Paper ID #16350Privatization of Public Education: Lessons from New Orleans for Engineer-ing Education in K-12 and BeyondDr. Donna M. Riley, Virginia Tech Donna Riley is Professor of Engineering Education at Virginia Tech.Mrs. Janice L. Hall, Virginia Tech I am a doctoral student in Engineering Education at Virginia Tech. I have B.S. and M.S. degrees in biolog- ical and bio-medical engineering respectively. It was through my participation in extracurricular activities and my experience as a graduate teaching assistant I found my passion for engineering education. My research interests include broadening participation and
different from many other invention competitions in that teamwork isstrongly encouraged and the teacher is a vital part of facilitating the process. When studentsparticipate in the InVenture Challenge, they do not work alone at home; rather, they arecollaborating with up to two other student peers and their teacher is guiding them through anengineering design process. As a result, the InVenture Challenge is inclusive and diverse—abouthalf of K-12 participants are female and nearly 40% are underrepresented minorities.The contributions of this paper are two-fold. First, a model is provided for a K-12 innovationprogram housed at a university that is aimed at empowering underrepresented groups in STEMdisciplines by looking further down the pipeline
President of the Milwaukee area Association of Health Care Executives, as a Board of Exam- iners for the Wisconsin Forward Award and as President of ALPs (Accelerated Learning Programs) in Oshkosh. Among her current volunteer activities, she serves as a quality consultant for Oshkosh Public Schools, as a leadership consultant to Christine Ann Domestic Abuse Services and is on the Advisory Board for the VNA (Visiting Nurse Association) of Wisconsin. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 Cultures of Collaboration in Emergency Remote Teaching and BeyondIntroductionWe pride ourselves on teaching through hands-on learning and being available to students
is no meaning outside of a person’s perception. Weconstruct our understanding of the world through our own realities: “[K]nowledge refers toconceptual structures that epistemic agents, given the range of present experience withintheir tradition of thought and language, consider viable” (Von Glasersfeld, 1989, p. 124;italics in original). Thus, knowledge is contextual, contingent, and subject to interpretation.Constructivism informs the thematic analysis of this study by considering the statements ofthe research participant to be their own construction of what diversity means and how itimpacts education. During the analysis I made efforts to ensure the authentic voice of theparticipant.Constructivism also has implications for data analysis
majors as well as at NAU since 2012. Before that, her own career path has been dotted with many exciting and rewarding ventures, some of which include 7 years as a high school science teacher (2 of which were at an international school in Mongolia), and 6 years in logistics and other science support for NSF grantees in the Antarctic. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2021 To Infinity and Beyond: Boosting URM Students’ Career Trajectories Through Professional Experiences Abstract It is hard to deny the impact of experiential learning through internships on
Paper ID #40773Enhancing the Cultural Competence of K-12 STEM Teachers through a GlobalResearch ExperienceDr. Margaret Pinnell, University of Dayton Dr. Margaret Pinnell is a professor in the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of Dayton.Dr. Leanne Petry, Central State University Dr. Leanne Petry is a Materials Engineer and Professor in the College of Engineering, Science, Tech- nology, and Agriculture (CESTA) at Central State University (CSU). Her expertise is in analytical and materials characterization techniques, including microscopy, spectroscopy, chromatography, and electro
exposing students to Python. Through theexisting researcher-practitioner partnerships (RPPs), we have been providing CT professionaldevelopment for the teachers based on block programming. Furthermore, we developed andpresented the new materials in two online PDs as a short and a more detailed one in Spring andSummer of 2020 to help the teachers with planning for the 20-21 school year. Moreover, westudied how such PD would impact the teachers.Our prior study of the middle school ecosystem revealed that teachers’ needs should always bethe focal point of PDs, as there are many unmet needs for CS/CT in K-12. Our first challenge wasto provide a holistic view of programming in Python while reassuring the teachers that they areable to learn the language
.Rios-Aguilar, C., & Deil-Amen, R. (2012). Beyond getting in and fitting in an examination of social networks and professionally relevant social capital among Latina/o university students. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 11(2), 179–196.Rogers-Chapman, M. F. (2014). Accessing Stem-Focused Education: Factors That Contribute to the Opportunity to Attend Stem High Schools across the United States. Education and Urban Society, 46(6), 716–737.San Miguel, A. M., & Kim, M. M. (2014). Successful Latina Scientists and Engineers Their Lived Mentoring Experiences and Career Development. Journal of Career Development, 894845314542248.Solórzano, D. G., & Delgado Bernal, D. (2001). Examining transformational resistance through a
