causes. Design failures are, therefore, associated with oversight or error. 6. Human Errors – Factors due to human errors affecting and influencing the success or failure of a space mission are explored. Specifically, three important concepts, (i) Assembly Errors, (ii) Parts Manufacturing Errors, and (iii) Operator Errors are investigated and their effect on space missions’ success. Importance of proper documenting of design procedures, assembly and operational procedures are stressed. Critical issues with documentation of parts as well as testing and manufacturing data for various components are discussed. Consequences of such errors to space mission budget, schedule
, c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Paper ID #9815 Social Studies Research and Practice, the Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, Computers in the Schools, and Social Education. In addition, she has overseen the evaluation of numerous federally funded education programs, including the Teaching Amer- ican History grant in Durham and Franklin Counties (NC) and the education programs of the ASSIST NSF engineering research center at North Carolina State University.Mr. Tom Snyder, North Carolina State University Senior level manager with substantial
served as chair of manufacturing Systems Development Applications Department of IEEE/IAS. He authored more than 25 refereed journal and conference publications. In 2009, he as PI received NSF-CCLI grant entitled A Mechatronics Curriculum and Packaging Automation Laboratory Facility. In 2010, he as Co-PI received NSF-ATE grant entitled Meeting Workforce Needs for Mechatron- ics Technicians. From 2003 through 2006, he was involved with Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Ill., in developing direct computer control for hydrogen powered automotives. He is also involved in several direct computer control and wireless process control related research projects. His interests are in the area of industrial transducer
Urals State University and the Ph.D. in computer aided design systems in manufacturing from the Urals State Technical University (1981), Ekaterinburg, Russia. Dr. Verner is a certified teacher of mathematics and technology in Israel. His research interests include experiential and situated learning, cognitive and affective development, design projects and robotics. He is involved in organization of international robot competitions and guidance of school teams. Dr. Verner is an editorial board member of the International Journal Page 14.864.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2009
Page 15.405.8were tested different times in a day and different weather conditions. Some of the questionsbelow were assigned to students to learn air heating system in detail. The passive solar heatingsystem is shown in Figure 2. ≠ Does a solar air heater work at night? ≠ Can I mount the air collector upside down? ≠ What happens during the summer? ≠ Can I mount it horizontally? ≠ How long does the installation usually take? ≠ Where are the units manufactured? ≠ Will it produce heat on cloudy days? ≠ Is it better to use a 2 pack (solarsheat 1500G and 1500GS) or two stand alone units (2- 1500G units)? ≠ Do air heaters need to face true south and at a tilt angle 90 degrees to the sun?Figure 2. Passive
aerospace at Wentworth Institute of Technology.Dr. Gloria Guohua Ma, Wentworth Institute of Technology Gloria Ma is a Professor in the Mechanical Engineering program at Wentworth Institute of Technology. She is actively involved in community services of offering STEM workshops to middle- and high-school girls. Her research interests include dynamics and system modeling, geometry modeling, project based engineering design, and robotics in manufacturing, artificial intelligent in Manufacturing, and engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2025 WIP: Engineering History in the First-Year Engineering Experience CourseIntroductionEngineering is not just about designing and
an alternative fueled, hybrid electric vehicle. The project outcomes indicatedthat allowing students to participate in project-based helped students in the areas of interfacing,decision making and cooperation.Efforts by Macomb Community College and Wayne State University include an ATE-NSFproject Hybrid Electric Vehicle (HEV) curriculum to develop specialized HEV courses asreported by Yet et al13. Additional joint activities as reported by Rathod et al14 includes coursesin Energy Sources and Conversion, Control Systems for Vehicles, Fuel Cell Technology, HybridVehicle Technology, Applied Vehicle Dynamics and Advanced Manufacturing Processes.The US Government has been proactive in supporting new energy related curriculum and coursedevelopment
experiential, entrepreneurial, and innovative learning experiences within the school’s academic curriculum. He is a Woodruff School Teaching Fellow and strives to enhance education by developing classes, workshops, and events focused on implementing hands-on, collaborative learning through solving real-world problems. He directs the operations of the Institute-wide Georgia Tech Capstone Design Expo, which highlights projects created by over 2000 Georgia Tech seniors graduating students annually. He serves as the faculty advisor for the student organization of over 150 student volunteers who all train, staff, and manage the operations of Georgia Tech’s Flowers Invention Studio – one of the nation’s premier volunteer student
