interdisciplinary STEM education by: • creating a peer-mentoring program between faculty and students in different STEM disciplines. • implementing rigorous assessment and survey tools to evaluate the success of the course during and after course activities.2. Enhance knowledge of Biomechanics and Biotransport for faculty by: • preparation of lectures, laboratories and student research presentations. • modifying existing STEM curriculum based on the need of the course.3. Develop and implement a course and curriculum changes to encourage Biomaterials as a minor program of study by: • developing a specialized course, Integrative Biomechanics and Biotransport course. • developing strong communication between faculty and students.4
both microstructureand composition. The third author researched creep strength in alloys with particular interest inwhether there were significant differences in creep performance between a lever arm apparatusand a direct load apparatus.As a result of the RET experience, we each developed a Legacy Cycle module (curriculum unit)that engaged our high school students in (1) a study of metals and ways to increase those metals’ability to withstand high ambient temperatures (in the context of an airplane crash investigation),and (2) a study of creep, stress, and strain tests and how to apply these tests to investigate theproperties of aluminum foil. These modules placed students in the role of an investigator andrequired them to become researchers
2006-723: DEVELOPING PERFORMANCE CRITERIA AND RUBRICS FORBIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING OUTCOME ASSESSMENTKay C Dee, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Kay C Dee is an Associate Professor of Applied Biology and Biomedical Engineering at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Her educational research interests include learning styles, teaching faculty about teaching, student evaluations of teaching, and assessment. Her teaching portfolio includes courses on: biology; biomaterials; cell-biomaterial interactions; cell and tissue mechanics; bioethics, science fiction, and tissue engineering; interdisciplinary engineering problem-solving; and teaching engineering
andmeaningful learning, including intentional design and sustained engagement over time (forexample, [12]–[14]). Starting three years ago, the authors, aware of the literature on professionaland faculty development, saw an opportunity to reimagine the program that is the subject of thismanuscript.There was limited documented history for the legacy program, mainly a record of participantsand their corresponding departments. There were no other assessment data. Conversations withtwo previous program administrators, program-affiliated faculty, prior student participants, andother affiliated administrators sketched a rough outline of the program’s strengths and how itmight also be improved. The reputation of the program was overall positive, and we
paper presents our current progress and core program activities of the CAPS program. Inparticular, we share our practices on recruitment process and mentor training program. Througha structured outreach, 12 CAPS scholars have been recruited (7 Hispanic and 6 female). Led by asocial psychologist who is also a Co-PI on the project, the training for faculty mentors focusedon increasing the awareness of the benefits of growth mindsets and developing a culturallyresponsive mentoring procedure. In Fall 2018, the inaugural semester, group and individualmentoring sessions have taken place following the culturally responsive mentoring strategy. Therest of the paper is organized as follows. Section 2 briefly summarizes the core activities of theCAPS
LionHELP. LionHELPhad two main goals; the first was to create a tool that would give students access to the samemental health resources as the faculty. The second was to create a replacement for the RedFolder that could live as a native app on each person’s smartphone to facilitate access at amoment’s notice.To develop this app, three students were selected to work with a faculty mentor. The studentswere majoring in either Computer Science or Software Engineering. To assist with thedevelopment and help steer the project, two outside experts were also enlisted. The first was afaculty member from the English department at the school who specializes in Englishcomposition and in creating inclusive content that can be understood by a variety of levels
Computer Science oversaw and coordinated allprojects, and six faculty members from computer and manufacturing engineering programsprovided direct supervision for the projects. The Chair had weekly classroom meetings withstudents in the senior project course, and bi-weekly meetings with the faculty supervisors. Thisexperience clearly indicated that in order to improve the multidisciplinary quality of the seniorprojects, students should be exposed to the engineering multidisciplinary project environmentprior to their senior year.Audience Introduction to Mechatronics is developed to be a project-based, first semester juniorlevel course. The course is designed to enhance the engineering related multidisciplinaryexperiences of students majoring
