Paper ID #14574Implementation of Infrastructure Education Courses Across Multiple Insti-tutionsDr. Carol Haden, Magnolia Consulting, LLC Dr. Carol Haden is a Principal Evaluator at Magnolia Consulting, LLC. She has served as evaluator for STEM education projects sponsored by the National Science Foundation, NASA, the William and Flora Hewlett Foundation, and the Arizona Department of Education, among others. Areas of expertise include evaluations of engineering education curricula and programs, informal education and outreach programs, STEM teacher development, and climate change education programs.Dr. Philip J
Paper ID #14393Implementing Open-ended Hands-on Design Projects throughout the Me-chanical Engineering CurriculumDr. Haolin Zhu, Arizona State University Dr. Haolin Zhu received her PhD in Solid Mechanics and Computational Science and Engineering from Cornell University. She is currently part of the freshmen engineering education team in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Currently she focuses on designing the curriculum for the freshman engineering program as well as the NAE Grand Challenge Scholars Program. She also designs and teaches courses in mechanical engineering at ASU. Her
Paper ID #16530Mapping Conventional Teaching Methods and Learning Styles in Engineer-ing DynamicsDr. Meera NK Singh P.Eng, University of Calgary Meera Singh has over 20 years of academic and industrial experience in the area of applied mechanics. She obtained her PhD. from the University of Waterloo, Canada, specializing in fatigue life prediction meth- ods. Following her PhD studies, she joined the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Manitoba, Canada, where she was a faculty member for 13 years. During that time, she conducted research primarily in the area of the fatigue behaviour of composite
Paper ID #14898Investigating First-Year Engineering Students’ Educational Technology Useand Academic Achievement: Development and Validation of an AssessmentToolDr. Leroy L. Long III, Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University, Daytona Beach Dr. Leroy L. Long III is an Assistant Professor of Engineering Fundamentals at Embry-Riddle Aeronau- tical University in Daytona Beach, FL. He earned his PhD in STEM Education with a focus on Engineer- ing Education within the Department of Teaching and Learning at The Ohio State University (OSU). He earned his Master’s in Mechanical Engineering at OSU and his Bachelors in Mechanical Engineering
Paper ID #19748A Longitudinal Study of the Perception of Academic Integrity among Stu-dents and FacultyTeresa Ryan, East Carolina University Dr. Teresa Ryan teaches mechanical engineering fundamentals such as Dynamics, Mechanics of Materi- als, Acoustics and Vibrations. She also focuses on technical communication skills within an engineering context. Her research interests include acoustics, the dynamics of complex structures, and the use of laser Doppler vibrometry for characterization of such structures including percussion instruments, land- mines/IED, and coupled resonator arrays.Dr. Colleen Janeiro, East Carolina
Paper ID #25830Best Practices in Promoting Faculty-Student Interaction in Online STEMCoursesMr. Thomas M. Freeman, Michigan Technological University Thom Freeman Sr. Instructional Designer, Online Learning Specialist, and Adjunct Instructor - Michigan Technological University Thom Freeman provides faculty and academic departments at Michigan Technological University with Instructional Design services, LMS Support, and assistance with the design, development, and admin- istration of distance learning programs and online learning. He teaches graduate education courses in online teaching and integrating educational
Paper ID #25232Board 122: Disciplinary Migration of Engineering Master’s Students: WhyDo Some Students Change Their Majors and Others Do Not?Mr. Demetri Blackwood, Kettering University Demetri is Senior at Kettering University in Flint, MI. He is writing for his bachelors in Industrial Engi- neering and minoring in Business and Statistics.Dr. Diane L. Peters, Kettering University Dr. Peters is an Associate Professor of Mechanical Engineering at Kettering University.Dr. Elizabeth Gross, Kettering University Elizabeth Gross is a postdoctoral research fellow in Engineering Education at Kettering University in Flint, MI. She
Paper ID #22569Using Concept Maps to Assess Student Learning in a Multi-Section Introduc-tion to Engineering CourseDr. Kristen L. Sanford Bernhardt P.E., Lafayette College Dr. Kristen Sanford Bernhardt is chair of the Engineering Studies program and associate professor of Civil and Environmental Engineering at Lafayette College. Her expertise is in sustainable civil infrastructure management and transportation systems. She teaches a variety of courses including sustainability of built systems, transportation systems, transportation planning, civil infrastructure management, engineering economics, and Lafayette’s
