Paper ID #42061Board 361: Reframing Racial Equity Year 2: Examining Script of WhitenessDr. Diana A. Chen, University of San Diego Diana A. Chen, PhD is an Associate Professor and one of the founding faculty members of Integrated Engineering at the University of San Diego. She earned her BS in Engineering from Harvey Mudd College, and MS and PhD in Civil Engineering from Clemson University. In collaboration with colleagues, Dr. Chen is designing a new engineering curriculum to educate changemakers who understand that engineering is an inherently socio-technical activity. Her passion is studying and encouraging culture
defend theiranalysis. Although in some fields cases are analyzed individually, team solutions are mostcommon in engineering and business.What are cases?A case is a narrative account of a situation, problem, or decision usually derived from actualexperience. 5 Cases often reflect real world concerns, situations, and issues managers andengineers encounter in practice; they are often open-ended, with no clear-cut solution. Whichanswer is ``best'' depends on the relative importance one assigns to various criteria. In businessschools, cases frequently describe critical decision points in the history of a company. Inengineering, cases may provide an account of a problem, technical issue, ethical dilemma, ordesign challenge.Cases provide a context for
AC 2010-633: INTEGRATION OF ENGINEERING AND THE LIBERAL ARTS: ATWO-WAY STREETCherrice Traver, Union College Cherrice Traver received her BS in Physics from the State University of New York at Albany in 1982 and her PhD in Electrical Engineering from the University of Virginia in 1988. She has been a faculty member at Union College in the Electrical and Computer Engineering department since 1986, and has been the Dean of Engineering since 2005. Recently Dr. Traver has been involved in initiatives at the interface of engineering and the liberal arts. She has led two national symposia on Engineering and Liberal Education at Union College and she was General Chair for the 2008 Frontiers
department faculty increase their understanding ofthe issues facing underrepresented minorities in doctoral programs, identify and remedydepartmental practices that may be hindering URM student success, and examine and improvetheir own mentoring practices. The theoretical framework of the model is the Kezar and Eckelmodel of change for colleges and universities, which proposes five core elements: supportivesenior administration, collaborative leadership, robust project design, faculty development, andvisible actions [7].At the heart of the project are the Fellows, usually tenured faculty members in participatingSTEM departments who share a strong interest in URM student success, with contributions alsobeing made by other departmental faculty members
Reflections on Fifteen Years of Service-Learning Projects in Thailand Richard Vaz Worcester Polytechnic Institute.I. IntroductionWorcester Polytechnic Institute (WPI) provides international experiences for over 50% of itsengineering students, more than any other US-based university. As part of its internationalofferings, WPI has since 1989 been sending mixed teams of engineering, science, andmanagement students to Bangkok to complete 8-week interdisciplinary projects. These projectsconnect science or technology to social issues and human need, and have been sponsored by Thainonprofit organizations, government agencies
, “I feel comfortable asking forhelp or oversight from Faculty and TAs when planning my work or setting up new experiments.”; and“When I observe a potential safety issue, I feel comfortable raising or reporting safety issues to Facultyand TAs.”; and “I feel comfortable intervening with a colleague to prevent an unsafe behavior fromoccurring.”Response Scoring and AnalysisStudents recorded their responses using a Likert scale with ratings that ranged from Strongly Agree (1),Agree (2), Somewhat agree (3), Neither nor Disagree (4), Somewhat disagree (5), Disagree (6), StronglyDisagree (7). Responses were converted to numerical values (numbers in parentheses). A paired sample t-test was used to determine whether changes in perception were
improve a relationship that is at times lacking in trust and respect. Architectural and engineering educators have a vital interest in enhancing their industrialexperience, it would enrich the schools, support experience and sustain learning. Thoseeducators teaching professional courses should not only have currency in their fields but shouldalso be properly credentialed. Experience in the field would provide faculty with first-hand exposure to and knowledgeabout advanced and creative uses of technology, current trends and cycles that affect the industry,and prevailing professional developments. ADVANCED AND CREATIVE USES OF TECHNOLOGYTHE NEW PROFESSIONAL OFFICE LAYOUT: CHANGED BY THE COMPUTER In an effort
takencorrespondence courses or online courses while in the military, so they knew how to managetheir time and be self-directed learners. ADVs were receptive to the changes in instructionaldelivery but Hyflex should be flexible enough to accommodate their schedules as their personaland family lives were impacted by the pandemic as well. Hyflex models were already beingcommended within pedagogical research as the new normal before the Covid pandemic. Hyflexapproaches offer advantages to student learning and retention that are not present in traditionalteacher-centered classrooms [3].ConclusionDeveloping a better understanding of the ADV students’ motivations and concerns highlights afew issues of importance to the engineering education community as it
