Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Stimulating K-12 Student Interest through Industry, Engineering College and K-12 School PartnershipsAbstractIndustries that employ engineers have an interest in supporting the children of their communitiesthrough pipeline programs to encourage K-12 students to develop interest and excel inmathematics, science, technology, and engineering. This can be accomplished by supporting theefforts of local K-12 schools to encourage students to pursue careers in STEM fields. We havefound that industry often has funding and a base of volunteers but may lack the knowledge, staff,and other means to effectively work with K-12 schools to accomplish these STEM educationgoals.This gap can be
universities to address this issue.BibliographyThe provided bibliography was used as an inspiration for documenting this AE studio experienceand is not specifically used in writing this paper.1. Beck, G. (2009) Leading New Design Paradigm for the 21st Century and Beyond, presented at AIA Convention2. Engineers vs. Architects by Arabian Business.com staff writer, Wednesday, 02 April 20083. The Ohio State Engineer, Co-operation of Engineers and Architects, by Dr. Frederick h. Newfll4. Finch, J. K. 1978. Engineering Classics. Kensington, MD: Cedar press.5. Gille, B. 1966. Engineers of the Renaissance. Cambridge: MIT Press.6. Grafton, A. 2000. Leon Battista Alberti: Master Builder of the Italian Renaissance. New York: Hill and Wang.7
AC 2011-700: UNDERWATER ROVS IN PRE-COLLEGE EDUCATION:UNIVERSITY-K12 PARTNERSHIPS THAT GO BEYOND THE COMPE-TITIONSDouglas E. Oppliger, Michigan Technological University Mr. Oppliger is a professional engineer and a lecturer in the Engineering Fundamentals department at Michigan Technological University. He is the director of the High School Enterprise program which has a mission to increase the numbers of students pursuing post-secondary degrees and careers in STEM fields. At its core, this program supports K-12 teachers who are leading teams of students in long-term STEM projects. This work is the latest in Oppliger’s history of working in K-12 STEM areas. For the past 10 years he has developed and taught first
represented the most advantageous combination ofthese criteria. During the think-aloud sessions these three participants began many of their phrases withthe word, “So,…” These declarative statements sounded very matter-of-fact and purposeful as ifto say, “Here is what I am going to do…” As a result, these participants sounded very confidentin their approaches as they worked step-by-step through the problem. These statements seem toindicate that they had a clear plan for the problem in mind. Each of these three participants spentless time on the problem compared to the others (with the exception of Joshua, who only gavethe problem a superficial treatment and never moved beyond material selection). The linear anddeterministic approaches of
emphasizes that synergy across a number ofinterconnected fields is needed to tackle certain types of challenges (but even here the emphasisis placed on technoscientific dimensions of problems). For example, the report suggests thatpersonalized medicine “will be addressed by the collaborative efforts of researchers from manydisciplines, from geneticists to clinical specialists to engineers.” 26 These openings point the waytoward a more expansive understanding of engineering and its potential contributions to grand-challenge problems, but the report does not follow through with this approach, which we take upin the following section.Alternative Framings of Engineering: Beyond the Social-Technical DivideContrary to the approach taken in Grand
AC 2011-2082: ENGAGING K-12 TEACHERS IN TECHNOLOGY TOOLSTO SUPPORT ELECTRONIC AND MOBILE LEARNING THROUGH ANONLINE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT COURSEMeltem Alemdar, Georgia Institute of Technology Dr. Meltem Alemdar is a Research Scientist in the Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics, and Computing (CEISMC) at the Georgia Institute of Technology. Dr. Alemdar has experience evaluat- ing programs that fall under the umbrella of educational evaluation, including K-12 educational curricula, after-school programs, and comprehensive school reform initiatives. Across these evaluations, she has used a variety of evaluation methods, ranging from multi-level evaluation plans designed to assess pro- gram impact to
, the Division is sponsoring a panel session on BestPractices in K-12 and university partnerships. Submissions chosen for participation in thissession demonstrate a true partnership between a K-12 school (or schools) and an engineeringschool/college at a university.Selected partnerships have data to support proven success in the classroom and demonstrateengineering engagement and knowledge acquisition by K-12 students through age appropriateactivities and lessons. Best Practices Partnership Panel winners’ papers are authoredcollaboratively between engineering and technology education faculty and K-12 teachers.Details on the partnership's structure and goals, the strategies employed to overcome challengesand obstacles, and successes and lessons