Paper ID #29601Increasing Diversity and Student Success in Engineering and ComputerScience through Contextualized PracticesDr. Doris J. Espiritu, Wilbur Wright College- One of the City Colleges of Chicago Doris Espiritu is the Executive Director of Engineering and Professor of Chemistry at City Colleges of Chicago-Wilbur Wright College. She pioneered Engineering at Wright. She promotes collaboration be- tween K-12 schools, community colleges, 4-years institutions, non-profit organizations, and industries to develop Community of Practice, Professional Identity, and Self-Efficacy for students to help increase diversity in
Paper ID #28759Experience of IoT Transceiver with Affordable Software Defined RadioPlatformDr. Liang Hong, Tennessee State University Dr. Liang Hong received the B.S. and the M.S. degrees in Electrical Engineering from Southeast Univer- sity, Nanjing, China in 1994 and 1997, respectively, and the Ph.D. degree in Electrical Engineering from University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri in 2002. Since August 2003, he has been with the Depart- ment of Electrical & Computer Engineering at Tennessee State University where he is now Full Professor. His research interests include wireless communication systems, Internet of
Paper ID #29183Putting Course Design Principles to Practice: Creation of an Elective onVaccines and ImmunoengineeringProf. Joshua A Enszer, University of Delaware Joshua Enszer is an associate professor in Chemical and Biomolecular Engineering at the University of Delaware. He has taught core and elective courses across the curriculum, from introduction to engineering science and material and energy balances to process control, capstone design, and mathematical modeling of chemical and environmental systems. His research interests include technology and learning in various incarnations: electronic portfolios as a means for
searching for the solution that little time is left for learningthe principles that will enable them to solve other related problems. Research incognitive science has shown that under certain conditions, studying worked examples is abetter way to learn than solving problems1-9. The purpose of the present paper is to bringthis work to the attention of a wider audience and to report on the writer’s experience inimplementing worked examples in a course in statics. Because the writer’s approach isbased strongly on a particular subfield of cognitive science called “cognitive load theory”(CLT), the paper will begin with an outline of CLT drawn from publications by severalresearchers closely identified with the theory2,5,8.Outline of cognitive load
, LabVIEW is among the most used programminglanguages for technical and scientific applications today, used to solve technical and commercialproblems. LabVIEW’s programming features are clear, coherent, powerful, comprehensive andentertaining, enabling an instructional presentation of computer-based experimentation in whichstudents create meaningful programs that illustrate useful concepts at each step of the learningcurve. LabVIEW programs are modular, so that after each is created and understood, it becomespart of a library that can be used later as a building block of a more sophisticated program.Lee12 integrated LabVIEW software into an instrumentation and experimental methods course
undergraduate programs listed in The WhitakerFoundation’s Biomedical Engineering Curriculum Database, fourteen were formed in 2003 orlater with the total number of biomedical engineering departments now numbering around 75.3, 4Seven new BME programs were visited in fall 2006.5 Assuming that the new programs formedin 2003 and 2004 will have graduates in 2007 and 2008, respectively, and are prepared for theaccreditation process, seven new programs will have ABET accreditation visits in fall 2007 andfive more in fall 2008. If all of the new programs visited in fall 2006 through fall 2008 aresuccessful, there will be a total of 61 ABET-accredited BME programs by summer 2009 withtwo-thirds of those representing new programs (Figure 1). This paper addresses
Paper ID #7063Evaluating Flipped Classroom Strategies and Tools for Computer Engineer-ingProf. Mark William Redekopp, University of Southern California Mark Redekopp is an Associate Professor of Engineering Practice in the Ming Hsieh Department of Elec- trical Engineering at USC. He teaches logic design, computer architecture, programming, and embedded systems courses. Mark’s research focus is in the area of circuit verification as well as distributed and parallel algorithms for data analytics.Dr. Gisele Ragusa, University of Southern California Dr. Gisele Ragusa is an associate professor at the University of Southern
