Paper ID #35582Retention Strategies for Educators from Women STEM Graduates of the1970’s & 1980’sDr. Kathleen Buse, Advancing Women in the Workforce Kathleen Buse is a business leader whose work focuses on helping organizations be more successful through the development of engaged and inclusive work cultures. As President and Founder of Advancing Women in the Workforce, she helps employers recruit, retain, and advance women. Kathleen’s experience includes 25 years in industry, beginning as an engineer and advancing to executive leadership. She spent ten years in academia where she became an award-winning researcher and
, CivilEngineering, Computer Engineering, Electrical Engineering, Nuclear Engineering, and Miningand Minerals Engineering. Graduate coordinators from each department were invited to providenames of students in their department who were doing equity work.Figure 3: Count of students’ primary academic departmentFigure 4: Count of students’ source of financial support for educational and living expensesThe social identities of students were diverse in terms of gender identity, race/ethnicity, sexualorientation, first-generation status, and having a disability/chronic illness. Thirteen students(59.1%) identified as being a member of the LGBTQ+ community. Eight students consideredthemselves a first-generation undergraduate student (36.4%), and twelve students
. His current work explores a range of engineering education design contexts, including the role of power in brainstorming activities, epistemological and conceptual develop- ment of undergraduate learning assistants, as well as the experiences of recent engineering graduates as they navigate new organizational cultures. American c Society for Engineering Education, 2022 Using Utility Value Interventions to Explore Student Connections to Engineering Mechanics Topics AbstractEngineering mechanics courses (e.g., statics and dynamics) are critical foundations within anengineering
relate to non-traditional graduate student agency.Positionality Since two of the researchers were in fact participants in the study, it is important todiscuss our roles and relationship as it relates to the topic of study. All authors identify as womenwho are conducting research in engineering and computing education at a Hispanic ServingInstitution (HSI). This is where our identities diverge. The co-authors include two current part-time doctoral students who also serve as administrators. Morgan H. McKie is a queer blackwoman currently a 2nd year doctoral student working as an administrator within the onlinedepartment focusing on technical development and services for the learning management system.Mais Kayyali is currently a 3rd year
Paper ID #35605Promoting First-Semester Persistence of Engineering Majors with DesignExperiences in General Chemistry LaboratoryMr. Corey Payne, University of FloridaDr. Kent J. Crippen, University of Florida Kent Crippen is a Professor of STEM education in the School of Teaching and Learning at the University of Florida and a Fellow of the American Association for the Advancement of Science. His research in- volves the design, development, and evaluation of STEM cyberlearning environments as well as scientist- teacher forms of professional development. Operating from a design-based research perspective, this work focuses
acknowledge such limitations in my publications.I also provide my current and historical positionality statements on my website to acknowledgethe fluid and evolving nature of my identity and understanding of my positionality.I received no funding for this research and have no conflicts of interest to report.References[1] A. Lillywhite and G. Wolbring, “Undergraduate Disabled Students as KnowledgeProducers including Researchers: A Missed Topic in Academic Literature,” Educ. Sci., vol. 9,no. 4, pp. 259, 2019, doi: 10.3390/educsci9040259.[2] National Educational Association of Disabled Students (NEADS), “Comparison ofSpecific Populations of Graduate Students with Disabilities Using 2016 CGPSS Data.” 2019.Accessed: Aug. 11, 2021. [Online
students at University ofIllinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC) to promote DEIA initiatives through allyship education.The original organizers established programming that consisted of six virtual workshops targetedat UIUC graduate students utilizing personal stories from minority leaders and educational toolsfrom DEIA professionals in Spring 2020. The topics chosen for the first year’s programmingincluded a graduate student experience panel, the interconnectedness of the Black Lives Matter(BLM) movement and STEM; a lesson on personal advocacy; allyship through everyday actions;conflict resolution techniques; and a panel of professionals in academia, industry, andgovernment on allyship throughout one's career. The introductory programming mostly
leadershipdevelopment with panel discussions by STEM leaders to a book club discussion. In the thirdyear, programming for professional skills was requested by the students. Dr. SubramanianSankaranarayanan, a Group Leader for the Center for Nanoscale Materials at Argonne NationalLaboratory, gave a seminar on how to prepare for a postdoctoral job search and leveraging thepostdoctoral experience to support professional aspirations. This topic was requested by thestudents to address their concerns about not knowing how to pursue or leverage a postdoctoralposition as first generation and/or historically minoritized graduate students. The students are invited to attend different modalities of seminars and workshops. Forexample, programs are offered virtually
