. Through his in- volvement in the UNR PRiDE Research Lab and engagement with the UNR and Northern Nevada STEM Education communities, he studied student motivation, active learning, and diversity; developed K-12 engineering education curriculum; and advocated for socioeconomically just access to STEM education. As a Ph.D. Candidate with the STRiDE Research Lab at Purdue University, Justin’s dissertation research focuses on the study of Intersectionality Theory and the intersectionality of socioeconomic inequality in engineering education, use of critical quantitative methodology and narrative inquiry to understand the complex stories of engineering students from traditionally minoritized backgrounds, and the pursuit of a
student questioning techniques and discusses effective strategies for their use X Systematic Design of Instruction: Introduces a model for designing a new course in an established curriculum and examines the role of classroom teaching in that model XI Non-Verbal Communication: Offers useful insights and techniques for understanding how an instructor communicates non-verbally and for interpreting non-verbal cues from students. XII Developing Interpersonal Rapport: Offers useful techniques for building an effective rapport with students; discusses student personality types and offers hints to avoid chill in the classroom XIII Making It Work at Your Institution: Discusses how the techniques and
Vir- ginia Tech Engineering Communications Center (VTECC). Her research focuses on communication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring communication, design, and identity in engineering. Drawing on theories of situated learning and identity development, her work includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication, effective teaching practices in design education, the effects of differing design pedagogies on retention and motivation, the dynamics of cross
the South- ern Alberta Institute of Technology in 2012. He has been a sessional instructor at the Schulich School of Engineering at the University of Calgary, where he completed his MSc. in engineering researching engineering education. His roots in industry aided him in the development of curriculum for 3 new courses by aligning industry’s desired competencies for new grads with accreditation criteria and facility constraints. The result was applied education: practical learning activities and hands-on labs that prepared students for the real world and accelerated their time-to-competency once on the job. Connect with Brendon on LinkedIn to start a conversation. c American Society
Philosophical History for EngineersAbstract Ethics education in the engineering curriculum is required by ABET. This paper presents anunconventional approach to meeting this requirement as surveyed and tested in the aerospaceengineering department of California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, with theintention of having a lasting impact on engineering graduates throughout their working career.All professions have common codes of competence, integrity, and intended good will towardshumanity. Often these codes presume internal regulation and constraint to guard against humannature’s self-serving inclinations and proclivities. Here, in addition to relying on studentexposure to and knowledge of a particular
AC 2007-2963: A STUDY OF MINORITY ENGINEERING STUDENTS AND TIMETO COMPLETION OF FIRST YEAR REQUIRED COURSES AT TEXAS A&MUNIVERSITYJorja Kimball, Texas Engineering Experiment Station Dr. Jorja Kimball is the Director of Strategic Research Development office for the Texas Engineering Experiment Station, an agency of the Texas A&M University system. She holds a Ph.D. in Higher Education Administration, BBA and MBA. Her research interests and publications involve engineering education, diversity, and underrepresented engineering groups and issues.Bryan Cole, Texas A&M University Dr. Bryan R. Cole is Professor of Educational Administration in the Department of Educational
of Engineering at Ohio Northern University.Dr. Farbrother received a Ph.D. degree from University of Hertfordshire in 1977. He serves as an ABET evaluatorand has written several papers on EC2000 curriculum development. Recently, Dr. Farbrother established theEngineer-in-Residence program to bring the workplace to the university campus. e-mail: b-farbrother@onu.edu Page 8.180.11“Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright 2003, American Society for Engineering Education”Appendix 1The model parameters are identified from a variety of data
programs in the mountain region. Further study would be needed to distinguishbetween the quality of transportation instruction and research provided at these 17 institutions.Only two interdisciplinary transportation programs were identified, despite the recognized needfor multidisciplinary approaches to addressing transportation problems. This paper may be ofuse to educators who are either developing or modifying their transportation programs,prospective students, and researchers who may be interested in doing similar studies of otherdisciplines or regions. Because of ongoing changes in faculty and courses, this and similarstudies should be updated regularly.Study Objective
