faculty at multiple universities/colleges as well as academic conferences and events. Industry events, conferences and presentations: Participate in industry conferences, events and present the new TCMT program.AcademicsThe highly integrated curriculum is designed in close collaboration and involvement with ourindustry partners to keep the program relevant for workplace needs for technical talents withbusiness acumen. Our industry advisory boards’ input will continually help hone the curriculumto ensure that the program stays relevant, leading-edge, and develops professionals who can bedeveloped and grown into leadership positions.Course Work Prefix and Required Courses Number TCMT 601 Engineering
Paper ID #19632Contextualizing a New General Engineering Curriculum in the Liberal ArtsDr. Diana A. Chen, University of San Diego Dr. Diana A. Chen is an Assistant Professor of General Engineering at the University of San Diego. She joined the Shiley-Marcos School of Engineering in 2016. Her research interests are in areas of sustainable design, including biomimicry and adaptability in structural, city, and regional applications. She earned her MS and PhD in Civil Engineering from Clemson University, and her BS in Engineering from Harvey Mudd College.Dr. Gordon D. Hoople, University of San Diego Dr. Gordon D. Hoople is
2017 ASEE International Forum:Columbus , Ohio Jun 28 Paper ID #20736SCUPI Derby – A New Approach to ”Introduction to Mechanical Design”Dr. F.C. Lai, University of Oklahoma Dr. Lai is currently Anadarko Presidential Professor at the University of Oklahoma. He received his B.S. degree in Power Mechanical Engineering from National Tsing Hua University in 1978, and his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Mechanical Engineering from the University of Delaware in 1985 and 1988, respectively. He joined the School of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering at the University of Oklahoma in 1992
Paper ID #19528Evaluating a Flipped Lab Approach in a First-Year Engineering Design CourseDr. Jack Bringardner, New York University, Tandon School of Engineering Jack Bringardner is an Assistant Professor in the First-Year Engineering Program at NYU Tandon School of Engineering. He studied civil engineering and received his B.S. from the Ohio State University and his M.S and Ph.D. at the University of Texas at Austin. His primary focus is developing curriculum and pedagogical techniques for engineering education, particularly in the Introduction to Engineering and Design course at NYU. He has a background in Transportation
. She earned a Ph.D. in chemical engineering from Polytechnic University (now NYU Polytechnic School of Engineering), an SM in Chemical Engineering Practice from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and a BS in Chemistry from the University at Albany of the State University of New York. Dr. Brown is a registered professional engineer in New York State. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Incorporating Undergraduate Research Experiences in an Engineering Technology Curriculum Benito Mendoza, Manuel Sairitupa, and Pamela Brown New York City College of Technology {bmendoza
approach we have taken has beencalled person-centered ethnography (Hollan and Wellenkamp, 1993; LeVine, 1982, Stevens,O’Connor, & Garrison, 2005). This term highlights both our interest in how people becomeengineers and that context shapes this becoming.Data from this work come from a large ethnographic study of the school-to-work transition ofearly career engineers. In total we observed and interviewed 20 new engineers (15 were bothobserved and interviewed and 5 were interviewed only) within their first two years in theworkforce (including both undergraduate co-ops/interns and newly graduated engineers) from 10engineering companies as they worked over several months. Data sources included: • Direct observations in the workplace, supported
; empowering faculty through educational collaborative action research. He holds a B.S.I.E. in Industrial Engineering and a M.Ed. specializing in mathematics education. Cole has worked as an engineer in the manufacturing industry, a pastor in full-time ministry, and a high school math teacher. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Approaches for coaching students in design reviewsAbstract: Design reviews offer a unique window into understanding how design teachers help their studentsdevelop as designers. They are a prevalent practice for helping students develop design thinking expertise,although their structure and content may vary across disciplines. Understanding the teaching
. TheMathematical Association of America has created a subcommittee on “Curriculum Renewalacross the First Two Years” (project CRAFTY) [1]. The MAA has also published a summary ofresults from the NSF-sponsored project [2] and two reports which focus on determining themathematical needs of partner disciplines [3]. Several new directions have emerged, and themost relevant ones can be grouped into three areas: Calculus re-sequencing [4] [5], activelearning methods [2] [6] [7] [8], and applications from engineering & sciences [9] [10] [11] [12].This paper discusses a calculus redesign project that is in progress in the School of Engineeringand Applied Sciences at the University of Virginia. It will focus on the following questions: 1. How did the
