challenges in order to understandand define user requirements, which then can be transformed into engineering specificationsessential for successful product design4,5.Experienced designers address these communication challenges through the use of prototypes. Inaddition to using prototypes in the traditional way, that is, to iterate and test an idea and to meetand verify design and engineering challenges, professional designers use prototypes throughoutthe development process1,4,5. Prototypes help designers to frame the design problem and askspecific questions in order to gain valuable insight into stakeholders’ needs3. In this way,designers' use of prototypes helps to facilitate a deeper understanding and knowledge of theproblem.In education
in 1995 as an associate professor of electrical and computer engineering. Prior to joining the faculty at Rose-Hulman he was an assistant professor at Virginia Tech and an instructor at N. C. State University. After completing his M.S. in electrical engineering in 1976, he joined the DuPont Corporation where he worked in various technical, design, and supervisory positions before returning to obtain his PhD. Dr. Moore directed the electrical and computer department’s senior design program for several years and is currently involved in externally sponsored multidisciplinary graduate and undergraduate projects as well as international project teams and collaborations. He recently spent a sabbatical year at the
understand their “short-hand” schematics. Thiscaused the Contractors numerous problems during the bid phase. Page 7.775.7 Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Education b) Contractor Bid Observations The most interesting observation made during the exercise by the event coordinators was by watching the Contractors, who have taken the very same courses and in many times are good friends with the A-E group, fail to understand the A-E group’s design. In all but one case, the contractors were frustrated
students are faced with solving an open-ended design problem, there may be specific partsof this practice that students either do not understand, do not implement correctly, or do notknow to attempt when solving open-ended design problems. Several studies have investigatedhow first year undergraduate engineering students in particular, approach design problemsolving, and their interpretation and knowledge of engineering design [4-7]. These studies usedvarious methods to evaluate students’ design thinking including pre- and post-tests associatedwith group design projects in a classroom setting [4], pre- and post-essay response critiques oftwo design plans [5], gender differences in students’ attempts to evaluate design factors [6], andshort essay
set-up of the spaces vary greatly between locations, agrowing number of universities have shifted from more traditional machine shop equipmenttowards digital design and rapid manufacturing tools (Wilczynski, 2015). These technologies areavailable to students through their coursework, their participation in certain extracurricularactivities, their status as an engineering student, or simply through their university enrollment.Students visit the Makerspaces for academic, personal, and extracurricular projects (Ali et al.2016; Wilczynski, Zinter & Wilen 2016). Since its establishment at the University of Texas atAustin in 2014, more than 30 courses offered by the university have included course projects thatprompt students to utilize the
AC 2010-1941: EFFECTS OF AN EARLY PROTOTYPING EXPERIENCE: CANDESIGN FIXATION BE AVOIDED?Vince Walker, US Air Force AcademyDaniel Jensen, United States Air Force AcademyKendra Crider, US Air Force AcademyJason Weaver, University of Texas, Austin Jason Weaver is a PhD candidate at The University of Texas at Austin, focusing on energy harvesting technologies, design methodologies and the characteristics of transformation. He previously received a MS in Mechanical Engineering from The University of Texas at Austin and a BS in Mechanical Engineering from Brigham Young University.Kristin Wood, University of Texas, Austin Dr Kristin Wood is the Cullen Trust Endowed Professor in Engineering and University
project included learning and understanding of 3D toolsand technologies, design and develop product prototypes, understand the advantages and limitsof 3D printing process from design concept to physical models, and use the new skills to enhancestudies across the other disciplines of engineering and science courses. The students were able toaccomplish these outcomes by demonstrating their abilities to understand the printable envelope Page 26.451.13size limitations of the MakerBot printers and were able to orient the parts such that build errorswere minimized, add supports option in the 3D printer to create more robust parts and control thefill
AC 2007-949: CLOSING THE HARDWARE DESIGN LOOP WITH MULTISIM: ACASE STUDYAsad Yousuf, Savannah State University Dr. Asad Yousuf is a Professor of Electronics Engineering Technology at Savannah State University. Dr. Yousuf has written number of articles published in the ASEE conference proceedings over the years.Ayush Bhardwaj, Savannah State University Ayush Bhardwaj is a student of Georgia Tech Regional Engineering program at Savannah State University. His major is Electrical EngineeringCrystal Reeves, Savannah State University Crystal Reeves is a student of Georgia Tech Regional Engineering program at Savannah State University. Her major is Electrical Engineering.William Lehman, St. Mary
