field.Michael Parker, Bristol Tennessee Essential Services MICHAEL L. PARKER received his undergraduate degree from East Tennessee State University in 2003 with a concentration in computer science. He has over 10 years of experience in networking and telecommunications in the cable TV and Internet service provider industry. He is the Network Supervisor for Bristol Tennessee Essential Services, a municipal electric utility and fiber to the user provider. He has participated as an examiner for the Tennessee Center for Performance Excellence.Robert Bridges, B&W Y-12 Technical Services, LLC Robert L. Bridges received his B.S. degree from East Tennessee State University in 2005 from the
Paper ID #10790An Undergraduate Course in Military Electronic Applications, aka ElectronicWarfareProf. Gene L. Harding, Purdue University GENE L. HARDING is an associate professor of Electrical and Computer Engineering Technology at Purdue University, where he has taught for eleven years. He has three years of industrial experience with Agilent Technologies and 28 years of combined active and reserve service in the United States Air Force. Page 24.176.1 c American Society for Engineering
conditioning of a material at higher temperatures. This paper describes theconception and execution of a laboratory to improve undergraduate students understanding ofcomplex material behaviors. In addition it includes portions which enable the student to quantifyphenomena often discussed only in a qualitative fashion. Laboratory procedure for theexperiment is described in detail. The laboratory presents theory and application in naturalfashion, linked and mutually supportive. The paper discusses the exceptionally positive impactthat this immediacy has on student learning.IntroductionThere is renewed emphasis on laboratory experience and project based learning in undergraduateengineering education, coupled with widespread belief that interdisciplinary
well, the process of assimilating different perspectives can bothproduce a superior building and enrich and expand the vision and skills of the participants.The Solar Decathlon project allowed largely inexperienced students from engineering andarchitecture, and advisors from all three disciplines, to breach the traditional barriers andto appreciate the contributions of the others—a maturing process that will serve themwell. However, this was not accomplished without some difficulty. Learning engineering design is challenging in today’s academic environment due tothe emphasis on research and specialization. Design requires both a breadth and depth ofunderstanding. Engineering, as a field, has excelled in pursuing depth of
, collaborative learning program for first-year federal Pell grant recipients. HEDS Student Success Champions Graduate, July 2023. I enjoy camping, hiking and exploring new landscapes with my family. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Strategies for Improving Retention in a New Undergraduate Engineering ProgramAbstractThis Complete Evidence-Based Practice paper details steps taken to improve retention ofstudents in a new undergraduate engineering program. The effort to improve retention began inthe 2018-19 academic year after strikingly poor results for first-year students that entered theprogram in the previous year. It was also part of a campus-wide effort to
. Sheppard, S.D., et al., Educating Engineers: Designing for the Future of the Field. 2008, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.2. Howe, S. and J. Wilbarger. 2005 NATIONAL SURVEY OF ENGINEERING CAPSTONE DESIGN COURSES. in Proc. ASEE Annual Meeting. 2006. Chicago.3. Ford, R.M. and C.S. Coulston, Design for Electrical and Computer Engineers. 2007, New York: McGraw- Hill.4. Woods, D.R., Problem-based Learning: how to gain the most from PBL. third ed. 1996, Hamilton, ON: Waterdown.5. Dutson, A.J., et al., A Review of Literature of Teaching Engineering Design Through Project-Oriented Capstone Courses. J. Eng. Educ., 1997. 89: p. 17.6. Dym, C.L., et al., Engineering Design Thinking, Teaching, and Learning. J
Paper ID #40801Adoption of an Advocates and Allies Program to a Predominantly STEMCampusDr. Adrienne Robyn Minerick, Michigan Technological University Adrienne Minerick is a Professor of Chemical Engineering and Director of ADVANCE at Michigan Tech- nological University. She earned her B.S. from Michigan Tech and her M.S. and Ph.D. from the University of Notre Dame. Her administrative experience has included Associate Dean for Research and Innovation in the College of Engineering, Assistant to the Provost for Faculty Development, Dean of the School of Technology, founding Dean of the College of Computing, and Interim
that both male and female engineering studentspositively benefit from taking a sociotechnical course compared to a technical course across allthree categories, with a more pronounced influence on female students.1. Introduction and BackgroundEngineering education programs typically focus on developing students’ technical skills withless attention given to the societal, cultural, or political context in which complex engineeringproblem solving occurs [e.g., 1-5]. This is particularly prevalent during students’ second yearwhen coursework is mainly centered on decontextualized engineering science classes [6, 7]. Thislack of contextualization can make it difficult for students to connect what they are learning towhat they would do as a practicing
