Asee peer logo

The Dynamics of Attracting Switchers: A Cross-Disciplinary Comparison

Download Paper |

Conference

2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition

Location

Atlanta, Georgia

Publication Date

June 23, 2013

Start Date

June 23, 2013

End Date

June 26, 2013

ISSN

2153-5965

Conference Session

Retention and Persistence in Engineering

Tagged Division

Educational Research and Methods

Page Count

14

Page Numbers

23.1187.1 - 23.1187.14

Permanent URL

https://peer.asee.org/22572

Download Count

14

Request a correction

Paper Authors

biography

Corey T Schimpf Purdue University, West Lafayette

visit author page

Corey Schimpf is a PhD student in Engineering Education. His research interests include examining how cyberlearning and informal learning environments can be brought into the engineering curriculum. His dissertation explores how a gaming platform can be used to facilitate early college engineering students design skills development.

visit author page

author page

George D Ricco Purdue University, West Lafayette

biography

Matthew W. Ohland Purdue University, West Lafayette Orcid 16x16 orcid.org/0000-0003-4052-1452

visit author page

Matthew W. Ohland is Professor of engineering education at Purdue University. He has degrees from Swarthmore College, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, and the University of Florida. His research on the longitudinal study of engineering students, team assignment, peer evaluation, and active and collaborative teaching methods has been supported by more than $12.4 million from the National Science Foundation and the Sloan Foundation and his team received the William Elgin Wickenden Award for the Best Paper in the Journal of Engineering Education in 2008 and 2011. Ohland is Past Chair of ASEE’s Educational Research and Methods division and a member of the Board of Governors of the IEEE Education Society. He was the 2002-2006 President of Tau Beta Pi.

visit author page

Download Paper |

Abstract

A Hazards Model Study of Pathway Analysis in EngineeringFactors that indicate, explain, or predict if a student will persist or exit an engineering degreehave been a subject of a lot of research in engineering education. Findings from these studiesidentify factors that lead to success or barriers that lead premature exit from an engineeringdegree; however, they often focus on students who matriculate into engineering or analyzestudents once they have matriculated into engineering. We propose studying an alternatepathway, students who switch into engineering from other majors. Examining alternate pathwaysmay yield a fuller picture of the ways into and through engineering degrees and may beleveraged through different institutional policies and programs for attracting engineering studentsfrom other fields.Survival analysis is a longitudinal statistical method used to model the hazard or risk of an eventoccurring for some population. Our study implemented discrete survival analysis and a subset ofa database comprising more than 1,000,000 unique students. For our current research, we use asample population of first-time in college (FTIC) students initially matriculating into non-engineering disciplines in two years with population of ~55,000 at nine institutions. The event ofinterest is switching into engineering, and time is measured by terms. To better understand thedynamics of “attraction” into engineering we also run similar analyses with Science, Technologyand Math (as a similar comparator) and Social Science (as a dissimilar comparator). Survivalanalysis results allow us to graph the term by term hazard or risk of attraction into engineering(and the comparators) as well as the “survival” rate in the pool of individuals who have notexperienced the event, providing us insights into the relative attraction rates of engineeringcontrasted with other disciplines.Our preliminary results show that the attraction (hazard) rates for engineering are lower thanboth STM and social science attraction rates; furthermore, the pool of students who abstain fromswitching is greatest for engineering, and significantly less for STM and social science. Thusengineering has the lowest attraction rates and the highest abstention (which would be viewed asretention from their current department) rates. Interestingly, the hazard rate displays a similarpattern for all three groups, peaking at semester four and dropping markedly after semester six.In the full study, we also plan to examine if attraction and abstention rates differ by gender andethnicity across engineering and the comparators. These findings agree with other studies usingthe same database, which gives confidence in the model. The unique contribution of this workwill be findings regarding the switching population that yield insight into those students andrelated insights regarding the students who matriculate in engineering.

Schimpf, C. T., & Ricco, G. D., & Ohland, M. W. (2013, June), The Dynamics of Attracting Switchers: A Cross-Disciplinary Comparison Paper presented at 2013 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, Atlanta, Georgia. https://peer.asee.org/22572

ASEE holds the copyright on this document. It may be read by the public free of charge. Authors may archive their work on personal websites or in institutional repositories with the following citation: © 2013 American Society for Engineering Education. Other scholars may excerpt or quote from these materials with the same citation. When excerpting or quoting from Conference Proceedings, authors should, in addition to noting the ASEE copyright, list all the original authors and their institutions and name the host city of the conference. - Last updated April 1, 2015