learning gathered from student evaluation of teaching surveys.AbstractAssessment and evaluation of student learning are important considerations for EngineeringTechnology programs. ABET-TAC standards require that educational objectives and outcomesbe chosen by the program and its constituents, measured by various means, and that the resultsbe used to improve the program. The data that is collected should be triangulated in somefashion for the results to be considered valid. A large part of our program’s data assessmentmethods can be classified as direct assessment, that is, using tests, papers, homework, and labexercises that measure the student’s learning or achievement of Criterion 3 a-k student outcomes.We collect data all through the
AC 2011-2432: LIVING IN A MATERIALS WORLD: MATERIALS SCI-ENCE ENGINEERING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR K-12 ED-UCATORSLouis S. Nadelson, Boise State University Louis S. Nadelson is an Assistant Professor in the College of Education at Boise State University. His research agenda is conducted within the context of STEM education and includes aspects of conceptual change, inquiry, and pre-service and in-service teacher education. He has published research ranging from teacher professional development to the impact of inquiry on STEM learning. Dr. Nadelson earned a B.S. degree in Biological and Physics Science from Colorado State University, a B.A. with concentrations in computing, mathematics and physics from The
AC 2011-2506: GIZMO FESTIVAL: K-8 OUTREACH AS A DESIGN/BUILDFOR ENGINEERING STUDENTSMargot A Vigeant, Bucknell University Margot is an associate professor of chemical engineering and associate dean of engineering at Bucknell University.Lori Smolleck, Bucknell University Page 22.746.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Gizmo Festival: K-8 Outreach as a Design/ Build for Engineering StudentsAbstractThe Gizmo Project is completed by first-year engineering students as the final exercise intheir introductory course: ENGR 100 – Exploring Engineering. The project also servesas a
AC 2011-2430: MOVING BEYOND THE DOUBLE-BIND: WIE AND MEPPROGRAMS AND SERVING THE NEEDS OF WOMEN OF COLOR INENGINEERINGLisa M Frehill, National Action Council for Minorities in Engineering Lisa Frehill is the Director of Research, Evaluation and Policy at the National Action Council for Mi- norities in Engineering (NACME), a Senior Program Officer with the Committee on Women in Science, Engineering, and Medicine at the National Research Council, and a senior analyst at Energetics Technol- ogy Center. Since earning her doctoral degree Dr. Frehill has developed expertise in the science and engineering workforce with a focus on how gender and ethnicity impact access to careers in these fields. While she was an
AC 2011-1061: ENCOURAGING ART AND SCIENCE CROSS-DEPARTMENTALCOLLABORATION THROUGH AN INTERDISCIPLINARY PROGRAMMahmoud K Quweider, University of Texas, Brownsville Dr. M K Quweider is an Associate Professor at University of Texas at Brownsville. He received his Ph.D. in Engineering Science and an M.S. in Applied Mathematics, M.S. in Engineering Science, and M.S. in Biomedical Engineering all from the University of Toledo, Ohio. After graduation, he worked at several places including Pixera, a digital image processing company in Cupertino, CA, and 3COM, a networking and communication company in Schaumberg, IL. He joined the UTB in 2000. His areas of interest include Imaging, Visualization and Animation, Web Design and
. Katehi, L., G. Pearson, and M. Feder, eds. Engineering in K - 12 education: Understanding the status and improving the prospects. 2009, The National Academies Press: Washington, DC.6. Mawson, B., Beyond `The Design Process': An alternative pedagogy for technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 2003. 13(2): p. 117-128.7. Jonassen, D., Toward a design theory of problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 2000. 48(4): p. 63-85.8. Cross, N., Expertise in design: An overview. Design Studies, 2004. 25(5): p. 427-441.9. Dym, C.L., et al., Engineering design thinking, teaching, and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 2005. 94(1): p
. Page 22.32.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 A Demographic Analysis of Engineering Majors with an Interest in TeachingAbstractThis work describes a demographic analysis of student participation in teaching relatedprofessional development programming at a research extensive university. This programming isoffered through Tech to Teaching, an initiative at Georgia Tech designed to illuminate pathwaystowards K-12 and higher education teaching careers for students seeking out such careers.Nationally sponsored efforts to increase the STEM workforce in the United States have gainedrecent prominence through such programs as the Race to the Top. Therefore, it is vital that weunderstand the
AC 2011-1928: FACILITATING SOCIAL PARTICIPATION THROUGH DE-SIGNBarbara A. Karanian, Stanford University; Wentworth Institute of Technology Barbara A. Karanian, Ph.D. is a Professor of Social Sciences and Psychology; and a Lecturer in Grad- uate Design Methods. She uses stories and storytelling to facilitate student progress from the idea and prototyping phases to reality. Involved in creating collaborative research teams that include members from the areas of engineering, design, psychology, and communication, she has people painting stories of entrepreneuring success. Barbara continues to work with changing organizations and entrepreneurial leaders.Gregory Kress, Stanford University