Paper ID #45135Development of a measure of intersectional socioeconomic inequality thatextends beyond incomeDr. Justin Charles Major, Rowan University Dr. Justin C. Major (they/them) is an Assistant Professor of Experiential Engineering Education at Rowan University where they leads ASPIRE Lab (Advancing Student Pathways through Inequality Research in Engineering). Justin’s research focuses on low-income students, engineering belonging and marginalization mechanisms, adverse childhood experiences, and feminist approaches to EER, and connects these topics to broader understandings of student success in engineering. Justin
in Biomedical Engineering and a Ph.D. in Engineering Education Systems and Design from Arizona State University. Prior, she worked as an engineer in the medical device industry. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Beyond Math Readiness: Understanding Why Some Women Pursue Engineering bstractAStudents decide to study engineering for many reasons: they may be interested in math and science, enjoy tinkering with things, or have been encouraged to study engineering because of their academic ability. Women students often study engineering because of their math and science abilities. In the literature, interest and success in math and science are
higher tax districts. At the same time, black families were disproportionately excluded from these areas, even if they could afford it, because of bias in obtaining a mortgage or even getting an offer on a house accepted.” “The 2017 Report of the Michigan Civil Rights Commission, “The Flint Water Crisis: Systemic Racism Through the Lens of Flint” was illuminating, disheartening, and in many ways surprising. (Which at my age should not happen).”Beyond issues of environmental justice and community health, this approach is recommended to enablestudents in many disciplines to examine the roles of racial and economic justice in the resilience of anypublic infrastructure disrupted by extreme events – a topic of
Paper ID #14555First Round Evaluation of First Tech Challenge (FTC) Robotics Club: Doesit Really Prepare Students for beyond College?Dr. Fethiye Ozis, Northern Arizona University Fethiye started working as an instructor in CECMEE at Northern Arizona University in Fall 2014. She has received her Ph.D. in environmental engineering from University of Southern California in 2005. Her doctorate work focused on modeling of bio filters for air pollution control. After graduation, she has been involved in K-12 STEM institutions both as a teacher and administrator. Her research interests include biotechnology for environmental
Paper ID #13684Supporting Women in Computing through Regional ConferencesProf. Alka R Harriger, Purdue University, West Lafayette Alka Harriger joined the faculty of the Computer and Information Technology Department (CIT) in 1982 and is currently a Professor of CIT. For the majority of that time, she has been actively involved in teaching software development courses. From 2008-2014, she led the NSF-ITEST funded SPIRIT (Surprising Possibilities Imagined and Realized through Information Technology) project. Since October 2013, she has been co-leading with Prof. Brad Harriger the NSF-ITEST funded TECHFIT (Teaching
Analytics Scientist with interest in design research, learning analytics, re- search methods and under-representation in engineering, A major strand of his work focuses on develop- ing and analyzing learning analytics that model students’ cognitive states or strategies through fine-grained computer-logged data from open-ended technology-centered science and engineering projects. His disser- tation research explored the use of Minecraft to teach early engineering college students about the design process.Ms. Sherry Hsi, Concord Consortium Dr. Sherry Hsi is the Executive Vice President of the Concord Consortium. She leads the strategic de- velopment, design, and research of learning technologies using her background in
science!”Because TechHive also includes elements of science education and science communication,some participants saw themselves moving in that direction. For example, two participants alsoexpressed interest in public service careers, which they indicated were influenced by theirexperience in TechHive. One was particularly interested in communication, saying, “I want toteach and keep doing video production on the side of scientific research.” Another was notspecific about what they wanted to do, but knew that TechHive “reinforced my goal to give backto the community as much a possible through what I create.”Beyond interview and survey results, youth provided additional evidence that they are moreinterested in STEM. Several participants described