their 'complementary studies' requirement. "Besides," says one student, "I'venever seen anyone deal with these things during work experience." Other students in the groupnot their heads in agreement. "Yeah," says another student, "and companies aren't going to hire'tree-huggers' anyway."Many faculty members still maintain that, except for environmental engineering specialties, thereisn't time or space to fit environmental/sustainability issues into already densely-packed courses.Some maintain that these are issues for attention after students complete their basic education. Inany case, to quote one faculty member, "Sustainable development has nothing to do withengineering" (apparently it's a "policy issue").We disagree. In fact, we believe that
focus beyond the skillsand theory needed for laboratory work detracts from the focused nature of the program. In thiscontext, our ABET visit was used as a catalyst for change. Beyond the reflection engendered bythe process, following the visit one concern was that curricular limitations did not allow studentsto take a sufficient number of electives. This finding resulted in faculty more broadly looking atthe curriculum rather than just specific, focused changes in existing courses.The second and third factors—a new chair and young faculty—were simply coincidental since anew, external department chair had been hired less than two years before the ABET visit at atime when 70% of the faculty in the department had been at PALACE for less than a
course," in American Society for Enginieering Education(ASEE) 123rd Annual Conferecne and Exposition, New Orleans, LA, 2016.[16] K. A. Mazurek and G. J. Putz, "Discussion of "Summary of developments in the civilengineering capstone course at Purdue University" by Brock E. Barry, Vincent P. Drnevich,Ayhan Irfanoglu, and Darcy Bullock," Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Educationand Practice, vol. 138, pp. 314-314, Oct 2012.[17] B. Oakley, R. Brent, R. M. Felder, and I. Elhajj, "Turning student groups into effectiveteams," Journal of Student Centered Learning, vol. 2, pp. 9-34, 2004.[18] G. K. Watkins, "Best practices for faculty mentorship of capstone design projects," inProceedings of the 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition
convincedmany prospective students that an education in manufacturing is a waste of time.Members of both industry and academia are rethinking the roles of manufacturing engineers andthe specific education provided at American colleges. Their shared concern is for new graduatesthat are best prepared and positioned to succeed in the new global manufacturing environment.A need clearly exists to evolve the curricula for manufacturing engineers and to reevaluatecurrent educational strategies. Unfortunately, there are few forums available for experts in thefield to come together to talk specifically about how education can evolve for manufacturingengineering.Several efforts, however, are attempting to provide just such an opportunity. Of course theAmerican
human resource concern fororganizations across the globe. The much talked about talent crisis across companies and sectorsled to the development of talent management as a field in itself. Talent management, as coinedby McKinsey & Company in their famous article on “The War for Talent,” stressed theimportance of managing talent in organizations [1], [2]. The article also emphasized theimportance of managing talent in new ways as the key challenge and direction for the future fororganizations to sustain and survive [2]. Although talent management gained popularity over thelast decade along with the need for talent management in organizations escalating rapidly, verylittle has been done to address the specifics of talent management for
programs and shouldjustify more faculty lines and funding for the department. It is difficult to attract students andestablish such a service course. Using this course for majors as well as non-majors would ensureenrollment as the course is being established.Another option for consideration is to incorporate elements of technological literacy in coursesthroughout the curriculum. With this approach, it would not be necessary to make room for andstaff a new course. Instead of finding a faculty member who is prepared and willing to take onan entire course on technological literacy, many faculty members must be willing to allot time inexisting course for technological literacy issues. It is likely that these issues are already beingaddressed, albeit
opportunities, and to make the available service more visible to student consumers. ≠ In general, best results are achieved when advanced planning is conducted prior to adding support for a course. The planning includes tutor preparation and attention to technical issues. In addition, faculty concerns and special needs can be considered. If a student seeks tutoring and finds it lacking due to technical difficulties or unprepared tutors, the student is not likely to seek help again. The student may also broadcast negative information about the tutoring service to peers or faculty members. Once the reputation of an innovation is damaged in this way, it may be difficult to regroup and recover.Software/Technical
