at Purdue University, the Inaugural Director of the College of Engineering’s Leadership Minor, and the Director of the International Institute of Engineering Education Assessment (i2e2a). In 2013, she be- came founder and owner of STEMinent LLC, a company focused on STEM education assessment and professional development for stakeholders in K-12 education, higher education, and Corporate America. Her research is focused upon the use of mixed methodologies to explore significant research questions in undergraduate, graduate, and professional engineering education, to integrate concepts from higher edu- cation and learning science into engineering education, and to develop and disseminate reliable and valid
Paper ID #14106Automated Identification of Terminological Dissonance in IT and adjacentfieldsMs. Jessica Richards, BYU Graduate student in Information Technology with a background of interdisciplinary work between com- puting and media fields. Highly interested in streamlining the collaborating of technical and creative minds.Joseph J Ekstrom, Brigham Young University Dr. Ekstrom spent more than 30 years in industry as a software developer, technical manager, and en- trepreneur. In 2001 he helped initiate the IT program at BYU. He was the Program Chair of the Informa- tion Technology program from 2007-2013. His research
and increasedopportunity for multidisciplinary projects. It emphasized the need for upperclass students to begiven a greater opportunity to develop skills in problem formulation, problem solving, andcontextual presentation of engineering topics. These changes are intended to better preparestudents for the environment that they will experience following graduation, whether that beprofessional practice, graduate studies, or other opportunities.One specific recommendation developed as part of this strategic plan was: “Design and build a new Learning Center to support innovative teaching and learning activities.”To foster and support the adoption of a student-centered learning environment, a major initiativewas the development of
for prototyping, the ability to iterate designs quickly, as well asdeveloping some of the teamwork and workplace professionalism skills associated with projectwork typically found in industry.Freshman and sophomores studying engineering benefit a great deal when they network andbond through the shared experiences of project work. Community college students, in particular,exhibit improved retention and graduation rates as a result of building a shared sense ofcommunity [3], [4]. With their commuting status and typically heavy part-time job workload,community college students don’t often socialize outside of class, which leads to isolation bothsocially and academically. Project based learning can help this by promoting a student’s sense ofself
AC 2008-2253: FOLLOWING UP ON ENGINEERS OF THE FUTURE (EOF)WORKSHOP MOMENTUMStephanie Goldberg, Buffalo State College Stephanie Goldberg worked as a test engineer for 10 years prior to joining Buffalo State College's Engineering Technology faculty. Courses taught include Digital Electronics, Microcontrollers, Analog Circuits, DC and AC Electrical Circuits.Paul Siciliano, Buffalo State College Paul Siciliano’s expertise is in multidisciplinary studies focusing on Art, Design and Technology. His teaching includes work with learners of all ages and ability levels, with certifications in elementary, special, industrial arts, and gifted education. He has taught psychology, special
innovation tools and systems. Prior to joining Rose-Hulman, he was a company co-founder and Chief Operating Officer of Montronix, a company in the global machine monitoring industry. Bill is a Phi Beta Kappa graduate of Illinois College and a Bronze Tablet graduate of University of Illinois at Urbana Champaign where he received a Ph.D. degree in Mechanical Engineering.Dr. Cory Hixson, Rowan University Cory is currently an Assistant Professor of Experiential Engineering Education (ExEEd) at Rowan Uni- versity. He earned his B.S. in Engineering Science (2007), M.S. in Industrial and System Engineering (2014) and Ph.D. in Engineering Education (2016). Cory has experience as both a professional engi- neer and high school
Paper ID #6115Using Scale Models to Promote Technological LiteracyDr. William R Loendorf, Eastern Washington University William R. Loendorf is a Full Professor Emeritus of Engineering & Design at Eastern Washington Uni- versity. He obtained his B.Sc. in Engineering Science at the University of Wisconsin - Parkside, M.S. in Electrical Engineering at Colorado State University, M.B.A. at the Lake Forest Graduate School of Management, and Ph.D. in Engineering Management at Walden University. He holds a Professional En- gineer license and has 30 years of industrial experience as an Engineer or Engineering Manager at General
