: tutoring, mentoring, learning centers, first-year students,at-risk students, academic advising, and career awareness.Much has been done to understand and improve the retention of students6-10. Universities useproblem solving recitations, and the integration of math/science/engineering into more excitingengineering courses with more active design project for students. Much of these efforts havelimited success and can often be overwhelmed by changes in the student body attending theuniversity, changes in faculty teaching key engineering courses, and changes in seeminglyinsignificant aspects such as classroom scheduling. In many cases, modest changes impact therate of progress through particular classes and the overall program.In this work, it is
whatgraduates in electrical and computer engineering should know about standards. As part of this review, the electrical and computerengineering and engineering technology education communities reported their needs for knowledge and skills in the application ofstandards to engineering and engineering technology design and development in a survey conducted by the IEEE joint StandardsAssociation and Educational Activities Board’s Standards in Education Task Force in the late spring of 2004. The results of thatsurvey motivated development of on-line learning modules to provide a foundation to the use of standards in design and developmentby students and their faculty mentors in electrical and computer engineering and engineering technology. The IEEE
, pedagogy, and tool selection (such as how to use CATME Team-Maker to form inclusive and diversified teams) to promote DEI. In addition, he also works on many research-to-practice projects to enhance educational technology usage in engineering classrooms and educational research by various methods, such as natural language processing. In addition, he is also interested in the learning experiences of international students. Siqing also works as the technical development and support manager at the CATME research group.Tiantian Li Tiantian Li (Olivia) is a PhD student in Engineering Education at Purdue University. She is a Purdue graduate with a Bachelor of Science degree in Biological Engineering, with a concentration in
inter/multi-disciplinary coursework that forces students to learn some aspects of the other disciplines and to cause real-worldpersonality and technical issues to arise between functional areas. [2]CTech IncUBator@University of Bridgeport is a new university-based incubator intended to hasten and support thegrowth of startup technology companies. The CTech IncUBator is located on the UB campus, and focuses only ontechnical startup businesses. The incubator’s founding sponsors include Connecticut Innovations, Inc., theUniversity of Bridgeport, and The United Illuminating Company.The University of Bridgeport offers a variety of Bachelors and Masters degrees. As examples, the School ofBusiness offers Bachelors and Masters of Business
skills that they will require later in their careersregardless of the particular STEM major they choose to pursue. In the context of bioengineeringapplications, students are introduced to important topics such as the engineering design process,self-directed inquiry, effective scientific communication, creative problem-solving techniques,and teamwork skills.Rationale and Progression. We chose to focus first on implementation in Capstone Design(Spring 2017). Our engagement in a universal design learning community at our institution thequarter prior allowed us to discuss ways to train engineers in universal design and accessibilitytopics with other faculty, staff, and graduate students across the College of Engineering. Inspiredby discussions with
students, and students with demonstrated need for academic support during the transition from high school to college.Jennie S. Popp Ph.D., University of Arkansas Jennie Popp, Ph.D. is a Professor of Agricultural Economics and the Associate Dean of the Honors Col- lege at University of Arkansas. As Associate Dean, Dr. Popp contributes to student success initiatives through the management of Honors College study abroad and research grant programs, the facilitation of the development of service learning and other new courses, promotion of undergraduate research activ- ities and in contributions to the PTG and Honors College Path programs. Her research has focused on identification and implementation of sustainable
commitment betweengovernments aiming at building a common educational area and improving transparency andcompatibility. It is important to understand that this Bologna Process is the result of multiplereflections and analysis promoted by national and supranational work groups andpersonalities. From these the need of a paradigm change arises, not only in educationalstructures, but also in thought and knowledge creation.The learning process will lead students to acquire personal, academic and professional skills.These skills will play a fundamental role for the individual and for his integration in society.The focus of the learning-teaching process will shift towards the student and his particularprogress will serve as a point of reference. This
