student, and then 1 studentin each of the following categories: SE Asian, E Asian, S Asian, and Middle Eastern orNorth African student. Pilot Results 33Furthermore, the sample was a little over half first generation college students (51%). Gender 34First we will walk through some of the scenario results by gender. Your first round of tests did not go well and your usual studying habits are not working Women’s top two choices: Men’s top two choices: 1. Spend more
twoother distinction programs, 1) Distinguished Engineer and 2) Distinguished Designer, which areappointments that lead to being a Fellow. All 3 positions are at the executive level and areoften referred to as IBM’s technical executives and thought leaders. They are the company’s“most exceptional” technical professionals and visionaries who are recognized inside andoutside IBM as experts in their field. They have won five Nobel Prizes, five Turing Awards, andbeen responsible for nearly 10,000 U.S. patents. This pre-eminent community of technicalprofessionals has since been emulated by other organizations as well.Today, this community acts as the “technical conscience” of the company, responsible formaintaining IBM’s technical edge. They also
further study.Keywords: Undergraduate, Gender, Race/Ethnicity, EngineeringIntroductionIn an effort to address this issue of persistence for undergraduate students majoring inengineering and taking general chemistry, typically one of the pre-requisite courses taken duringthe first two-years on campus, we have developed a career-forward laboratory curriculum that isdesigned to support persistence. A career-forward curriculum targets the long-term goal ofpersistence—the personal capacity of students to continue towards an academic goal—byframing experiences with the content, context and specific skills of working in the target careerfield. Created as an extension of an earlier reform of the recitation component of chemistrycourses [1], this
., assumptions, lessons, values, beliefs, attitudes, and perspectives) thatare not openly acknowledged in a given environment [1]. HC often consists of positive(inclusive) or negative (exclusionary) systemic messages that are structurally supported andsustained [2]. HC affects everyone but people with limited access to social and institutionalcapital are the most prone to be affected negatively by HC (e.g., first-generation) [1],[2]. The U.S. Department of Education classifies first-generation (FG) college students asthose who came from families where neither parent obtained a four-year college degree [3]. FGstudents are disproportionally people of color (POC) [4], therefore their disenfranchised andmarginal identities are intersectional [5]. The
the Commission on Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (CDEI). He holds degrees in Industrial Engineering (BS, MS) from the National Experimental University of T´achira, Master of Business Administration (MBA) from Temple University, and Engineering Education (PhD) from Virginia Tech. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022In this session we will think about engineering and computer doctoral students’ movement through the education system over time‐‐disaggregating by race/ethnicity as well as doctoral students’ first generation status. We would like the session to be interactive, so we’ve built in places to generate some group conversation.The project is a
enhancing engineering education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Peru in State College: Providing Scholarswith a Global Perspective at HomeOur Story of Resilience 1 Lauren Griggs, PhD • Director, Clark Scholars Program • Director, Multicultural Engineering Program • Assistant Teaching Professor Julio Urbina, PhD • Faculty Advisor, Clark Scholars Program • Professor
Shifting Perceptions, Attitudes, and Cultures in Engineering (SPACE) Lab group and her research interests include broadening participation in engineer- ing, engineering leadership, and experiential learning experiences in engineering. She received her B.S. in Industrial Engineering from the University of Pittsburgh and her M.S. in Human Systems Engineering from Arizona State University.Dr. Meseret F. Hailu, Arizona State University Dr. Meseret F. Hailu is an Assistant Professor of Higher and Postsecondary Education at Arizona State University. Her research focuses on the retention of minoritized women in STEM higher education path- ways. Recently, her work has focused on 1) how Black immigrant women in the U.S. persist
