hypothesize that an early project experience is a significant contributorrecruitment and retention of Scholars based on the supporting literature [20] and our ownexperience with past successful undergraduate project advising. Indeed, early exposure to projectsinvolving engineering problem solving with direct and clear benefits to society and the localcommunity have been shown to be especially beneficial to women and underrepresented minoritystudents [20, 21], and highly useful as retention tools. These projects are taken for a variablenumber of credits (1 to 3), and generally consist of teams of 3–4 students across all threeengineering disciplines, and fit within the existing project advising framework at the engineeringdepartment in one of three
Paper ID #30667The RED Teams Start Up Session: Leveraging Research with Practice forSuccess in Academic ChangeDr. Julia M. Williams, Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology Dr. Julia M. Williams is Professor of English at Rose-Hulman Institute of Technology. Her research areas include technical communication, assessment, accreditation, and the development of change management strategies for faculty and staff. Her articles have appeared in the Journal of Engineering Education, In- ternational Journal of Engineering Education, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, and Technical Communication Quarterly, among
Nanotechnology technical committee. He was awarded the IEEE Millennium Medal and won the 2005 CPMT David Feldman Outstanding Contribution Award. He is an Associate-Editor of the IEEE CPMT Transactions and has been General Chair of three IEEE confer- ences, Treasurer or Program Chair of others, and serves on several CPMT conference committees. As the CPMT Society representative on the IEEE Nanotechnology Council (NTC), he instituted a regular Nanopackaging series of articles in the IEEE Nanotechnology Magazine, established the NTC Nanopack- aging technical committee, was the 2010-2013 NTC Awards Chair, chaired the IEEE NANO 2011 con- ference, serves as NTC Vice-President for Conferences (2013-2014) and has been elected as NTC
activitiesstudents participate in during their pre-college years have an impact on their choices of majorand their views of a subject area [7, 8]. In particular, [8] shows us that male and femaleparticipants, at times, take away differing views about their experience in the activities.Phase 1 ProcessPhase 1 began with a focus group of six computing education researchers and evaluators whotook part in multiple online sessions over several weeks to answer the following two researchquestions: 1. What type of data might be useable and useful for educational researchers and evaluators when measuring the impact of pre-college computing activities? and 2. What type of data might be useable and useful for practitioners who are designing and/or
Paper ID #15703Integrating Sustainability Grand Challenges and Experiential Learning intoEngineering Curricula: Years 1 through 3Dr. Claire L. A. Dancz, Clemson University Claire L. A. Dancz is a Postdoctoral Research Fellow in Civil Engineering and online active experiential learning and assessment with Clemson Online at Clemson University. Dr. Dancz received her B.S. in Environmental Microbiology and Biology from Michigan State University, her M.S. in Civil Engineering from University of Pittsburgh, and Ph.D. in Sustainable Engineering from Arizona State University. Her areas of research include modular, course, and
design and construction process,ranging from excavation to material choice to various building systems. CEE 507 focuses oninfrastructure systems from the technical and environmental perspectives and examines theinterdependences between these infrastructures.III. Motivation and Vision:Introductory courses tend to be required for lower-division students and these courses act asprerequisites for upper-division courses that tend to be more discipline-specific and thus, may bemore engaging for students. Introductory courses provide fundamental information andknowledge needed for upper-division courses. This framework continues throughout anacademic course map, forming a linear advancement. Figure 1 shows this progression
consider global, cultural, social, environmental, and economicfactors in student outcomes [1], as do licensing agencies such as the National Society ofProfessional Engineers (NSPE) [2] and profession societies such as IEEE [3].Most engineering instructors have been educated with a deep technical focus, and though manysee the value of addressing sociotechnical issues, they have little experience outside ofengineering and feel ill-equipped to integrate these topics in the curriculum. In this project, weaim to make it easier for engineering instructors to include sociotechnical issues in their coursesby developing modules (with detailed teaching guides and instructional resources) for theintroduction to circuits course, each emphasizing a different