the local hospitals, as well as with the disabilityservices at Texas A&M University to better understand the barriers faced by the disabled on a dailybasis.The mathematical tools in analysis and design the students must understand to begin to designmechanisms and comprehend design flaws in the field of mechanical engineering are at timesoverwhelming. However, when students are given a chance to design devises that have an immediatereal-world application, they are motivated to progress in ways that are unimaginable. They see theapplications of the assistive devises beyond manufacturing and are excited to be the engineers tomake a difference in the lives of targeted individuals.To facilitate learning in a time demanding environment, authors
infused into the latest course offering, making for an intensive, project-basedexperience which has proven to be extremely challenging from a time management aspect forboth students and faculty. A new VET curriculum is under development and is intended to be an ABET accreditedversion of the existing Industrial Technology – Vehicle Design (IT-VD) program, that presentlylacks accreditation. Within the IT-VD program there is an additional course that focuses onmanufacturing economics, which was recently dropped from the requirements for all programsbut those associated with vehicle design, including the Plastics Engineering Technology /Vehicle Engineering Technology (PET/VET) program. Likewise, the current Foundry, Formingand Joining course
, 2011 Implementation of an Integrated Product Development (IPD) Competition in a Rural Dominican Community: Lessons Learned AbstractThis paper describes the challenges in the development and execution of a product design anddevelopment competition for a rural community by a small engineering student team. Theservice-learning project was conducted by a four-person team, relying on the collaboration of acommunity partner organization in the Dominican Republic, and a small group of graduatestudent advisors. The goals of the project were to a) identify critical needs in the community touse as a theme in the competition, b) encourage team-building within the community, c) developmodules for
c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 An Exploration of Social and Educational Influences on User- Centered Design: Revisiting a Compatibility QuestionnaireAbstractMany different factors actively influence the approach a user takes when interacting with a givenproduct or system. The user-product interaction is a form of communication primarily dependenton (1) the message that the product is transmitting in terms of its usability and (2) the user’scognitive ability to receive, process, and understand such message. The external interfaces of aproduct or system are where these interactions generally occur, which are typically developedfollowing user-centered design principles. An intuitive interface which
measurement. Next, he spent a fewminutes discussing some of the different jobs they perform, including design, product planning,testing, field applications engineering, sales and sales support, marketing, and various leadershippositions. The last thing he discussed before the project was an overview of the four-year EETcurriculum at Purdue.The conference theme was Electric Vehicle Technology, so the authors chose a project thatclearly related to electric vehicles. The final 10-12 minutes of the session was dedicated to thisproject. Page 22.530.3EET ProjectThe goal of the EET project was to demonstrate two different methods of controlling the speedof
represents a characteristic of the curriculum. For instance, a customer requirement such as ‘understand economics of engineering project management’ could be translated into components such as ‘knowledge of finance’, ‘ knowledge of engineering economy’, ‘knowledge of scheduling principles’ etc. It also tries to find out how many credit hours need to be assigned to each course.3. Instruction Planning: This step identifies the resources and methods needed to impart education and training conforming to customer requirements. This includes qualifications of instructors, experience teaching same or similar courses, relevant work experience in the field etc.4. Quality Control: This is the final step in the design of the curriculum. It tries
equations or to be “able with the table.” But thisrelegates structural design to simply being familiar with specification documents. Of course,experienced structural engineers know that a solid conceptual understanding of the underlyingstructural mechanics and behavior are far more useful, where engineering judgement must beused alongside design specifications. This is especially true for the ever increasing amount ofautomation offered by structural analysis and design software packages. New engineering gradswho learn only to “plug and chug” specification equations for textbook problems will be lesscreative and will be ill-prepared to interpret computer results and make important decisions withthe aid of computer generated designs.It can be