2.2included improved power management, longer battery life, and a streamlined microcontrollerboard 2. Other upgrades included: a 128 x 32 programmable graphical LCD display, 5 servomotor control ports, I/O expandability for additional sensors, a programmable speaker, 3programmable LEDs, and 3 programmable control switches. Photos of the current CEENBoT™platform, and a close up of the CEENBoT™’s controller board are shown below: Page 22.364.4The Need for Computer Programming Interfaces for K-16In 2008, the newly created CEENBoT™ did not possess a straightforward method which enabledusers to program and control it beyond the included firmware settings. The
AC 2011-871: ATTRACTING K-12 STUDENTS TOWARDS ENGINEER-ING DISCIPLINES WITH PROJECT BASED LEARNING MODULESAlok K. Verma, Old Dominion University Dr. Alok K. Verma is Ray Ferrari Professor and, Director of the Lean Institute at Old Dominion Univer- sity. He also serves as the Director of the Automated Manufacturing Laboratory. Dr. Verma received his B.S. in Aeronautical Engineering from IIT Kanpur, MS in Engineering Mechanics and PhD in Mechanical Engineering from ODU. Prof. Verma is a licensed professional engineer in the state of Virginia, a certi- fied manufacturing engineer and has certifications in Lean Manufacturing and Six Sigma. He has orga- nized several international conferences as General Chair, including
AC 2011-273: MEASURING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF ROBOTICS AC-TIVITIES IN UNDERSERVED K-12 COMMUNITIES OUTSIDE THE CLASS-ROOMRayshun J Dorsey, WizKidz Science and Technology Centers, Inc. Rayshun Dorsey is currently the Founder and President of WizKidz Science and Technology Centers, an organization that works in conjunction with the Georgia Institute of Technology and currently offers an extensive in-formal education collaboration through various outreach projects to include AroPability, a federally funded initiative in conjunction with California Institute of Technology, Center for the Vi- sually Impaired, National Federation of the Blind and Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta at Scottish Rite that seeks to stimulate STEM
. F. and Smith, K. A. 2008. Looking beyond content: Skill development for engineers. Journal of Engineering Education, 97:3, 295-307.[6] August, Stephanie E. and Hammers, Michele L. 2009. IEECI: Encouraging Diversity in Engineering through a Virtual Engineering Sciences Learning Lab. NSF Grant no.0935100.[7] Second Life Research: Second Life Residents Statistics. 08 March 2007. http://secondliferesearch.blogspot.com/2007/03/second-life-residents-statistics.html (last accessed 1 June 2009).[8] Moreno, R. and Mayer, R. 2007. Interactive multimodal learning environments, special issue on interactive learning environments: Contemporary issues and trends. EducationPsychology Review, 19, 309-326. DOI= 10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2[9
Page 22.668.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Exchange - Structural Engineering and Geophysics Education for High School Students through Experiential and Problem-Based Learning1. IntroductionThe California State Summer School for Mathematics and Science (COSMOS) is a four-week,educational summer program for gifted and talented high school students. Science andengineering topics are presented via a variety of “clusters” located at four of the University ofCalifornia campuses. The “Earthquakes in Action” cluster at the University of California, SanDiego (UCSD) has successfully employed experiential education methods in order to presentstructural
RETAINING ENGINEERING STUDENTS THROUGH A J-TERM GERMAN IMMERSION STUDY TOUR Faculty Paper Recruitment, Retention, and Outreach Programs Sigrid Berka International Engineering Program University of Rhode Island sberka@uri.eduIntroduction:The International Engineering Program (IEP) organizes a 10-14 day German Study Tour duringJanuary break. It offers International Engineering and International Business students a full-immersion program to further expand and extend their study of German language and
, and allows full observability and controllability through a host tool. It, however, does notprovide a host-independent product and, thus, requires a host tool for running the processor inthe classroom (for tasks that reach beyond programming). The PLP system provides a rich set ofI/O, requiring the host tool for nothing more than initial programming. Additionally, the PLPMIPS design is more robust, while still simple enough for design and implementation in theclassroom. Nagaonkar and Manwaring[15] discuss a complete FPGA and micro-controller basedSoC for use in research and academia. Their design uses a very flexible custom hardware design.While its use in the classroom is mentioned, no explicit educational use is defined. The PLPsystem is