experience designing water and wastewater treatment facilities in central California. He was the recipient of the NSF CAREER award in 2011. Dr. Brown’s research interests are in conceptual change, epistemology, and social or situated cognition. Specifically, his research focuses on theoretical approaches to understanding why some engineering concepts are harder to learn than others, including the role of language and context in the learning process.Mr. Devlin Montfort, Washington State UniversityNadia L. Frye, Washington State University Page 23.1365.1 c American Society for Engineering
interest in learning howthey can become more innovative, accelerate innovation processes, and identify strategiesfor commercializing innovation. Long-time innovation leaders such as 3M and Toyotaare studied for their internal processes and emulated by firms both from within andbeyond their respective industries.5 New theories about how innovation works inindustrial “ecosystems” have made celebrities out of some academics. Harvard’s ClaytonChristensen has made terms such as “innovator’s dilemma” and “disruptive innovation”as common as “first mover advantage” was just a few short years ago6. Companies todayare aware of the challenges and pitfalls associated with innovation, and are seeking waysto ensure that the “innovation to cash” cycle is short
consciously or subconsciouslydevaluing the intellectual capabilities of students of color [16] and courses heavily reliant onmemorizing content such as formulae or definitions disadvantage students with ADHD whomight struggle with rote learning [17]. Therefore, students who hold one or more of thesemarginalized identities might find themselves excluded within their classrooms. However, even domestic students who do not hold traditionally marginalized identitiesmight find themselves struggling in engineering courses at the college level, and that can beattributed to the differences in schooling that such students experience before they get to thesame college classroom. Walden et al. [18], in their recommendations for stronger practices ofequity
in active projects in their major,providing mentorship from faculty, and enhancing their professional development by offeringspecific workshops targeted toward their research experience and to facilitate their transitioninto an existing minority program or internship. Specific objectives of the program are toincrease: Proceedings of the 2014 American Society for Engineering Education Zone IV Conference Copyright © 2014, American Society for Engineering Education 1421. Each student’s ability to apply content and skills learned in the classroom to research2. Their understanding of the research process3. The
by many as the killerof the positive energy or other driving forces.Peer Support Page 12.1614.9Most of the persisters, as well as switchers, cited the importance of peer support in assisting themwhen they are having troubles with engineering coursework. One computer engineering majorwent further to explain why she preferred the peer support rather than teaching assistant support.She related that “If a teaching assistant describes something, they know it very well, and theymight describe it in high-end terms, and you may or may not get it. But if someone is learning itright now and it clicks with them, then they are probably going to explain
later, the council beganevaluating engineering technology degree programs. By 1947, ECPD had accredited 582engineering programs and 14 technology programs. In 1980, ECPD was renamed theAccreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) to more accurately describe itsemphasis on accreditation of both engineering (1303 programs) and technology programs (637).In response to the boom in computer science education, ABET helped establish the ComputingSciences Accreditation Board (now called CSAB) in 1985. CSAB is now one of ABET's largestmember societies with more than 300 accredited programs. In 2005, ABET formally changed itsname to ABET and no longer uses the title "Accreditation Board for Engineering andTechnology." ABET is an organization
succeed in their selected field of study16. When faculty adhereto traditional grading practices (such as the imposition of curves), they have a differential impacton women students. Faculty differ in their views of, strategies for, and success at creating an atmosphere thatfosters learning.12 The subject matter of projects and problems, the fit between pedagogical andlearning styles, and classroom "climate" have each been discussed as influences that affectretention, particularly the retention of students of color and women students. Faculty practicesfrequently mentioned in the retention literature include: the use of study and project groups,exam construction, time pressure on tests (and tactics for neutralizing it); incorporation