Engineering Education, 2017 UAS Curriculum for Students using an Active Learning ApproachAbstractUnmanned aircraft systems (UAS) offer an exciting opportunity to teach students about basicprinciples of aerospace engineering and instill valuable systems engineering design experience.The widespread popularity of UAS, an explosion of affordable and capable systems, and recentadvances in policy by the FAA have created a permissive climate where these may be effectivelyused by students as either a new means to conduct scientific research or as the primary focus of asystems engineering design project. Whether a means or an end, UAS-based projects and coursesprovide stimulating and relevant learning opportunities many students are seeking today.The
conducted throughout the duration of the ten-weekquarter, including weekly in-class discussions or activities and at least one SGMA-specificquestion on each weekly homework assignment. This curriculum has been used twice, duringFall quarter of 2015 and 2016, with an average class size each year of approximately 35 students.This senior-level class typically includes a mix of environmental engineering students and civilengineering students with an emphasis on water resources or geotechnical engineering.Course ImplementationThis section includes further details on development of specific activities for each level ofBloom’s Taxonomy. This discussion of activities and assignments is intended to provide insightfor new engineering educators in many
teachers do, rather than what students think. Instead, they reframe formative assessment asresponsive teaching, an instructional approach in which teachers elicit student thinking around aparticular topic, notice and interpret the disciplinary substance contained within students’thinking, and then respond in real-time in order to support students’ disciplinary behaviors.Responsive teaching has been studied for some time in K-12 mathematics and science education,and it has recently become a focus in K-12 engineering education. However, to our knowledgeno research has investigated responsive teaching in undergraduate engineering education. Weintend to begin a conversation about this important area of study through three specific aims ofthis paper: 1
Engineering Education, 93(3): 223-231.5. Dillenbourg P, 1999. What do you mean by ‘collaborative learning’? Collaborative-learning: Cognitive and computational approaches, 1: 1-15.6. McDonald, W. M., D. S. Brogan, V. K. Lohani, G. H. Joshi and A. S. Shettar. Developing a First-Year Engineering Course at a University in India: International Engineering Education Collaboration. 123rd ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition, New Orleans, LA, USA, June 26-29, 2016.7. Brogan, D.S., McDonald, W.M., Lohani, V.K., and Dymond, R.L., 2016. A High-Frequency Real- Time System for Creating and Sharing Environmental Data. Advances in Engineering Education (AEE), 5 (2).8. McDonald WM, Brogan DS, Lohani VK, Dymond RL, and Clark RL, 2015
design and space systems engineering. Dr. Fowler’s has received over a dozen local, regional, and national teaching awards. He is a Fellow of both the ASEE and the AIAA. He is a member of the University of Texas Academyof Distinguished Teachers. He served as President of ASEE in 2000-2001. He was the recipient of the 1985 AIAA/ASEE John Leland Atwood Award and the 1994 ASEE Fred Merryfield Design Education Award. He currently directs the NASA Texas Space Grant Consortium. He has served as an ABET visitor for 24 programs. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Approaching ABET Preparations as a Design ExerciseAbstract Much of the preparation of the self-study
LearningAccreditationAlthough not a motivation, this approach does simplify ABET accreditation. Normally projectwork and professional skills are distributed through a TBL curriculum. This makes it verydifficult to isolate and assess these topics. A common approach is to create one course to carrymany of the topics, or heap most of the assessment categories into the capstone course. With aPBL core the assessment topics can be assessed at a natural pace in the spirit of continuousimprovement. For reference the ABET ETAC and EAC criteria are listed 7 . Engineering Accreditation Commission (EAC) Criteria: (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as
Paper ID #20149Scaffold Approach to Teaching ExperimentationDr. Megan Reissman, University of Dayton Dr. Reissman studied mechanical engineering at Cornell University (BS) and Northwestern University (PhD). She currently teaches engineering design, analysis, and experimentation courses in the mechanical engineering department of University of Dayton. She specializes in biomechanics and robotic systems.Dr. Timothy Reissman, University of Dayton Dr. Timothy Reissman is an Assistant Professor within the Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering at the University of Dayton. He teaches primarily courses related to