Paper ID #11292Integrating Sustainability Grand Challenges and Experiential Learning intoEngineering Curricula: Years 1 and 2Claire Louise Antaya Dancz, Arizona State University Ph.D. Candidate in Sustainable Engineering at Arizona State UniversityKevin J. Ketchman, University of PittsburghRebekah Burke, Arizona State UniversityDr. Melissa M. Bilec, University of PittsburghDr. Elizabeth A Adams, Chandler-Gilbert Community College Residential Engineering Faculty at Chandler-Gilbert Community College.Prof. brad allenby, Arizona State UniversityProf. Mikhail Chester, Arizona State UniversityProf. Vikas Khanna
33 4 31 4 31 9 30 24 30 Ethnicity Native Am. & 0 0 1 8 0 0 1 8 1 3 3 4 Pacific Islander Black 2 15 5 42 2 15 7 54 16 53 32 40 Asian 4 31 0 0 3 23 0 0 2 7 9 11 Hispanic 3 23 1 8 2 15 5 39 10 33 21 26 White 4 31 5 42 6 46 0 0 1 3 16 20 First Generation College Student Yes 5 39 3 25 6 46 5 39 5 17
drying and straightening are examples of energy that are not typically examined in anengineering classroom. Research led by Mechanical Engineering professor Dr. Tahira Reid atPurdue University examines the heat transfer of hair care products [4]. The thermalcharacterization of hair dryers and straighteners is an area that may have more personal relevanceto female engineering students. This topic can connect to students’ everyday lives anddemonstrate technical aspects of energy, establishing the legitimacy of stereotypically non-maleproducts can have in engineering.Energy Distribution: Mini-grids in Developing ContextsRoughly 1 billion people across the globe are still without access to electricity [5]. TheInternational Energy Agency (IAE
Paper ID #14439Revamping Robotics Education via University, Community College and In-dustry Partnership - Year 1 Project ProgressProf. Aleksandr Sergeyev, Michigan Technological University Aleksandr Sergeyev is currently an Associate Professor in the Electrical Engineering Technology program in the School of Technology at Michigan Technological University. Dr. Aleksandr Sergeyev earned his bachelor degree in Electrical Engineering at Moscow University of Electronics and Automation in 1995. He obtained the Master degree in Physics from Michigan Technological University in 2004 and the PhD degree in Electrical Engineering
brief paper depicts a current snapshot of an ongoing investigation that probes how studentsreconcile social and technical forms of identity in engineering education. While the detailedresults are represented in other publications, this paper highlights the study in its current form inorder to describe what will be presented at the poster session that corresponds to this paper. Theoutcomes of this ongoing investigation will be relevant for engineering educators who arefocused on sharpening the social and technical competencies of their students. As we inengineering education seek to develop engineers that competently navigate a sociotechnicalpractice, this study provides a detailed snapshot of how social and technical perspectives ofengineering
). This steptook 10 minutes at each of the 3 institutions.Ideation Session 1: Students generated and recorded their ideas for 20 minutes without using aformal ideation method; this was repeated at the 3 institutions.TRIZ Training Intervention: A common TRIZ PowerPoint presentation lecture was given to theTRIZ intervention groups (not to the control groups). Students received a list of TRIZ principlesand the Contradiction Matrix handouts; this was repeated at the 3 institutions.Ideation Session 2: Students were asked to generate and record ideas for 50 minutes (UTEP) or20 minutes (UMD and Penn State) following the TRIZ method while the control group wasasked to generate ideas without following a formal ideation method.Ideation Homework: Students
Cybersecurity.2.0 BackgroundThe two-fold goal of the NSF Division of Undergraduate Education (DUE) S-STEM fundedAttracting and Cultivating Cybersecurity Experts and Scholars through Scholarships (ACCESS)program is: (1) to increase cybersecurity-related STEM degree completion of low-income, high-achieving undergraduate students with demonstrated financial need (including women andminorities) and (2) to generate knowledge about academic success, retention, persistence,graduation, and career pathways of these students to improve the education of futureCybersecurity-related STEM workers. Specifically, ACCESS aims to contribute towardsaddressing the tremendous governmental and industry need for highly skilled cybersecurityexperts by addressing the following
at their own and two collaborating institutions. We are studying changes in students’ conceptual learning as a result of participation in this program, and are building a repository of accurate, engaging videos for thermodynamics learning that will ultimately be shared with other instructors and the public. Background and Methods This work is a component of a broader study between three institutions that seek to evaluate the effect of video generation and viewing on student understanding of several thermodynamics concepts: 1) Entropy and the Second Law, 2) Reversibility, 3) Steady State vs Equilibrium, 4) Internal Energy vs Enthalpy, and 5