profoundly impact “students’ andteachers’ engagement, performance, and personality development” [17, p.3]. The emotional stateof the teacher affects the students’ emotions, which then impact either their success or failure inthe classroom is documented [18]. Teachers’ emotions are mirrored by the students; if teachersshow enthusiasm, then their students do also. Conversely, if teachers are bored with a topic andshow a lack of interest, students’ emotions of boredom, irritation or anxiety surface [19, p.9].With that, “both knowledge and emotion are inescapably matters of concern in education is onewhich has been reached by generations of teachers, parents, and educationists from the time ofPlato to the present day” [16, p.229]. Given the
. Behav., vol. 113, no. October 2018, pp. 51–61, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.jvb.2018.10.018.[16] A. E. Austin, “Preparing the next generation of faculty: Graduate school as socialization to the academic career,” J. Higher Educ., vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 94–122, 2002, doi: 10.1080/00221546.2002.11777132.[17] J. C. Weidman, D. J. Twale, and E. L. Stein, “Socialization of Graduate and Professional Students in Higher Education, a Perilous Passage?,” The Journal of Higher Education, vol. 74, no. 6. pp. 719–719, 2003. doi: 10.1080/00221546.2003.11780868.[18] C. M. Golde, “The role of the department and discipline in doctoral student attrition: Lessons from four departments,” J. Higher Educ., vol. 76, no. 6, pp. 669–700, 2005, doi
identity. ReferencesAustin, A. E., & McDaniels, M. (2006). Preparing the professoriate of the future: Graduate student socialization for faculty roles. In HIGHER EDUCATION: (pp. 397-456). Springer, Dordrecht.Austin, A. E. (2002). Preparing the next generation of faculty. The Journal of Higher Education, 73(1), 94-122.Austin, A. E., & Sorcinelli, M. D. (2013). The future of faculty development: Where are we going? New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2013(133), 85-97.Bell, D. A. (1980). Brown v. Board of Education and the interest-convergence dilemma. Harvard Law Review, 93, 518–533.Bell, D. A. (1995). Who’s afraid of critical race theory? University of Illinois Law Review, 1995(4), 893
resistance in students’ persistence behaviors, although it wasresistance against racism in general and not the system of the school. This instance was whenStudent 4 had taken it upon themselves to educate other students against racial stereotypes. Theyexplained that when they were stereotyped, they assumed it was due to domestic students’ignorance of other cultures and chose to educate rather than ignore it: “This kind of stuff happens all the time to be honest. […] For example, if someone I didn't know came up, and for whatever reason had a math problem to do, will just look at me and be like, ‘Yeah. You're probably good at math right? Because you look Indian.’ […] I just kind of take it lightheartedly. I know a lot of
graduate education. She worked with faculty and students to improve and enhance mentoring. Grasso was an active participant in the Council of Graduate School’s ”PhD completion project”, The Commission on ”Pathways Through Graduate School and into Careers” and the Advancement Advisory Committee. She was a founding member of the CGS Advisory Com- mittee on Advocacy and Public Policy. Grasso served as President and Past President of CSGS and in 2009, She received the CSGS Award for Outstanding Contribution to Graduate Education in the Southern Region. She served on the National Academy of Sciences committee on ”Revitalizing Gradute Stem Ed- ucation for the 21st Century.” Grasso currently serves as a Co-PI on the NC AGEP
WEPAN, Dr. Metcalf did her postdoctoral research at the University of Arizona as part of their NSF ADVANCE Institutional Transformation grant and was Chief Research Officer at the Associa- tion for Women in Science (AWIS). Dr. Metcalf has undergraduate degrees in applied mathematics and computer science from Clarion University of Pennsylvania, master’s degrees in computer science from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and gender studies from the University of Arizona, and a doctorate in higher education, science, and technology policy from the University of Arizona.Virginia L Rhodes M.S., The Women in Engineering ProActive Network (WEPAN) Virginia Rhodes is the ADVANCE Resource and Coordination (ARC) Network
journey, not just at the high school stage. Therefore, including engineering mentors throughout students' schooling can help students get interested in engineering.I n addition to family members and role models, students cited their high school engineering experiences as an essential factor that helped them decide on engineering. The past decade has seen an increase in engineering education for middle and high school students, likely because of states aligning with the Next Generation Science Standards that came out in 2013, which include engineering design at all grade levels[57]. Manystudents thought they were interested in engineering, so they took an engineering class, which
