Roberts, “Application of the SolidWorks in teaching mechanical design for the digital generation”, 2010 ASEE Northeast Section Conference, May 7 -8, 2010, Boston, MA12. Ali R. Moazed, Richard Roberts, Xiaobin Le, Anthony Duva, “Teaching Finite Element Analysis in Undergraduate Technology Curriculum”, 2010 ASEE Northeast Section Conference, May 7 -8, 2010, Boston, MA13. Randy Shih, “Introduction to Finite Element Analysis Using Solidworks Simulation 2011”, Schroff Development Corporation, 2011 Page 25.199.15 14
learning is easier when the reinforcement closely follows the action.17 Teamtesting provides the reward of rapid feedback in two ways. First, it provides students withsolution feedback and secondly, it provides feedback about their own performance and how itrelates to the performance of their peers.3.2 JustificationCooperative learning in a testing environment is beneficial because students develop groupinteraction and individual reasoning skills with the encouragement of a reward. The studentshave spent time considering the problems before discussion, which encourages them to becomemore involved. In fact, team-testing discussions are amongst the most lively and energetic in ourcourses, in part because of emotional reactions to learning answers
Missouri.Dr. Daniel K. Marble, Tarleton State University Daniel Marble earned a B.S. in electrical engineering from the University of Houston, with an M.S. and Ph.D. in accelerator-based nuclear physics from the University of North Texas. Marble began his academic career as an Assistant Professor of physics at the U.S. Military Academy in West Point in 1994. In 1998, he was hired to develop the first engineering program at Tarleton State University (engineering physics), where he presently serves as Head of the Department of Engineering and Physics. In addition to interests in ion solid interaction, physics of sports, accelerator technology, and materials characterization, Marble is actively involved in K-16 science and
even have the 2011 ESMDSpace Grant Systems Engineering Paper Competition3.In addition to introducing systems engineering in the senior design course another way tointroduce systems engineering to non-systems engineering majors is to add relevant courses intothe curriculum however this is difficult since it will require replacing other courses. A simpleway to give the students the systems engineering experience they will need is through theparticipation in one of the many competitions that are available to engineering students. Thefocus of this paper is not to imply that participation in engineering competitions will be asubstitute to having a systems engineering program nor is it implied that this experience will bein any way complete. The
necessary to consider how to retire the system and costs related to retirement must be included in the optimal design. In order to achieve this goal, we should be able to formulate the design model and prepare the model for optimization based on the life cycle cost (LCC)3. In this paper, we discuss these steps in the context of a gas transmission system design. We develop a reasonably realistic model of a representative gas pipeline transmission system and use it as benchmark problem to evaluate the applicability of optimization technique. Although numerous optimization techniques are available and every one claims to obtain optimal solution for every kind of design problems but in reality it is not
. She said that she had made progress in “both the oralcommunication and being a more reflective and open person,” although she was still pushingherself to develop her speaking skills. She argued that “I have gained a better ability tocommunicate with others in both a formal setting, such as presentations, as well as informalsettings, like class.”In her senior year, the moderators described Jennifer as “capable!” and commented that,although she still needed to work on building self-confidence, she had shown growth in workingin groups. Using her reflective essay for both “looking forward” and “casting backward”Jennifer looked back to her first year: “When I began the program, I had a difficult timespeaking in front of large groups of people. Now
numerous others.Final oral and written reports must be presented, including both a User’s Manual, and aTechnical Report. The Technical Report includes mathematical analyses of the various parts ofthe machines as well as fabrication procedures and a cost analysis. An informal (though graded)preliminary demonstration is held about two weeks before the official public demonstration towhich the general public is invited.INTRODUCTIONThree years ago, the freshman engineering curriculum at Clemson University was completelyoverhauled. Replacing the standard freshman programming course (FORTRAN) during thesecond semester was ENGR 120, a new course in engineering computation, problem solving anddesign. A group project was designated to be an integral part