developed after havingdiscussed the photos in the group.This paper reports preliminary findings associated with the first data collection phase: the initialindividual interview. For our theoretical and methodological frameworks, we used a combinationof inductive coding with Shaffer and colleagues’ epistemic frame elements. In addition, wecoded for outcome, relationships with others, and ways of thinking and doing. Results wereanalyzed for hegemonic gender markers and put into a broader engineering epistemologicalcontext. Results were also interpreted based on how the participants conceptualized and gendertheir perceptions. Initial findings have suggested that most professors and students have bothsimilar and unique ways of defining engineering, and
AC 2012-3009: USING STUDENT AMBASSADORS TO RELAY THEMESFROM CHANGING THE CONVERSATION IN ENGINEERING FIRST-YEAR SEMINARSDr. Sarah E. Zappe, Pennsylvania State University, University Park Sarah Zappe is the Director of Assessment and Instructional Support in the College of Engineering at Penn State University. In this role, she provides support to faculty in trying innovative ideas in the classroom. Her background is in educational psychology with an emphasis in applied testing and measurement. Her current research interests include integrating creativity into the engineering curriculum, developing in- struments to measure the engineering professional skills, and using qualitative data to enhance response process
Paper ID #41981A Low-Cost, Adaptable System for Lift and Drag Measurement in an EducationalWind TunnelJessica Weakly, University of PennsylvaniaSarah Ho, University of PennsylvaniaErica Feehery, University of PennsylvaniaDr. Bruce David Kothmann, University of PennsylvaniaCynthia Sung, University of Pennsylvania ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 A Low-Cost, Adaptable System for Lift and Drag Measurement in an Educational Wind TunnelAbstractWind tunnel testing augments the undergraduate fluid dynamics curriculum by providinghands-on application of the course material, and a low-cost version of
TAsin science and engineering programs, “this group of teachers is almost invisible in the academicmachinery that drives educational programs at large universities” [14].Impacts of TAs:As a natural consequence of their relative invisibility compared to faculty, much less is knownregarding how TAs affect the undergraduate experience compared to the impacts of faculty onstudents. However, as agents assigned to carry out the teaching and learning objectives of thefaculty member, TAs are often the “first line of defense” [15, p. 89] in undergraduate instructionand what they do directly affects the perceived quality of the faculty member’s teaching as wellas the overall quality of the curriculum in the department [15]. In a quantitative study
environment that is perceived as "chilly" orunwelcoming for them. Growing research in engineering education has highlighted differences inwomen's educational experiences compared to men's. Women in engineering education havereported experiencing heightened levels of overwhelm due to the pace and workload of theengineering curriculum, reduced comfort in asking questions in class, lower confidence in theirabilities, and a diminished sense of belonging (Metz et al., 1999). The lack of diversityconcerning gender and race/ethnicity in engineering education influences the development ofbroader society. As such, we must make sense of the experiences of Latine engineering facultywho have persisted through the engineering pathway
challenges forengineering technology students and faculty. A project based model can be used as an effectiveinstructional strategy to enhance learning about complex RF concepts and technologies. Thisproject method can lead to improved understanding and create interest by actively engagingstudents with hands-on experiences coupled with problem solving and critical thinking activities.This project is based on teaching and learning experiences with a previously developed low costPIC microcontroller training system4. The PIC training system was coupled with a readilyavailable RF communication module7 that could be used in a variety of real world, hands-onapplications in designing senior capstone projects for engineering and technology majors. In
Michigan. Her scholarship focuses on curriculum, teaching, and learning in higher education generally and in engineering programs. Her en- gineering education research focuses on organizational, curricular and instructional factors shape faculty work, students’ learning experiences, and students’ learning outcomes. Page 24.926.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 Multiple Starting Lines: Pre-College Characteristics of Community College and Four-Year Institution Engineering StudentsAbstractIn response to the pressing need to expand and diversify the engineering