can be used in education in a creative and ethical way.Sidney Katherine Uy Tesy, Texas A&M University Sidney Katherine Uy Tesy is a second-year student at Texas A&M University’s College of Arts and Sciences, where she is pursuing a degree in Philosophy and Sociology (BA) and a minor in Psychology. She is a recipient of an Undergraduate Glasscock Scholarship, which has allowed her to engage in qualitative research on digital ethics, mobile apps, and social stigma, working alongside one her faculty mentors. Her research interests focuses on the intersection of technology and social institutions that concern education and legal systems.Dr. Kristi J. Shryock, Texas A&M University Dr. Kristi J. Shryock
“friendly environment”where the students can feel free to express their feelings and concerns in a non-classroom setting.To accomplish this we have designed small classes (10-15 students per mentor) that initiate aclose bond between the freshmen students and their mentor. There are similar programs that usefaculty instead of students [12], however, we felt that building a student/student relationshipwould be more valuable in solving the various transition issues. The classes are based upon acommon non-academic theme. The small class size and common interests increases theopportunity for a personal relationship to build between the freshmen and their mentor. Oncethis relationship is developed between the student and the mentor, we have found that
project, require some sort ofperiodic progress report or update. However, historically, there has been littlecoordination between faculty concerning the scope and format of these status reports. Inthe Fall 2003, every faculty member in the chemical engineering department requiredeach member of each clinic team to answer the following questions, in the form of awritten status report, every two weeks: 1. What issues are you having with the technical aspects of the project? Page 9.414.9Proceedings of the 2004 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright
participate in team-based activities. Developing faculty engagement toScrum Team membership and participation then requires other types of incentives anddisincentives. Identifying such alternatives is a major goal of this project. Preliminarydiscussions with faculty members suggest wide-ranging motivations from student success andteaching excellence to successful research funding and hiring grad students.Value proposition and the Product Owner Role. Other differences concern the notion of ProductOwner and the value associated with Product Backlog Items. In industry, the Product Ownerrepresents the enterprise and its customer to the Scrum Team, creating the Product BacklogInventory and prioritizing it by value. This role provides a quick turn around
substantial issues with thecontent of the coursework as the material did not appear as exploring what was considered ITcybersecurity. In this way, the department chair associated with CIT was prepared to block theproposal. After unprofessional behavior was displayed, a request was made to include the Deanin a future discussion.A meeting between the Dean and the two department chairs was held. Deep concerns wereexpressed that the CIT program must teach all material related to the concept of cybersecuritylest other academic programs on campus could also encroach on the territory. The HETMprogram director was not part of the conversation. As a result, the requisite medical deviceknowledge needed for course delivery was not raised. The result of the
example, we surveyed faculty to learn more about their understandingsand perspectives on active learning. We had a 56% response rate from the entire Mines faculty,so had a good representation of faculty perspectives. The survey and subsequent interviewswith faculty indicated that faculty knew “active learning” was something that they should betrying, but that they had little or no idea what active learning was, how to enact it, or what kindsof activities they should use to make their courses more active and to achieve the outcomes fortheir courses. Faculty were confused and looking for guidance on how to better design theircourses.The issue faced by our faculty of not being sure when and what kind of active learning isappropriate is mirrored in
challenge is to determine that “mix” and support its multiple components.Implementation should include significant, ongoing training of faculty and investment in serviceand support for students and faculty.Quality of Online EducationWith the proliferation of distance education, there has been a paradigm shift in higher educationover the past two decades. Academic institutions have offered online courses for studentsthrough various Learning Management Systems (LMS) and are still trying to expand onlinelearning offerings. However, regulators and accrediting bodies have raised some concerns aboutonline education, compared to on-ground face-to-face education. One of the biggest concernsresides in the quality of online instructions. There have been