manuscript introduces a lesson design in engineeringeducation to analyze and improve educational strategies, reflective practices, and instructionalmaterials.Assessment methods: This study outlines a lesson design utilizing the ArgumentationFramework to support first-year engineering students in overcoming conceptual challenges whiledeveloping engineering projects. This approach was implemented in an Engineering Technologyundergraduate course at a Midwestern university, whose curriculum covered foundational topicsin Energy Science. The task involved designing a zero-energy home using Aladdin software, asan integrated CAD/CAE platform for design and simulation. Students documented their analysis,inferences, and decisions in a design journal with
Paper ID #44366WIP: The Role of Classroom Teaching Practices on the Academic Success ofEngineering College Students with ADHDNolgie O. Oquendo-Col´on, University of Michigan Nolgie O. Oquendo-Colon is an Engineering Education Research PhD student at the University of Michigan. He holds a MS and BS in Industrial Engineering from the University of Puerto Rico at Mayaguez.Miss Xiaping Li, University of Michigan Xiaping Li is a Ph.D. candidate in Engineering Education Research at the University of Michigan. Her research interests encompass faculty development and change, neurodiverse college student learning experiences and
also used Nearpod with engineering students for instruction purposes [8].While the goal of this case study was to increase motivation and academic performance, theinstruction was not tied to information literacy. Instead, Romero Rodriguez used the gamificationaspects of Nearpod to deliver instruction on the engineering curriculum to two of their threecourse sections, with the last section receiving instruction as traditional lectures. They found thevast majority (98%) preferred the gamification instruction used in Nearpod to the traditionalmethods. In addition, 91% of forty-seven students surveyed shared that lectures using Nearpodincreased their motivation for the course topics. The gamified group also had an increasedpassing rate and higher
understanding the needs of students with disabilities, with a particular focus oninclusive classroom environments that actively promote a sense of belonging. Institutions anddepartments should consider developing more robust support structures that go well beyond whatis typically considered an accessibility service. For example, creating opportunities for studentsto be mentored with peers or professionals who might share similar experiences. Perhaps one ofthe strongest interventions to support and promote sense of belonging would be curriculum andpedagogy adjustments that include more diverse perspectives, especially including those ofpeople with disabilities. For example, this could involve integrating case study examples thathighlight the
-Intervention on Action-State Orientation Surveys" for further reference (Uysal, 2023). The objective of the first phase of the study was to find out how survey responses could be used to predict whether a student could be considered at-risk for failing academically. The objective of the second phase discussed in this article is to analyze and quantify the effects of in-class interventions on student study habits and, ultimately, their academic performance using action-state orientation surveys as engineering students progress in their respective curriculum. While these surveys are anonymous, it is crucial to be able to track changes in academic performance for individual students across multiple semesters as they go through the various stages of their
interface design, many of which are visual concepts. In order to adapt the curriculum, weused a high-resolution tactile display capable of mirroring imagery from a video display into adepth map that could be felt. This enabled the dual presentation of visual content as tactilesurface maps. Through this process, we learned several best practices in terms of how to createcontent that transfers well from one modality to another, and we also developed a number ofguidelines for creation of teaching materials like notes and assignments in a way that is morescreen-reader friendly.This paper shares key takeaways while also communicating student and teacher perspectives ondeveloping, teaching, and using more accessible materials. Our goal is to encourage
instructorsmay lack the requisite knowledge of STEM specialties, which can create a deficit for students[23]. MSI college entrance SAT scores are lower than non-MSI at about 89.3%, exceptAANAPISI and AANH, which tend to be much closer to average [5]. When considering howinstructors respond to students who may have additional needs due to their K-12 education, theymay be unable to overcome “deficit ideology” [24, 25]. MSI are more likely to have minoritystudents who did not take Advanced Placement courses than non-MSIs [26]. It may take studentsat MSIs longer to graduate [27], which makes the degree more costly.Active learning pedagogies are typically presented as part of a construction curriculum. This typeof pedagogy may well fit with a “1st-Person
special commands to handle data from an A-to-D converter (shiftout) and torun a servo motor (pulseout). Most of the work here is programming; our students will have taken arequired programming course in the lower division. In the previous semester to Process Control, mostwill have taken Separations (ChE 4111); here MathCad and its programming facilities are usedextensively. Process Control is a 3-credit course meeting for three 50-min sessions per week in a 15-weeeksemester. Just over a third of the class time was devoted to the work with the microcontroller; to fit thisin some modifications of the curriculum were necessary. In addition to developing a more economicalpresentation of the subject matter, the following steps were taken