veteran, characterized it as “running on a treadmill and breathingthrough a straw” [30]. For those who attempt to summit without supplemental oxygen, a feataccomplished in 1978 by Reinhold Messner and Peter Habeler, simply breathing is an exhaustingactivity. Notes Messner, he felt like “nothing more than a single narrow gasping lung, floatingover the mists and summits” as he literally crawled to the summit [31].Climbers die every season, and although reported numbers tend to vary, about 300 have perishedin the past six decades [32], primarily in the Death Zone and on descent. About one-third areSherpas [33]. A 2008 study by Massachusetts General Hospital researchers concluded that thehighest percentage of deaths is the result of cerebral edema
Paper ID #32628Teaching Materials Science Labs Online AsynchronouslyDr. Surendra ”Vinnie” K. Gupta, Rochester Institute of Technology (COE) ”Vinnie” Gupta is a professor of mechanical engineering, and a member of the graduate faculty of ma- terials science and engineering at the Rochester Institute of Technology (RIT), Rochester, NY. He is a recipient of the 2014 Robert G. Quinn Award from ASEE, and the 2000 Eisenhart Award for Outstanding Teaching. At RIT, he teaches undergraduate and graduate courses in applied mechanics, computational techniques, and materials science. American
Graduate School, School, Industry M.S. and Ph. Ph.D. College of Engineering Fintite Elemets Method Towards Graduation Dynamics Mechanics of Materials
AC 2008-1700: OUTCOMES ASSESSMENT IN A HANDS-ON MANUFACTURINGPROCESSES COURSEMukasa Ssemakula, Wayne State University Page 13.958.1© American Society for Engineering Education, 2008 Outcomes Assessment in a Hands-On Manufacturing Processes CourseAbstractIndustry has consistently identified lack of experience in manufacturing processes as one of thekey competency gaps among new engineering graduates. This paper will discuss a laboratory-based Manufacturing Processes course that provides hands-on manufacturing experience tostudents. In addition to standard theoretical concepts, the course uses team-based projects thathelp students gain hands-on experience with selected
classified as multidisciplinary (i.e., with programnames that are judged not to be “disciplinary” names). The current roster assigned to ASEE forprogram accreditation under that heading includes 69 institutions offering 72 accreditedprograms. These numbers are likely to change annually as any institution may not seek re-accreditation of a presently listed program or may in fact terminate the program and, on the otherside, institutions may present new programs for accreditation upon graduation of their firststudents(s) or anytime thereafter.In this multidisciplinary engineering program analysis, the following five groups of accreditedmultidisciplinary engineering programs are identified from the current ABET website listing.There are 34 Engineering
amultidisciplinary graduate program in Biomedical Engineering by attracting specialized facultyacross different departments, such as electrical engineering, mechanical engineering andcomputer science.The CS and EE programs are structured to have, at the senior level, several elective courses thathelp the students specialize within their disciplines. Our hypothesis is that we might attract morestudents into the biomedical field by applying existing skills from the original programs. Theproposed course is considered a special topics class but might be adopted permanently if wecould offer it successfully for several semesters. This is also available as an option for thegraduate programs
, control logic implementation inLabVIEW software, and wood/metal work in departmental shop. These projects were carriedout during the final four weeks of the semester after eleven weeks of lecture/laboratory sessions.IntroductionThe ability to conduct and design experiments is rated as one of the most desirable technicalskills of engineering and engineering technology graduates1. Specifically, the referenced surveyindicates that employers want graduates with a working knowledge of data acquisition, analysisand interpretation; and an ability to formulate a range of alternative problem solutions.Additionally, potential employers of our EET graduates are in the automated manufacturing andtesting sector of the industry; and that motivated the creation
2006-728: INNOVATIVE TEACHING OF FOURIER SERIES USING LABVIEWPeter Avitabile, University of Massachusetts-Lowell Peter Avitabile is an Associate Professor in the Mechanical Engineering Department and the Director of the Modal Analysis and Controls Laboratory at the University of Massachusetts Lowell. He is a Registered Professional Engineer with a BS, MS and Doctorate in Mechanical Engineering and a member of ASEE, ASME and SEM.Jeffrey Hodgkins, University of Massachusetts-Lowell Jeff Hodgkins is a Graduate Student in the Mechanical Engineering Department at the University of Massachusetts. He is currently working on his Master’s Degree in the Modal Analysis and Controls Laboratory
