, social, cultural, and economic issues thatare intimately connected to engineering issues and people affected by these engineeringchallenges. One of the most effective ways of providing our students these learning experiencesis through education abroad opportunities. Yet less than 4% of US engineering students studyabroad and there has been little growth in the past two years1. It is also well established that experiential, project/problem-based learning with an emphasison acquiring new knowledge and applying and integrating previous knowledge can be veryeffective structures for enhancing student learning2. These structures engage students in open-ended, ambiguous, authentic activities; and usually involve teams. It is learning that goes
abroad experiences in Panama for the past three years, and has also taught on Semester at Sea.Prof. Reid Bailey, University of Virginia Reid Bailey is an Associate Professor in the Department of Systems and Information Engineering at the University of Virginia. Previously, he has held faculty positions centered on engineering design at the University of Arizona and the University of Dayton. He received his MSME and Ph.D. in mechanical engineering from Georgia Tech in 1997 and 2000 and his BSE in mechanical engineering from Duke University in 1995. Concerning study abroad, Reid created a engineering program in Argentina for the University of Virginia and has taught on Semester at Sea
a method that suits a constructivist view of learning in that it gives the students an opportunity to contemplate issues from new perspectives. This is augmented by scaffolding the students regarding how to reflect beyond the mere descriptive form. Reflection assignments have also been used to highlight crucial aspects in the course, e.g. to consider how to act in order to avoid difficulties with cultural differences in the international collaboration on an individual basis.Reflections are also important as a means to help the students cope with unusual educational settings, such as open-ended group projects, and learning goals different from
students participating in international education experiences remains small,there is a particular concern for the preparation of career researchers.In response, U.S. universities are experimenting with new curricular methods, including thedevelopment of international programs designed for STEM students, to foster the development ofskill sets necessary for successful international research collaboration. However, sparse researchexists that comprehensively assesses globally focused outcomes associated with such efforts, andthe simple question remains: Are international programs for STEM students effective in meetingthese goals?In this paper, we compare the experiences of students participating in two Research Experiences forUndergraduates (REU