conducted through Zoom, taking approximately an hour.Interviews were recorded and transcribed using Zoom’s built-in recognitionsoftware, and we applied qualitative content analysis to identify somecommon themesWe covered age groups ranging from 18 to 65, with 4 in the range of 18-25, 2from 26-35, 2 from 36-45, 3 from 46-55, and 1 from 56-656 participants identified as female, 4 as male, one as two-spirited, and 1preferred not to say5 reported having a disability and 7 did notOf those 5, 4 of them reported having chronic illness, 3 of them reported amobility-related disability, 2 had a vision-related disability, and 1 hearing-relatedStudents seemed generally lonely. Most of them, even the ones who foundin-person classes difficult, were looking
post-COVID, the case likely represents a similar phenomenon at other large engineering programs. articipants and SamplingPSince the case involves several individuals situated in the same context[43], purposeful sampling was used to find participants for the study[44]. The participants in the study are first-year engineering students at a large R1 university enrolled in Calculus 1 during their second semester. After receiving approval from the IRB, we collaborated with the General Engineering Advising Coordinator at the university to contact all first-year engineering students enrolled in Calculus 1 during the spring semester. If students were interested in being interviewed, they were asked
activities, and in the development of DEI proposals to expand outreach 5efforts in K-12 schools, community colleges, and higher education institutions. CLICKThese are all funded using funds allocated to the Faculty Engagement Fund with theobjective to:(1) assist COE faculty with the administrative burden of accessing and spending funds on DEI activities while developing outreach ideas to maximize impact;(2) encourage faculty to partner with each other and existing programs;(3) track and measure the impact of COE efforts; and(4) help faculty strengthen their research proposals to external agencies.Since the program’s inception, the
CONCLUSIONS OR RECOMMENDATIONS EXPRESSED IN THISMATERIAL ARE THOSE OF THE AUTHOR(S) AND DO NOT NECESSARILYREFLECT THE VIEWS OF THE NATIONAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION. NATIONAL PRIORITY INCREASE GRADUATES BROADEN PARTICIPATION President’s Council of Advisors on Underrepresented groups in engineering Science and Technology estimated that are also the fastest growing segment of the United States will need 1 million the general population, and so it is also additional STEM professionals. important that the field similarly reflect the population it serves.Among the national priorities are increasing graduates in STEM and
. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Improving engineering-student retention via the UC Davis LEADR program Ralph C. Aldredge, PhD, PE1 and Tanya D. Culliver-Whitlow, MA College of Engineering, University of California, DavisAbstract:The impact of the Leadership in Engineering Advancement, Diversity and Retention (LEADR) Program onthe retention of engineering undergraduates at UC Davis is evaluated. First-year retention rates for first-generation, female and URM program participants are found to be higher than those for their non-LEADRengineering undergraduate counterparts, while positive program impact on retention is found generallyto
codeblocks as preparation for actual coding. Recruitment Strategy Generalized over both semesters 1 2 3 4 5 Connect with Email graduate Hold instructor Behind-the- Finalize list of students who Bioengineering interest meeting scenes paperwork students who will have cleararances students about and gather names
they want andcustomize the course offerings to match student interests.Ultimately, we found, to no surprise, that students are interested inthese topics. Still, if we only talk about them using examples of disastersor catastrophes, students will associate only the negatives with theseconversations. Suppose students are told of and can experience throughtheir discussions the benefits of being ethical engineers, scientists,students, and people in general by using ideas that affect them moreclosely. In that case, they are more interested in the conversation. 16 Related Publications 1. Using the Boeing Max Air Disaster
Peterson from theUniversity of Colorado Colorado Springs. 1 WARM UP • How do you define STEM identity? • Which classroom practices do you believe are beneficial to fostering the STEM identity of undergraduate women? • Alternatively, which classroom practices do you believe are detrimental to the formation of STEM identity among undergraduate women?To begin, how do you define STEM identity?Which classroom practices do you believe are beneficial to fostering the STEM identity ofundergraduate women?Alternatively, which classroom practices do you believe are detrimental to the formation of STEMidentity among