Paper ID #22452Machine Design: Different Pedagogical Approaches to Achieve Targeted Out-comesDr. Robert Scott Pierce P.E., Western Carolina University Robert Scott Pierce is an Assistant Professor of Engineering and Technology at Western Carolina Univer- sity. He received his Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Georgia Tech in 1993. Prior to his teaching career, he spent 14 years in industry designing automated equipment.Dr. Rungun Nathan, Pennsylvania State University, Berks Campus Dr. Rungun Nathan is an associate professor and program chair for mechanical engineering in the division of engineering at Penn State Berks
AC 2010-1128: A SYSTEMS VIEW OF TECHNOLOGY CURRICULAJohn Robertson, Arizona State University John Robertson is a Professor in the Engineering Technology Department at Arizona State University Polytechnic. He was formerly an executive with Motorola and now participates in many senior technical training programs with the JACMET consortium. He is also a consultant to MATEC for the ESYST program to introduce a system-focused curriculum for Community Colleges.Louis Frenzel, Electronic Design Magazine Lou Frenzel has been a Technology Editor for Electronic Design Magazine for seven years. Formerly, he was professor and department head at Austin Community College and he still teaches at
applications of 2 mathematics, science, engineering and technology (MSET) An ability to conduct, analyze, and interpret experiments and apply experimental 3 results to improve process An ability to apply creativity in the design of systems, components or processes 4 appropriate to program objectives 5 An ability to function effectively on teams 6 An ability to identify, analyze, and solve technical problems 7 Ability to communicate effectively 8 A recognition to the need for and an ability to engage in life-long learning 9 An ability to understand professional, ethical, and social responsibilities A respect for diversity and knowledge of contemporary professional, societal, 10
and optimizing offerings. In simple terms, the educational valueproposition of an engineering college might read “provide the highest quality educationalexperience to the students for the least cost”, with the cost being correlated to faculty workloadand institutional resources, for example. Inefficiency in realizing such a proposition may be tiedto bureaucratic structures that sub-optimize and resist organizational change.Our interest is in the process of bringing about organizational change at a college level,understanding the tension between the departmental or local forces, the college-wide, and theoverarching system forces. In particular, this paper focuses on experiences with integratingdisciplinary senior design courses into a college
courses in a number of different disciplines including : history, mathematics, physics,engineering and computer science.As is typically the case for inter-disciplinary courses, there are formidable challenges in presentingthis material in an understandable way for the wide variety of students that may enroll for thecourse. Other challenges include instructing both history and scientific theory simultaneously, andproviding a global perspective for the roles of each topics in the overall spacecraft design.As mentioned earlier, the course is separated into two parts. The pedagogical content of thesesections is distinct and are as follows : 1. Topics in astronomy, mathematical modeling, and spacecraft design
things that they have wanted to do for a while. Most often, we haveto check students’ ambitions, and ask them to develop Plan B’s and Plan C’s, just in case some-thing unexpected affects their progress.5 ConclusionWe have approached Interactive Device Design as an experiment in changing the way that weapproach engineering education. As we look to increase the general electronics literacy of stu-dents of all backgrounds, we might consider some of the ways that this course is distinct fromother introductory electrical engineering courses. First, it is centered around practical knowledgeand making, rather than first-principles understanding. In many ways, the course provides stu-dents with experience in tinkering and fabrication that those in
withunsustainable packaging, conduct and report on research that examines sustainability and ethicalproblems related to the selected packaging, and redesign the packaging, solving the identifiedproblems. They also participate in groups to peer review other students’ reports. This module isimplemented in a junior level communication, design, and engineering core course in theDepartment of Human Centered Design & Engineering in the College of Engineering at theUniversity of Washington. Outcomes were qualitatively assessed by examining samples ofstudents’ reports versus requirements and students’ reflections on the module and reportassignment. Outcomes have been positive and reveal that students gain an understanding ofsustainable and ethical design