correlated to Innovation Self Efficacy andEntrepreneurial Learning Experiences. Finally, we draw practical implications of these relationshipsfor Entrepreneurship and Engineering Education, while at the same time keeping in mind that youcannot just “make” someone an Entrepreneur or change his or her personality. This paper is anexplorative starting point that results in various findings that suggest future research. We recommendfocusing on the three personality traits that showed significant results. 1. IntroductionSome of the biggest economic success stories were written by people who had an idea andfounded their own company. An example would be Sergey Brin and Larry Page who foundedGoogle in 1998. Today, the company employs over 72,000 people
Elementary Engineering Workshop (Fundamental)AbstractIn the engineering education community, failure at the design stage has been promoted byresearchers and policy documents, generally in an effort to engage learners in authenticengineering practices. Less often in engineering education, failure has been discussed asproductive in its own right. One way failure may be beneficial is by encouraging students torevise and build on their ideas about why their designs are performing as they are. This connectsdirectly to decades-old constructivist ideas that learning occurs through constructing, testing, andrefining theories about how the world works.If students are indeed learning from failure, then we can expect to see
Education, 2023 Resources and Exercises for STEM Educators and Students Navigating the “Misinformation Age”Teaching students how to research a topic and navigate source usage is an important part ofpreparing future professionals in any discipline. In STEM/STEAM fields, both professionals andstudents must keep up with the fast pace of innovation, making information literacy essential toprofessional growth. Source evaluation instruction in students’ disciplines can help studentsidentify the information sources most applicable to their research. Moreover, reading credible,current publications helps students learn the discourse of their discipline [1]. However, thecomplex range of sources and ways of searching available to
leadership development, performance management, competency development and people analytics. She integrates her research in Engineering Education with prior background in Human Resource Management and Engineering to understand better ways to develop STEM workforce both in universities and companies.Prof. Brent K. Jesiek, Purdue University, West Lafayette Dr. Brent K. Jesiek is an Associate Professor in the Schools of Engineering Education and Electrical and Computer Engineering at Purdue University. He also leads the Global Engineering Education Collabora- tory (GEEC) research group, and is the recipient of an NSF CAREER award to study boundary-spanning roles and competencies among early career engineers. He holds a B.S
learn it on the computer”) and difficulty getting to study sessions (held “during herother classes”) she concluded that she did not have the necessarily preparation, which maderemaining in her chosen engineering major impossible (F). This discussion about mathematicsboth reflects the pattern in the scholarly literature7-9 and helps us see that, given the studentdemographics at This State University, a pattern of simply enrolling in more math classes maynot be sufficient to support student success.Not surprisingly, participation in e-Girls and other STEM related camps or summer enrichmentprogramming was cited as being a pre-college experience that was supportive of their academicand career pathways. Interestingly, it is not only the emphasis on
Paper ID #21987Introducing Social Relevance and Global Context into the Introduction toHeat Transfer CourseDr. Elizabeth A. Reddy, University of San Diego Elizabeth Reddy is a post-doctoral research associate at the University of San Diego’s Shiley-Marcos School of Engineering. She is a social scientist, holding a PhD in cultural anthropology from the Univer- sity of California at Irvine and an MA in Social Science from the University of Chicago. She is Co-Chair of the Committee for the Anthropology of Science, Technology and Computing in the American Anthro- pological Association. She studies engineers and their work in
Michigan Tech and M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Science and Technology Studies (STS) from Virginia Tech. Dr. Jesiek draws on expertise from engineering, computing, and the social sciences to advance understanding of geographic, disciplinary, and historical variations in engineering education and practice.Natascha Michele Trellinger, Purdue University, West Lafayette Natascha Trellinger is a Ph.D. student in the School of Engineering Education at Purdue University. She graduated with her B.S. in Aerospace Engineering from Syracuse University where her interest in the teaching and learning aspects of engineering began. At Purdue, Natascha is a member of the Global Engineering Education Collaboratory (GEEC) and is particularly