is an increasing interest in getting engineering students to function onteams is the demonstrated impact of cooperative education techniques on student learning.Several meta-analyses 4, 5 of cooperative learning have shown a strong positive impact comparedto more traditional, competitive approaches. Students, however, needed to be trained inteamwork in order to obtain maximal benefit from such cooperative learning approaches. As aresult of the positive effect on students learning and engineering programs’ interest in developingteamwork skills in their graduates, a wide variety of resources on team building are becomingavailable. Such resources include team development handbooks 6, 7, formative assessment forstudents working on teams 8, and
Paper ID #29712Departures from the ”norm”: How nontraditional undergraduates definedtheir success in an alternative engineering transfer programDr. Angela Minichiello P.E., Utah State University Angela Minichiello is an assistant professor in the Department of Engineering Education at Utah State University (USU) and a registered professional mechanical engineer. Her research examines issues of access, diversity, and inclusivity in engineering education. In particular, she is interested in engineering identity, problem-solving, and the intersections of online learning and alternative pathways for adult, nontraditional
Paper ID #14901The 2015 Capstone Design Survey: Observations from the Front LinesDr. Susannah Howe, Smith College Susannah Howe, Ph.D. is the Design Clinic Director in the Picker Engineering Program at Smith College, where she coordinates and teaches the capstone engineering design course. Her current research focuses on innovations in engineering design education, particularly at the capstone level. She is invested in building the capstone design community; she is a leader in the biannual Capstone Design Conferences and the Capstone Design Hub initiative. She is also involved with efforts to foster design learning in
Paper ID #16167Talking ”Faculty Development” with Engineering Educators, Then Talking”Engineering Education” with Faculty Developers: A Collaborative Reflec-tion on Working Across CommunitiesDr. Alexandra Coso Strong, Franklin W. Olin College of Engineering Alexandra Strong is an Assistant Professor for Systems Design and Engineering at Olin College of En- gineering. She joined Olin after completing a postdoctoral fellowship at Georgia Tech’s Center for the Enhancement of Teaching and Learning and a Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering from Georgia Tech. Prior to her time at Georgia Tech, she received her B.S. in Aerospace
classrooms, and is also interested in enhancing mathematics education through the integration of science, engineering, and computer programming.Dr. Tamara J Moore, Purdue University, West Lafayette Tamara J. Moore, Ph.D., is an Associate Professor in the School of Engineering Education and Director of STEM Integration in the INSPIRE Institute at Purdue University. Dr. Moore’s research is centered on the integration of STEM concepts in K-12 and postsecondary classrooms in order to help students make connections among the STEM disciplines and achieve deep understanding. Her work focuses on defining STEM integration and investigating its power for student learning
together to explore human, technology and society interactions to transform civil engineering education and practice with an emphasis on understanding hazard recog- nition, competencies, satisfaction, personal resilience, organizational culture, training, informal learning and social considerations. The broader impact of this work lies in achieving and sustaining safe, produc- tive, and inclusive project organizations composed of engaged, competent and diverse people. The SRL is supported by multiple research grants, including a CAREER award, funded by the National Science Foundation (NSF). Dr. Simmons is a former project director of the Summer Transportation Institute (STI) at South Carolina State University and
, Boulder Daria Kotys-Schwartz is the Faculty Director for the Mesa State College-University of Colorado Mechan- ical Engineering Partnership program and an instructor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the University of Colorado, Boulder. She received B.S. and M..S degrees in mechanical engineering from the Ohio State University and a Ph.D. in mechanical rngineering from the University of Colorado, Boul- der. Kotys-Schwartz has focused her research in engineering epistemology, engineering student learning, retention, and diversity. She is currently investigating the use of oral discourse method for conceptual development in engineering, the impact of a four-year hands-on design curriculum in engineering, the
familiarity with computers, and the learned ability to stay up all night without caffeine.Student #2 I haven taken 10.467 (polymer lab) and have some knowledge of laboratory procedures related to polymers. Ihave also had an internship last summer at xerox, where I learned about toner processing and some particle size analysis.Student #3 I’ve taken two other labs, 5.310 and 7.02. As a senior who has just completed 1st term ICE I have someexperience working closely with groups on a technical project. My prior knowledge from 10.32 and 10.37 should also behelpful.10. What happens if you all decide you want to get an “A” in tbe course and then, because of time constraints, one ofthe team members decides that a “B” will be all right?Student #l If we all
