Minneapolis, MN
August 23, 2022
June 26, 2022
June 29, 2022
Engineering Ethics Division: Approaches to Ethics Education (Part 3, Nature and Environment)
26
10.18260/1-2--40415
https://peer.asee.org/40415
1811
Marilyn Dyrud retired in 2017 as a professor
emerita in the Communication Department at
Oregon Institute of Technology, where she taught classes in writing, speech, rhetoric, and ethics for four decades. She has been a member of ASEE since 1983 and is active in two divisions: Engineering Ethics and Engineering Technology.
She is an ASEE fellow (2008), winner of the James
McGraw Award (2010), winner of the Berger
Award (2013), the communications editor of
the Journal of Engineering Technology, and the ETD mini-grant coordinator.
“Because it’s there,” George Mallory famously responded in 1923 to the question “Why climb Mount Everest?” posed by New York Times reporters. The next year, he and climbing partner Andrew “Sandy” Irvine walked into the clouds of Mount Everest and vanished for 75 years: his remains were discovered in 1999, sans evidence that he had reached the summit, and Irvine has yet to be located. Despite their highly publicized demise, Mallory and Irvine’s heroic efforts did little to dissuade future adventurists; thousands of optimistic souls, now mostly members of commercial ventures, have since attempted to summit, with a significant mortality rate. Three decades later, New Zealand beekeeper Edmund Hillary and Nepalese Sherpa Tenzing Norgay finally reached the top of the world, opening the floodgates. The deluge of climbers brings with them a mountain of supplies and support personnel, including Sherpa, porters and yaks, guides, cooks, medical staff. Summit seekers wend their way through four camps above Base Camp, shedding equipment as they climb: depleted oxygen canisters, tents, broken items, a variety of smaller detritus, and, of course, human waste, up to 14 tons per climbing season. As a result, Mount Everest, in addition to being the tallest peak in the world, is also the world’s highest garbage heap. It is a far cry from the awe-inspiring beauty Mallory, Irvine, and other climbers witnessed nearly a century ago. This paper will explore the complex issue of the environmental degradation of Mount Everest, focusing on ethical implications such as environmental stewardship and waste management, and offer suggestions for classroom implementation. Specifically, the paper will examine background, classroom suitability, problem definition, ethical considerations, and potential engineering solutions, such as the Mount Everest Biogas Project and a variety of retrieval/recycling efforts. Instructors in search of a unique and compelling ethics case should consider incorporating a module featuring the pollution of Mount Everest.
Dyrud, M. (2022, August), Polluting the Pristine: Using Mount Everest to Teach Environmental Ethics Paper presented at 2022 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Minneapolis, MN. 10.18260/1-2--40415
ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2022 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015