(5)reaction forces are evaluated as {r} = [k] {u} – {f} (6)local internal forces are calculated as fix= k(uix-ujx) (7) fjx= k(ujx-uix) (8)then normal forces are calculated ( ) (9)where σ is the average stress in any two-force member and k is stiffness constant.Solutions based on analytical formulationsWith uneven loads applied to the two top nodes, an initial search was to determine whether anintersection existed between the two diagonal elements which would inform us that at somepoint, the element
UniversityDr. Anthony J McGoron, Florida International University Associate Professor Dr. Anthony McGoron received his Ph.D. in Biomedical Engineering from Louisiana Tech University in Ruston, LA and post-doctoral training in Pharmacology and Cell Biophysics from the University of Cincinnati. His first faculty appointment was at UC’s Department of Radiology. He joined FIU in 1999 and was instrumental in the development of the academic programs in Biomedical Engineering (BME). He led the design and implementation of the B.S. in BME program in 2002, its initial ABET accreditation in 2005, re-accreditation in 2008. He served as the founding advisor for the student chapters of the Biomedical Engineering Society (BMES) and the
manner that can be useful to alarger study investigating the educational pathways of makers.How is Making Defined?The literature review looked at several articles in order to determine how terms for maker andmaking appear and in which context. The initial search was conducted using common terms thatare already known to be associated with makers or that have similar meanings. These includemaker, hacker, tinkerer, DIY (do-it-yourself), and hobbyist. Some of these terms appeared in thecontext of a growing maker movement, but many were terms in common usage to describepeople as makers and the activities around making.MakerThe term maker, being the topic of the primary research project, was examined first. It wasprimarily found in articles concerning
in the recruitment and retention of underrepresented engineering students at Auburn University. She earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in Business and Management from Alverno College, a Master of Business Administration from Cardinal Stritch University, and a PhD in Educational Psychology from Auburn University. Her research focused on comparing the variables that predict the retention of Black pre-engineering students and White pre-engineering students engineering students at a majority univer- sity. Dr. Harris directs all program activities in the Academic Excellence Program including recruitment, retention, fundraising, funding through grants and proposals, budget preparation, and student counsel- ing. She
Paper ID #6140Engineering Everywhere: Bridging Formal and Informal STEM Education(Works in Progress)Sharlene Yang, Museum of Science Sharlene Yang is the director of Partnerships for the Engineering is Elementary project. In this position she is working with organizations and individuals across the country to help them support implementation of elementary engineering with area schools and teachers. She also led the efforts and initiatives of EiE professional development team, which now reach approximately 300 teachers a year. Yang has been active with STEM education for the past fifteen years; prior to her work with EiE
) areas. The ABET list of accredited programs iswidely accepted by employers, academic institutions, professional engineering societies,and the professional engineer licensure boards. Furthermore, ABET criteria and processesfor accreditation are highly regarded internationally by academic institutions andagencies for accreditation.ABET recently completed the transition phase to new engineering criteria foraccreditation of engineering educational programs, initially and still popularly calledEngineering Criteria 2000 [1]. These program objectives and outcomes were nurturedfrom the early 1990’s and adopted in 1995. The criteria are embedded in a frameworkthat invokes continues improvement. Criterion 3 Program Outcomes and Assessment isevidence of
members. Eachacademic year produces a unique engineering leadership experience that has lifetime impact for itsmembers and a legacy of improved infrastructure for design education. In this paper, theteamwork model derived from Larson and LaFosto is used to reflect on the people, strategy, andoperations that form the IEW. Based on this analysis, strengths of the IEW experience are unifiedcommitment and creation of a collaborative environment while several improvements could bemade to improve its results-driven structure.BackgroundIdaho Engineering Works (IEW) began as a way to improve the graduate experience.Traditionally, graduate students are paired with a member of the faculty with similar interests ofstudy to work on research and complete a