students looked at airportsecurity before and after 9/11, government use of biometrics, and privacy issues related to theuse of Facebook and government powers (e.g., wiretapping, laws introduced post 9/11).Student AssessmentStudents were given weekly quizzes to ensure that they kept up with the reading in the class.Points were also awarded for general participation in class discussion, attendance, enthusiasm,and attending the library sessions. However, the students’ final grade largely depended on thework they did for their final research paper. They were allowed to submit an initial draft, whichthey received constructive comments on, and then had to turn in a final research paper at the endof term. They also had to put together a presentation of
create, test and refine a model, then present theirfindings as an authentic deliverable to a client (e.g., proposal, technical memo). This projectbuilds on the work of [7] by expanding the scope to include prerequisite general chemistrycourses.Table 1. Overview of the Design Challenges (DCs). DC-0 DC-1 DC-2 DC-3 Grand Restore and Improve Provide Universal Make Solar Energy Develop Carbon Challenge Urban Infrastructure Access to Clean Economical Sequestration Water Methods Description Use density
. Page 24.240.1 c American Society for Engineering Education, 2014 BUILDING A STUDENT- STUDENT-GENERATED INSTRUCTIONAL VIDEO LIBRARY FOR THERMODYNAMICSAbstract Current college students are accustomed to documenting and sharingtheir experiences through text, photo, and video, thanks to the ready availabilityof all of these through personal portable devices. The democratization of videoproduction and access has led to the possibility to both teach and learn with videoas never before. This work seeks to capitalize on student expectations and thecurrent technological environment to bring the benefits of both teaching andlearning with video into core technical undergraduate engineering
about their program as a whole, showing that students who interacted with our system seemed to show more confidence in their own ability. Finally, we analyze student actions within the game itself to show that the PING system helps them complete content sections faster and with fewer attempts.1. IntroductionWith the advent of new methods and approaches in virtual education, automated systems, andonline learning, there is a need for general-purpose approaches to help automate studenteducation. These new approaches can serve not to replace traditional education, but to augment itthrough automated student assistance, easier classroom operation for instructors, and bettersupport for under-performing students [1]. In turn, the
identified asengaged vs. non-engaged during the classroom observation. The three most frequent categoriesfor each group are highlighted in Table 1. From Table 1, the engaged students at both ASU andPitt most frequently noted 1) application and active learning via games, 2) an actual positiveimpact of games on technical learning and performance, 3) the motivating and fun nature ofgames, and 4) an overall desirableness of games for learning. Although the non-engagedstudents most frequently noted positive benefits such as engagement and motivation also, thenon-engaged students at ASU noted a lack of challenge with their games, including alreadybeing familiar with the material. The non-engaged students at both schools also most-frequentlyindicated that
). Figure 1: GIKS student network feedback Rather than seeing a random force-generated network graph each time, the student’s termlocations align to the “Master” expert network map, thus the student views a network structure oftheir own essay for the first time laid out in a domain-normative way, where term closeness in 2-dimensional space reflects that of an expert. Clicking on a term in either network highlights thatterm along with its links and term associates in both networks. Dragging any term in eithernetwork moves the same term in the other network. These interactive features allow the studentsto explore the sometimes complex networks in a term-by-term way. Also, there are controlbuttons under the student’s network. (Fig. 1) If
applied to educational purposes, Tranquillo, Kline, andHixson [9] generalize canvases as “one-page visual frameworks for modeling the criticalelements of a real-world system [each of which are] deemed essential in order to design, addvalue, or make changes to a system out in the world” (p.1). Using this framework, an innovatorcan more easily identify the most important levers within a system, collect and synthesizeinformation, discover where critical information is missing, gain a holistic understanding of thesystem, and make decisions [9]. Building on these principles, the study team has adapted theBusiness Model Canvas to propose a template for the Faculty Innovation Canvas (FIC) intendedto help better understand the levers and system that can