AC 2012-5275: DEVELOPING AND DESIGNING UNDERGRADUATE LAB-ORATORY WIRELESS SENSOR NETWORK EXERCISESDr. David Border, Bowling Green State University David A. Border, Ph.D., holds a principle research interest in electronic information systems. This field includes digital communication and networking and intelligent networked devices. His current work in- cludes wireless sensor networks. Prior research included work on signal bandwidth compression and signal specific data encoding techniques. His technology application interest includes networked systems. Typical teaching duties include junior- and senior-level courses in the Electronics and Computer Technol- ogy (ECT) program. Within this course set are the
Session 3553 Development of a Knowledge Based System for Advising Freshmen Engineering Students S. Keith Hargrove Tuskegee University College of Engineering, Architecture & Physical SciencesINTRODUCTIONOne of the greatest challenges faced by engineering faculty is balancing effectiveteaching, research, and service with time. Faculty are also responsible for advisingstudents to register for courses in the curriculum and other developmental matters.Probably the most neglected area in engineering education is advising, and researchindicates that advising
support access andopportunities for students to leverage, develop, and use their social capital. This study aims toanswer the following research question: 1. How do first-year engineering students utilize social capital resources in a cohort program?PositionalityWe present a group positionality statement to articulate the ways our individual experiencescame together to shape the choices made in this paper [14]. The research team was composed oftwo graduate students, an undergraduate student, and three faculty members at a western, landgrant, predominantly white institution. The first author who led the analysis and reporting of theresearch brings the unique experience of being a mixed-ethnicity woman in engineering. Thesecond through
and Penn State.PMT Associate DegreeMAGLEV, Inc., CCAC and Penn State University began the development of a unique associatedegree in 2004. It was determined that each group had unique capabilities and that the optimumapproach was for each organization to do what they do best. CCAC would develop the courses forthe first three semesters. MAGLEV engineers would develop with Penn State faculty six PMTcourses for the fourth semester. Penn State would obtain PSU Faculty Senate approval andMAGLEV engineers and Penn State faculty would teach the six courses at the MAGLEVmanufacturing facility. During their first three semesters, students will build expertise infoundational classes such as physics, statistics, algebra, and dynamics, which they take at
. Here, he encourages and supports the use of ARM in universities in myriad ways, including curricu- lum development and migration, technical guest lectures, hands-on workshops, faculty training, technical support, and facilitation of research ties. Page 23.207.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 The ARM Developer Day: Engaging Engineering Students through Industry-relevant Hands-On WorkshopsAbstractThe annual ARM Developer Day at the Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT) is a uniqueevent offered to engineering students and faculty on campus
Technology program are secondary appointments. Adjunct instructors from industry and otherinstitutions also serve as program faculty in Management of Technology.DESCRIPTIONS OF UNDERGRADUATE MANAGEMENT OF TECHNOLOGYCOURSESMT 214. Technology, Business, and Public Policy. Technology, business, and public policiesstudied through the development of conceptual frameworks and their application to case studies.Examines the development of current technologies, their related industrial organizations, emergingtechnologies, and impact on business. Prerequisite: sophomore standing or above or consent ofinstructor.MT 215. Introduction to Management of Technology. A study of the problems encountered bymanagers in the planning
response to theneeds of the maritime stakeholders from military, government and industry, Old DominionUniversity is expanding its faculty, research, curriculum, facilities infrastructure, and studentengagement programs.This paper discusses Old Dominion University’s distance learning curriculum for marineengineering education. This initiative is being carried out in response to industry and Navydemand to maintain a professional marine engineering workforce, such as reported by theNational Shipbuilding Research Program [1], and complements Old Dominion University’s highrate of success in distance learning and marine engineering education over the past 15 years.Prior to 2016, two marine engineering courses were developed for, and launched in, a
faculty enhancement activities.IntroductionVacuum systems are used in virtually every functional area of a wafer fab to create theproper processing environments for semiconductor manufacturing processes. Because ofthe pervasive of vacuum technology in the wafer fab, most two-year, associate degreecurricula require at least one course in vacuum technology. Unfortunately, support fortechnology level courses in this area are lacking in terms of textbooks, vacuum trainingsystems, and laboratory manuals.In 1995, Portland Community College, with funding from the National Science Founda-tion, began development of a generic vacuum technology course and supporting labora-tory.1 A team of community college faculty and industry experts was formed and