than 2700 patients and aimed at gaining knowledge about atrial fibrillation. She returned to academia in Fall 2013. She now teaches Fluid Dynamics and is in charge of the freshman engineering program in Mechanical Engineering department. It is a tri-term course introducing theoretical and hands-on engineering to a wide variety of students. She is also director of the Invention Bootcamp at PSU, a 4-weeks summer course for high school students in a university setting. She received her BS and MS degrees in Mechanical and Materials Engineering from the EPF, Ecole Polytechnique Feminine, France, and an MS degree in Bioengineering from Clemson University, SC (2004).Shannon K. Keith-Marsoun, Portland State University
do tend to produce more productiveresearchers [8]. Thus, engaging graduate students in activities that develop them as teachers andprovide them as opportunities beyond their research could increase retention in doctoralprograms, as well as improve their research abilities. Melding these two needs of improving K-12 STEM education with increasing diverseopportunities for graduate students to engage beyond their research projects could be synergistic.This paper describes a program to take the scientific expertise of researchers, both graduatestudents and postdoctoral fellows, to underserved secondary classrooms by pairing researcherswith teachers. The researchers share their research at the students’ levels by visiting theclassrooms
NSF S-STEM Track 3: Scaling Up Student Success through Broadening Participation Beyond our S-STEM CohortIntroductionFirst year programs in engineering education are commonly used to help improve studentsuccess and retention at engineering colleges. Such attendant programs often involve studentinterventions such as learning communities, student mentoring, and bridge programs or bootcamps that provide external motivations and supplementary learning objectives aimed at helpingfirst year students in engineering succeed academically, [1]. Moreover, urban universities oftenhave student populations with a wide array of hurdles that impede their success in engineeringand STEM fields. Of these includes financial instabilities
psychology and a M.Ed. degree in educational psychology. Her research interests include K-12 student mathematics and science achievement, STEM and gender, and co-curricular involvement.Dr. Eric A. Vance, Virginia Tech Dr. Eric Vance is an assistant research professor of statistics at Virginia Tech. He is the Director of LISA, Virginia Tech’s Laboratory for Interdisciplinary Statistical Analysis, which met with 1324 clients last year to help them use statistics to solve real-world problems in their research. LISA’s primary mission is to train statisticians to become interdisciplinary collaborators, and since its reformation in 2008, it has trained and mentored 173 statistics students to communicate and collaborate with non
26.204.1 tunity to present at a regional and national conference and she has conducted research internationally. In addition, Ms. Hester is a licensed graduate social worker (LGSW) in the state of Maryland and pro- vides outpatient mental health treatment to members in underserved communities. Contact information: shawnisha@gmail.com c American Society for Engineering Education, 2015 An NSF AGEP Program’s Unintended Effect on Broadening Participation: Transforming “Non-STEM” Graduate Students into Engineering Education Faculty, Researchers, K-12 Educators, and Advocates Introduction The National Science Foundation’s Alliances for Graduate Education and the Professoriate (AGEP
become a valued resource for business incubator programs throughout Virginia and her success as a business consultant is reflected in the successful outcomes of her clients. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2016 Beyond "The Innovator's DNA:" Systematic Development of Creative Intelligence in an Engineering Entrepreneurship ProgramIn a seminal paper published in the Harvard Business Review in 2009 and titled “The Innovator’sDNA,” Dyer, Gregersen, and Christensen argue that there are "five discovery skills thatdistinguish the most innovative entrepreneurs from other executives." The specific skills theyidentified through their research were (1) associating, (2) questioning, (3
learning goals for pre-college engineering are stillbeing contested. One argument, which is promoted in science standards, is that engineeringdesign provides an authentic context to apply science concepts [4] [5] [6]. However, others arguethat this represents too narrow a view of engineering and promotes misconceptions [7] [8]. Inresponse to these concerns, the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) andAdvancing Excellence in P12 Engineering Education introduced a Framework for P-12Engineering Learning [9]. This framework outlines learning goals for engineering literacy thatmove beyond a narrow focus on practices, including engineering habits of mind and knowledge.In addition, the authors call for further research to scaffold learning