decisions are influenced by knowledge of the manufacturing process capability. Knowledge of these process capabilities also allows the designers to create, evaluate, and select design options. First hand experience with basic manufacturing processes and awareness of advanced process are necessary to be an effective designer. • Engineering mechanics – Decisions on part geometry and material affect the structural performance of the parts (e.g. stress, deflection, buckling load, natural frequency, etc.) Designers need to understand if their design will be able to meet the specified requirements. Therefore, timely evaluation is needed for designers to perform analysis using hand calculations and
. Time Management (1) 8. Importance of Documentation (1) 9. Overall planning and implementation of a project (1)Another question, provided the participants with a list of benefits of research experiences to rankorder. The results are presented in Table 6. From these results, it is observed that the mostbeneficial experiences were identified as: (1) Learning and developing CAD skills, and (2)Learning about the challenges of implementing analytical designs. Other benefits included,understanding the research process, understanding engineering design, development of teamworkskills, and learning to work with suppliers. The students identified the learning of experimentaltechniques as the least beneficial learning experience. Other learning
August 15, 1999 Table 3. UA B.S. Industrial Engineering Program Educational Objectives with Linkage to Program OutcomesGraduates should demonstrate/possess:1. An understanding of the mathematical and scientific foundations of industrial engineering as well as the ability to apply this foundation material to engineering problems. (a), (e), (k), (l), (m)2. The ability to apply an engineering design methodology to unstructured problems and to evaluate alternative solutions in the broader context of an organization or society. (c), (e), (h), (j), (n)3. The ability to plan and conduct
Engineering, manages theadministrative aspect of all projects. Design projects that could be completedwithin an academic-year are recruited from local industries by the Project Centerpersonnel and the department’s design coordinator (ie. the instructor of the seniordesign sequence) in summer and early fall prior to the beginning of the academic Page 12.1190.2year. Teams of three to four students work under the direction of a companyliaison and a faculty advisor to solve a real life engineering problem.Teams spend the fall quarter meeting with the sponsoring company liaison(s) andthe faculty advisor, visiting the project site (if applicable), understanding theoverall
interdisciplinarychallenges in their courses, or 3) approach design instruction in a more consistent, scholarly orphilosophic way. As educators, we often show students how to do individual problems step bystep, and find the one right solution but significantly less in helping them to develop the skillsand knowledge needed to view a problem from multiple perspectives, understand the relationshipof creativity to engineering design and employ these in ill-structured problems.Möjligheter provide a framework for exploring both needs (problems) and benefits (value). Inthis paper, we argue how engineering faculty should instead, show how creativity can be used inthe service of constrained, if ill-structured, projects, requires collaboration, and ultimately allowsstudents
and academic research.Because the quality of solutions can vary from individual to individual and from circumstance tocircumstance, it would be useful to better understand how different interventions influence theoutcomes of the ideation process in the concept generation stage of engineering design. In thiswork, we investigated the impacts of the problem context and three specific interventionsdesigned to increase the ideation flexibility for the outcomes of concept generation. The threeinterventions were problem framing, design tools, and teaming. Our results show that bothproblem framing and teaming impact several aspects of quality, while design tools only impactthe quantity of ideas produced.1.0 IntroductionThis paper investigates
. Page 25.1285.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Mapping the Development of Design for XAbstractThis paper uses a historical case study to propose a preliminary, generalized understanding ofhow DfXs may develop. Engineering design guidelines, also known as Design For X or DfX areused by engineers to better the outcome of their design process with respect to the X in question.For example, Design for Safety is a common DfX, used to ensure an engineer’s final outputminimizes the occurrence of harm to users. An exploration of how a recently emerged DfX,Design for the Environment (DfE), developed suggests a possible model for the emergence of aDfX.Historical records for the
thethis initiative is to expand the UAHuntsville Integrated Product Team (IPT) program into areahigh schools in order to help them develop a better understanding of the purpose of science andmathematics education by providing the opportunity to design a payload for a spacecraftdesigned by the UAHuntsville senior design experience. This initiative exposes high schoolstudents to the systems engineering design and integration process over the course of theacademic year. This year over 250 high school and college students are involved in the IPTprogram. The overarching goal of the program is to provide a broad impact across the spectrumof the educational system by establishing the foundation for a highly integrated design programthat links