recruiting the next generation of engineers. Paula is passionate about empowering girls to consider engineering where they can use their talent to develop technology and create solutions to everyday prob- lems. As a former practicing lawyer, she enjoys speaking with engineering students about the intersection of law and technology.Dr. Whitney Gaskins, University of Cincinnati Dr. Gaskins is the Assistant Dean of Inclusive Excellence and Community Engagement in the University of Cincinnati College of Engineering and Applied Science, the only African-American female currently teaching in the faculty of the College of Engineering. Whitney earned her Bachelor of Science in Biomed- ical Engineering, her Masters of Business
possible inengineering education and in engineering departments. Intentionality and evidence-basedstrategies are a must. There are many implications for new and established engineeringdepartments from this case study. In fact, strategies described in this case study have thepotential to transform higher education departments and institutions.I. INTRODUCTIONThe role of higher education and its impacts towards advancing citizens towards economicprosperity, to enrich the human experience through knowledge and perspective, to be a force forgood and human flourishing, to produce the next generation of leaders in our society, to advanceknowledge discovery and community empowerment are well established (Rudolph, 2021;Rhodes, 2001). Along with the many
incorporating a scholarly international experience, an intervention notcommonly utilized for underrepresented groups, further elevate the graduation rate?In this project, conventional interventions were administered to a group of tenstudents at Pennsylvania State University, all of whom belonged to underrepresenteddemographics in the field of engineering based on race or gender. This study spanneda four-year duration, during which an international or study abroad component wasintroduced. Interventions were implemented to target four established factors knownto enhance student retention: financial support, preparation in mathematics andacademics, the creation of a supportive learning community, and the inclusion ofinternational education. The project
Paper ID #40762Considerations for assessment, evaluation, and continuous improvement ofa pre-college STEM summer program for promising Black high schoolstudentsJesika Monet McDaniel, Virginia Tech Department of Engineering Education Jesika is an accomplished graduate of Virginia Tech, holding degrees from both the College of Engineer- ing and the School of Education. Her passion for education led her to become a dedicated K-12 STEM Educator. In this role, Jesika is committed to introducing and inspiring students from diverse backgrounds and cultures to the intricacies of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics
, belonging, and access.Ms. Claudine-Lonje A Williams, Syracuse University Claudine-Lonj´e A. Williams, LMSW is currently a doctoral student and graduate assistant/teaching as- sistant in the Higher Education Department (HED) at Syracuse University (SU). She is also the teacher of record for sections of the Practicum Seminar course, and assists with the coordination of the Masters Students’ Practicum process including the Round Robin interviews. Claudine has worked as a graduate assistant and program coordinator for three consecutive summers for the Louis Stokes Alliance for Mi- nority Participation (LSAMP) Program at SU where she guided undergraduate BIPOC students majoring in the STEM fields as they conducted research
to learn directly from their peers.IntroductionSince 2014, women have comprised just one-fifth of those graduating with associate degrees incomputing and information systems (CIS) [1]. Due to the growth in the number of CIS associatedegrees conferred to men, the proportion earned by women has diminished by more than halffrom 1999 levels [1]. The CIS gender gap in community colleges 1 (CCs) is particularlyconcerning from an equity perspective, since these institutions provide crucial access to post-secondary education, including for the socioeconomically disadvantaged, first-generation, older,and Hispanic college students they disproportionately serve [2]. However, relatively littleresearch and programming focuses on supporting gender equity
Paper ID #40675Understanding Decision Processes Related to Pathways of CommunityCollege Engineering StudentsMr. Rene Alberto Hernandez, Virginia Tech Ren´e Hernandez, is a Salvadorean-American first-generation graduate student at Virginia Tech’s School of Education. He is pursuing his PhD in Higher Education with a cognate in Engineering Education. He has more than 10 years of K-12 and higher education experience which he leverages towards his pursuits of helping others find success in education. He has an evolving research agenda focused on pathways, policy, and how it shapes education and undergraduate engineering
was on the board of governors for the Rocky Mountain chapter of ASHRAE. He holds a bachelor’s and master’s degree in architectural engineering and an MBA. He is a licensed professional engineer and a LEED-accredited professional in building design and construction.Rachel Levitt, Kansas State University ©American Society for Engineering Education, 2024 Creating buy-in from key constituencies for supportingLGBTQIA+ engineering students Dr. Amy Betz (she/her)1 Craig Wanklyn, PE, MBA (he/him)1 Dr. Rachel Levitt (they/them)2 Mariya Vaughn (she/they)31-Col l ege of Engineering, 2-Social Transformation Studies, 3