linked SCIENCE NOTES. Guidance notes inblue help with any difficult step.Each Micro-project has an attached Discussion Point – a challenge to go further. TheDiscussion Point poses a question linked to or arising from the micro-project. Responding tothe Discussion point requires independent thought and research, takes longer, but isrewarding if followed. It is an add-on for more advanced study.Each Micro-project and its Discussion point has a fully worked Specimen Response,available to the instructor.Topics have been picked to be of interest to first year students and cover a wide range oftopics. The authors have worked with recent graduates to test an initial set of Micro Projects,refine them and build up the following current set of 14
solidbackground in. In addition, communication and problem-solving skills are important.As many 4- year Engineering Technology graduates plan to take jobs in the design area, Page 12.1538.2many students use the experience gained in the classroom through taking CAD and SolidModeling courses early in their academic careers to obtain entry level drafting position orinternships. Since many employers pay for continuing education drafting has become agate way job for student continuing with their education to become engineeringtechnicians or engineers.CADD systems have become more powerful and easier to use also and has limited thedemand for highly skilled drafters as
AC 2008-420: EXPERIENCES WITH THE DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT OF ANOVEL RAPID PRODUCT MANUFACTURING TECHNIQUE IN THE BATCHPRODUCTION OF MINIATURE INDUSTRIAL COMPONENTS.Immanuel Edinbarough, The University of Texas at Brownsville Immanuel Edinbarough is a Professor in the Department of Applied Engineering Technology at the University of Texas at Brownsville, Brownsville, Texas, USA. He received his Ph.D. in Mechanical Engineering from the Bharathiar University, Coimbatore, India in 1996. Dr. Edinbarough has several years of industry experience. He has taught at the Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, NY before joining the University of Texas at Brownsville. His teaching and research interests are in
for exposure depends on thesituation. Some schools will use a few engineering lessons that have been developed byengineering graduate students while other schools will use lessons and “hands-on” activities thatare commercially available. However, there are a few elementary schools throughout thecountry that are developing their entire curriculum using engineering themes. Two examplesinclude, Douglas L. Jamerson, Jr. Elementary School in St. Petersburg, Florida, which has anengineering based curriculum that is in its third year of use, and Martha and Josh Morriss Mathand Engineering Elementary School in Texarkana, Texas, which is scheduled to open its doorsthis fall. In both of these situations, the school districts are supporting and
with employment opportunities to support their studies and also becausesome may seek to pursue academic careers and it is felt that the labs provide a viable trainingopportunity for them. These students frequently have very little, if any, previous teachingexperience and although they may know the subject matter well, they cannot necessarily teach itwell. A less than perfect command of the English language in respect of international graduatestudents can also be a factor.A common scenario is that 7/8 different graduate students are engaged to teach approximately 11lab sections and the combination of factors outlined above frequently means that there isconsiderable variability in teaching quality and thus in the educational experience of the
Paper ID #10255Intercollegiate Student Design Projects: Lessons Learned by Four Universi-tiesProf. Nassif E Rayess, University of Detroit MercyDr. Brian A Garner, Baylor University Dr. Brian A.Garner is an Associate Professor in Mechanical Engineering at Baylor University. He re- ceived his PhD in ME from the University of Texas at Austin in 1998, and joined the Baylor faculty in 2002. His research interests include computer modeling of the human musculoskeletal system, algorithms for human motion analysis, biomechanics of equine assisted therapies, and design of therapy assistance devices. His teaching includes capstone
. Students and Graduates An engineering technology program must demonstrate that graduates have: a. an appropriate mastery of the knowledge, techniques, skills and modern tools of their disciplines, b. an ability to apply current knowledge and adapt to emerging applications of mathematics, science, engineering and technology, c. an ability to conduct, analyze and interpret experiments and apply experimental results to improve processes, d. an ability to apply creativity in the design of systems, components or processes appropriate to program objectives, e. an ability to function effectively on teams, f. an ability to
one science tour (this change had little effect on theoverall distribution of attendance, but provided more flexibility to a minority of students.) Beforethe tours begin, other course elements help students to narrow their choices down to a fewdepartments that most interest them. The tours then provide an opportunity to see a program inits own element—with its faculty, graduate and undergraduate students, and its facilities. Tours Page 8.1239.1 Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright © 2003, American Society for Engineering Educationare