more motivated because they can recognize their ability touse technical skills to change people’s lives. In general, understanding how physics affects 3D objects has been necessary for me as I am working on a prosthetic project for one of my clubs right now and need to have the necessary tools to figure out how to make that work for the patient. I am excited, as in general this class has expanded my mindset on how things work and allow me to remember why I wanted to be an engineer in the first place. I was looking forward to being able to fight for social justice, and this is the first class that really takes into account the real world applications of the technical skills that we learn. I don't want
something in theenvironment rather than the student or their preparation is the root cause. Admissions statistics for students at participating institution. 8 We identified a first-year programming course with an equity gap in BLI students’ academic performance.Figure 1. Normalized GPA differences on a 4.0 scale for BLI students (left) and women(right) controlling for gender, race/ethnicity, first-generation college student status, HSGPA, and instructor. 9 Prior work on belonging interventions demonstrate significant impact
Undergraduate Education. Overview: S-STEM *S-STEM Research Hubs*S-STEM Active Awards “Through this solicitation, NSF seeks to foster a network of S-STEM stakeholders and further develop the infrastructure needed to generate and disseminate new knowledge, successful practices and effective design principles arising from NSF S-STEM projects nationwide.”Source: NSF NSF 23-536 3Overview: S-STEM *S-STEM Research Hubs* “Through this solicitation, NSF seeks to foster a network of S-STEM stakeholders and further
regarding their wellbeing. The findings on the lack of perceived support areorganized by departmental and university-level influences. The students also identify areasfor improvement that have posed barriers to their awareness and utilization of universitysupports and services and to their overall wellbeing. The method of soliciting studentperspectives has implications for institutions wanting to examine their own practices andpolicies in order to better support students’ whole selves.Keywords: wellbeing, student support, undergraduate, student experience, studentperception, thematic analysis1. BackgroundHigher education is dealing with a mental health crisis [1]. According to the 2019 ACHA-National College Health Assessment II (ACHA-NCHA II
own experiences after acquiring disabilities during college, Jamie delved into research on the challenges faced by students with disabilities entering higher education. ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024Slide 1 Cutting the Curb for Students with Disabilities Transitioning to Higher Education S eth Vuletich Br ianna Buljung Jam ie ReganBefore we begin, we want to acknowledge that accessibility is a broad and expansive field thatis constantly changing. Despite best efforts to learn about the field and support accessibleresources, we are not aware of all accessibility concerns but
from the University of Washington Center for Evaluation & Research for STEMEquity (CERSE, pronounced like the words “SIR”-”see”). We are here with CERSE Director Dr.Liz Litzler, Associate Director Dr. Erin Carll, and thank our collaborator Senior ResearchScientist Dr. Emily Knaphus-Soran who is not able to be here today.40 minutes totalSlide 1-5: 4 minutesSlide 6: (Audience Engagement) 5 minutesSlides 7-11: 4 minutesSlide 12: (Audience Engagement) 5 minutesSlide 13-14: (Audience Engagement) 10 minutes DIYSlide 15: Takeaways – 1-2 minutesSlide 16: 10 minutes final Q&A 1 Topics for Today Why use logic models? What are the components of a
Department at Virginia Tech and an M.S. student in the Virginia Tech – Wake Forest University School of Biomedical Engineering and Sciences Engineering. She received her Bachelors of Science in Bioengineering from Clemson University. She was previously an undergraduate research assistant in Clemson University’s Engineering and Science Education Department. Her research interests include undergraduate research experiences, broadening participation in engineering, and biomedical engineering education.Dr. Jeremi S London, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University Dr. Jeremi London is an Assistant Professor in the Engineering Education Department at Virginia Poly- technic Institute and State University. London is a
, BakersfieldAisha Farra ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 1 Examining how Graduate Advisors in STEM Support Mental Health among Black and Latinx Graduate Women Kerrie Wilkins-Yel1, Stephanie Marando-Blanck1, Angela Wang1, Aisha Farra1, Pavneet Kaur Bharaj2, and Aishwarya Shridhar1 1 University of Massachusetts Boston 2 California State University BakersfieldIntroduction It is well known that Women of Color (WOC) navigate an onslaught of
