James is also an occasional guest lecturer for this course teaching about field robotics and team communication challenges.Dr. Laura K Alford, University of Michigan Laura K. Alford is a Lecturer and Research Investigator at the University of Michigan. She researches ways to use data-informed analysis of students’ performance and perceptions of
Clearing House, 83:2, 39-43, (2010) DOI: 10.1080/0009865090350541522. Krauss, J. and Boss, S., Thinking Through Project-Based Learning: Guiding Deeper Inquiry, Corwin Press(2013)23. Hegeman, J. (2015). Using instructor-generated video lectures in online mathematics courses im- proves student learning. Online Learning, 19(3). http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v19i3.48424. Tibi, M. (2018). Computer science students’ attitudes towards the use of structured and unstructured discussion forums in fully online courses. Online Learning, 22(1). http://dx.doi.org/10.24059/olj.v22i1.99525. Vajravelu, K., & Muhs, T. (2016). Integration of digital technology and innovative strategies for learning and teaching large classes: A calculus case
AerospaceStructural Analysis II course (taught in the Department of Aerospace Engineering at Mississippi StateUniversity) with easy-to-follow discussions, mathematical descriptions, illustrative diagrams, and detailedexample problems, and tailor it specifically for the World Wide Web.Phase 2. Develop and incorporate short video clips, either through animation or digitized video of actuallaborato~ experiments, demonstrating and clarifying the concepts covered in the course.Phase 3. Develop and incorporate a solution software that students can use to solve the types of aircraftstructures problems discussed in this course, and enable them to answer the “what if” questions in each problemby varying the input parameters. The first phase of the project
ofthis paper and are given below [4].“V.A.3. Programs must have written goals which are consistent with overall institutional goals.These goals must, as a minimum, focus on the student body served, resource allocation, andother factors directly affecting the program. Articulation of goals should be accomplishedthrough specification of objectives by which achievement toward goals can be measured.Programs must demonstrate achievements through various methods, e.g., student outcomeassessments, graduate career performance and employer feedback measures.V.A.4. Programs must have plans for continuous improvement. The visiting team will belooking for evidence which demonstrates implementation of continuous improvement processesand procedures for each
. There will also one or two questions on the homework which will test the students’knowledge a little bit beyond what was covered in class. These questions will only be worth afew points but it keeps the students interested. They were assigned homework assignments. Theyalso have a midterm exam and a final exam. Class participation was primarily gauged byattendance for guest speaker sessions and the project presentation sessions. The lectures help students get to know the core concepts in the field of electronicsdistribution. The guest lectures expose them to practical methodologies used in industrycurrently. The concepts learnt through the lectures are tested on the in class quizzes, homeworkassignments and the exams (midterm and final
quality of the learning experience in introductory courses is fundamental formaintaining enrollment of undergraduate students in STEM-related majors 10.To improve undergraduate learning experiences, interactive approaches in which students moreactively participate in classroom learning should be considered. Many studies have shown thatstudents’ learning and/or retention can be improved through student-active pedagogies. Forexample, Hake 17 has shown that interactive learning experiences significantly improvesconceptual understanding in introductory physics courses. Beyond interactive learning,cooperative learning approaches, in which small groups of students learn through interactionwith one another has been shown to enhance learning 18. In
Ph.D in Computer Science from the University of California, Davis. Dr. Haungs spe- cializes in game design, web development, and cloud computing. He is the developer of PolyXpress (http://mhaungs.github.io/PolyXpress) – a system that allows for the writing and sharing of location-based stories. Dr. Haungs has also been actively involved in curriculum development and undergraduate edu- cation. Through industry sponsorship, he has led several K-12 outreach programs to inform and inspire both students and teachers about opportunities in computer science. Recently, Dr. Haungs took on the position of Co-Director of the Liberal Arts and Engineering Studies (LAES) program. LAES is a new, multidiscisplinary degree offered
offerings. The potential fora spike in COVID-19 cases in the campus community meant that courses could pivot to fullyremote teaching and learning at any moment. In response to this new pedagogical framework, thesemester-long course project for an upper-level ocean engineering course was reinvented. Theproject was inspired by Wired Magazine’s video series “5-Levels” in which experts explain atopic to a child, teenager, undergraduate, graduate student, and an expert in their field. This fall,students worked individually to create a video series in which they explained a self-selectedadvanced topic in ocean engineering to three distinct audiences of their choosing. The success ofthe new course project is assessed through analysis of students’ videos