interest groups. Studentsself-select into the program and typically there is space for all who wish to participate. TheDivision of Engineering uses the program to recruit women and high ability students by creatingspecific FIGs for these groups. Using a retention model as a conceptual framework, this paperwill attempt to address the impact of this first-year program on the academic success ofengineering students.Conceptual FrameworkOne of the most widely accepted models for understanding persistence was developed byVincent Tinto. Tinto’s model accounts for both student and institutional variables inunderstanding student departure and persistence. “Broadly understood, it argues that individual departure from institutions can be viewed
Design Projects in Undergraduate Heat Transfer: Six Examples from the Fall 2007 Course at the University of Arkansas W. Roy Penney, Rachel M. Lee, Meagan E. Magie, Edgar C. Clausen Ralph E. Martin Department of Chemical Engineering University of ArkansasIntroductionOne of the main objectives of engineering education is to effectively transfer subject informationto the engineering students. A number of methods have been developed for enhancing thisstudent learning including multimedia developments1,2, active, problem-based learning3,collaborative learning4,5, and participation in cooperative education6. Several papers havespecifically addressed
. Witchger School of Engineering Award for Teaching Excellence in 2023.Dr. Sarah Klanderman, Marian University Dr. Sarah Klanderman is an Assistant Professor of Mathematics at Marian University. She is an algebraic topologist and math education researcher, with interests including computations related to topological Hochschild homology, supporting underrepresented groups in STEM, connections between mathematics and other disciplines, and her work with undergraduate research students at the intersection of number sequences and graph theory.Salomon Turgman Cohen, Marian University Prof. Turgman has been teaching chemical engineering since 2013 and has experience teaching almost the entire chemical engineering curriculum
assistant professor and the director of Architectural Engineering Program at Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT). He was re- sponsible for developing the current architectural engineering undergraduate and master’s programs at the Illinois Institute of Technology (IIT). During his stay at IIT, he taught fundamental engineering courses, such as thermodynamics and heat transfer, as well as design courses, such as HVAC, energy, plumbing, fire protection and lighting. Also, he supervise many courses in the frame of interprofessional projects program (IPRO). In few months, Dr. Megri will defend his ”Habilitation” (HDR) degree at Pierre and Marie Curie Univer- sity - Paris VI, Sorbonne Universities
rehabilitation projects (these terms are defined later),and consequently are not required to use traditional methods. Scheduling, then, becomes a mucheasier task because availability and type of resources are known. Non-profit companies are morelikely to undertake preservation projects. Ideally, project managers in charge of preservationprojects are trained in preservation techniques used in their region. Unfortunately, this may bethe only known information in the planning stages. The workforce will most certainly contain acrew supervisor, however the number and skill of the workforce personnel will not be known.This uncertainty is no excuse for not developing a comprehensive schedule and budget. In fact, itis even more necessary to provide early
thepreparation of potato chips. Much of the recent research effort has been directed towardevaluation of cooking oils and seasonings, nutritional content, and product preservation. Otherwork has been done to optimize storage life with various protective barriers/packing materialsand application of preservatives. An amazing amount of work has been done to develop the Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Page 7.647.1 Copyright © 2002, American Society for Engineering Educationsweet potato as a snack food (patents, preparation, storage, etc.), though to date, none
Session 1630 Who Wants to be an Engineer? -or- Better Teaching through Game Shows Robert W. Carpick Dept. of Engineering Physics, Engineering Mechanics Program University of Wisconsin - MadisonAbstractA 50 (or 60 or 70) -minute lecture is inherently incompatible with the typical attention spans ofstudents. The author has developed a teaching technique that successfully re-captures attention inthe classroom. The technique, loosely based on a popular prime-time game show
childcare on children ofworking parents. These studies report conflicting results depending on the interpretation of theresearcher.3 Some indicate that there is little negative effect on children. Others have found thatthe positive outcomes outweigh the negative aspects.If quality care is selected, the adverse effects on the child are minimal and in some cases,childcare is beneficial to the child’s social and academic development. 4 The key is being surethat the child’s needs are met at each critical stage. If parents take the time to select good,competent childcare, they will have confidence in the provider and can focus on getting the jobdone rather than worrying whether their children are happy and safe.Some suggestions for selection include