Foundation CAREER Award focused on characterizing latent diversity, which includes diverse attitudes, mindsets, and approaches to learning to understand engineering students’ identity development. She has won several awards for her research including the 2021 Journal of Civil Engineering Education Best Technical Paper, the 2021 Chemical Engineering Education William H. Corcoran Award, the 2022 American Educational Research Association Education in the Professions (Division I) 2021-2022 Outstanding Research Publication Award, and the 2023 American Institute of Chemical Engineers Award for Excellence in Engineering Education Research.Charlie D´ıaz, University of Pittsburgh Charlie Diaz is a PhD student studying
learning environment. While the influence of language on educationalexperiences has been the subject of several scholarly papers, no research have looked explicitlyat language use patterns in the field of engineering education or the possible negative effects ofbiased language.In light of this, the present study integrates two conceptual frameworks: implicit bias theory andacademic literacy theory. This approach allows for a detailed investigation into biased languageuse trends within engineering education research, as well as an understanding of how thesetrends diverge from the field’s goals of diversity and inclusion. Implicit bias theory examinesunconscious attitudes and stereotypes that subtly but significantly influence language use
to randomly assigned students duringthe Summer session and during the Fall semester of 2021. Based on what was learned from thesesections, the redesigned course will be taught by 7 instructors to approximately 400 students in17 sections during the 2022 Spring semester. A critical piece of the redesign is a new finalproject that focuses on a design-build-test experience. In this paper, the authors will discuss theprevious course and how it has been adjusted to better address the institutional outcomes. Theywill explain which topics were removed and what lessons and design experiences were added toadequately fulfill the USAFA’s objective of developing future Air Force officers who have asolid educational background in STEM. They will also
(www.vanth.org) are concerned about how their innovative efforts to integratecommunication instruction into their classes can be promulgated throughout the curriculum.To investigate these problems and gather data to help us improve the teaching of writingthroughout the curriculum, our interdisciplinary committee--faculty from engineering, writing,and the learning sciences—collaborated to: (1) systematically gather information about the writing standards that engineering faculty want to support (2) discuss the standards with faculty in relation to preferred teaching methods (3) disseminate those standards through a websiteOur primary research question was to determine whether engineering faculty within and acrossdisciplines share
-college students and there is a new Engineering Managementprogram in the Engineering College. The focus areas include a variety of engineering disciplinesand all are hybrids of the traditional programs. For example, students in computer sciencetypically combine traditional programming courses with courses in artificial intelligence. Themost traditional programs are those students that are using industrial and systems engineering as afocus area.5. Lessons Learned and Strategies for SuccessWe had some difficulties in getting the program started and in keeping our focus. We had a greatdeal of help and guidance from the NSF visiting committee as they pointed out key issues. Weconclude this paper with a few of the critical needs for success:Program
in the resourcesbelow, we aim to emphasize how these impacts are presented and touch upon some of theoverarching themes.In 2000, the NSF released the “Nifty Fifty” list in honor of their 50th anniversary—“NSF-fundedinventions, innovations and discoveries that have become commonplace in our lives” [34]. Ofthese breakthroughs, at least 22 have direct ties to engineering 1. A decade later, in celebration of1 Bar Codes, Buckyballs, CAD/CAM, Computer Visualization Techniques, The Darci Card, Data CompressionTechnology, Doppler radar, Earthquake Mitigation, “Eye Chip” or Retina Chip, Fiber Optics, The Internet, MRI:its 60th anniversary, the NSF compiled a list of sixty significant advancements—the “Sensational60”—that “have had a large impact or
, Michigan State University Michele J. Grimm is the Wielenga Creative Engineering Endowed Professor of Mechanical Engineering. Her research has focused on injury biomechanics – from characterizing important tissue properties to developing appropriate models for the assessment of injury mechanisms. Most recently, this has included working with obstetricians to identify the pathomechanics of neonatal brachial plexus injury. Based on this work, she served on the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Task Force on Neonatal Brachial Plexus Palsy. In addition to her scientific research, Dr. Grimm has spent a large part of her career focused on curriculum development and enhancement of student learning in
soundunderstanding of how to successfully start and lead a global team.IntroductionGlobalization is the current buzzword in the technical industry. But at the same time, it’s also arelatively new concept. Consequently, there is a growing interest and curiosity among existingand new engineering managers to learn what is really required to be an effective global leader.Globalization is definitely a good learning topic for new leaders. But it is equally, if not more,important to educate the existing leaders on this topic since they need to learn and adapt to a newform of leadership.Understanding globalization is a good start to becoming an effective global leader but thelearning does not end there. In addition, industry leaders and management students need to