Paper ID #6286Insights into the Process of Building a Presentation Scoring System for Engi-neersDr. Tristan T. Utschig, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Tristan T. Utschig is a Senior Academic Professional in the Center for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning and is Assistant Director for the Scholarship and Assessment of Teaching and Learning at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Formerly, he was a tenured Associate Professor of Engineering Physics at Lewis-Clark State College. Dr. Utschig has regularly published and presented work on a variety of topics including assessment instruments and methodologies
Paper ID #6678An Evaluation of the Mexican culture on students hands on research experi-encesDr. Erick Jones, University of Texas, ArlingtonDr. Vettrivel Gnaneswaran, University of Wisconsin-PlattevilleBeatriz Murrieta, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Campus Queretaro Page 23.163.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 An Evaluation of the Mexican Culture on Students Research ExperiencesAbstractThe performance of a student undergoing research or pursuing education in a culture
.Manufacturers have embraced lean manufacturing during the slow down in the economyas one method of remaining profitable5. Having students experience lean manufacturing concepts in the laboratory canhave a positive effect on the experiences offered to the students prior to them entering theindustrial setting. It is important that faculty provide students with the experiences thatdevelop a strong conceptual framework of how this management practice will benefit theindustry in which they work. Many of our students learn best when they are actively engaged in activities thatemphasize the concepts that we are trying to teach. This paper will focus on a NationalInstitute of Standards (NIST) developed Lean Manufacturing Workshop and a project
Session 3554 Engineering Entrepreneurship at Penn Thomas A.V. Cassel School of Engineering and Applied Science University of PennsylvaniaAbstractPenn’s two Engineering Entrepreneurship courses receive the highest student ratings of allcourses offered in the School of Engineering and Applied Science. This paper discusses theimportance of engineering entrepreneurship, both from a global economic perspective and fromthe personal perspective of the engineer. The paper then discusses Penn’s approach to theirEngineering Entrepreneurship
70 facultywho teach undergraduate courses using SL. The data showed a general increase in positiveattitudes toward SL among the faculty over time (2004 to 2009), and that students learned thesubject matter better through SL, meeting the course learning objectives.15Banzaertet al.16 studied mechanical engineering faculty views of SL at MIT using a 10-minuteshort interview method. While 80% of the faculty were open to the use of SL, 52% wereconcerned about time constraints and 56% needed support to identify SL projects appropriate forthe core technical course that they were teaching. SL was considered most appropriate for Page 25.546.3design
engineering programs. While still ramping up its operation,RIT Dubai has already been very successful in attracting study abroad students from the maincampus. This paper discusses the observed barriers to cross-cultural collaboration in theclassroom at the Dubai campus of RTI, where this effect has been noted in a senior/graduatelevel course composed by over 50% of study-abroad students from the main US campus.Faculty and students observations about the class interaction are presented and somerecommendations are formulated to enhance the cross cultural experience with the aim tofacilitate the development of global competencies in engineering students.RationaleThe need of educating engineers not only with solid technical knowledge but also with a
acquisition systems home andconduct experiments and design projects. This paper presents the results of a pilot project inwhich a first-year engineering course at a large university was modified to use data acquisitionhardware systems and a graphical programming environment. This paper will discuss thecurricular structure, the implementation of the graphical programming language and hardwarecomponent, examples from the class, and initial assessments from the experience in the form ofclass surveys. Challenges and opportunities are discussed. Overall, students reacted positivelyto the inclusion of the graphical language and extremely positively to the inclusion of thehardware aspect, which allowed for more hands-on activities. The instructional team