resourcesor knowledge to implement these concepts fully in their curriculum. In addition, Wang’s [27]exploration of the perceived divide between DEI pedagogy and technical rigor amongstengineering faculty points to a need for a better understanding of whether engineering facultyrecognize DEIJ concepts as components within the engineering curriculum and, if so, how theseconcepts connect with other engineering content.Research questionsThe purpose of this exploratory study was to compare the relevance faculty members fromRowan University’s College of Engineering and College of Education place on DEIJ concepts aspart of their curriculum by addressing the following research questions: 1) What level of relevance do faculty members place on DEIJ as part
participation in STEM graduate programs and research. Open to 3rd and 4th year undergraduates, masters, and 1st and 2nd year PhD students, this program: • Helps students frame their research • Prepares students to apply for external grants and fellowships • Provides support to workshop manuscripts for publications • Participants attend monthly sessions led by subject-matter experts and administrators during the spring semester. During the summer semester students receive 1:1 support for applications or manuscripts.The FSA is a new initiative which evolved out of several iterations of support forgraduate students designed to prepare students to secure external
other academicinstitutions to develop effective targeted programming.1. Introduction1.1 Existing demographics of STEMHistorically and currently, science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fieldshave been characterized by a lack of diversity, with limited representation from variousdemographic groups [1-6]. Although the workforce has become more diverse in recent years,there are still significant disparities in the representation of women, racial minorities, and otherhistorically underrepresented demographics [2,7-9]. Within the US, the dominance of White menin STEM flourished due to legal barriers that prevented access for other groups until the 1960s[2,7-9]. This domination has been institutionalized through a range of laws and
practices whilenavigating their graduate programs. I discuss the findings as they relate to concepts in literatureand my own auto-ethnographic experience. I also provide researchers, students, faculty, staff,and policy makers in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (STEM) academiawith recommendations. Finally, I present the research community with areas for furtheracademic study.IntroductionProblemThere is a dearth of knowledge pertaining to graduate students with disabilities. Publicationsregarding the enrollment, retention, and graduation rates of this population are scarce. Similarly,little is known about the retention and graduation rates of graduate students with disabilities [1],[2]. More generally, there is a gap in knowledge
culture of engineering.Action-Oriented Education and Organizing as Beyond ReformsBowen et al. [34] formed the Undergraduate Engineering Collaborative Growth Series (UECGS),seeking to “design a program for marginalized engineering students that reduced barriers to theexpression of their whole selves, including the value of their identities within the engineeringeducational space” [p. 1]. This was done through four two-hour workshops in addition to a seriesof one-on-one feedback and coaching sessions to provide participants reflective space to discussthe series itself and how it connected to other components of participants’ lives. The firstworkshop consisted of focus groups on naming barriers within and relating to engineering thatthey perceive
and Identity Development: A Case Study of an Asexual Woman Engineer Vivian X. Chou 1, Jerry A. Yang 2, Brandon Bakka 3, Patricia Clayton 4, Maura Borrego1,5 1 Mechanical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712 USA 2 Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, 94305 USA 3 Biomedical Engineering, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712 USA 4 Department of Engineering, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC, 27101 USA 5 Center for Engineering Education, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, 78712 USADEI programming in recent years has focused
-appropriate activities, marketing materials, graphics and arobot mascot, recruited 40 volunteers and 10 industry/partner school sponsors for this inauguralyear. All costs of the event were fully absorbed by the Saguaro Math & Science Academy parentBooster Board’s 501 (c) (3) general funds. ● Anticipating participation similar to that of theannual Girl Power event of 40 students, the launch year event fielded 130 young children and100 adult participants. ● From the connections made at the event, three long running ‘spinoff’outreach initiatives were launched: a student-led math tutoring program at a local Title 1 school;a student mentored young girls’ programming group; and full development and launch of theSisters in STEM website for connectivity