the Educational Research and Methods Division of ASEE. She founded the Center for Research on Learning and Teaching in Engineering at U-M in 2003 and served as its Director for 12 years. Prior to joining U-M, Dr. Finelli was the Richard L. Terrell Professor of Excellence in Teaching, founding director of the Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning, and Associate Professor of Electrical Engineering at Kettering University. Dr. Finelli’s current research interests include student resistance to active learning, faculty adoption of evidence-based teaching practices, and the use of technology and innovative pedagogies on student learn- ing and success. She also led a project to develop a taxonomy for the field of
by accreditation requirements5 and other factors, faculty have better definedthe need, developed materials, and introduced these topics to undergraduate engineering studentsacross the United States. Much less material, however, is available to assist in developing anengineering graduate student’s understanding of “academic” ethics involved in teaching andresearch.Researchers, such as Steneck,6 stress the importance of including topics of engineering ethics incourses across the curriculum, but few researchers have outlined specific suggestions forincluding ethics at the graduate level (there are exceptions – see Vollmer and Hall’s work7). Yet,graduate students, who stand at the doorway to future careers as high-level engineers andresearchers
. Page 23.79.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2013 A NEW COURSE ON PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT FOR ELECTRONICS ENGINEERING TECHNOLOGYIntroduction College-level engineering and technology programs across the US have beenexperiencing decreasing enrollments for the past several years.1 This has not only been anissue for the Electronics Engineering Technology program at Texas A&M University but it is animportant problem for the United States in terms of developing a new generation of innovators.One reason that our faculty has identified with decreasing enrollment has been an inability tointerest young men and women through traditional engineering “selling points
, particularly senior faculty, persists in many fields across the United States as well as other countries13-15,and is evenmore pronounced for women of minority racial and ethnic backgrounds16-18. Furthermore,foreign female professors can face additional challenges19.Gendered dimensions of academic careers, on the other hand, are well documented in a largebody of literature that has repeatedly identified numerous challenges for female academics(e.g.,20) including lack of professional development and mentoring, gender discriminationand biases related to behavior and competence, and gendered socialization21-25. Variouslenses have been used to explain women’s underrepresentation in academia. For example,human capital, socialization, culture and privilege
higher education and improve learning outcomes. Her research to date has focused on educational designs that emphasize learner ini- tiative and agency through inquiry or problem-based learning in formal and informal learning contexts. She has published several papers on the characteristics of learning environments that support or constrain opportunities for any students (including those from non-dominant backgrounds) to participate in key science and engineering process skills such as scientific argumentation. Her work is largely informed by the principles and perspectives on human development and cognition articulated by Cultural Historical Activity Theory. Putting theory into practice, she teaches a service-learning
sustainable,assessment plans must make efficient use of faculty time. This paper will presentstrategies for collecting assessment data that serves multiple purposes beyondaccreditation, using the Rowan University Junior/Senior Engineering Clinic as anexample.The Rowan University Junior/Senior Engineering Clinic is a multidisciplinary, project-based course required for engineering students in all disciplines. Students solve realengineering research and design problems, many of which are sponsored by localindustry. Because each clinic project is unique, grading student work and maintainingapproximately uniform expectations across all projects is a significant challenge. At thesame time, the Clinic is the course within the Rowan Engineering curriculum
workshops and services that cater to the needs of STEM students andfaculty throughout the research lifecycle,33-34 as well as developing fun extra-curricularprogramming to encourage STEM students and researchers to visit the physical library.35-36While getting engineers into the library remains a challenge, studies continue to confirm thatgraduate students and faculty in science and engineering frequently use online libraryresources,37-38 and Soria determined that undergraduate students conducting research or pursuingcareers in science, technology, or health affairs were more likely than their peers to view havingaccess to a world-class library as important to their success.39Consequently, we suspect that engineers’ and scientists’ low use of