theconcepts learned in class. This conventional way of learning is driven by the constraint inthe time of the lecture period and by the fact that the student should demonstrate his/herinterests for learning. However, the research literature suggests1 “that students must do more than justlisten. They must read, write, discuss, or be engaged in solving problems. Most importantto be actively involved, students must engage in such higher-order thinking tasks asanalysis, synthesis, and evaluation. Within this context, it is proposed that strategiespromoting active learning be defined as instructional activities involving students indoing things and thinking about what they are doing.” Basically, it is suggested that the lecture time be
. McGourty, R.L. Miller, B.M. Olds, G. Rogers, ” Matching Assessment Methods to Outcomes: Definitions and Research Questions,” Proceedings of the 2000 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, St. Louis, MO, June 18-21, 2000.DICK K.P. YUEProfessor Dick K. P. Yue is the Associate Dean for Engineering at MIT. He is also a professor in the Department ofOcean Engineering. Professor Yue has initiated a number of engineering education innovation efforts in the Schoolof Engineering including undergraduate internship programs in professional practice and entrepreneurship, onlineprofessional engineering education, and the Engineering Council for Undergraduate Education.BARBARA A. MASIDr
Page 25.769.2University in a nationally recognized engineering program. As observed by the CEO of ParsonsBrinkerhoff Inc., also an alumnus of the College of Engineering, “The United States is simplynot graduating enough engineers, and students from under-resourced areas, including minorities,are under-represented in the profession. To remain competitive as a company and as a country,we must draw students of all backgrounds into engineering fields.” These same thoughts areechoed in many recent publications including Rising Above the Gathering Storm 1 and RisingAbove the Gathering Storm, Revisited 2 by the National Research Council. The College ofEngineering has developed a partnership with this firm and several other industry partners
Master Facilitators continued to offer train thetrainer workshops both for Teaching Facilitators and participants in microteachingcertifications, and initiation of an expanded research model to assess facilitator skills,faculty performance, and impact on student learning.Teacher TrainingsIn conjunction with CREATE we held 5 full day teacher trainings in the southernCalifornia area. Below are the details of these trainings. Michael Arquin the directorof KidWind traveled California and was the lead trainer at the Cerro Coso event. Bradand John were in attendance at this event and then proceeded to lead the other trainings.June 29-30, 2011 San Diego Office of Education 20 schoolsOctober 13, 2011 State Center Consortium
opportunities for engineering. The committee will draw upon many sources of engineering expertise (including the NAE membership and foreign associates, the NAE's international Frontiers of Engineering program, and engineering societies worldwide) as well as ideas from the broader public. The NAE committee will create a ranked list of the grand challenges and opportunities for engineering during the world's next few generations. It will also point to engineering or scientific research and innovation that look promising for addressing each challenge as well as suggest currently unmet research needs.As a result of this project, fourteen engineering grand challenges were identified2
has a keen interest in pedagogy and instruction delivery methods related to Distance learning.Chandra Sekhar, Purdue University, Calumet Professsor CHANDRA R. SEKHAR is a member of the faculty of the Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology at Purdue University Calumet. Professor Sekhar earned a Bachelor’s Degree in Chemistry from the University of Madras (India), a Diploma in Instrumentation from Madras Institute of Technology and Master’s Degree in Electrical Engineering from University of Pennsylvania. Professor Sekhar’s primary teaching and research focus is in the areas of Biomedical and Process Control Instrumentation and Clinical Engineering.Jai Agrawal, Purdue University, Calumet
anengineering career. But key to the message throughout all camp activities, from the GlobalWorkshop and Grand Challenge Curriculum to the informal time with their peer mentors, is thenotion that they can make that difference now as well. They learn that—through such activitiesas undergraduate research, applied projects, engineering service learning, and service-orientedengineering student organizations—the carrot isn’t four years away. In fact, it’s in their hands.Logistics and costsAs can be imagined, the logistics and costs for a program of this magnitude are daunting.Planning for E2 camp is on a thirteen month calendar starting with finalizing the facility bookingfor the subsequent year’s camp.In planning for the initial E2 camp for the summer of
AC 2010-1153: TEACHING INTERACTIVELY WITH GOOGLE DOCSEdward Gehringer, North Carolina State University Ed Gehringer, efg@ncsu.edu, is Associate Professor of Computer Science and Computer Engineering at North Carolina State University. His main research area is collaborative learning technology. He received his Ph.D. degree from Purdue University, and taught at Carnegie Mellon University, and Monash University in Australia. Page 15.1177.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Teaching Interactively with Google DocsAbstractActive learning has repeatedly been shown to be