AC 2012-3712: K-12 ENGINEERING EDUCATION: PRIORITIES, RESEARCHTHEMES, AND CHALLENGESDr. Eugene F. Brown, Virginia Tech Eugene Brown is a professor of mechanical engineering at Virginia Tech. He has worked with ONR and DoD since 2001 on educational outreach-related work-force development issues. He teaches undergrad- uate and graduate courses in thermodynamics and fluid mechanics and is the author of many papers and reports describing his research in the areas of computational fluid dynamics, fluid mechanics, and his work in educational outreach.Prof. Larry G. Richards, University of Virginia Larry G. Richards is a professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of Virginia
, C., Lee, G., & Sacks, R. (2003). Development of a knowledge-rich CAD system for the north American precast concrete industry. Paper presented at the Connecting-Crossroads of Digital Discourse, Acadia22 Conference, Ball State University. Muncie, IN. 3 National Building Information Model Standard project (NBIMS): Page 15.251.15 http://www.facilityinformationcouncil.org/bim/ 4 Giligan, B., & Kunz, J. (2007). VDC Use in 2007: Significant value, dramatic growth, and apparent business opportunity (CIFE Technical Rep. No TR171). Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University. 5 Kemlani, L. (2006). The
Session 2238 Defining Exper tise in the Use of Constr aint-based CAD Tools by Examining Pr acticing Pr ofessionals Nathan W. Har tman Pur due Univer sityAbstr actAcademic engineering graphics curricula are facing a rapidly changing knowledge base andcurrent teaching and assessment methods are struggling to keep pace. Engineering graphicscurricula within an academic setting should examine industry-based techniques in an effort toimprove classroom instruction. This paper is the second in a two-part series which examinespracticing engineering
Paper ID #10108Assessing BS–CS Student Outcomes Using Senior ProjectMr. Norman Pestaina, Florida International University Mr. Norman Pestaina is a Senior Instructor in the School of Computing and Information Sciences (SCIS) at Florida International University (FIU). Mr. Pestaina completed the B.Sc. in Mathematics (Special) at the University of the West Indies in 1972, and the MS in Computer Science at the Pennsylvania State University in 1979. He has been an Assistant Staff member of the Massachusetts Institute of Technol- ogy’s Lincoln Laboratory, and Lecturer in the Department of Mathematics at the Cave Hill campus of the
Paper ID #10134Introduction to Architectural Structures: Lessons Learned from Parti PrisPedagogyProf. Keith E. Hedges, Drury University Keith Hedges is an Assistant Professor of Architecture and teaches the architectural structures sequence at Drury University. Keith’s teaching repertoire includes seventeen different courses of engineering topics at NAAB (architecture) and architecture topics at ABET (engineering) accredited institutions. His interests involve the disciplinary knowledge gap between architecture and engineering students in higher education
thefirst-year. To assess the impact of this seminar structure, an Engineering-Awareness Surveyinstrument was developed to capture, both quantitatively and qualitatively, the nature ofstudents’ perceptions of the interrelationships between engineering disciplines as well as theirawareness of nanotechnology. This paper presents results of the impact of the themed-seminarstructure as delivered in the Fall of 2003.BackgroundThe estimated need for 2 million nanotechnology workers worldwide within the next 10-15years, with 0.8-0.9 million in the U.S. alone1, presents a special challenge and opportunity torestructure teaching and curricula at all levels to include nanotechnology concepts and nurturethe scientific and technical workforce of the 21st
Session 2171 Design and Startup of an ABET General Engineering Science Program. Doanh Van, PhD., PE., CEM Associate Professor and Chair Engineering Union UniversityI. AbstractUnion University started up its new engineering program in 2001. The program offers aBachelor of Science in Engineering with a specialty in either Mechanical Engineering orElectrical Engineering. The first graduating class will be in May 2005, which will pave the wayfor the application for ABET accreditation1 (EAC) in 2006.This paper presents a case study to discuss and
Jersey. Having started with a clean curriculum slate during a periodof national change in engineering curricula in response to ABET 2000, we had the opportunity toinfuse an entrepreneurial culture into our engineering program from its inception. Specifically,we have developed a variety of policies/programs including creating an 8-semester engineeringclinic sequence, creating an undergraduate venture capital fund and developing the TechnologyEntrepreneurship Concentration. This paper will describe the impact of these and other relatedinitiatives that have helped create an entrepreneurial culture in our undergraduate students. Itshould be noted that many of these initiatives do not require a new program or major curriculumreform. Rather, our