through an Undergraduate Mentoring Teamand Module Database, ChE Outreach, 48, (1), 33-36.40. Moskal, B., Skokan, C., (2011). Supporting the K-12 Classroom through University Outreach, Journal ofHigher Education Outreach and Engagement, 15 (1), 53-75.41. Sullivan, J., et al, (1999). Beyond the Pipeline: Building a K-12 Engineering Outreach Program, Proceedings ofthe 29th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference – Session 11b5-21, San Juan, Puerto Rico.42. Nadleson, L., Callahan, J., (2011). A Comparison of Two Engineering Outreach Programs for Adolescents,Journal of STEM Education, 12 (1&2), 43-52.43. Groh, J., Scott, R. (2014) Access Engineering: Re-visioning Summer Opportunities for Pre-College Outreach,WEPAN 2014, available at http
Paper ID #33533Engineering Explorations: Connecting K-12 Classroom Learning and FieldTrip Experiences through Engineering DesignDanielle Harlow, University of California, Santa Barbara Danielle Harlow is a professor of STEM education at the University of California, Santa Barbara.Ron Skinner, MOXI, The Wolf Museum of Exploration + Innovation Ron Skinner, Research and Evaluation Specialist at MOXI, The Wolf Museum of Exploration + Innova- tion Ron Skinner has been involved with science education and research for the past 30 years. He has taught physics, astronomy, and general science in formal settings to audiences from
Paper ID #25690Building a Cybersecurity Pipeline through Experiential Virtual Labs andWorkforce AlliancesDr. Jorge Crichigno, University of South Carolina Jorge Crichigno received the Ph.D. degree in computer engineering from the University of New Mexico, Albuquerque (NM), USA. He is an Associate Professor in the Integrated Information Technology De- partment in the College of Engineering and Computing at the University of South Carolina, Columbia (SC), USA. His current research interests are in the areas of network and protocol optimization for high- throughput high-latency systems, and Internet measurements for cyber
students’engagement and factors they consider when making engagement decisions through a compilationof survey items from multiple co-curricular engagement surveys and frameworks [12], [13], [18].In future work of this project, findings from the pilot survey will be used to prototype the co-curricular engagement guide. To further explore engagement decisions of the student population,stakeholder interviews will be conducted and inform iterations of the engagement guide, thusimproving its usability and potential adoption as a resource.Study Context. The student population studied is an undergraduate engineering population at amid-Atlantic research institution. Majors that students can enroll in include biomedicalengineering, chemical engineering, civil and
pathways to inform education for future engineers?RQ2. What can we learn about the pathways of Makers through the qualitative research approach, constructivist grounded theory, utilizing artifact elicitation interview and critical incident interview methods?This research, guided by RQ1 and RQ2, is situated within a broader four-year study exploresmaking as a means of engaging both current engineering students as well as adults and pre-college students in the engineering landscape described in The Engineer of 2020, ABET a-k, and21st Century Skills.The study was designed with Crotty’s17 four elements of a research study (epistemology
transitions and retention of underrepresented students in engineering and also research about engineering global preparedness and engineering innovation. She also has research expertise in STEM K-12 and in STEM assessment. She chairs USC’s STEM Consortium.Dr. Lisa Benson, Clemson University Lisa Benson is an Associate Professor of Engineering and Science Education at Clemson University, with a joint appointment in Bioengineering. Her research focuses on the interactions between student moti- vation and their learning experiences. Her projects involve the study of student perceptions, beliefs and attitudes towards becoming engineers and scientists, and their problem solving processes. Other projects in the Benson group
Paper ID #11396Synthesis of Engineering Undergraduate Students’ Out of Class InvolvementMs. Rongrong Yu, Virginia Tech Rongrong Yu is a PhD student at the Educational Research and Evaluation Program in School of Education at Virginia Tech. She holds a B.S. degree in psychology and a M.Ed. degree in educational psychology. Her research interests include K-12 student mathematics and science achievement, STEM and gender, and co-curricular involvement.Dr. Denise Rutledge Simmons PE, Virginia Tech Dr. Denise R. Simmons, PE, is an assistant professor in the Myers-Lawson School of Construction and in Civil &
changes of global competency levels of engineeringundergraduate students and how it is influenced by different factors through time. A conceptualmodel differs from the formal structures of hypothesis testing in the sense that it is exploratory innature. That is, it looks to uncover any existing relationships between the considered variables,based either in theory or in empirical evidence, instead of testing the magnitude or direction ofhypothesized relationships 15. Our model proposes that students entering an engineering programmay already have certain levels of global competency, and that these potential differences arecritical in designing strategies and interventions at the college-level. In our model, these baselinelevels are influenced by