spring to provide a metric for the health of the programwith specific questions related to curriculum, facilities, and faculty. Comparing the relevantsurvey results for the seniors graduating in May 2010, just before the DOE grant began, to thosegraduating in May 2013 reveal significant increases in responses related to laboratories andoverall program satisfaction as shown in Table 1. Fig. 6. EE undergraduate (UG) and graduate (Grad) enrollment 2008 – 2015 Table 1: Senior Exit Survey Comparison (4-point scale) Statement 2010 2013 % Change The lab facilities are excellent. 2.6 3.3 +27% I would recommend this
Paper ID #36903Aesthetics and Engineering: A Path to TransformativeLearning and Professional ConfidenceHugh Ephraim Scribner Hugh is an undergraduate student at the University of Colorado Boulder studying mechanical engineering and applied mathematics. At CU he works under his advisors Professors Jean Hertzberg and Katherine Goodman to measure student affect and transformative learning experiences.Katherine Goodman Katherine Goodman is an assistant professor (teaching track) at the University of Colorado Denver. She serves as curriculum lead for Inworks, an interdisciplinary innovation lab within the College of
backgroundIt is known that engineers need to possess strong visualization and problem solving skills, yet the Page 24.835.2K-12 education system fails to implement visualization and practical problem solving lessonsinto the curriculum thereby decreasing interest in engineering and science. This problem isfurther compounded by the lack of hands-on extra-curricular activities that spark interest inscience and engineering while improving the troubleshooting and practical skills of the students.In fact, our young generations are mastering the usage of keyboards, mice, and touchscreensmore than their predecessors with disregard to machine shops skills
; Systems Engineering, and Civil Engineering from Ohio University, and B.S. in Industrial Engineering from Istanbul Technical University, Turkey. His re- search interests cover a variety of topics that include engineering education, applied optimization and simulation modeling, social, economic and environmental life cycle assessment, data analytics, engineer- ing education, energy and sustainability, input-output analysis, transportation sustainability and safety. Gokhan has over 50 peer-reviewed publications in prestigious academic journals, books, and conference proceedings related to sustainable development, life cycle assessment, manufacturing system design and control, supply chain management, transportation safety
manufacturing technology, product design, and engineering economics. He is a Registered Professional Engineer in Illinois and holds memberships in SPE and ASEE. Page 15.134.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Alumni Perceptions of Project Management InstructionAbstractAfter teaching a project-oriented capstone course several semesters, the author observed someteams failed to provide quality solutions for their semester-long, team-based project. The rootcause appeared to be poor project management skills. This prompted the author to considerasking alumni, who have demonstrated success leading teams in their
AC 2011-1159: COMPREHENSIVE COURSE REDESIGN: INTRODUC-TION TO THE MECHANICS OF MATERIALSJefferey E. Froyd, Texas A&M University Jeff Froyd is the Director of Faculty Climate and Development in the Office of the Dean of Faculties and Associate Provost at Texas A&M University. He served as Project Director for the Foundation Coalition, an NSF Engineering Education Coalition in which six institutions systematically renewed, assessed, and institutionalized their undergraduate engineering curricula, and extensively shared their results with the engineering education community. He co-created the Integrated, First-Year Curriculum in Science, Engi- neering and Mathematics at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology
Institute of Technology Amy R. Pritchett is the Davis S. Lewis Associate Professor in the Georgia Tech School of Aerospace Engineering c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Creating and Validating a Model to Support Aerospace Engineering Students’ Coordination of Knowledge about a DesignIntroductionAs a general field, design symbolizes the "conception and realisation of new things".1 However,engineering design differs from other design areas (e.g. graphic, industrial, and software design) in theenhanced complexity involved with clarifying and defining engineering products. Engineering designcan also be defined as a structured approach to developing, validating, and