specification. Artefacts used have included small bridges and self-propelled vehicles. Figure 1 – Bridge buildingStudents have to meet in their teams prior to the residential course, so that they can initiate theirdesign. They must have meetings that are minuted for evidence and progress. The artefact is thenbuilt during the residential course, Figure1. Page 10.1276.4 Proceedings of the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2005, American Society for Engineering Education Figure 2 – Bridge
higher motivation and maturity scores.The data collected appear to indicate that students with Co-Op experience are more mature thanstudents without Co-Op experience. However, the statistical distributions of motivation scoresare similar for both groups and it appears that for the population studied there is no differencebetween the two groups. Two explanations for the lack of correlation between motivation andCo-Op experience are that 1)the test used to measure motivation cannot discriminate the changefor the age and circumstances of the study and 2)the experiment design must be refined toincrease randomization and to eliminate confounding variables. Additional research isrecommended to validate the model proposed.IntroductionCo-Op education is
motivation andCo-Op experience are that 1)the test used to measure motivation cannot discriminate the changefor the age and circumstances of the study and 2)the experiment design must be refined toincrease randomization and to eliminate confounding variables. Additional research isrecommended to validate the model proposed.IntroductionCo-Op education is at least 100 years old1. Herman Schneider2 is generally given credit fororiginating the term and for creating a framework for modern cooperative education in theUnited States. There is widespread agreement that Co-Op education is beneficial to bothemployers and students3. Employers benefit because they can tryout a potential employeewithout making a commitment. Students benefit because they gain
, etc. to form an interactive visual/audio presentation of information and knowledge.Interactive multimedia can be used to support education and training, to serve as a reference tool andto provide dynamic presentations 1,2. Educational research has showed that if information isconveyed to the students in a combination of text, color, graphics, animation, sound, movingpictures, and a degree of interactivity, the interactive multimedia approach may result in a significantincrease in retention, improvement in the learning rate and active learning process3-5. According toStoney and Oliver's report, “The use of interactive multimedia can foster and develop cognitiveengagement through its ability to attract and hold students' attention and focus.”6
tilt meter, by having an LED bar display light up when the red box is tilted to the right or left.≠ Do some research on acceptable vibration on an engine and compare your finding with readings from an actual engine.≠ Study the effects of g force going around curves in a car (keep to the speed limit of course!) Page 15.754.11 There are many more experiments listed on the company’s website (www.dimensionengineering.com) as well as other sites on the web.The lab grade in this part will depend partly on the quality of research and partly on the design(added electronics, Labview VI, etc).Results:The accelerometer project has
15.65.2Course StructureThis course spanned three quarters, and each week students attended one lecture and two three-hour long labs. The first quarter of the course was focused on team building, problem definitionand conceptual design. Students conducted background research and determined the engineeringrequirements and specifications that defined the engineering problem to be solved. Studentswere encouraged to foster their creativity and generate as many solutions as possible. They usedconceptual models and decision schemes to narrow their solutions and developed projectschedules to monitor and ensure completion by the end of the course. At the end of the firstquarter, students performed conceptual design reviews and provided documentation of
student during the learningprocess. Second, organize the skills to be acquired in complexity levels. Third, generateeducational objectives for each of the skills. Fourth, based on educational theories(teaching styles, learning styles, etc.), transform the design skills to didactic tasks (i.e.lectures, problems, exams, etc.) in such a way that the student will be able to developthose skills.This model could serve initially as a diagnostic tool to characterize the current set ofskills of a given course or program. The model can also be use to implement educationaltasks into the classroom and labs depending on the desired student profile. Page 15.694.21