), “Teaching Cellular Automaton Concepts Through InterdisciplinaryCollaborative Learning,” Chem. Eng. Ed., 34(4), 204-309, 315.10 Heitsch, A. T., Ekerdt, J. G., and Korgel, B. A. (2009), “NANOLAB at the University of Texas at Austin: AModel for Interdisciplinary Undergraduate Science and Engineering Education,” Chemical Engineering Education,43(3), 225-231.11 Hunter, K. W., Matson, J. O., and Dunn, R. (2002), “Impact of a Fifty-Minute Experiential Team-BuildingProgram on Design Team Performance,” Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering EducationAnnual Conference and Exposition, Session 2257.12 Biernacki, J. J. and Wilson, C. , (1999) “Interdisciplinary Laboratory in Advanced Materials - A Team-OrientedInquiry-Based Approach,” NSF
project. He is interested in incorporating his teaching and versatile research experience in science to engage students in preparing them for the college and beyond. Page 22.1001.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 Learning from a Teacher’s PerspectiveAbstract In recent years, enrollment in STEM related fields has steadily declined. To combat this,the INSPIRES curriculum (INcreasing Student Participation, Interest, and Recruitment inEngineering & Science) was developed with the goal to increase student motivation to learn byincorporating real world
time per week to discuss the projects’ progression. Overall, the 2009-2010 capstonesequence was a success for all involved. The 2010-2011 projects are underway and each teamhas completed their conceptual design reviews. During the conceptual design review, the facultymentors perceived an increase in the quality of student work as compared to 2009-2010.Bibliography1. Western Carolina University. (2003). A Regional Summit: Meeting Western North Carolina's Needs through Higher Education. Retrieved May 18, 2005 from http://www.wcu.edu/chancellor/Presentations/regional%20summit.htm2. Western Carolina University. (2010) Engagement at Western Carolina University. http://www.wcu.edu/5179.asp3. Sorien K. Schmidt Elizabeth A. Jordan
Page 22.1440.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2011 The Development of an Instructional and Assessment Tool From Student Work on a Model-Eliciting ActivityAbstractModel-Eliciting Activities (MEAs) are interdisciplinary, engineering based problems set in arealistic context with a client. MEAs allow researchers and teachers to observe students’development of conceptual models as they go through the cycle of express, test, and revise withtheir solutions. MEAs are being used increasingly in K-College level classes. Research tools thatcan be used for instruction and assessment with MEAs are needed. This paper will describe thedevelopment of such a research tool. Cognitive Task
://www.dailyfinance.com/story/careers/people-work-plugging-the-gap-between-jobs-and-skills/1964888 8.9. Jackson, Shirley Ann. Envisioning a 21st Century Science and Engineering Workforce for the United States: Tasks for University, Industry, and Government. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2003. Page 22.623.10 http://books.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=1064710. Virginia’s K-12 STEM Ed Report Card 2010: Economic Prosperity through STEM Education. http://www.tap2015.org/maps/pdfs/STEMEdVirginia2010.pdf, accessed October 15, 2010.11. LEAD. LEAD Program for Engineering. 2010, Accessed Jan. 2011. http
AC 2011-2551: IMPROVING MATH SKILLS THROUGH INTENSIVE MEN-TORING AND TUTORINGJianping Yue, Essex County College Jianping Yue is a Professor in the Division of Engineering Technologies and Computer Sciences at Essex County College, Newark, New Jersey. Dr. Yue is the Principle Investigator (PI) of the DUE 0622440 grant of the Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics Talent Expansion Program (STEP) at the National Science Foundation (NSF). Dr. Yue received his B.S. and M.S. degrees in Hydraulic and Coastal Engineering from Wuhan Institute of Hydraulic and Electric Engineering in Wuhan, China in 1977 and 1982, and a Ph.D. degree in Civil Engineering from Memphis State University, Memphis, Tennessee in 1990
approaches for a rapidly changingworld.Now in its sixth year, EBB provides flexible funding for faculty-driven projects with a particularemphasis on high-value, transformative change. Through a focused group of stakeholders,this initiative defines a coordinated strategy that places engineering fundamentals within asocietal context, thus fostering a passion for life-long learning. Further details, including acomprehensive assessment of successful outcomes, were presented at this venue one yearearlier5. The 2010 paper illustrates how a well-defined infrastructure at the College level ‒ withleadership provided by a collaborative group of faculty ‒ is used to define objectives, facilitatethe development of new ideas and programs, and begin to
. dissertations, with Masters’ candidates using more “grey literature,” or literature notgenerally accessed through the main collections of libraries, like technical reports, industry andgovernment standards, government documents and web-based resources.11 Kirkwood’s findingsshowed that roughly 40% of the resources cited in all theses and dissertations in civil engineeringin the period 2003-2004 were grey literature. Kirkwood noted that this result correlated well witha finding of 41% grey literature citations in a study of engineering graduate student Masters’theses at Mississippi State University reported by Virginia K. Williams and Christine LeaFletcher.13 She then checked the citations against library holdings as a way of informing futurecollection