Paper ID #46181Middle School Preservice Teachers’ Discussion Prompts to Help a StudentAvatar Overcome Idea Fixation during Brainstorming (Fundamental)Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue Ph.D., Towson University Pamela S. Lottero-Perdue, Ph.D., is Professor of Science and Engineering Education in the Department of Physics, Astronomy & Geosciences at Towson University. She has integrated engineering into courses for PreK-8 teacher candidates, developed and directed a graduate STEM program for PreK-6 teachers, and partnered with teachers to implement PreK-8 science-integrated engineering learning experiences. She has authored
use AI in education was addressedand researchers were interested in applying AI techniques to education, like Khanmigo inKhan Academy [21]. Many studies showed the positive effect of using AI in STEM, non-STEM, and online education. One of the reasons behind this is that using AI is customizable,where teachers can produce a personalized plan for each student depending on theirimprovement needs. Another reason is fast response, where you are a click away from gettingyour answer. Figure 1: AI types [71]. One promising and most common branch of AI has attracted researchers and developers tobenefit in education, which is Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI). GenAI is a branchof machine learning that
. Her research focuses on the development, implementation, and assessment of modeling and design activities with authentic engineering contexts; the design and implementation of learning objective-based grading for transparent and fair assessment; and the integration of reflection to develop self-directed learners.Euclides Maluf, University of Nebraska - Lincoln The author is an experienced Industrial Engineer with a minor in Occupational Safety Engineering and Education. With over 10 years of expertise in training professionals across companies, educational institutions, and industries, they possess strong skills in processing, analyzing, and synthesizing large data sets. Their ability to thrive in collaborative
Teaching Robotics Teaching with Robotics: Integrating Robotics in School Curriculum, 2012, pp. 153–162.[36] A. Takacs, G. Eigner, L. Kovacs, I. J. Rudas, and T. Haidegger, “Teacher’s kit: Development, usability, and communities of modular robotic kits for classroom education,” IEEE Robotics Automation Magazine, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 30–39, 2016.[37] S. Evripidou, K. Georgiou, L. Doitsidis, A. A. Amanatiadis, Z. Zinonos, and S. A. Chatzichristofis, “Educational robotics: Platforms, competitions and expected learning outcomes,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 219 534–219 562, 2020.[38] M. Gardiner. (2023) oribokit. [Online]. Available: https://oribokit.com/[39] ——, “Ori* on the aesthetics of folding and technology,” Ph.D. dissertation
REU participants)taking place on Fridays. Participants in RET and REU collaborate on research projects and offerinput based on their unique perspectives and experiences. To provide a closer connectionbetween engineering research principles and practical application, the curriculum depends onimmersive instruction.The REU/RET teams create a video "elevator pitch" on their experience and present their workin a virtual research symposium at the end of the summer. The top 9 participants in the programare given stipends to continue their research at their home university during the academic year.For RET participants to bring the proper hardware and components back to their classrooms tosupport their engineering activities, host institutions
undergraduate students from different backgrounds (i.e., Black, Latinx, andIndigenous). For example, Strayhorn et al. [7] and Tolbert Smith [15] found that Black studentsare subjected to looks and messaging that suggest they will not succeed in engineering and otherSTEM-related careers. Similarly, McGee [8] found that Black men students were oftenstereotyped as being more suited for careers outside of STEM and their success in STEMcoursework was attributed to them either being extremely intelligent or garnered throughcheating, which hindered some students’ ability to develop an affinity for their STEM discipline.Similarly, Black and Latinx students have reported feelings of isolation and loneliness which canalso negatively impact their academic
indispensable role in providing the infrastructure that enables society andcommunities to be healthy, efficient, and thriving. To fulfill this responsibility, civil engineersmust be trained to be leaders with an array of socio-technical skills, knowledge, and attitudes.Further, there must be a sufficient number of trained engineers to meet societal needs. Thepresident of the American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), Dennis D. Truax, recently calledattention to “a workforce shortage that’s going to be exacerbated in the near future” and notedthat the ASCE’s Future World Vision (FWV) project could contribute to workforce development[1]. This paper begins by framing enrollment and student interest challenges in civil engineering.This is followed by a