communication and was giventhe task of managing an outside organization composed of professionals. Nepotism mayhave been the only qualification for the customer to have their position.The students were reminded that they would have to create a product based on theinformation received from the customer—and the customer was often unwilling or unableto supply enough detail. This required that the team research the problem, the industry andthe solution space to complete the task at hand. These harsh lessons in reality wereconsidered one of the highlights of what the student teams learned in the course.Course Methodology Page 8.347.2This course was taught in a
Session 2793 Distance Learning: A Multimedia Approach Graham Walker, Paul Marnell, and Richard Heist Mechanical Engineering / Chemical Engineering / Chemical Engineering Manhattan College, Riverdale, NY 10471IntroductionMany of the industrial advisors to the Engineering School at Manhattan College have indicatedover the years that they would like to improve the education level of their workforce by allowingthem to study for a Master’s degree. However, in many of these cases it has been difficult toachieve this because of work constraints on the employees. This was
where real students suffer the consequences. Seymour andHewitt1 concluded in a study of 355 students at seven institutions that poor teaching (inadequateorganization, ineffective presentation, inaccessible faculty) was the most common studentcomplaint and was a cause for many to leave math, science and engineering programs. Inresponse to the clear need for faculty training, the American Society of Civil Engineers hasdeveloped the ExCEEd (Excellence in Civil Engineering Education) Teaching Workshop (ETW)which is entering its third year of existence. The ETW was developed from the TeachingTeachers To Teach Engineering (T4E) originated at United States Military Academy (USMA)and sponsored by the National Science Foundation2. In 1999, a group of
enrolled in Electrical Engineering Technology (Networking Option) BS degree program • 8 students enrolled in Electrical Engineering Technology BS degree program • 3 students majoring in Computer science and/or Information system • 3 students enrolled as distance learners currently studying in the Civil Engineering graduate program at Purdue University • 1 practicing engineer with a need to broaden his knowledge in this areaIn addition to homework, laboratories and tests, a course project (with 2 to 3 studentsforming a team) or comprehensive final exam is required for the completion of thecourse. The majority of students selected the term project option, while only two chosethe final exam. Examples of final projects are
andrelated issues.Bibliography1. SME. (1997). Manufacturing Education Plan: Phase I Report. Dearborn, MI: Society of Manufacturing Engineers.2. http://www.sigmazone.com/doekiss.htm (Accessed January 8, 2002).CHARLENE A. YAUCHCharlene A. Yauch is an assistant professor at Oklahoma State University. She received her M.S. (Sociology, Mfg.Systems Engineering) and Ph.D. (Industrial Engineering) degrees from the University of Wisconsin -Madison and aB.S.I.E. from Purdue University. She is a licensed professional engineer with over 6 years of industry experience.In addition to research on implementing new manufacturing systems, she currently teaches a graduate course onmanagement of cellular manufacturing systems and an undergraduate courses on
basic manufacturing processes, but he had noexperience in assembling them into a production process with only product specifications to guidehim. She understood tolerances but didn't have the experience needed to place tolerances on ablueprint in a manner that permitted cost-effective manufacturing. The faculty of the PurdueUniversity Mechanical Engineering Technology Department determined that they could do a betterjob of providing practical application of organization, synthesis, and analysis skills to engineeringtechnology graduates. A Mechanical Design course was therefore introduced into the Mechanical EngineeringTechnology curriculum at Purdue University and taught for the first time in the Fall of 1997. Itrepresents a cross-disciplinary
text book, yet with distinct learning objectives tailored to satisfy theneeds of their individual programs. The author has taught Strength of Materials to classesdesigned exclusively for EN students, exclusively for ET students, and designed for a mix of ENand ET students. This past year he has developed and implemented Strength of Materials PSIcourses for both EN and ET students based on separate agendas of learning objectives, and isnow in a position to combine both courses in the same classroom.IntroductionMy third teaching assignment as a graduate student was a course in Strength of Materials, whichwas a core requirement for all EAC-ABET Engineering (EN) programs within the College ofEngineering and Technology at a western university. It