changed how products are built. Products can now becustomized to meet the unique demands of the consumer. Automobiles, for example, were onceassembled to be identical, whereas now customers are able to purchase cars online, select from apallet of colors, and install unique features and equipment, whereby no two of the same product,make, or model are identical [1].While both types of manufacturing remain essential to the industry, advanced manufacturing hascreated a need for technicians with new skillsets. Technologies such as 3D printing, the Internetof Things (IoT), nanotechnology, cloud computing, augmented reality, and next-level robotics,have made a home in advanced manufacturing, resulting in increased speed, customization,precision, and
Chair of Civil and Construction Engineering. At Western Michigan, he started the civil engineering undergraduate and graduate degree programs and also chaired the Departments of Materials Science and Engineering and Industrial Design. In summer 2005, he joined the faculty at the University of Texas, Tyler. At UT, Tyler, he was the Founding Chair of the Department of Civil Engineering and instituted the bachelor’s and master’s degree programs. In 2006, he became the Dean of Engineering and Computer Science. Nelson’s primary technical research interest is the behavior of structural systems. For almost 25 years, he has been actively involved in evaluating the behavior of free-fall lifeboats and the development of
mathematical skills of students, computers and numerical analysis software (NAS)and modern computation tools can be used effectively to enhance the student learning ofengineering subjects, particularly when tedious algebraic work exhausts the student confidenceand patience in learning. In particular, the use of NAS can be justified when problems do notallow analytical solutions. A recent survey study1 indicates that a large number of undergraduatemechanical engineering programs in the United States extensively use arithmetic computationsoftware packages; e.g., Matlab or Mathematica in required (core) junior and seniormechanical engineering courses. Problems seem to arise when students try to use NAS to solve a dynamics problem whosebehavior is
informed design teaching and learning matrix,” Journal of Engineering Education, vol. 101, no. 4, pp. 738–797, 2012. doi: 10.1002/j.2168- 9830.2012.tb01127.x[23] R. P. Loweth, S. R. Daly, K. H. Sienko, A. Hortop, and E. A. Strehl, “Novice Designers’ Approaches to Justifying User Requirements and Engineering Specifications,” In Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference, 2020. doi: 10.1115/DETC2020- 22163.[24] I. Mohedas, S. R. Daly, and K. H. Sienko, “Requirements Development: Approaches and Behaviors of Novice Designers,” Journal of Mechanical Design, vol. 137, no. 071407, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1115
, Purdue University, West Lafayette Daniel M. Ferguson is CATME Managing Director in the school of engineering education, college of engineering and the recipient of several NSF awards for research in engineering education including his own research in engineering innovativeness and a research associate at Purdue University. Prior to coming to Purdue he was Assistant Professor of Entrepreneurship at Ohio Northern University. Before assuming that position he was Associate Director of the Inter-Professional capstone Studies Program [IPRO] and Senior Lecturer at Illinois Institute of Technology and involved in research in service learning, assessment processes and interventions aimed at improving learning objective
science background includes degrees in Botany and Forest Ecology. Dr. Bell’s interest in sharing science with others led him to earn a teaching license and then teach science for six years in a rural high school in Eastern Oregon, where he was recognized as the Oregon Science Teachers Association’s ”New Science Teacher of the Year.” Eventually, Dr. Bell’s interest in educational research and science teacher preparation led him back to graduate school, where he earned the PhD in Science Education in 1999. For the past 16 years, Dr. Bell has been heavily involved in teaching preservice teachers, providing professional development for practicing teachers, and research and development re- lated to teaching and learning
outcomes rather than thecontent of students’ interactions with users; as such, there may be a knowledge gap related to theprocess that students use to elicit requirements or solicit feedback during user interactions. Inother words, previous studies have often described what students learned about their usersthrough their interactions, but not how students learned this new information.Other research, focusing on situations where students did not interact with users, indicates whyuser interactions in and of themselves may be beneficial for student design outcomes. In lieu ofcollecting data from users, student designers may instead extract generalized information aboutusers from third-party research or rely on their own personal perspectives and