≠ Industrial Tooling, Machines, Automation, Manufacturing≠ Industrial/Agricultural Equipment (graders, tractors, etc) ≠ Transportation≠ Systems Integrators ≠ IT Services (Technology)≠ Industrial Chemicals and Supplies ≠ Energy/Utilities≠ Contractors and HVAC SuppliersThe Industrial Engineering committee reviewed the companies that were hiring COE graduates for sales and marketing positions.Prior ISU graduates at these companies, or companies in similar industries, were asked to participate on an engineering salesadvisory board which would assist in developing the curriculum for the course. The industry advisory board, selected by
® manipulatives for teachinginquiry based STEM curriculum. The course began with a three-day summer workshop (Phase I)and continued through the school year with on-site support and Internet based educationalmodules (Phase II). This current study reports on the outcome of the Phase I three-day summerworkshop. Again the goals of this initiative were: increase participants’ preparation for teachingSTEM content; increase participants’ knowledge of STEM careers and in particular engineering;and increase participants’ understanding of how to teach using inquiry and manipulatives.Research QuestionsThe three research questions that guided our research were: 1. What were the relationships between years of teaching experience, levels of education, reported
: Competency Management Hall and LeCavalier (2000) define competency management as " individualized, Web-enabled curriculum maps or learning profiles based on job analyses" (p. 66). These maps orprofiles allow the learner to select and proceed toward an educational path by placing theresponsibility of learning in the student's hands. In lieu of pre-determined, static requirements,students would be allowed the opportunity to choose their path of study. As with traditional methods of education, rewards may be incorporated within thelearning process. One thought regarding rewards is to motivate the student through relevance topersonal activities or goals. The more applicable or interesting the subject matter is to the targetaudience, the
three aspects: theprogram overview, central program themes, and the curriculum system through interviews withdirectors of both programs.The results of this paper will present the directors’ outlooks of the ongoing programs in both atheoretical level (program vision and mission), and in an operating level (curriculum). Thereasons for the programs’ similarities and differences will be thoroughly discussed based on abroader and comprehensive international and educational background, in order to obtain a moreclear understanding and more rapid advancement of this kind of programs.IntroductionFirst-year Engineering Honors Programs (FEHPs) provide highly motivated, academicallyexcellent first-year engineering students with a broader, and more enriched
structures and engineering pedagogy.Dr. Lelli Van Den Einde, University of California San Diego Van Den Einde is a Teaching Professor in Structural Engineering at UCSD. She incorporates education in- novations into courses (Active Learning, Project-based learning), prepares next generation faculty through TA Training, serves as advisor to student organizations, and is committed to fostering a supportive en- vironment for diverse students. Her research focuses on engagement strategies for large classrooms and developing K-16 design-based curriculum in earthquake engineering and spatial visualization to support persistence.Dr. Nathan Delson, eGrove Education Nathan Delson, Ph.D. is a Senior Teaching Professor at the
. William ”Bill” C. Oakes, Purdue University, West Lafayette William (Bill) Oakes is the Director of the EPICS Program and one of the founding faculty members of the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. He has held courtesy appointments in Mechanical, Environmental and Ecological Engineering as well as Curriculum and Instruction in the College of Education. He is a registered professional engineer and on the NSPE board for Professional Engineers in Higher Education. He has been active in ASEE serving in the FPD, CIP and ERM. He is the past chair of the IN/IL section. He is a fellow of the Teaching Academy and listed in the Book of Great Teachers at Purdue University. He was the first engineering faculty
oriented and integrates severaldisciplines” when talking about benefits of robotics curriculum in STEM classrooms. Wedewardet al.6 do not directly mention the systematic nature of robotics in education while stating thattheir robot kit provides “a basis of studies in math, physics and computer programming”.Nordstrom et al.1 emphasize the multidisciplinary nature of robotics that “makes it a natural toolfor science and engineering education at many levels”. Weinberg et al.7 consider the possibilityand the growing popularity of using robotics in all disciplines including liberal arts studies, thushighlighting the systematic nature of robotics.An after-workshop questionnaire was employed in this study to obtain student perceptions andinterests in