and more specifically engineering crosses from the focuson the skin-tone of an individual to focusing on the systems in place that allow there to be aglutton of white identities in these disciplines and fields. By realizing that Whiteness is anideology that both white and BIPOC operate under, problem-solving becomes more aboutstructures rather than individuals. What are administrators in engineering education doing thatdoesn’t allow for more BIPOC to be attracted, retained, graduated, and become leaders inengineering? [67-69] Taking a more holistic view, what are the pedagogical strategies beingimplemented in k-12 that don’t allow diverse students to see themselves as valuable in STEMfields? Notice that we aren’t asking about individuals and
education. In 2019, the NAE issued acall for nominations of policies or programs that are targeted to students from underrepresentedpopulations among incoming first-year full-time students, incoming transfer students (from communitycolleges or other institutions), and/or veterans or other students over the age of 25 who are enteringengineering. The project defines underrepresented populations broadly, including men of color, allwomen, individuals with disabilities, and individuals from other underrepresented or marginalizedpopulations (e.g., first-generation students, LGBTQI individuals, students from low socioeconomic statusbackgrounds, students for whom English is a second language, veterans). A committee of experts named8 of the nominated
researched inengineering education. Numerous studies have revealed that engineering recognition is connectedto increased student retention and an engineering student’s developing sense of belonging (Cribbset al., 2016; Hatmaker, 2013; Rover, 2008; Wang & Hazari, 2018). Additionally, recognition isinvaluable because of its capability to demonstrate how students form relationships withinengineering, its ability to verify the other two components of engineering identity, competencyand performance, and its ability to shed light on the experiences of underrepresented andmarginalized students in STEM (Carlone & Johnson, 2007; Rodriquez et al., 2017; Rohde et al.,2019). This topic has been studied using various methodologies (Godwin, 2016
Paper ID #35628Uncomfortable Conversations with Faculty and Students in Zoom:Experiences with diversity and inclusion spurred by police brutality andracial injustice in the U.S.Mr. Lance Leon Allen White, Texas A&M University Lance White is a Ph.D. student at Texas A&M University in Interdisciplinary Engineering with a thrust in Engineering Education. He is working as a graduate research assistant at the Institute of Engineering Education and Innovation at the Texas Engineering Experiment Station at Texas A&M University under director Dr. Tracy Hammond. Dr. Karan Watson and Dr. Pavel Tsvetkov are his co-chairs. He
minorityengineering programs in collaboration with universities, (5) advocacy from minority students,faculty, and community organizations that pushed for the creation of these programs, and (6)institutional initiatives that took steps to establish minority engineering programs (Landis, 1991;Slaton, 2012; McNeely & Freehill, 2011).In the 1970s, MEPs served as community and academic support sources in light of the alarmingnumber of minority students that left the major each year (Landis, 1991). MEPs primarily focuson increasing marginalized students' retention and graduation rates. Some focus on gendermarginalization (i.e., women), racially marginalized communities in engineering fields,first-generation students, and students from low-income families. They
were not engineering specific, they were conveyed as beingcritical to students that may be first generation college students and/or lacking awareness of timemanagement skills and others that can be impactful for first time students. The graduate students suggested numerous recommendations that have the potential toenhance the experiences of Black students in graduate engineering programs across the country.They shared what they viewed as the most influential recommendations that universities canemploy to enhance the experiences of Black students in engineering as well as improve theirtransition from undergraduate to graduate education. Descriptions of the recommendationsranged from developing counterspaces for Black graduate students to
artificial intelligence titled ”Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Double- Edged Sword,” which was given at the World Engineering Education Forum & Global Engineering Dean’s Council in October 2023. His work demonstrates his keen interest in cutting-edge technology, engineering solutions, and a passion for DEI topics. In addition to his academic pursuits, Kevin has gained valuable experience through various internships and work roles. He served as a Mechanical Engineering Intern at Jacobs, where he contributed to HVAC and MEP design projects, created energy models using HAP, and performed essential calculations for mechanical equipment selection. His involvement in report writing summarizing ultrasonic pipe testing