Michigan University Engineering Design Center for Service-Learning whichsponsors the project.The Initial Design Page 9.383.1 “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright c 2004. American Society for Engineering Education”In the mid-to-late 1990’s when the primary author was an associate professor of mechanicalengineering at University of South Alabama, he adopted the service-learning pedagogy inteaching the first- year “Introduction to Mechanical Engineering”1. In ME 101, students workedin teams to design and build laboratory equipment and
Architectural, Page 9.920.1Building, Civil, Mechanical and Robotic Engineering, “Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright c 2004, American Society for Engineering Education”The rationale for this change stemmed essentially from Dewey (1) who proposed that“If an experience arouses curiosity, strengthens initiative”…..(it)…. “sets up desires andpurposes that are sufficiently intense to carry a person over the dead places, in the future”.In other words such experiences can motivate an individual to go on and succeed when thingsget difficult. It is the author’s
course.IntroductionIn recent years, much focus has been placed on course and student assessment, but instructionalassessment has not received the attention it deserves. Many tenure-track professors in the UnitedStates are evaluated heavily on their research contributions to the university, but for otheruniversities, quality instruction is a top priority.What is quality instruction? ASCE ExCEEd Teaching workshops define “good teaching” basedon the ExCEEd (Excellence in Civil Engineering Education) Teaching Model1. The six mainfocus areas of the teaching model include; structured organization, engaging presentation,enthusiasm, positive rapport with students, frequent assessment of student learning, andappropriate use of technology. Seymour and Hewitt2 were able
limited to taking on jobs that aresimpler in nature and do not require employees capable of multitasking. In the long-run,the company will not be able to compete effectively due to the engineering staffs’ lack ofinnovative ideas and necessary knowledge to implement those ideas. Sustainedtechnological innovation is widely regarded as vital to the success of manufacturingcompanies.According to Holzer2, economic research indicates that employers more than ever areseeking a higher level of cognitive skills (such as reading and writing ability, andcomputer skills) from less-educated workers. New developments, the growingcompetitiveness of product markets, and the growing role of technology in many settings,has changed what employers need from their
her B.S. in Engineering from Brown University, her M.S.E.E. from the University of Southern California, and her Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from the University of Southern California in 1999. Her area of research is centered around the concept of humanized intelligence, the process of embedding human cognitive capability into the control path of autonomous systems. This work, which addresses issues of autonomous control as well as aspects of interaction with humans and the surrounding environment, has resulted in over 130 peer-reviewed pub- lications in a number of projects – from scientific rover navigation in glacier environments to assistive robots for the home. To date, her unique accomplishments have been
Paper ID #10261Are We Prepared: Issues Relating to Cyber Security EconomicsDr. Jane LeClair, National Cybersecurity Institute at Excelsior College Dr. Jane LeClair serves as the Chief Operating Officer of the National Cyber-security Institute (NCI) at Excelsior College in Washington, D.C., whose mission is to serve as an academic and research center dedicated to increasing the knowledge of the cyber security discipline. Prior to this position, Dr. LeClair served as Dean of the School of Business and Technology at Excelsior College where she led faculty and staff in carrying out the mission and goals of the college and
Science, Thermodynamics, Manufacturing Engineering, and Technical Communication. Mar- tin then joined Johnson Matthey Electronics/Honeywell Electronic Materials where he held positions in Technical Service, Product Management, Six Sigma, and Research & Development. He is an inventor on a dozen patents and patent applications and has published over 30 papers and book chapters on topics including ceramic processing, Pb-free solder development, experimental design, and biomechanics. His current research focuses on rocket propellant characterization, fin flutter, and heat transfer.Dr. Hani Serhal Saad, Eastern Washington UniversityDr. Robert E Gerlick, Eastern Washington University Dr. Gerlick is Assistant Professor at
Paper ID #9987Changing the Course Design to Include Habitat for Humanity Improved CourseOutcomes and Broadened Student’s Perceptions of Community ServiceMs. Laura Elizabeth Leach, Western Kentucky University Laura Leach, M. Arch. is an Architect and an Assistant Professor in the Department of Architectural and Manufacturing Sciences at Western Kentucky University. She has eleven years of experience in teaching and research including architectural design, drawing and documentation, studios, modeling, construction methods and materials, and management. She also has three years of professional experience in the architecture