knowledge can be applied to design a simple machinery. • Dr. Li’ workshops were on alternative and renewable energy, which coverd three most important renewable energy resources: hydroelectric power, solar power and wind power. This is the only subject area where CAD and 3D printing was not directly used. Yet energy is very important aspect in engineering field because no manufacturing is possible without energy. The workshop was to broaden the participating teachers’ horizon on the grand energy challenge the entire world is facing and will continue to face. Each week, the teachers worked with the LU curriculum specialist Dorothy Sisk, who isprofessor of teacher education, on applying their Engineering
. Introduction to Mechanical Engineering is a course thatintroduces mechanical and civil engineering students to the engineering college education andprofession. The challenge-based instruction (CBI) curriculum developed for Introduction toMechanical Engineering includes challenges, lecture and handout materials, hands-on activities,and assessment tools. CBI is a form of inquiry based learning which can be thought of asteaching backwards strategy. When implementing CBI, a challenge is presented first, and thesupporting theory required to solve the challenge is presented second. CBI was built around theHow People Learn (HPL) framework for effective learning environments and is realized andanchored by the STAR Legacy Cycle, as developed and fostered by
no largegeneral education requirement in German higher education. Students take a total of three free Page 25.40.4Classes: Semester: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8Math 6 6Chemistry 2 2Physics 2 2Statics and Dynamics 4 4Strength of Materials 4 4Geometry 2Material Science 2 3Machine Parts I 2 2Machine Parts II
Engineering Education Department and an Adjunct Pro- fessor in the Bioengineering Department in Utah State University. Her multiple roles as an engineer, engineering educator, engineering educational researcher, and professional development mentor for un- derrepresented populations has aided her in the design and integration of educational and physiological technologies to research ’best practices’ for student professional development and training. In addition, she is developing methodologies around hidden curriculum, academic emotions and physiology, and en- gineering makerspaces. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2019Understanding Industry’s Expectations of Engineering Communication
solutions. It is critical that engineers understand the broader societal impacts of their proposedsolutions and evaluate the tradeoffs between the value of technical work and the public good.However, many instructors find it difficult to effectively introduce sociotechnical concepts intofoundational engineering science courses [4]. Engineering education should seek to teach beyondtechnical practicalities and offer the valuable contexts of engineering in society. Core introductory courses in an engineering curriculum, including circuits,thermodynamics, and physics, address a wide range of technical topics that establish animportant foundation for more advanced courses. Besides providing preparation for futureclasses, these courses must
AC 2008-1062: INTEGRATION OF COMPUTER BASED PROBLEM SOLVINGINTO ENGINEERING CURRICULADianne Raubenheimer, North Carolina State University Dianne Raubenheimer is Director of Assessment in the College of Engineering and Adjunct Assistant Professor in the Department of Adult and Higher Education in the College of Education at NCSU. She has worked with faculty and administrators in Engineering for two years, and previously in the Science and Education disciplines. She has a background in teacher education, curriculum development and evaluation and has worked as an education consultant for a number of organizations in the USA and South Africa conducting program evaluations. She received a Ph.D
outcome, andthe potential benefits for future engineering education and research.In order to develop this new facility, we acquired the new equipment including an automaticstorage and retrieval system (AS/RS), an intelligent robot, open-architecture conveyor, aprogrammable logic controller and RFID module, and integrated them with the existingprocessing and testing equipment in house. Researchers and students can use this facility tocatalyze a wide range of cutting edge research projects spanning mechanical, industrial,manufacturing and electrical engineering and to renovate engineering curriculum to practice thetheme of the product life cycle in the subsequent effort. These include: (i) studying the impact ofRFID on integrated logistics from
Paper ID #47858WIP: Efficacy of Connecting Engineering and Calculus through AI ProblemGenerationDr. Jeffrey Stransky, Rochester Institute of Technology Dr. Jeffrey Stransky is an assistant professor at Rochester Institute of Technology with a joint appointment in the Department of Manufacturing and Mechanical Engineering Technology and the Dean’s office. His research interests include engineering ethics, use of educational simulations and games, and statistical modeling. Jeff obtained his PhD in Engineering Education from Rowan University in 2023, where he also obtained his MS in Mechanical Engineering in 2021. https