, she employs active learning techniques and project-based learning. Her previous education research, also at Stanford, focused on the role of cultural capital in science education. Her current interests include en- gineering students’ development of social responsibility and the impact of students’ backgrounds in their formation as engineers. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Formative Peer Assessment of TeachingIntroductionTeaching assessment in American institutions of higher education is often viewed as a high-stakes endeavor with the potential to impact faculty promotion and tenure decisions. Despite theimportant role teaching assessment plays in a
education. At Michigan Technological University (Michigan Tech),we had three different groups (faculty, graduate students and upper level undergraduate students)develop design activities. These activities were developed for the ENG1001/1100 coursesequence for first-year students who were enrolled in pre-calculus as their first math course atMichigan Tech as part of an NSF CCLI Phase 1 grant (DUE: 0836861). All groups developedengineering activities that included a: Design/Model/Build sequence, Matlab mathematicalmodel, spreadsheet analyses, and technical communication of their activities. For thecomponents listed previously, lectures and class activities, project description and deliverablesand example Matlab codes were developed for the
and Usability Testing lab (ETUT) at VT. He is affiliated with the Center for Human Computer Interaction and the Institute for Creativity in Art and Technology, as a participating faculty member and researcher. His current research areas investigate the intersection of perception and usability evaluation methodologies utilizing multiple data-streams including eye tracking, qualitative data and facial reading. Additionally his lab is exploring new participatory design methods within Human Centered Design which create novel inter-disciplinary knowledge. His lab is currently developing an instrument system designers can utilize during the iterative phases of design to assure positive affective interactions as well as
Session 3675 STAYING ABREAST OF PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENTS ‘The A & E Profession in Transition’ Daniel Davis University of Hartford, Ward College of Technology ABSTRACT The architecture and engineering profession is facing a whirlwind of change and it is achallenge for faculty members to keep abreast of these developments. According to the NationalUniversity Continuing Education Association, even slower paced technical fields are reinventingthemselves at least once a decade. What is the best way for faculty to monitor and
AC 2010-1520: PRAXIS-ORIENTED ENGINEERING EDUCATION IN VEHICLETECHNOLOGY STUDIES - CHALLENGES AND SOLUTIONSEmilia Bratschitsch, Joanneum University of Applied SciencesAnnette Casey, Joanneum University of Applied Sciences Page 15.967.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2010 Praxis-Oriented Engineering Education in Vehicle Technology Studies - Challenges and SolutionsAbstractUniversities of applied sciences have to fulfil two main requirements: They should providepraxis-oriented education and engage in applied research and development .The approach used to meet these requirements at our department of Vehicle Technology canbe
receive training, mentoring, and feedback from faculty about theirteaching have been found to demonstrate higher self-esteem in their teaching abilities andto provide higher quality instruction within undergraduate courses. Graduate teachingassistant training courses range from campus-wide initiatives, with more organizationaland administrative focuses and purely decontextualized teaching methods courses, tocontent-based discipline specific modules. Since engineering graduate teachingassistants’ have training needs specific to their teaching responsibilities, courses focusingon pedagogy within engineering are desired.This paper describes the development of a pedagogically-focused engineering educationcourse based on elements of the “How People
through the curriculum is being conducted. The information helped to identify a needfor cross-disciplinary engagement, create draft global learning outcomes consistent with ASCE'sBOK Professional Outcomes, and create preliminary ideas for a professional development planfor the faculty to support improved global learning.IntroductionAs globalization has expanded, the need has arisen for civil engineers to be able to designinfrastructure considering a systems perspective, especially those able to transcend technicalconcerns and consider cross-cultural factors.1 The ASCE BOK2 captures the essence of this needin an array of civil engineering education student learning outcomes. The BOK2 is organizedinto three broad areas: foundational, technical, and
campusstudents. The remote candidates must, however, attend three weeklong residencies on campus tograduate.This paper will detail the types of activities that can promote the development of an engagingdistance learning community through an analysis of the four cohorts enrolled to date. Surveysdistributed to a representative sample of distance students will be used to examine theexperiences that were most effective in fostering connections with faculty, staff, and otherstudents. Focal areas for assessment will include: community membership, key activities forrelationship building, sources of program support, and communication channels.IntroductionDistance learning provides a powerful mechanism by which nontraditional students can pursuetheir academic