].The experiences serve as academic anchors that bolster confidence, a growth mindset,motivation, a sense of connection with faculty and peers [3], and collaborative learning [4]. Firstyear discipline-specific experiences can better inform students of the profession, significantlyimprove retention, and grow strong associations of students with their respective engineeringdepartments [5].The use of 3D printing and CAD/simulation technology can be used in design-build-test projectswithin introductory courses to enrich student experiences. It can provide a realistic virtual canvasto explore, more fundamentally, the nature of the engineering design process [6]. The simulationtools provide immediate feedback on realistic engineering outputs like
of new ideas and new Page 22.1357.2applications. However, one individual is sometimes overshadowed or excluded from the group.What can a whole team of individuals from diverse backgrounds accomplish? First steps first;for there to be a team, there needs to be diversity among available engineers. This is whereeducators come in; educators can strive to develop diverse individuals, not mold every studentinto a clone engineer.Progress and Resources to Learn About Current Diversity IssuesA number of excellent articles have been published on promoting diversity and measuringprogress towards this goal. One comprehensive study is Gary May’s
to have theengineering graduates who will work directly for DoD and for their suppliers, develop SEcompetencies that they can successfully apply to military systems development and deployment.In order to achieve this goal, DoD has supported a consortium of 14 universities and militaryacademies to pilot various projects whose results can help establish a framework for building SEinto the capstone design courses of engineering programs nationwide.The main SE learning goals that are being pursued in the project at Stevens to help develop this Page 22.1278.3framework for all participating students are described below. These are aligned with the
25.1075.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2012 Professional Development-Styled Short Courses for a Highly Effective Bioprocess Engineering Laboratory ExperienceAbstractProfessional development-styled short courses often provide working engineers an intensivehands-on learning experience that is difficult to achieve within the confines of the dailyworkplace. Can this model be extended into engineering education and provide engineeringstudents hands-on laboratory experiences that are difficult to achieve within the confines ofcampus? This collaborative project between the Engineering Department at East CarolinaUniversity (ECU) and the BioNetwork Capstone Center, an industrial-scale
projects over a five-yearperiod from 2002 to 2006 in an early mechanical engineering design course. All ten,semester-long team projects are hands-on and require the design, fabrication and testingof an artifact. Of the six individual projects described: two are experimental; onerequires reverse engineering; one is hands-on; and two are related to design evaluationand the design process. Example results are given for two of the team projects and twoof the individual projects. Student surveys indicate that engineering students enjoyworking on these projects and learn from the experience.IntroductionEarly, hands-on, design experiences in the BSME curriculum have become morecommon recently even though providing “hands-on” experiences in an
(STEM). Given the need, universities and colleges must meet the Page 11.1107.2growing challenge to identify and enroll students in these areas1. The September 2000 Report ofthe Congressional Commission on the Advancement of Women and Minorities in Science,Engineering and Technology Development (CAWMSET), entitled Land of Plenty; Diversity asAmerica’s Competitive Edge in Science, Engineering and Technology, states that “Unless theSET (science, engineering, and technology) workforce becomes more representative of thegeneral U.S. workforce, the nation may likely face severe shortages in SET workers, such asthose already seen in many computer
and qualitative approaches offertotal of 667 articles were retrieved from Scopus, Web of a more holistic analysis of EV adoption. For machine learning,Science, Google Scholar, and JSTOR using specified keywords articles employing advanced computational models, such asand filters. Then screening is an essential step to remove the neural networks and predictive algorithms, to analyze and124 duplicates of the articles’ abstract downloads. Titles and forecast EV adoption trends[14], [15], [15], [16], [17], [18].abstracts were investigated to 319 of exclude irrelevant articles. After collecting, selecting, and categorizing articles, theThe third step is to check their eligibility
computational/data analysis courses. This spring, we areoffering a sensing course for the first time. And we have worked to integrate sensing and sensingdata analysis and interpretation into our project sequence (required semester-long courses ofCivil and Environmental Engineering students their sophomore, junior, and senior years). Our junior-level, semester-long Civil and Environmental Engineering (CEE) projectcourse is nine “units” (at our institution one unit connotes, on average, one hour of student workper week of the course). All junior CEE students are required to take the course. Our CEEstudents are also required to take a sophomore and senior project courses. Non-CEE studentstypically do not enroll in these courses. Typically, the