additional authors provide context and discussions connected to literature around thetopics the narratives address.4.2 Participant and Data CollectionParticipants in this paper are the first and second authors who share their experiences asneurodivergent students in undergraduate engineering. Data collection occurred in the writingprocess of this paper. The remaining authors developed written prompts, and asked theundergraduate researchers to write in their thoughts as a response to the prompts. Some editswere made for clarity, but otherwise, the data is presented in the form of self-expressednarratives.4.3 AnalysisAnalysis was a thematic approach drawing heavily from literature in accommodations in highereducation, critical disability theory, and
math andscience, young women make up approximately 21.9 percent of undergraduate engineeringmajors [3].Efforts aimed at persuading girls and young women to pursue engineering include increasedscience, technology, engineering and math (STEM) extracurricular activities in schools, mediacampaigns to raise awareness and the development of new science and technology toys designedfor girls and young women [4], [5]. Recruiting young women to engineering, however, is notwithout challenges. Engineering is often perceived of as a traditionally masculine occupation thatis unwelcoming to women [6], [7]. Studies also regularly find that women in engineeringencounter discrimination, difficulties cultivating a sense of belonging and obstacles to
Paper ID #25733Using Recycled Photovoltic Modules and Batteries for Engineering Educa-tion, Student Projects, and as Viable Portable, Backup Storage Power SourcesDr. Robert W. Fletcher, Lawrence Technological University Robert Fletcher joined the faculty of the Mechanical Engineering Department at Lawrence Technological University in the summer of 2003, after two decades of various industry engineering positions in research, and product development. Dr. Fletcher earned his Bachelor of Science Degree in Chemical Engineering from the University of Washington, in Seattle, and the Master of Science and Ph.D. degrees in
Engineering from Carnegie Mellon University. She is co-coordinator of a first-year engineering course and her research interests include engineering ethics, curriculum development, and use of classroom technologies.Vinod Lohani, Virginia Tech VINOD K. LOHANI is an associate professor in the Department of Engineering Education and an adjunct faculty in Civil & Environmental Engineering at Virginia Tech. He received a Ph.D. in civil engineering from Virginia Tech in 1995. His areas of teaching and research include engineering education, international collaboration and hydrology & water resources
the undergraduate engineering curriculum, including which programs tend todiscuss ethics, where it falls in the curriculum, and how much attention it receives [38]–[40].This inconsistency in quantity and quality of engineering ethics education across engineeringprograms is problematic given the importance of ethical conduct as professionals. It is alsopredictable, however, given the generality of the Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology (ABET) student learning outcome (outcome four) associated with ethics: studentsshould have “an ability to recognize ethical and professional responsibilities in engineeringsituations and make informed judgments, which must consider the impact of engineeringsolutions in global, economic
curriculum. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2020 Designing an Engineering Computer Instructional Laboratory: Working with the PanopticonAbstractWe describe the process and outcome of designing a new computer laboratory to serve asinstructional space as well as student workspace. Throughout the design process, we werecognizant of the important role that space configuration plays in materializing power relationsamong the occupants. To that effect, we were interested in dismantling the panopticon. Weemployed a participatory design approach that extends user-centered design to allow coping withdisagreements. The use of this approach unraveled the complexity in which power
roles (e.g., organizer, creator, worker, or finisher) andpreferred projects [8]. Some have identified the students with the most relevant experience andplaced them as team leaders [9]. A new open-source software tool developed called “gruepr” forcreating optimal student teams [9]. “The software tool runs on the instructor’s computer using survey dataentered by the students into, and then downloaded from, a Google Form. The instructor has considerableflexibility in choosing the content of the survey questions as well as the definition of a quantitatively optimalteam.” The importance of a functional team leader is key to have a functional (or dysfunctional)team. [10]. It was concluded that team leadership is significant and does appear to be an
instructor to develop (i.e., obvious) • Purely deductive teaching leaves the student thinking that he or she could never come up with the derivation by him/herself. • Deductive teaching may be more Figure 1: Deductive learning is begins with principles, and efficient for short-term retention. inductive learning begins with observations (Adapted from Page 8.197.3 5 Felder et al. ).Proceedings of the 2003 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference & Exposition Copyright