placement of the projection screen, and fixingcommon computer issues, among a few others. Some of these concerns can be easily overlookedwhen priority is on integrating state-of-the-art technology rather than the actual needs of the end-users. When overlooked, these basic issues can considerably hinder the teaching and learningexperience, even on a brand new classroom with all the bells and whistles. Fixing these commonproblems, as a first step in the process of the initial design, is the essence behind the scalingdown before scaling up idea brought forth in this paper. With the scale down approach, one canmore accurately and effectively integrate new technologies to enhance the learning environmentand complement the teaching strategies of
key leadership positions. Dr. Matusovich is recognized for her research and leadership related to graduate student mentoring and faculty development. She won the Hokie Supervisor Spotlight Award in 2014, received the College of Engineering Graduate Student Mentor Award in 2018, and was inducted into the Virginia Tech Academy of Faculty Leadership in 2020. Dr. Matusovich has been a PI/Co-PI on 19 funded research projects including the NSF CAREER Award, with her share of funding being nearly $3 million. She has co-authored 2 book chapters, 34 journal publications, and more than 80 conference papers. She is recognized for her research and teaching, including Dean’s Awards for Outstanding New Faculty, Outstanding
wasnot frequent enough to make a measurable difference. We note that there was a strong bondformed with the students by the liaison. Through conversations that he had with the students, wediscovered that many questioned the value of college (few considered engineering as an option).In the course of the study, we also questioned the value of "selling" the idea of an engineeringmajor to those who wanted careers as firefighters, hair stylists, mechanics. We have not resolvedthis question within ourselves, but feel it is an important new awareness. It points to theproblem of assuming shared values and beliefs (e.g., "a college education will help you throughlife.").In reference to the needs and concerns that the groups developed, it is not
effectiveness.The decision to investigate this topic stems from a growing concern that students may not bereaping the full benefits of this valuable academic support system. As educational landscapesevolve, particularly in response to the challenges posed by the global pandemic, understandinghow shifting study habits and expectations impact the use of office hours becomes imperative. Tocomprehensively explore this issue, we conducted surveys not only among engineering studentsbut also among faculty specializing in civil and environmental engineering. Our research buildson this context, aiming to provide insights that can inform educators and administrators increating a more responsive and student-centric learning environment.To narrow our focus, we
classroom. Page 14.12.2The ECCS Department was created via the merger of two departments, containing a total of threedegree programs, in 2001. One of the issues faced by the new department was the differences inthe capstone requirements between the programs2. In the former Electrical and ComputerEngineering Department, senior design consisted of a yearlong, three quarter sequence ofcourses. The first course focused on the characteristics of engineering design projects and thedevelopment of a project proposal, the second course focused on a comprehensive project, andthe third course focused on the presentation of technical information from the project
skills and advance the level of understandingattained by the students enrolled in their courses. Through involvement in CTEP,interested faculty members may become sufficiently familiar with a host of newtechnologies and attain enough experience using them to generate meaningfultransformations within the engineering curriculum.I. Introduction - The State of Engineering EducationWith the arrival of the new century many engineering institutions find themselvesstruggling with numerous problems associated with modern engineeringeducation, one of which is technology. There have been a host of books, articlesand papers written on the significance of the technology age and how it could “Proceedings of the 2001 American Society for Engineering
Using Video Podcast to Enhance Students’ Learning Experience in Engineering Imin Kao Department of Mechanical Engineering State University of New York (SUNY) at Stony Brook Stony Brook, NY 11794-2200 Corresponding author: imin.kao@sunysb.eduAbstractThe students and faculty today have available to them many technologies that did not exist adecade ago. Such technologies can be great tools for the delivery of course contents to enhancestudents’ learning experience. In this presentation, podcast is employed as an asynchronousonline tool in engineering courses to record lectures and supplementary materials
Using Video Podcast to Enhance Students’ Learning Experience in Engineering Imin Kao Department of Mechanical Engineering State University of New York (SUNY) at Stony Brook Stony Brook, NY 11794-2200 Corresponding author: imin.kao@sunysb.eduAbstractThe students and faculty today have available to them many technologies that did not exist adecade ago. Such technologies can be great tools for the delivery of course contents to enhancestudents’ learning experience. In this presentation, podcast is employed as an asynchronousonline tool in engineering courses to record lectures and supplementary materials