drawbacks, however.Common concerns are that team members will agree to give one another identically highratings, or give ratings based on gender or racial prejudice, or inflate their own ratings if self-ratings are collected. Some instructors also worry that many students will resent having theirgrades affected by their teammates’ ratings. The objective of this study was to examine thevalidity of these concerns.A peer rating system developed at the Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology was modifiedand used in two sophomore-level chemical engineering courses. The students completed theirhomework in instructor-formed teams in each course, and an average homework grade wascomputed for each team. At the end of each course the students confidentially
Session 1461 Cooperative Learning: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Problem-Based Environmental Education Dennis B. George, Melissa S. Goldsipe, Arthur C. Goldsipe, Martha J.M. Wells, and Harsha N. Mookherjee Center for the Management, Utilization, and Protection of Water Resources/Department of Sociology, Tennessee Technological UniversityBeginning in the year 2001, engineering education programs in the United States seekingaccreditation will be evaluated according to Engineering Criteria 2000 developed by theAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology 1. Outcome
from the fictional character Mary Poppinsare used to describe a variety of approaches and methods that have been developed andimplemented for effective leadership in academia by the author, a woman who is an engineeringdepartment chair (head) and director of a large national industry/university cooperative researchcenter. Following an introduction that includes background and motivation, a brief review of theliterature on academic leadership and gender differences in leadership is presented. Threeprimary approaches are then described, including: 1) know your organization, 2) fostercollaboration, a sense of team and community, and 3) serve as an example of excellence. Detailsof several methods and strategies are provided for implementing each
classroom response systems for formative assessment in natural resource courses. Journal of Forestry, 103(7), 417-420.24. FitzPatrick, K. A., Finn, K. E., & Compisis, J. (2011). Effect of personal response systems on student perception and academic performance in courses in a health sciences curriculum. Advanced Physiological Education, 35, 280-289. doi:10.1152/advan.00036.201125. Patterson, B., Kilpartick, J., & Woebkenberg, E. (2010). Evidence for teaching practice: The impact of clickers in a large classroom environment. Nurse Education Today, 30, 603-607. doi:10.1016/j.nedt.2009.12.200826. Fredericksen, E. E., & Ames, M. (2006). Can $30 piece of plastic improve learning? An evaluation of personal response systems
, programming, testing ofvarious applications installed, as well as ethical hacking and incident investigation in thevirtualized Linux environments. All these will provide students with in-depth knowledge andskills in cloud computing and information assurance. More important, research results can benaturally integrated with the existing Computer Information Technology curriculum, whichcan benefit students in the CIT program at Purdue University Calumet (PUC) and students inthe programs that have partnerships with PUC in the Midwest.6. ConclusionIn this paper, a systematic approach has been proposed to develop the forensics readiness tofight against attacks and inside activities committed in virtualized Linux environments. Thisapproach focuses on
Paper ID #7209The Dynamics of Attracting Switchers: A Cross-Disciplinary ComparisonMr. Corey T Schimpf, Purdue University, West Lafayette Corey Schimpf is a PhD student in Engineering Education. His research interests include examining how cyberlearning and informal learning environments can be brought into the engineering curriculum. His dissertation explores how a gaming platform can be used to facilitate early college engineering students design skills development.Mr. George D Ricco, Purdue University, West LafayetteDr. Matthew W. Ohland, Purdue University, West Lafayette Matthew W. Ohland is Professor of engineering
mean that students might have been “primed” tolearn about these topics, we suspect that the elective nature of the course meant that students whoselected in to the course had a higher-than-average commitment to public welfareresponsibilities. This would mean that the changes we observed might be a conservative estimateof the shifts that might occur given a sample of students who were required to take the course.Course EvaluationWe used two approaches to evaluate the PubWRIT course: pre- and post- class surveys andanonymous open-ended post-class reflections. We drew the 5-point, Likert-scale surveyquestions from an instrument developed we developed for an earlier part of the project to assessemployed engineers’ assessment of their public