developed for primary school, junior high schooland high school, respectively. In 2008, France implemented new science education standard“the new curriculum for primary school”[10], including discovery-oriented curriculum forprimary students, experiment-oriented for junior high students, and integration-orientedcurriculum for senior-high students. Japan's recent education reform was in 2008, with afocus on emphasizing scientific inquiry methods and life-related problem solving activities.At the 2013 Global STEMx Education Conference, Finland, Australia, New Zealand andother countries have participated to discuss science education for new era. Along with scienceeducation reform, original meaning of STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering
and environmental engineering. She is active in pre-college engi- neering outreach and improving non-motorized transportation infrastructure. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 A New Framework for Teaching the Triple Bottom Line: The Sustainability Triangle and the Sustainability IndexIntroductionCivil engineers are integral to, and ethically bound to, advancing sustainable development(ASCE, 2004). In response to community and industry needs, as well as ABET accreditationrequirements, sustainability has been increasingly integrated into civil and environmentalengineering curricula (Allen et al., 2008). The American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE
(“Engineering Student Engagement(ESEPs) were hired at the beginning of the 2016-17 Partners”, or “ESEPs”) were hired at the beginning of theacademic year to help maximize first-year student success 2016-17 academic year to help maximize first-year studentand to involve junior students in curriculum development success, engagement and motivation; and to increase Engfor first-year engineering courses. ESEPs support One students’ sense of belonging to an engineeringstudents by attending lectures, providing tutoring, community. The ESEP program was also initiated to involvedirecting students to support services, and hosting “online junior students in curriculum development for the four Engrooms
newManufacturing Engineering Technology program at Indiana Purdue Fort Wayne drew from pastexperience of offering manufacturing specific courses in the Mechanical EngineeringTechnology program16. Linn et al. presented their efforts in creating a new 4 year degree inprocess and system engineering technology (PSET)15. The creation of the new PSET programwas based on an existing Industrial Engineering Technology program with a different focus.Mullett17 presented a curriculum enhancement effort where the focus of the engineeringtechnology program was shifted from component-based to system-oriented. A similar change offocus and program name was made at Texas A&M University, where the Electronic EngineeringTechnology and Telecommunication Engineering
Paper ID #18757A Microcontroller-based DSP Laboratory CurriculumDr. Ying Lin, Western Washington University Ying Lin has been with the faculty of Engineering and Design Department at Western Washington Uni- versity since September 2010 after she taught for two years at SUNY, New Platz. She received her MS in Applied Statistics and Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Syracuse University, NY, respectively. Her teaching interests include first-year Intro to Electrical Engineering, circuit analysis sequence, and upper-division communication systems and digital Signal Processing courses. Her research areas focus on
Engineering Education, 2017 Engineering Empathy: A Multidisciplinary Approach Combining Engineering, Peace Studies, and New TechnologyAbstractAs educators we train our students to view the world using a particular disciplinary lens. Inengineering this means helping our students to “think” like engineers. We teach them tocategorize and solve problems using a technically focused mindset. For instance, they learn theimportance of using hard data to quantify success or failure. Other disciplines, especially in thesocial sciences, focus additional attention on normative and substantive issues. Students aretaught the importance of developing contextual understanding and of recognizing that livedexperiences generate different
become a primary focus at the University of economic backgrounds, and prior knowledge among studentsTexas at Arlington (UTA). UTA conducted a study that at UTA, ENGR 1300 utilizes the Student-Centered Activefound students were ill-equipped in the areas of problem Learning Environment with Upside-down Pedagogiessolving, professional writing, and computer (SCALE-UP) method. This method, developed at NC Stateprogramming. Therefore, UTA has recently created a University [1] and now utilized in many universities [2],new first year engineering course focused on improving focuses on creating a highly active and collaborativethese specific skill areas using the Student-Centered
lab implement the math theory covered in class. For example, aexperiments, and ability to complete a team project. MATLAB simulation of a robot arm uses trigonometry.However, students were much less confident in their ability While it is too early to assess the impact of these new labs,to solve engineering problems. Among seven different class we feel it is a promising approach. We are also exploring theactivities, students ranked labs, project and homework as idea of two tracks in ECE 102. One would be at the same pacemost helpful in their learning. The last one is puzzling as the current course, but we would offer a second trackbecause we do not emphasize homework in this course
