the course of Winter and Spring quarters,there were 726 total student registrations for our midterm 1, 2 and finals EIG sessions. A commonsentiment expressed in student feedback is that they appreciate seeing additional practiceproblems, and there is easy access to a tutor to get instant feedback in their problem solving.Our hope is that by sharing our experiences, other engineering educators can utilize this virtualEIG model to expand their repertoire of resources for student success.
with the software were observed by the instructors. Assessment of studentperformance on the quizzes was strong with an average of 90.8 ± 11.1. Future course offeringswill continue to implement changes aimed at improved student engagement and learning.References[1] A. Ali and D. T Smith, “Teaching an introductory programming language in a general education course,” Journal of Information Technology Education: Innovations in Practice, vol. 13, pp. 057–067, 2014.[2] O. Solarte Pabón and L. E. Machuca Villegas, “Fostering Motivation and Improving Student Performance in an introductory programming course: An Integrated Teaching Approach,” Revista EIA, vol. 16, no. 31, pp. 65–76, 2019.[3] C. Gordon, R. Lysecky, and F. Vahid, “The