, reflection,articulation, and exploration.17 A summary of activities for the student teams is shown in Table 1together with the appropriate instructor- student interactions. The shaded activities form thefocus of this study. The project is introduced in 2-3 lecture periods, where the instructor presentsthe project task, the framework for the project, general technical background about the industrialcontext and some of the relevant engineering science, and the project deliverables and timeline.At this time, the students are also provided a design notebook and asked to record activity,keeping track of the run parameters, data analysis, interpretation, and conclusions and decisionsfrom the interpretation. This reflective activity is intended to help the
Paper ID #39033Board 227: Building Interest in Technology Careers through a Five-WeekSaturday ProgramDr. Karen Wosczyna-Birch, National Center for Next Generation Manufacturing Dr. Karen Wosczyna-Birch has been a champion of engineering and technology education for the past 30 years. Since 1995, she has been the state director of the CT College of Technology (COT) where her leadership has been instrumental in creating nationally recognized seamless pathway programs in engineering and technology between all 12 public community colleges in CT with 10 universities and high schools. She is also the Executive Director and
Paper ID #38921Board 228: Building Partnerships for Advanced Manufacturing ProgramsDr. Karen Wosczyna-Birch, National Center for Next Generation Manufacturing Dr. Karen Wosczyna-Birch has been a champion of engineering and technology education for over 30 years. Since 1995, she has been the state director of the CT College of Technology (COT) where her lead- ership has been instrumental in creating nationally recognized seamless pathway programs in engineering and technology between all 12 public community colleges in CT with 10 universities and technical and comprehensive high schools. She is also the Executive Director
Paper ID #39018Board 340: Mentoring to Support Community Colleges through the NSFATEProposal Submission ProcessDr. Karen Wosczyna-Birch, National Center for Next Generation Manufacturing Dr. Karen Wosczyna-Birch has been a champion of engineering and technology education for the past 30 years. Since 1995, she has been the state director of the CT College of Technology (COT) where her leadership has been instrumental in creating nationally recognized seamless pathway programs in engineering and technology between all 12 public community colleges in CT with 10 universities and high schools. She is also the Executive
©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024A Hands-On, Dual-Credit Mechatronics Pathway Overview for Secondary & Post-Secondary EducatorsAccording to a study by Deloitte and the Manufacturing Institute [1], “Over the next decade, 4million manufacturing jobs will likely be needed, and 2.1 million are expected to go unfilled ifwe do not inspire more people to pursue modern manufacturing careers.” The mission of theNational Science Foundation Advanced Technological Education (NSF ATE) funded NationalCenter for Next Generation Manufacturing (NCNGM) is to cultivate and nurture partnershipswith advanced manufacturing stakeholders, creating a national network throughout the UnitedStates to further develop a diverse technical
create students that will be able to solve relevant problems using the engineering designprocess. Figure 1 - Exploratory model of engagement in engineering activities According to Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology, Inc (ABET),engineering design “involves identifying opportunities, developing requirements, performinganalysis and synthesis, generating multiple solutions, evaluating solutions against requirements,considering risks, and making trade-offs, for the purpose of obtaining a high-quality solutionunder the given circumstances.” [10] Engineering design is a process of generating multiplecreative solutions for an identified need, analyzing these solutions, and implementing the mostappropriate one
Associate Professor and Associate Chair of Women’s and Gender Studies at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. A first-generation college student, Dr. Else-Quest earned her Ph.D. in developmental psychology at the University of Wisconsin—Madison. She uses a combination of quantitative and qualitative methods to understand psychological gender differences, how they develop and shape participation in STEM, and how we can intervene to expand women’s and girl’s participation in STEM. She has written extensively on implementing intersectionality within social sciences research and adapting quantitative as well as qualitative methods to do so. Else-Quest is currently PI on two grants from the National Science
Paper ID #26387Resources and Partnerships for Community College Engineering and Tech-nology ProgramsProf. Karen Wosczyna-Birch, CT College of Technology/Regional Center for Next Generation Manufacturing Dr. Karen Wosczyna-Birch is the Executive Director and Principal Investigator of the Regional Center for Next Generation Manufacturing, an National Science Foundation Center of Excellence. She is the State Director for the College of Technology, a seamless pathway in technology and engineering from all 12 public community colleges to 8 public and private universities. Dr. Wosczyna-Birch has expertise with both the recruitment