Paper ID #20913Instilling Entrepreneurial Mindset by Vertical Integration of Engineering ProjectsShankar Ramakrishnan, Arizona State University, Polytechnic campus Dr. Shankar Ramakrishnan received his PhD in Electrical Engineering from Arizona State University. He is currently part of the engineering education team in the Ira A. Fulton Schools of Engineering at Arizona State University. Currently he designs the curriculum for the freshman engineering program at the Polytechnic campus of the Arizona State University. He also designs and teaches engineering design courses in the first and sophomore years at ASU. His interests
moral character and ethical integrity. This professionalrequirement also calls on the engineering educators to develop the engineering curriculumenriched with ethics and professionalism.An engineering undergraduate can passively learn professionalism and ethics through seniorcapstone design, summer internships and undergraduate research. However, these opportunitieshave limitations. Hence, as the instructors in an engineering program, the authors felt more onthe formal teaching and practice on ethics and professional conduct needed to raise theawareness in accordance with ABET Student Outcomes-f and i, and the professional bodyexpectations. Environmental engineering curriculum in the authors’ institution introduces ethicsand professionalism to
require a collective effort by all involved in theprocess, namely: the institution, the faculty, and students.Engineering Education in the Arab Gulf States: An OverviewEngineering education in the Arab Middle East is relatively new, as organized educationalendeavors go. It had its early start shortly after World War I. Colleges of engineering (orschools of engineering as they were labeled) were founded then, in Cairo and Alexandria,Egypt, and also in Beirut, Lebanon. By the end of World War II, colleges of engineeringsprung out in Iraq and Syria. And two decades later, Jordan had its first college ofengineering in its capital, Amman. The colleges in Lebanon and Syria paralleled, by andlarge, the French schools of engineering, except for the
-only) to an active learning course inthe fall 2016 semester. The instructor was a new faculty member and had previously taught thecourse in a traditional, lecture-only manner. In our work, we provide an approach for coursetransformation that is simple and effective with highly positive results that new faculty can easilyadopt and replicate in their respective engineering courses.2. Literature ReviewWhen considering the use of active learning, faculty members commonly have concerns aboutstudent acceptance, content coverage, preparation time, and logistics, and research has shownthat the likelihood of adoption of new, research-based instructional approaches is directly relatedto the ease of implementation (Prince et al., 2013). This is
Paper ID #18314A Model Workshop for Helping New Faculty Engage Students in the STEMClassroomDr. Clifton B. Farnsworth, Brigham Young University Clifton Farnsworth received B.S. and M.S. degrees in civil engineering from Brigham Young University and a Ph.D. in civil engineering from the University of Utah. He worked as a geotechnical engineer for eight years with the Utah Department of Transportation, spent three years as an Assistant Professor of civil engineering at The University of Texas at Tyler, and has a current appointment as an Assistant Professor of construction and facilities management at Brigham Young
Center of the City University of New York in 1991. c American Society for Engineering Education, 2017 Incorporating Quantum Technologies into Engineering CurriculumAbstract: This paper first reviews the present status of quantum technologies that are rapidlymaking inroads to various fields of science and engineering. The author then suggests, in light ofthese developments, how one may incorporate the key principles, ideas, and topics of newquantum technologies into undergraduate quantum mechanics courses and laboratories to prepareand equip future engineers. Concrete examples of curriculum changes in modern physics,quantum mechanics, and advanced quantum mechanics courses are presented based on threeyears of
design in both countries. Several other publications discuss singularengineering capstone programs in Australia and New Zealand.4,5 An additional report6 addressesassessment practices at engineering capstone design courses at many institutions in Australia,summarizing the results of a multi-year grant-funded research project.There seems to be a growing initiative in Australia to study capstone curriculum across a broadrange of disciplines and to connect the community of capstone educators nationally. The websitecapstonecurriulum.com.au provides resources, reports, and blog posts about capstone coursepedagogy, assessment, and structure.7 A recent paper8 on capstone curriculum provides rich dataacross multiple disciplines from several countries